You'll need to shut your stupid mouth or I'll kick you out of the thread.
As I suspected, you can't explain your claims. Here's how you operate:
1. Make ridiculous claim.
2. Ban those who question your claim.
3. Revel in your victory.
4. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
only the third law of Newton would be true under the coherent flat-earth model
But, the flat earth model violates all three laws among a host of others.
Einstein already debunked Newton
No, he didn't. He corrected Newton on a few points. Other than that, Newtons laws hold.
Sorry, you're really going to have to put your big boy pants on for this and try to come up with something valid. Right now, you're just shooting blanks.
I can and have
But, you haven't formed an argument for a flat earth, no one has.
In fact, we even got down to the very basics of violating Newton's laws of motion, which your claims do violate, despite the fact it has never occurred anywhere in nature. We then went on further to establish you didn't know those laws, couldn't come up with an explanation, so you just disappeared.
The fervour with which you loathe me, mock me and spit at my metaphorical face
I do no such thing, this is just how you react to others when you can't form an argument to defend your irrational beliefs about a flat earth.
perceive the truth without ego and sheep-think involved
If by ego, you refer to facts and by sheep-think you refer to evidence, then yes, that is how it works.
it is usually better to know something that most don't
You know as well as I do that you don't know the earth is flat, we determined that through our discussions on the topic. Your entire education on flat earth logistics comes from youtube videos of other flat earth proponents who attempt to show the earth is flat by placing a camera on a tennis court.
"See, the tennis court is flat, ergo..."
I'm not him
And, I'm sure you would like everyone to believe that regardless of how indistinguishable your posts are from Burrito's.
people from CD know me as FactMachine
Was that one of the many accounts you have in addition to these others?
If not, perhaps you could explain why you are as equally brain dead as Burrito, why your posts and threads you create are literally identical to his?
you didn't know the difference between a subscript and a superscript.
No, that was you who doesn't still yet know what a subscript is, then you went on to lie about what he said when YOU changed his story.
How quickly they forget. Lol.
There are no research papers on turning male mammals into female mammals
Your claim is that it couldn't be done, do you have evidence to support that?
ADHD, mild autism
Those can be found in non-transgender folks, a lot of them.
recent social movements made it faddish to claim the biologically disjunctive gender
What social movements do you refer and how did they lead to fads?