I never said you said nothing happens after. Just sayin', if nothing happens after then there's no point in doing the test.
unwanted pregnancy = problem
broken bone = problem
unwanted pregnancy =/= broken bone
guess I should of made that more clear =/
"A broken arm is an injury, easily mended. When a person's life ends, there can be to going back."
Sure there is, you can make another kid later when your ready.
If nothing happens after, why bother with the test?
---------------------------------------
Because, you know, there isn't a surplus of orphans or anything. =/
Should women who don't want kids have them anyway out of guilt for people who can't?
"and we have millions of people having sex and not being able to handle the consequences of pregnancy. if u have sex u better be ready to have babies too."
That's stupid. Just..... stupid. So a woman should go out of her way to NOT solve a problem just because she got herself into it? If you tripped and broke your arm should you NOT get a cast on it just because you were foolish enough to trip? maybe you shouldn't have been walking if you weren't ready to handle the possibility of breaking your arm. Maybe you should of had the good sense to wear a bubble-wrap suit. No? Why does that backwards logic only apply to abortion then?
Test them, then what?
---------------------------------------
You know, because it's worked out well so far =/
.......................................
Didn't even know that was a factor. =/
Learned something new today =D
cuz ppl rn't hipy jez bein demselvz
.......................................
Because the North American hobo is a lazy specimen. All of them. =)
Some do, some don't. =/
As for "Were slaves better off in America than as free men in Africa?"
It depends on what you mean by "better off".
It would be much easier to create a new country and make it "Whitlandia" than to try and "purify" the U.S.
You know, I just can't see any good coming of it =/
.......................................
Relax Siriusly. Whether I liked this movie or not is not objective, so there is nothing to debate. Or, are you egotistical enough to tell me I'm wrong in thinking I liked the movie?
I doubt it =/
That comment gave you your second reward point. 2 points and your going to tell me you know more than me about how to make appropriate comments? =/
With all the other debates on this site, there's no reason to take this one in particular so "Siriusly".
Adagio for Strings is 20th century, not classical =/
.......................................
I find it boring. Baroque was much better.
.......................................
The egg. You have to intend to make a chicken before you can have a chicken. =/
They don't have my respect. I don't care if other people do because I don't out source my opinions.
If an apologetic has the respect of someone else, then they deserve it; whatever the reason, they deserve it.
But, they don't have mine because they don't deserve it.
No..... just, no.
If by "law" you mean "invention" then of course not. Never will all people accept one moral law, it doesn't exist.
If by "law" you mean "discovery" then also no. Morals are subjective, they must be invented and cannot be discovered.
It's easy to blame outside sources for our problems. Sometimes a little insearch is needed.
If they did, they would already have it. =/
.......................................
You assume race is only skin deep. Talk to an actual racist and you will see their hate has less to do with skin colour and more to do with behavioral patterns.
I'm sure the KKK hates albino blacks as much as regular blacks =/
