#1 |
#2 |
#3 |
Paste this URL into an email or IM: |
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
|
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
|
Nom thinks protecting your freedoms means invading 3rd world countries
What a dick
Side Score: 49
|
 |
What an ass
Side Score: 24
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
0
points
3
points
-1
points
3
points
1
point
3
points
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
So give us a list of countries and/or territories that the U.S. has invaded Various sovereign Indian Nations of North America Pirate "kingdoms" along the North African Coast (including parts of what are now Moracco, Libya, Tunisia, and Algeria) British Empire (Canada) Empire of Spain (Florida) Mexico Korea (1872 during a trade disagreement) Haiti (several times in the 1800s, plus 1994) Empire of Spain (in what are now Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Phillippines) Samoa (2nd Samoan War) China during the Boxer Rebellion Cuba (intervened in local revolution, 1906) German Empire (WW1) Austro-Hungarian Empire (WW1) Russia (during the Russian Revolution and Civil War) Germany (WW2) Italy (WW2) Empire of Japan (WW2) Austria (though how much this counts as it wasn't particularly independent of Germany) North Korea North Vietnam Republic of Laos Cambodia Dominican Republic Panama Grenada Iraq Afghanistan Side: What an ass
3
points
1
point
Weird. I ask for a list of countries or territories that the U.S. took over and claimed as their own and you give me Nazi Germany, 2 Nazi allies, and a bunch of countries never owned by the United States. The US practices economic imperialism rather than more traditional forms. That's why there are Mcdonald's restaurants in third world countries. Side: What an ass
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
Weird. I ask for a list of countries or territories that the U.S. took over and claimed as their own You loaded your question so I loaded my answer. Weird how you don't like it. Imperialism has moved forward since the days of the Nazis. The existence of the UN makes military occupation very difficult when done overtly, which is why the US carefully chooses words like "security" when explaining why it still has thousands of troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. Side: What an ass
3
points
You loaded your question so I loaded my answer. Weird how you don't like it. It was a simple question. You still haven't answered it. Imperialism has moved forward since the days of the Nazis. Interesting. Britain looked like it kept losing control of countries... You must be talking about Communist China in Africa... The existence of the UN makes military occupation very difficult when done overtly, which is why the US carefully chooses words like "security" when explaining why it still has thousands of troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. Interesting. Referencing a group that backs the U.S. every time in these campaigns and sends its own troops to participate right there by the evil USA... Side: What a dick
1
point
It was a simple question. I didn't say it was a complicated question you fucking moron. I said it was a loaded question. Do you read English? Interesting. Britain looked like it kept losing control of countries... I don't know what this even means. Interesting. What group backs the U.S. every time in these campaigns and sends its own troops to participate right there by the evil USA... Definitely bronto. Great Britain is bad therefore America is good. Your logic is definitely improving buddy. Side: What an ass
1
point
It was a simple question. I didn't say it was a complicated question you fucking moron. I said it was a loaded question. Do you read English? Still haven't shown us the US conquering territory and claiming it as its own in recent times. Interesting. Britain looked like it kept losing control of countries... I don't know what this even means. Britain is losing its "imperialistic" influence. Or are they still running India... Side: What a dick
1
point
Still haven't shown us the US conquering territory I apologise for asking if you can read English because clearly you can't. I provided you with a long list of countries conquered by the USA you retarded fucking imbecile. Learn to read in a language other than German. Side: What an ass
1
point
Interesting. What group backs the U.S. every time in these campaigns and sends its own troops to participate right there by the evil USA... Definitely bronto. Great Britain is bad therefore America is good. Your logic is definitely improving buddy. So no rebuttal to the UN's nose being in all of these "imperialist" campaigns... Side: What a dick
1
point
So no rebuttal to the UN's nose being in all of these "imperialist" campaigns... Oh, well if it was the UN you were referring to then that's easily sorted because you are lying. The then United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan stated in September 2004 that: "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter. From our point of view and the UN Charter point of view, it [the war] was illegal", explicitly declaring that the US-led war on Iraq was illegal. Side: What an ass
1
point
1
point
https://www.google.com/amp/s/ So first it was the UK you were referring to, then it was the UN, now it is the UK again? Gotcha. You're such a joke. You can't even decide who you are attacking. Side: What an ass
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
2
points
|
