Should school attendance be voluntary?
In most of the developed world, school is not just an option for young people, but also compulsory. Parents of children who do not go to school can be fined, or even jailed. This is because governments believe that school is very important in giving children the knowledge to succeed in life.
However, for many children school is an unhappy or frustrating place, and some people believe it is possible to succeed even without normal schooling. Would it be better then, if children got to decide about going to school for themselves?
YES, it is a choice
Side Score: 19
|
![]() |
NO, good for society
Side Score: 14
|
|
|
|
|
4
points
• School should be optional for the reason that the children who do not want to learn disrupt the children who want to learn. The children who cause trouble in the classroom cause the teacher to pay more attention to them and not the ones who do want to learn. • i think school should be optional past the age of 11 because we all know enough to look after ourselves past the age of 11 it should be optional because we all know enough maths and big enough vocabs to look after ourselves we should not waste 1 fifth of our entire lives in school a quarter of the population of England and America go to school • -At the end of the school semester, attendance should not matter, just the grades that are recieved. If the student is still able to study and pass his tests, attendance should be voluntary. -Passing grades are not correlated with perfect attendance. There are many students who attend class every day, but still manage to fail. -Nowadays, many students have responsibilties at home (helping in a single-parent home, helping ailing parents, taking care of younger siblings) and sometimes being absent from school is necessary. -Voluntary attendance should be a privilage to students who can prove the can still pass their classes. • Of course it should be voulentary earlier in our history it used to be and people were better off for it. The people in the school wanted to be there thus better education providing more one on one with kids who want to excel and make something of themselves as compared to other kids where school is just an all day babysitter for parents. Secondly i dont think the government should have the right to say who does and doesent attend school as far as i can tell our country should be free but they lock down on young people and make them go to school and arrest parents who dont make them? Does this sound right or free at all? 997 days ago | Side: YES, it is a choice
2
points
They can study by themselves with a computer or a textbook of the grade. This is a free country. You can achieve in life without education, like Harriet Tubman. She didn't get much education because she was a slave. It turns out Harriet Tubman found out "an underground railroad". 77 days ago | Side: YES, it is a choice
I am actually yes and no on this. First of all, I don't necessarily think it was an altruistic motive behind this first government intrusion into our lives. However, most very young children don't really know what is best for themselves. Just because they'd rather eat ice cream and play Wii all day doesn't mean it is in their best interests to do so. So I believe in compulsory primary education through about grade 5 or 6. After that, it should be voluntary. Also, I believe that if school were taught properly, basic education beyond eighth or ninth grade would not be necessary. The most essential thing kids need to learn is reading and mathematics, another language, and compassion toward others. Everything else is built upon those essentials. I think art and music should be introduced to them at a young age also, because I believe they are important forms of expression both for the performer and the audience. Beyond fifth grade, introduction to science, history, geography, physics, should be provided so that those with an interest in them may pursue them. 614 days ago | Side: YES, it is a choice
i think that children should have a choice if they want to go to school or not. If you force a child to go somewhere where they don't want to do well 1. they could grow farther apart 2. they will resist to learn and will only feel angry & 3. i think that kids can learn just as much from common sense, books and their elders. 373 days ago | Side: YES, it is a choice
I have just 1 thing for everyone to think about should people really ahve to be forced to go somewhere? this isnt about rather responsibilty or if youd o or dont want to go to school, this is more about whether or not you would willingly make your child hate you or never learn anything because all they can think about is how much they dont want to be there 373 days ago | Side: YES, it is a choice
1
point
0
points
|
2
points
School attendance should remain government mandated because society benefits from formal education because those who don't even possess a high school diploma, it not only hurts them individually, but it hurts the general labor market and brings it to a lower level. Also, Milton Friedman stated that freedom doesn't pertain to children and madmen because of their lack of responsibility; thus, this mandate is not negotiable. 1184 days ago | Side: NO, good for society
1
point
1
point
ok i STRONGLY disagree!!!! if you even decide to go school you couls still be lazy, spoiled and uneducated and you know why because not everyoneis perfect if children decide to not go to school well they could not listen to a single thing that anyone says and besides if they do do that then theres no piobnt in going to school. 371 days ago | Side: YES, it is a choice
1
point
1
point
1
point
If people were able to opt out of everything that is 'unhappy' or 'frustrating', no one would go to work, pay their taxes, or raise their children. Doing things that you don't want to do is just a fact of life and those things often end up benefiting you in the long run. Personally, I find nothing wrong with giving kids an obligation like school and holding them accountable for doing what's necessary to fulfill that obligation. It's called responsibility. 922 days ago | Side: NO, good for society
1
point
How is the government or someone forcing students to go to school be called responsibility? Responsibility would be students going to school without force and holding students accountable at their own expense. This tactic is already applied in college. If you don't go to school, you fail. 921 days ago | Side: YES, it is a choice
1
point
How it would be voluntary ? Allow the student to choose if he or she wants to go school, and then make them force the burden of future consequences. So, if they decide to skip school, and later they can't find a job because they have no high school diploma, they will suffer the consequences. 922 days ago | Side: NO, good for society
|


