Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
38271
| Reward Points: | 12 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 63% |
| Arguments: | 3 |
| Debates: | 0 |
With the way that this question is worded it seems that Russia made a bad decision. Had they kept Alaska they would've been able to profit from what has been discovered since it was sold. This includes the gold rush, and current things such as tourism, oil, and other plentiful resources.
I believe that it is possible for war to be justified. This does not apply to all wars, but it is an option that should remain valid. War can be justified with just war principals such as last resort. If a side has nothing more they can do, it would actually be unjust to not go into war and let themselves remain in danger. Even though war usually ends in destruction, it can provide hope for an overall better future.
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
