Off topic. Clearly, the argument is whether or not homosexuality is natural.

I definitely and wholeheartedly agree!! And how could this "modification" even begin? There are certainly no legal grounds with which to catalyst such a change. And I am sure that this country would never pass legislation which discriminates against certain groups, ethnicities, or profiles in respect to voting (except Alabama, which just passed a bill which discriminated against same-sex couples. Obviously, they would no doubt pass another bill illegalizing voting for gay people if they could get away with it.)

I agree, wholeheartedly!! Democrats are people. They uphold the Constitution. They are of the people, by the people, and for the people.

Republicans are an institution. Clearly, they get elected and ignore constituents.

Yes, it is the ability/necessity to revise the Constitution. Democrats are progressively acting to change the country's wayward course instituted by Republicans. Once, the Grand Old Party was grand. Not anymore.

And Republicans have never argued a "codified process for Constitutional altercation," because Republicans don't do ANYTHING!!

While I have close ties to animal rights organizations, I do not believe that hunting animals for sport should be illegal. Hunting is almost a religion to some people. And this issue really has no basis. Just a clear path back to the issue of gun control.

And obviously, by creating all these LGBTQ-centered debates, you either must be highly discriminate or an aspiring gym owner.

No, psychologically speaking.Transgenders are born in the wrong body and seek to change physical features in order to clarify their physical, social, etc. identity.

Therefore, transgender people only wish to fit into society. Creating a separate environment specifically for "segregating" them would not only be discriminate, but also unnaturally cruel. Statistically, transgender are the most suicidal out of the LGBTQ community. Rates would presumably soar if transgender people were further separated from society.

The Declaration of Independence clearly states that all men are created equal. Furthermore, the US Constitution is clear when it dictates that the US Supreme Court has jurisdiction over all the laws of the land, including but not limited to, the individual states' constitutions.

It would be dilatant to assume that the states ever had or ever will have jurisdiction over matters concerning the protection of a certain race, group, or ethnicity.

Most definitely! If gay people are treated as if they're committing a crime, then siblings committing incest should also be billed as deplorable to society!!

Therefore, if you disagree with the entire idea of marriage, then you should start your own debate based on your own ideology. Registering your opinion in a debate on a completely different topic invalidates your point.