the right to veiw information is fundamental in the belief that people should be treated as grown adults with the capability to decide for thmselves what they want to see read or hear.

just as the right to postulate ideas to creat art music movies and books and to inform others about what they so choose respecting the rights of others to say the that something cant be distributed read or seen especialy fact is treating adults like children and is tyrany

by means of law?

i say that the freedom to veiw the potencialy upsetting ideas information and media is just as much a right as the right to postulate ideas spread information and creat and produce media

oh and from the brittish flag i gather you are brittish and i feal bad for what your government has done to pursicute its citizens by imposing speach laws on yall and if i was british i would vote for the bnp

yes that does indeed seem too be the fact of the this matter i aggree

yes races of people or groups of people that adapted differently to other groups of people in different environments will have different traits

and to an issue no has touched is why do admit the inequalities of race it comes to penis size and athletic ability but not intelligence? i understand why because as intellectually inferior some races are like aborigines who have the smallest cranium,brain size and IQ even less than black Africans they are still smart enough to learn to debate to get offended to create so telling them they are inferior is a little difficult so lets not tell them they probably wont bother looking up any research

what? what you said is nonsensical

so publishing a book of facts if it offended mass groups of people should be a ilegal? for instance if a scientist came up with scientific proof that intellectuall inferiorty does exist between races and listed a hierarchy of the races. i think that is should be published and legal i even think a fictional commedy should be legal also

rights are objective i look at rights like traffic if i am carring on lawfully and respecting the rights of others i am in the right of way say purchasing a bag of weed or buying a gun and some one punches me in the face i have the right to beat the dog shit out of them and to clarify rights in the i describe them are rights not priveleges given by a govenment but a persons right to be free as long as the dont other

i think that animales other than bugs have the right to be free of torture

to my knoweledge transgender woman is a man who decided to modify himself to look like a woman (surgery) and to put them in the bunch whith all the others is akin to rape because think of the victims at home mainly 13 year olds without access to porn busting a nut to the vision of a man thats sick. pluss they are not natural women

yeah totaly they say take all the guns away give to the government how are we to trust a government with that much money guns power and influence pluss the fact they the government in america would never take away the freedom of speach before the the right to bare arms because the second ammendment is the fail safe for the first ammendment.

if we are talking about wich one is eviler then my choice would be the politicain because of the pandering to what people want to here and the over all lying and cheating nature