- New Activity
- Most Heated
- Most Recent
- Most Arguments
- Most Votes
- Debate Research
- My Debates
- My Waterfall
- Public Waterfall
- Newest Recruits
- Most Persuasive
- Most Provocative
- Most Outspoken
- Most Creative
- Alphabetically
- My Allies
- My Enemies
- My Hostiles
You must not know the truth on the resurrection of the Catholic Church. It was built on blood and deceit. If you read the Bible you will see that the prophesy was The Assyrians along with other kingdoms, got together to overthrow Jerusalem, and keep it from habitating its original Hebrew people, leaving the land desolate and with no more sacrifices to Allah. (Dan 8:11-12). The Bible speaks about how the Messiah will come (Daniel 9:25-27), dwell for a certain time rebuild the streets and walls, even in the troublous times. You can find that verse fulfilled through Christ in the New Testament (John 2:19) when Christ prophesies His death and resurrection, and now Christ is our Temple. Not the Pope!
is this meant to be in the comedy section because i really cant help but find this hilarious...... obviously your religiously brainwashed...so let me get this straight, were you married when you were 16 and had two kids and lived with ya daddy,when you say the kids were crying thru the trial how old were they,were they crying because they understood what the judge was saying or were they crying because they didnt want to be there,when the jolly gays walk by do you call them fags before they respond with pscycho?,.....lol......for who christians describe jesus to be i dont think hed be impressed. jesus was a dude, youre not.,and you know it! ps.........maybe you should find a bigger town.now take care,.. sooner or later someone is gonna more than stone or smite you with your damned attitude.
when your a child you dont have many responsibilites except taking yourself to the bathroom, feeding yourself and maybe if your parents are too busy cleaning your room. Apart from these tiny responsibilities children get it easy, get to play all day don't need to worry about deadlines for work or essays for uni, and if their parents have no dicipline they get everything they want. Seriously what could be better than being a child?
Bullshit!
I’ll forego (unless provoked otherwise) a brutal assault against your hasty question. Yet, in response to your question, I will provide a reason (via Socratic method) for you to live that may exceed your sole purpose to satisfy your emotions. And after having done so, I will leave to you the decision of determining what in fact it is that you live for and that which you don’t live for.
Are you gay?
Do you support gay marriage?
If gay marriage becomes universally accepted, which is more important to you: the universal acceptance of gay marriage, or your joy of the universal acceptance of gay marriage?
So, what is it that you live for, your joy, or the universal acceptance of gay marriage? (We’ll presume the necessity of gay marriage for this dialogue.)
I could submit a plethora of examples that evidence you do not live for emotions. But, I think one example is sufficient to shine a light upon the darkness of your hasty question.
(BTW, Our emotions are consequences, not causes. We don’t create causes for the purpose of a possible satisfaction of an emotion/s.)
This is a high school debate, for a history class, anyone not in it like yourself is banned and anyone else floating in here and reading this don't bother typing you are not a high school student and need to find something else to busy yourself with that interrupting out education activity.
Thank you
First of all its not in the constitution itself, its simply an amendment, i think you should read about what your talking about before you go and time up and argument on it.
Here is the a the direct quote
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
In oder for the state to be secure we cannot have deadly weapons used for looks like they are some new type of hot wheels made for fun and looks. Your constitutional right is to keep and bare arms, not guns, and for the safety of the state and all in it we need to take away simple dangers for citizens, cause eventually we need to stop playing with hot wheels and grow up.
Hello Savant,
I. Define Terms:
1. History: By its most common definition, the word history now means "the past of mankind." Compare the German word for history -- Geschichte, which is derived from geschehen, meaning to happen. Geschichte is that which has happened (Gottschalk, Understanding History: A Primer of Historical Method, 41).
2. Historical Method: The process of critically examining and analyzing the records and survivals of the past is here called historical method. The imaginative reconstruction of the past from the data derived by that process is called historiography (the writing of history). By means of historical method and historiography (both of which are frequently grouped together simply as historical method) the historian endeavors to reconstruct as much of the past of mankind as he can (Gottschalk, Understanding History: A Primer of Historical Method, 48-49).
3. Scientific Method: ...related to measurement of phenomena and experimentation or repeated observation (McDowell, More Than A Carpenter, 33)
II. Your points:
1. "If Jesus Christ was a real person where did all those magical powers came from that's talk about in the bible...?"
2. "..why we humans today don't have that power?"
III. Refuttal:
I believe that you misunderstood that the debate deals with the question of "Was Jesus Christ a real Person?". That is, it is a question of the past, hence history. In order to know if Jesus of Nazareth from the Bible was indeed a real person, than you have to do it by "examining and analyzing the records and survivals of the past" (Gottschalk 41). You can not measure an historical event because it is the "past" and therefore not repeatable. Thus, you can not prove that a person existed in the past by using the scientific method. For example, you can not even prove to me that somebody attacked you physically with the scientific method. You would have to prove that historical event by historical method. That is you have to gather evidences such as, fingerprints, blood samples, eye witness, etc.
IV. Conclusion
Therefore, your argument is self-refutting and makes no sense at all.
No, just suicide if the "stress" is too much.
I've been to torture in jail for 4 years, I still dont call life stress.
so if u didn;t go thorugh 4 years of torture, yet call life stress, then it means ur body is not meant for living, it is meant for dying. so please die.
Are you saying that since they said that there were no classes, that there weren't any classes? For example, even if people were separated by different classes, they were only distinguished in the same class because the government said that they were in the same class. Is that what you are saying?
"payment is not a necessary issue of class."- then why did you say that income is a necessary determinant?
I didn't say that income was the only determinant of class.
WHATS TO BE JEALOUS OF? BRAVERY OR ARROGANCE? PERSONALLY I WILL JUST STAY HOME ...THANKS FOR THE INVITE. Not saying you dont have a beautiful country. I have met quite a few Americans,just about all have been lovely people, tho they tend to have this air of arrogance about them or maybe thats just the "AMERICAN WAY"
Well, obviously feelings make things feel good. But I do hate the emotional stigmas that Right Brain thinking faggots have created.
I mean, people always bitch about shit. I mean, holy shit. Everyone feels entitled to something and think that everyone should care about what they want when the truth is, no one gives a shit about your wants. Fuck off, asshole.
And then there's just constant sadness over so much shit. Here's the thing about break ups, you liked the person before you dated, why do you dipshits have to hate each other once the relationship no longer works?
God, so many things about people I just fuckin' hate. God damn it!
I don't even fuckin' know, to be honest.
I mean, how advance are these guys? Do they view us ants? If that's the case, NO. I would never want to live in an anthill for a little while, I fuckin' hate ants.
If we're just a less advanced civilization but with a similar, evolved brain, than sure. Always good to spread the joy of life and shit. Plus, we can start a Galactic Federation and share technology in order to help in the progression of life and shit. fuck yeah.
You don't lower taxes to get out of debt, you stop spending.
Why should the government fuck everything up and then have the citizens pay for it? Here's an idea, all the politicians can pay out of their own pocket in order to get us out of the debt they put us in.
The worse part is, they're FUCKIN' STUPID. They're still spending and still raising taxes. And there's nothing we can do about it (legally). MOTHERFUCKERS!
|
About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate BlogTake a Tour Help/FAQ Newsletter Archive |
Sharing Tools
Invite Your FriendsBookmarklets Partner Buttons RSS & XML Feeds |
Reach Out
AdvertiseContact Us Report Abuse |
Basic Stuff
User AgreementPrivacy Policy Sitemap Creative Commons |