CreateDebate


DeathWolf666's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of DeathWolf666's arguments, looking across every debate.

Give just one example.

God created man instead of man making God up to scare the peasantry into obedience.

Climate change is a communist conspiracy designed to put the poor, hard-working oil barons out of business.

Capitalism is about economic freedom even though your economic freedom and ability to make money depends on how much of it you already have.

Everyone who doesn't agree with the right must believe there are 6 billion genders and be lazy.

Trump is the most honest living being in the history of the universe other than Jesus himself.

That's five, in case you can't count.

Like the idiots who believe that there are 17 different genders.

I am further left than any liberal you know and I don't believe that. I'm a socialist and I believe in biology over the notions of the subjective human brain.

Or the ones who believe that people who work for a living should support those who dont.

I agree with you that they shouldn't, which is why I believe the workers, producers, and experts should own the means of production instead of useless lazy business people who's job is to profit off of other peoples work.

Nahh.. You don't get to BE an elderly Jew by mistaking who hates you.

Well it's true that I hate you but not because you're a Jew. It's because you're a capitalist and because you claim to be a Jew when you're not.

Would you, perhaps, like me to show you credible scientists who believe the Earth is flat? All are, of course, no longer in employment.

By all means, but keep in mind being accepted into the scientific community doesn't make you "credible" anymore than being rejected makes you "incredible" so just because they were once respected by the community doesn't mean they know all that much in and of itself.

They do, then they are fired and bullied the next day. So therefore, they are no longer 'real/actual scientists'.

Being accepted by the scientific community isn't what makes you a "scientist". That depends on your understanding of the methodology and expertise in certain fields.

The only thing liberals are good for is turning food into shit.

I would be inclined to agree with you, but I would also add that conservatives not only have the same flaw, but they also have the secondary function of flipping reality on it's head every chance they get. Thus in this scenario less is truly more.

Hello hater

There are no elderly Jews that call people "haters", that is what teenage non-jews do.

What do you mean by that? .

Why do you think that if you believe this the scientific community excludes you and would basically fire you from your job to ensure it's 'entire'? :) Do tell.

That can go two ways, either they really don't want you to figure something out or what you propose is officially just plain wrong and retarded. Either way you will be ridiculed and in the case of flat earth it's the latter.

Ask yourself this, why do no actual scientists claim the earth is flat? Why is it always some random dick head with no back round in science or understanding of it? Even if the scientific community at large excludes you that doesn't stop you from being a scientist or knowing science, so why doesn't anyone with actual credible science skills claim the earth is flat?

Could it be that the written history about the missing link a lie and we are the aliens?

It's unlikely because we have the same genetic code as every other species on earth and we share a lot of DNA with other apes. We have also found plenty of other hominids.

Right wingers seem to do this a lot. Bronto's main argument against Nom is that he "lives in his moms basement because he's a leftist"

They operate in different realities. Easy Kritik to win this debate.

The realities are similar enough, unless you assume that the force wouldn't work in pokemon world or that psychic pokemon would be ineffective in sw world.

DeathWolf666(372) Clarified
1 point

The only reason he lost to Anakin in that later battle was literally ageing in my eyes. Reflexes and raw strength won Anakin the fight.

That's a big part of it but also style 2 (makashi) has a weakness against style 5, which Anakin used towards the end of the duel with great proficiency due to his dark side enhanced state of anger.

I think style 7 is the best but if I was an actual sw character I think I would end up using style 6 which basically mixes the first 5 styles into one balanced style.

and was extremely high IQ,

Then he should be on board.

if he was advocating to get rid of money he would have explicitly stated so.

Not necessarily, he was from an earlier time and there is a possibility he thought that at some point in the future we wouldn't need money but it was unrealistic to think that would happen anytime soon so he didn't dwell on it.

DeathWolf666(372) Clarified
1 point

That is true, I concede it but he's definitely the money-socialism type.

How do you know this if it's true?

LOL this isn't even a contest.

Einstein was a socialist.

Christmas is not a pagan holiday. Christmas, the mass/festival of Christ, is a holiday made by Christians to celebrate the birth of Jesus. Christians stole pagan traditions and labelled them as their own. Though, I get what you're saying. With a little translation, this is true. -Agnostic Satanist

You're an incoherent, gibbering moron.

Is your choice suddenly better for being more normal to pick?

Of course not. My answer of course is Nicola Tesla and I don't see how you could choose Sun Tzu over him. Sun Tzu was a smart guy obviously but can you honestly say there aren't thousands of people who were smarter if not millions throughout history? Of course you value strategy and social skills over technical shit so I see where your bias is coming from but Nicola Tesla is just plain more intelligent all things considered. I might even argue that I myself am smarter than Sun Tzu was.

That’s all a correct interpretation, which illustrates one of its many flaws. No powerful state apparatus will ever “fall away”

It really depends if it's genuine communism or just an attempt to overthrow an old authoritarian regime just to replace it with a new one. Communism is a perfect lie for people who want to take power and deceive the masses into thinking it is for their own good. But if genuine communist socialism was implemented the state would be run partially through democracy, far more democratic than most other systems infact but not fully democratic because methodology and established authority would still make many decisions.

@Amarel

Well with mob rule the majority of the people control the state, but the people in general don't because only majority opinions hold any sway. Yes I fucked up with how I worded it at first.

DeathWolf666(372) Clarified
1 point

Overall, probably Sun Tzu but in a sense of specifics many others.

An odd choice. Also, more proof of the kind of thing you value in life.

"Communistic Socialism" IS about state ownership.

You're wrong about that. Communism is actually stateless and classless. After the revolution there is supposed to be a state apparatus to set up socialism but in full communism there is no state. I should know, I've been reading a lot of Marxist books lately.

Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

Yes, so they could propagandize everyone.

Free Public Health.

For Aryans.

The Nazis provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft, which promoted the collectivity of a people's community

Welfare capitalism is not socialism. The Nazis had every kind of ownership other than collective ownership. The only people who received the benefits of any program were Aryans, a society that splits people into groups is not socialist, because socialism is about diminishing the class structure of society.

Because civilians found their allotments of sugar and meats doled out by the ounce. As a result, many kept Daschschwein or roof pigs, the term describing cats raised as food, often in rooftop cages.

Do you realize that you're a retarded ass monkey throwing poop at your computer screen? Receiving rations from the state is not socialism.

The fact that the state decided wages and prices.

Do you realize that socialism has nothing to do with the state?

a bad environment can kill other poor people but not me, dude I got money.

When the ecosystem collapses no one survives, child. You cannot eat money or make a good fire with it, when the environment collapses resources become scarce, then industry collapses, then society collapses. Money will be worth nothing if that happens. But your demise could be much more swift depending on the extent of the environmental decay.

DeathWolf666(372) Clarified
1 point

a rich man deals with a poor man that "if you would not clean the environment I will give you lot of money" do you think he will agree? If you say yes, then you surely understand human. If not then think twice, imagine that you are the poor man then their you would understand.

The environment is the only thing that makes human life possible. I would not agree to "not clean the environment" for anything. The entire existence of both myself and the entire human species (as well as every other species) depends on the environment. We absolutely must "clean the environment" and protect it for our own good and everyone else's. That is the truly intelligent conclusion.

Trump is a pathetic orange baboon. The wall is a massive waste of funds and resources and now the cheeto-dicked little Putin groupie is disrupting the whole system over it. Trump and Mike Pence should both be impeached and indicted and they should put Bernie Sanders in. Of course they will never do that but that's what they should do. Trump needs an orange dildo in his ass for all the shit he does.

@Washington

How are those 300 slaves doing buddy? You murder any Indians lately?

Still not telling us where you disagree with Hitler on issues.

Hitler was a conservative nationalist patriot who strictly regulated who entered the borders.

DeathWolf666(372) Clarified
2 points

Now I know why you admit you and Trump got one destination, that's coz you both talk shit and you both poop your feces in your mouth

Wow, you really told em' off there.

False. Christians are commanded to support Israel and its people. The 2 commentators I quote most are both Jews.

You are a disgrace to your people. Christians murdered them and brainwashed them with christianity, forcing them to abandon their culture and their heritage. Now you are sucking Jesus's dick and shitting all over your ancestors. You even fought in a war and almost died for the nation that molested the Native American people. Your ancestors are rolling in their grave.

I'm a bit confused, there's no rap on Earth that I'm embarassed to like... I am proud as fuck of my taste.

Well there are a few gangsta rap type of raps that I like which aren't exactly intelligent or even that lyrical but I like them because of how aggressive they are. I am slightly embarrassed because the rappers that made them are known for sucking among real rap fans.

DeathWolf666(372) Clarified
1 point

If there is a super-reality then it won't necessarily have anything to do with fields, energy or matter however, because these things are all observations we have made only about our own universe.

Yes, that is an interesting point. Even if this reality is actually reality there could be an underlying meta-reality or super-reality. One possibility is that multiple realities overlap each other and we are trapped in the illusion that the universe consists of what it does because that is the only thing that registers for us. A being from another state of reality might look at a star and see something entirely different from what we see, or perhaps detect nothing at all and move right through it unaffected. If you could see what underlies all the "realities" then that would be objective reality.

There are a few things that sway me toward simulation theory but one of the strongest is the fact that there is experimental evidence time moves in increments at the quantum level.

As I see it that could mean one of two things. Either we are definitely in a simulation or they are making the mistake of trusting mathematics too much without observation. When you rely on mathematics as heavily as we do for theoretical physics, everything has to fundamentally be quantifiable and come in bits and increments. It's very possible that this is not actually how things are, and like I've said before I think it is more logical for fields to be fundamental rather than things which come in "bits" like strings and particles. That is why I can't be sure either way, but based on what is widely accepted in the scientific community this definitely seems like a simulation.

There is also the duality of light to consider

The way that I would explain that is that light is fundamentally an electromagnetic wave and the photon is something created by the wave, similar to a tiny vortex of electricity which is denser than the wave itself. When the wave itself is disrupted the photons may be split from the wave they came from and reset the oscillation based on their own resonance, creating the illusion that a wave transformed into a particle but is still somehow a wave. That's just a hypothesis though.

quantum entanglement

That one is harder to find an explanation for. I think the most plausible physical explanation is that the entangled particles were created in close proximity and somehow got "wound up" with each other in the process. The field/membrane literally would get tangled and "tie" the particles together.

perhaps most importantly, the way that observation forces a particle to identify itself from a random set of possibilities.

This one could either be due to the same process I described above in the case of Young's double slit or it could be because of what I mentioned before that. That is, the fundamental super-reality that is actually reality is unknown to us so when we observe something that is beyond our perception it becomes a part of our reality. In other words when you look at an object it is not really what you see, it is a multi-layered field of something not ascertainable to man and if you try to look at what it's made of all you will see is a fragment of reality that separates from the cloud of the unknown and now appears to be a particle.

Ideally, credit would be given where credit is due, and there would be no need for a law. Plus no one forms ideas in a vacuum, almost every new idea is based on someone else's "intellectual property".

Science and religion are exact opposites. Religion is about beliefs and faith, and unquestioning adherence to doctrine. Science is about facts, open speculation, and questioning things.

K-Rino's lyrics are relevant to literally no-one.

His entire fan base disagrees with you. You should really adjust your clit.

He's not even a proper anti-Illuminati rapper either, he believes the Earth is round

Scientific literacy is a sin against Fiora I take it.

that Trump was the better choice over Hillary

I don't even think he thinks that. He hates them both probably.

He never makes realistic stances

You're one to talk. Your stance is that you will rule the world because the demi-gods like you.

sane

Who decides what is sane? "Normal" people?

normal

Why do you sound so mediocre and sheep-like when you speak about normalcy, your intelligence must be normal.

What entitles a human to that land over another human other than money or political sway?

No one is entitled to anything. The concept of owning land is primitive and animalistic. The real question is how should the land be used? Should we use it to profit a few people, use it as a war zone while we kill each other, or should we use it to produce and sustain everything that we need for civilisation to prosper and progress, not fighting or competing for it but co-operating to use it in the wisest way possible?

I honestly really liked that video. Hope that doesn’t ruin it for you.

I honestly think you are just saying that because you think I will be affected negatively when in reality I know that you probably didn't even watch the video and if you did you were too distracted by your racist thoughts towards the black man on the screen to even pay attention to what he was saying.

K-Rino is the type of guy to see an ant being eaten by an anteater and make a documentary about it and then get the idea that people are gonna kill the anteaters to save the ants.

What a tragically non-leftist thing to say. If you think leftism is about whining about mean words while you shrug at the thought of the poor being shit on you are sorely mistaken. This is why I have no fucking respect for you whatsoever you infuriating little stooge. You think the privileged and the impoverished should rightfully have a predator and prey relationship rather than equality of opportunity being established and you wonder why FM the lion is tearing into your ant eating ass?

Facts... Something you're missing.

You're a crooked dildo with a chicken in your pants. K-Rino is way more lyrical and way more intellectual. Notice how in this track he talks about Logan Paul and Lil Xan for half the time whereas K-Rino is bringing a much more relevant topic to the table. K-Rino is better than Webby when he's not even rapping. Kiss my maximized gluteus cheeks and GTFO

You are going to have it, you can't stop it.

You will fail, scum. If you spent more time studying dialectical/historical materialism instead of tongue-fucking Napoleon's dead butt hole you would understand that socialism is the most desirable if not the inevitable outcome. The rise of automation, increased wealth disparity, environmental degradation and availability of information can only culminate in one of three ways:

A) True progress

B)Totalitarian technocracy

or C) Extinction

I couldn't care less what you call real leftist or not

Reality agrees with me. Reality doesn't care what you care about.

You actively censor Bronto

Yep, because like I said I want to shut down propaganda. That is very different from being a pussy who is offended by mean words.

What you do is ACTUALLY illegal and immoral

Guess what? I don't give a shit. The law is written by the most evil people in existence and morality is just a hyper-subjective and arbitrary version of ethics.

You just go 'WEEE WAAAWW WEEE WAAAW KILLUMINATI I HATE ALL RICH POWERFUL PEOPLE A HURDEEE DURDEE DURR

Are you done? You really don't know anything and your characterization of my mentality proves it. You want to collaborate with the very forces that oppress and control humanity while claiming the moral high ground, I'm not gonna have it.

Everything you just said there is the actual opposite of the truth.

So you mean to tell me that what defines "unique" is being normal? If the opposite of what I said is the truth then what you're saying is the truth is self explanatorily not the truth.

Also, in a time when Da Vinci, Galileo and Newton had already came and went people of Napolean's level do not get to be "geniuses". Genius is relative to what is normal for the time, place and species etc. For example a chimpanzee that can do elementary school math is a genius whereas that is normal for a human. A human that can do calculus in the stone ages is a genius but by today's standards that is just above average. The bar was already raised above Napoleon's head by the time he arrived.

On that oldschool scaling I am in between Liberal and Moderate

Look closer, that means you're a fucking monarchist. Left wing my ass, on that scale the "radical" would be considered a right wing conservative by today's standards. You are literally saying you're more right wing than a republican capitalist.

because of the uniqueness of my brain

You have too much respect for normalcy to be making such claims. People who listen to pop music and criticize others for not being conventional enough are not special or different.

I am a one in 1.7billion rarity of genius, Bonaparte was the most famous of my tier.

Bonaparte was not a genius and you are not even as intelligent as he was.

You're not wrong that I support censoring bullying. It's the right-wing who enjoy seeing bullying happen after all.

The left wing censorship thing is just a manifestation of state leftists who are more on the authoritarian side. Real radical leftists don't support censorship. It's the right that claims they are for free speech while they shut down the speech of dissenters. I only condone the censorship of objectively false claims being put out to deceive the public, censoring things because they hurt people's feelings is for pussies.

I downvoted it.

Yes because it's such a big meanie head bullying thing to say. I'm Mingi-boohoo and I need to downvote all the big scawy meanie heads. Stop bullying me or I'll have you exterminated for the NWO.


2 of 8 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]