CreateDebate


Quocalimar's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Quocalimar's arguments, looking across every debate.
-2 points
-2 points
-2 points
-2 points
-2 points

No, I meant it as in they have every right to not respect me, they have no obligations, except a moral one.

In a sense no, but also in a sense yes. I'd do what I love, which is what I already do. The reason it's in a sense no, is because of the saying "If you do what you love, you'll never work a day in your life"

I heard Srom revealed it for him.

Both are white both use CD, you see how accusations go? How about we just let it go, regardless of if it's him or not.

Relax, I was asking a skeptical question you seem like you're pushing for it.

Apparently not, but I want to say this isn't very fair. She (I'm still call him she) may have been oddly nice to a fault, what with the bogus stories of how she helped people, but she was a great contribution to the site. If he comes back I would hope it'd be as her.

3 points

Are you him? We're all on edge and that question seems staged.

All rights deserved to as well.

As an Agnostic I don't deny the possibility of God, But as a logical person who has seen that the brain does some things we cannot explain, I still don't doubt the possibility of him having had a hallucination.

And again you missed the point.

Absolutely, but neglect is not killing.

Holy crap, that's a sad life.

It may lack respect but it's not disrespectful. To disrespect is to actively take an action of showing a lack of respect, to lack respect is simply that. Most people simply lack respect for all of nature, yet they don't disrespect it by littering.

2 points

This is crazy! I was gone for two days, and I was 8 hours late for the big reveal!

I disregarded it because it had no basis while we're arguing online like this. If that person were talking to his doctor, his doctor would have to help. If here talking to some random stranger that stranger would have brushed him off, or maybe even disrespected him.

There is only two. Me and you.

0 points

Oh yea, Azra replied to me and I saw that her pic was replaced.

I'm eager to see where you're going with this. No you have not.

Of course. I offer everyone a base amount of respect.

2 points

With what I just learned, I must admit, I do not know.

0 points

Well, it looks like you were right. You were not the worst, that person was.

0 points

This is like something out of a sitcom.

I don't. Because I can clearly look up with my eyes, that have not failed me yet, and see that it's not purple, and for them to try to convince me that it's purple is a waste of my time.

He does not call anyone an idiot without being prompted.

Wrong. If someone says the sky is purple it's not disrespectful to disregard that idiocy. ell in Lolzors' case, you're saying the sky is purple by saying anything contrary to what he claims he's here to teach us.

You're not that good at acting.

It's not inherently a disrespectful thing. It can be taken as such, but when you feel you are right, others have to be wrong, and he comes as if he's right, and as if others are wrong. Rarely with an air of cockiness.

Well whoever that is, he didn't solicit trolls like you.

It's because I respect religion, and I actually do like most of them. I just often don't like the religious for how they adulterate the words. On paper Christianity is almost perfect, when applied you see the natural faults, and so many more.

I'm glad you know it, I was posting it for reference so that anyone reading my argument would know immediately what definition I was using, and there would be nothing to clear up.

Like you've said in this debate, people try to change the definition. That doesn't actually change the definition. If they want the word bigot to be synonymous with anyone not down with their cause that's their own issue, but as for the formal definition, and the one that would be recognized by a judge, no, I do not like bigots.

That's a relief.

Indeed. I'll give it to you that it was showy and attention grabbing, but I could probably Google it, copy it then paste it.

2 points

Oh lol, I didn't even check.

3 points

No, I just wrote your name and underlined it.

In that case I could think of no one. I don't think this site has enough popularity to call forth a celebrity.

If they are wrong (or you think they are wrong) it's not a sign of disrespect. Where the respect comes into play is how he doesn't resort to name calling, and the like.

You're missing the point. Science doesn't know everything about the brain. Things that we think we know, can be almost completely tossed out the window with a new discovery. What that man having hallucinations even though they said he shouldn't have has told me is that we have a new discovery and the brain is capable of more.

Is it really? Do you have any data to support this?

All but one person to be dead. That way what is considered right and wrong is completely left up to that one person, and agreed upon by every (that one) person. I don't think humans can achieve universal morality.

Quocalimar(6470) Clarified
1 point

Seems like this page is glitching, it's got all the letters bold.

and your point is? lol, if they happened to find three great faces on the internet to use, more power to them.

Ironically humans do learn from animals. Quite a bit. One invention I know of that was inspired by nature was Velcro. It's texture and hooks came from a plant that has similar barbs and hooks.

2 points

Between me and you... whisper 'they're religious' explains it all.

Disregard all of that longer post. I can't believe so many, or any person for that matter, couldn't locate their country...on a map of their country. I imagine they were caught off guard by the fact that the whole thing was America and just didn't feel like thinking about it.

Is that an Asian who's also American? Or is that some new name for Americans someone made up somewhere?

Anyway, I can locate my country, and most of the other famous ones. I just can't go so specific as to go into detail on all of the countries I know of, and where they are etc.

One more thing though. Americans generally don't have to learn about maps. We learn basic knowledge of what one is, what they are used for, and how to use it, but we don't ever really need it since the likely hood of leaving the U.S. is low, and instead of learning all of this info about other countries and their locales we'll most likely have to know quite a few street names within the country already, making learning more than that useless and mentally taxing.

I'm laughing and a little sad about this video.

The phonies like this are making the real ki masters look like imbeciles. I don't know if it's real or not, but their are monks that practice it, and they don't use it offensively they use it defensively, and whatever it is, it works. They have a better method of not getting hurt than normal people. I doubt it's magical, I just know whatever it is, they are calling ki, is acting as protection for their skin.

Here ya go.

I know some people will say that humans aren't animals but we are so deal with it!

Who the hell said that? They deserved to be slapped for that idiocy.

Anyway, what separates humans from animals is mostly our level of intelligence. We not only make and use tools, but we use them to an extent that's greater than an other animal that makes or uses tools.

In that case, I say it's real because the bisexuals say so. We can't get in there head to prove either way so it stands to reason that lying would not benefit them so they wouldn't.

Quocalimar(6470) Clarified
1 point

Everyone agrees about it, because every and anyone can test it. If it's 100 % opinion Mike Jackson was a great singer, we still can't prove it. If it's 100% fact that he was born black, we can prove that.

Okay maybe I was wrong for why people react, but what about how people live?

Definitely a sense of touch. I would probably die in a week but it'd be the best week of my life. My YouTube page would be the greatest, until the day I die.

Tell me something I don't know.

Yay that sounds like fun...except for all the water that will flood the continent.

Not Christ's heavens but any place where good people go, anyone that actually is good should be allowed. The reason I say not Christ's heaven is for two main reasons.

1. They have rules to get there, that non Christians don't follow. One of those rules is well believing in Christ.

2. We'd be shunned and outcast, no thanks.

I loved that one soooo much! I actually downloaded it, and listen to it in my normal playlist as I would any other song. Best by far!

No. Sometimes you find a good song you like, and you stick with it. Other times you hear a new song you hate, and you just refrain from all new songs for a while.

It's literally sin. God is word of law, God is perfect, God is good all that jazz. Anything against him is blasphemy, which is said to be the one sin he does not forgive.

I like free roam games where I can do whatever regardless of the mission, also I have no consoles so...

WTF?

Texting, stop and look up and catch yourself possibly. Small possibility but present still.

Drunk, completely screwed up with you depth perception in the shitter.

That's what lolzors says, my question is, why worship him if that's the case? That means he sends those to hell, because he wants to.

Ikr

Jc whatever his numbers are.

Will never get married. So....no.

Definitely going to get shot if you walk into a public place...no exceptions!

Screw the characters, I could read a story with shapes, so long as their is a conflict, I'll be alright.

What is really relevant to be the bible? I'm sure Christians could swing it to make him important enough, even if he doesn't do anything.

How long is indefinitely? I mean if I get hungry enough, sure I'll try it, but I won't just pick up the stuff and start chowing away on the first day.

Probably, but most likely maybe not.

I'm not a Christian but I'll take a stab at it.

If a man's testicles are crushed or his penis is cut off, he may not be admitted to the assembly of the LORD

No sex changes, simple enough.

When two men are fighting and the wife of one of them intervenes to drag her husband clear of his opponent, if she puts out her hand and catches hold of the man by his privates, you must cut off her hand and show her no mercy.

She was probably cheating and she meant to grab his Johnson and for that reason she was trying to be clever about it, but actually wasn't so her hand needs to be cut off.

Play physical sports, watch Chess. I always watch physical sports and think "Damn it! You should have done this!!!" Except with Chess I always watch in awe because it's too tough for me.

I used to when I was newer, I have learned a little something and became more confident in the validity of my own argument so I gave up on it.

I definitely do as well, but I won't say said name.

What does it matter? Just hold your views, and vote on those views, fuck the political system just because you agree more with one side.

You should have put it in video format instantly.

There you go.

Out of respect I never do or will on purpose.

I prefer a good debate, but I guess objectively I see how some could like very many but sucky debates.

We've made a need for it. It's good to know if a hurricane is coming now I guess.

3 points

It is also scientifically impossible to live without a rain, yet there was a baby born and that lived to 2 I think or 1 that had no brain, just a stem. He had emotions and other characteristics that you need a brain for. All this tells me is that the people who study the brain need to study more, and that there is still tons more about it that we don't know.

When your mind is weak like that, it doesn't matter what you know the hallucination will be stronger.

Help.

If it's really an addiction, it's out of your control, and at that point you need someone with nothing invested to take control from you.

1. It would no doubt get boring, and become a torment eventually.

2. Some kind of ruler would have to reside over it, making sure everything went right for people.

3. Over crowding.

Probably a myth until we can get more solid information it it.

2 points

Probably not, maybe so. If there was evidence for him, we wouldn't have debates like this. No one ever maks the debate "Does Earth exist" because...well e can see it. Blind people can hear it. Deaf and blind people can feel it. People with those conditions, and that one that makes you unable to feel pain, have equilibrium on their ears that let them know they are standing on it.

I'd go on but it'd get weird. Point is he probably doesn't exist, since this question keeps finding a reason to pop up and when it does, no one ever firmly solidifies his possibility, even though other evidence points to his lack of a possibility.

Kinda sorta. Assuming we're talking about the Christian one, and also assuming the Bible is true. Well we have carbon dating evidence of Earth's approximate age, which is no where near close to the age described in the Bible.

We also have date that tells a fairly accurate story of human genesis (as a species, not the first life form though) that is a way different story than the Bibles.

I have to agree with you here.

Fairness is trying to put two things together that don't go. Equality is giving everyone a chance at fairness with no prejudice on how they were born. We can't force fairness on the world, or not as easy as we could force equality I should say.

What? I don't understand doesn't it say 'eternal rest'?

The whitest rapper I've ever seen, my gosh! Oh, and apparently he's a veteraned user.

I think it could but it won't. Everyone has been telling me that it's a superman movie, with Batman thrown in, and it's most likely because they are trying to rush the Justice league movie, which is probably already made, or almost.


1 of 66 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]