of course it is proven. You guys never play Pokemon?
You evolutionists just spout a bunch of hot air, and its been a long time you ape breeds responded to any of my arguments...
Sense and insight would tell you, that when a theory contradicts a proven factual LAW that the theory is nothing but a lie...
The THEORY of evolution breaks not one, but TWO
scientific laws. One of which is the Law of thermodynamics. A law is fact, a theory is theory. When a theory contradicts a fact, it is wrong. Why people continue trying to trace their lineage to primates is beyond me.
Well...its not beyond me any more....
Multiple micro evolution never made a new animal or organism...
The scenario made was merely fantasy...
''Evolutionists assume evolution is true, then write endlessly about when and where it happened, rates and lineages, etc. But if macroevolution is physically impossible in the real world, and it is, then all the rest is fantasy. There are only two possibilities. Either every part of every living thing arose by random chance, or an intelligence designed them. It is now clear that the theory of evolution's only mechanism for building new parts and creatures, mutation-natural selection, is totally, utterly, pathetically inadequate. In spite of overwhelming evidence that the theory of evolution is dead wrong, many are not ready to throw in the towel. They desperately hope that some natural process will be found that causes things to fall together into organized complexity. These are people of great faith.'' http://www.newgeology.us/
Yes it is true. BUT it we all know that is not what many scientists try to communicate when they speak of evolution.. It is only when faced with logical sensible arguments they give testament to its true meaning..
You ever notice how each of us make logical statements, and get down voted, and no responses are given to our arguments, except mockery and ridicule, or no response at all? This is because we are right. We REASON with them, but they do not reason with us. It leads me to the very illogical question of whether they came from primates in truth!
I CHALLENGE ANY OF YOU SILLY SHEEP TO CHALLENGE THE INFORMATION PRESTENTED HERE IF YOU CAN!
Macro evolution and Micro evoultion is not the same thing.
I read other people saying that macro evolution is just lots of micro evolution. What a bunch of bollocks. This is not pokemon or digimon. Nor is this Harry Potter
''Creationists have always agreed that there is variation within species. What evolutionists do not want you to know is that there are strict limits to variation that are never crossed, something every breeder of animals or plants is aware of. Whenever variation is pushed to extremes by selective breeding (to get the most milk from cows, sugar from beets, bristles on fruit flies, or any other characteristic), the line becomes sterile and dies out. And as one characteristic increases, others diminish.'' You clearly can see that the beliefs of evolution has been disproven by real life circumstances. To continue believing in evolution which is disproven, is to be a total air-headed, hair-brained idiot.
''Do these big changes (macroevolution) really happen? Evolutionists tell us we cannot see evolution taking place because it happens too slowly. A human generation takes about 20 years from birth to parenthood. They say it took tens of thousands of generations to form man from a common ancestor with the ape, from populations of only hundreds or thousands. We do not have these problems with bacteria. A new generation of bacteria grows in as short as 12 minutes or up to 24 hours or more, depending on the type of bacteria and the environment, but typically 20 minutes to a few hours. There are more bacteria in the world than there are grains of sand on all of the beaches of the world (and many grains of sand are covered with bacteria). They exist in just about any environment: hot, cold, dry, wet, high pressure, low pressure, small groups, large colonies, isolated, much food, little food, much oxygen, no oxygen, in toxic chemicals, etc. There is much variation in bacteria. There are many mutations (in fact, evolutionists say that smaller organisms have a faster mutation rate than larger ones). But they never turn into anything new. They always remain bacteria. ''
Bacteria do not evolve. And when a scientists forcefully and artificially injects new DNA into animals, like the case a person called Nichole mentioned on another debate mentioned, it was still a fly. If you want a more complex being:
''There is much variation in fruit flies. There are many mutations. But they never turn into anything new. They always remain fruit flies. Many years of study of countless generations of bacteria and fruit flies all over the world shows that evolution is not happening today.'' Like us you can say that fruit flies have races. But they can still reproduce with each other, because they are one and the same species.
A white man can procreate with any other female HUMAN ''race'' no matter her genetic mutation. But he or she was never proven to be an Ape,chimpanzee or any other primate. Science DISPROVES evolution. Scientists like those who are here winning this debate with up votes of ignorance accept for a reason I do not know..
Because we are pokemons!
More evidence points to a designer than to a coincidence.
When the scientists CREATED the new fly, it evolved. Problem there.... Nature does not inject DNA into other unrelated animals. The only way another species is created is when they procreate... If they do not procreate with their relatives the offspring is sterile. Evolution is artificial. You said it yourself.
Scientists almost speak of Nature as having a mind .God has mind though :). Only Natural selection ''could pick out with unerring skill the best of varieties'' a quote from Darwin. All of you who accept evolution admit it yourself that it has not been proven AND IT WILL NEVER be proven because it is not true, and is directly related to practices that are completely unrelated to science such as freemasonry.
Shame on you scientists! you aren't supposed to be involved in secret societies that believe in ancient mysteries and golems and such... Such beliefs are inconsistent, and shows the originators of this silly theory's true intentions. To control the goyim. Or cattle. The sheep! who do not think for themselves!
The only reason you will be down voted is because you spoke the truth. They downvoted you with emotion rather than logic.
HA HA you are absolutely right! I'm SURE none of them witnessed evolution. "Never will the doctrine of spontaneous generation recover from the mortal blow struck by this simple experiment." Louis Pasteur- he was WRONG! It is dead, but the foolish evolutionists treat it as it is still right. Making daughters of its flawed, and retarded theory- Abiogenesis.
Abiogenesis and spontaneous generation is one and the same.. Evolutionist need to let go of their fairy tales of molecules being the building blocks of life. ''Scientists not only have been unable to find a single undisputed link that clearly connects two of the hundreds of major family groups, but they have not even been able to produce a plausible starting point for their hypothetical evolutionary chain'' (Shapiro, 1986) Scientists know little in these regards, but behave as if it is fact. The only giver of life is GOD! not a bunch of molecules dancing around in a magical dance to create life. Showing abiogenesis and spontaneous generation disproves Evolution because it is based on the premise that God did not make the Universe. Saying abiogenesis and spontaneous generation or any other of ''science's'' witchraft and magical hypotheses is irrelevant to evoultion is saying the ''creationists are right, but I DID come from an ape.''
The theory of evolution is nothing but a masonic doctrine of man progressing (evolving) until he becomes perfect (god-like) which lead to the belief of the black man being sub-human and asians being more advanced. This theory scientists see as fact Evolution lead to more preposterous and supernatural implications the fools who think they are wise were trying to avoid. And in trying to disprove the supernatural they proved it.
Widely accepted... That dose not mean SHIT! why? because if it is accepted doesn't mean its the truth. Louis Pasteur proved that bacteria was the cause of disease when everyone thought he was a mad man.http://www.youtube.com/
Evolution has no answer for the origin of life. Spontaneous generation - the only way the theory of evolution could get off the ground, by taking the supernatural being out of the equation-has been disproved 120 years ago."There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation, that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. ''That leaves us with the only possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God. Therefore, I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible; spontaneous generation arising to evolution." (Wald, George, "Innovation and Biology," Scientific American, Vol. 199, Sept. 1958, p. 100) Evolutionists are guilty of believing in MAGIC! What does a mixture of chemicals transforming into life sound like to you?! (spontaneous generation) If you can believe in evolution in its full true sense, then you are more delusional than you believe Christians to be. God's creative energy was manifested through the ''big bang'' evolution in the sense scientists are speaking of is clearly false..
Yes he has evidence of the people.... adam and eve... Every human on the planet comes from a single Paternal ancestor and a maternal ancestor..... Not acknowledging this fact (which the Bible does, and narrows it down to Noah and Eve (since the x chromosome was more ancient than the y-chromosome of Noah- or whoever you want to call it!) is testament to your extreme ignorance...
You said you dont give a shit about scripture until it is verified... verified by who? i believe in the Big Bang... I simply believe it is the description of an event (by scientists), to say an event that has been described by Judeo-christianity did not happen which is counter productive and evidence to many scientists occultic origin, that you probably dont even know about. How does a belief in magic reconcile with science? it does not.
Lol Oh sorry about that was a while ago when i was inmy immature stage. Yes it is preposterous.
''Men in some countries do not let women be'' Yet many of your kind, treat the anglosphere as if they force women under Sharia Law, that they mutilate female genitalia, doing what I did... While against stereotyping made a steretype myself. Feminism in theory is good, but in practice has proved to be full of utter bullshit. You can have the same ideals of equality etc. Without bringing images of man-hating lesbianic whores to a person's mind. This is what feminism is mostly associated with, and a discerning man or woman should have no part in it. Take the positive leave the good. I dont go around saying im a masculinist or some shit like that do I?
Um.... Jesus wouldn't shun gays. But you forget this. ''Go and sin no more.'' He did not tell the adulterer.. ''its ok. You werent stoned because you didnt deserve it!'' He said'' He who has not sinned throw the first stone.'' and AFTER this he said GO and sin NO MORE. You are clearly a twister of ideologies.
I believe the last one. http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/
Leviathans and Behemoths are all the dinosaurs categorized down to two http://www.answersingenesis.
http://www.answersingenesis.
I think we need to redefine equality.Think about it what is superior the apple or the grape? The doctor or the garbage collector? they both serve their purpose. The garbage collector makes the doctors' job easier. but when there are no garbage collectors, you have a crisis. For me feminism is garbage for putting the notion in the grape's head that they are somehow disrespectful for understanding that they are grapes not apples. You can't -I meanshouldn't change Nature this is pr oven time and time again. Though I agree that men take it to the extreme, (domestic violence etc) Feminism is another extreme. And extremes are not good.
Are you speaking of feminists in general or are you speaking of the vast majority? My first example is to show what I believe feminism is founded upon. Other than I agree with everything you said-but the fact that the feminism also encourages the increased masculinity and false-manhood that make most "normal" men panic when they hear the title, is enough evidence to show how unhealthy most of it is. majority of Feminism is about equality in name only. Actions speak louder than words. I believe they were successful in making the law courts (in particular ,divorce) biased towards women. Only time men receive custody is is when the woman is an absolute psycho. While some men are suffering the loss, and pain of not being able to see their children. Not to mention the number of women that use their snake-like lawyers to steal the man of his well-earned money. She tells lies in court, then the man gets mad- then the judge sees the side of him that the ex-wife fabricated. Though I admit there are many that simply wanted sex. But they too are like this for a reason I heard a conversation that went something like this between my cousin and his Neanderthal-like buddies. Jerry-" Women are evil. Cant trust them." Buddies- LolLOLOLOL jerry- "I'm serious. one of the main reasons I dint have steady relationships with women is because they claim to love you, then they rip you off of all your money- And the sistas dint sign pre-numptial agreements!" He put a little cussing hear and there, and a little crude colloquialisms but yeah thats what he said..... I believe feminism has made women -cunning and deceitful.
"Recognizing the gap between their lesson plans and most parents' sensibilities, mainstream sex educators openly embrace a policy of secrecy. The Centers for Disease Control lauds one program, Becoming a Responsible Teen, that insists students sign a contract of secrecy: if a student talks to his parents about what he has learned in class, he is thrown out of the program."
Yep. Sex educators know more about the dangers of homosexual behavior than you do. § Here are a couple of interesting quotes from a homosexual writer named Paul Varnell, out of a homosexual newspaper: "Lesbians and gay men have nothing in common except mutual incomprehension" and "Almost all gay men say that they experience their desire for other men as a given, as if it were an inherent part of them. By contrast, many (but not all) lesbians say they regard their sexual desire for women as a choice" (Chicago Free Press, Nov. 30, 2005, p. 6). That item about lesbians can be explained thusly: if many lesbians know they were sexually abused by men when they were young (and many were), then they should be able to understand how they were probably not born lesbian but have "chosen" to be with women due to a fear of men.
No animal species are homosexual. Animals are always bi-sexual. 2. I find it rather interesting that you look to the infererior intelligence of animals to justify homosexuality. The Bible clely states that you are "born into sin"....But to say that God made someone Gay is absurd and ridiculous- As he never made any one a liar- they chose the path of dishonesty... world. The best bet homosexuals have in a Darwinian world is that its a genetic mutation, chemical imbalance o ttp://www.cfsh.net/2.htmlr something like that.
Some Liberals are selfish. Homosexuality should have their "rights" but when it comes to saying something that offends Homosexuals--its ironic the way they respond to views of Homosexuality that des not support their own. If anyone says something to offend a homo he is punished severly in Western culture. If a homosexual says someone is bigoted becauuse they see something wrong with their lifestyle they are bigots, forced to apologize for their ACTUAL right to freedom of speech. The very homosexuals who want freedom to marry, to engage in a hardly justifiable union, (health-wise,emotionally-wise etc.) take away rights to freedom of speech. How selfish, and Totalitarian that is. Some homos are just being Legalistic bullies.http://www.cfsh.net/7.html "So, they are finally throwing the long-ago discredited 10% figure under the bus, and they are indirectly admitting that 50% of homosexuals were probably NOT born homosexual and so should be able to change and become what they were born to be---heterosexual. They are also indirectly admitting that if people can be homosexual without having homosexual genes, then people can be heterosexual without having heterosexual genes. In other words, they are admitting that people born with homosexual genes (if they exist) can still satisfactorily enjoy the heterosexual lifestyle."http://www.cfsh.net/5.html
ur catholic or what? A christian that dosent see a problem with Gay marriage is not christian. As homosexuality is against the bible's principles. I agreed with you until you started talking about how it hurts no one but stripping away rights. I agree with you hlf way..But the Bible says sin is detrimental to most evryone while sexual sins are sins against ones own body. do you believe in Sin? or are you one of those watered-down christians? I agree in speration of church and state, And that ppl should be able to make their own choices.. But seriously....
Oh really?! If i dont think its right for my child to see two men/women making out in a subway train im gonna do what i can to convince them of their...Hold a sec.None of my business?
It was our business when a startling number of homosexuals gave blood transfusions giving innocent people AIDS. It was our business when that fat guy anally penetrated a three year old boy.- But hey thats how he loves!!! He likes three year olds then we're out of place to put him in jail. http://www.cfsh.net/3.html http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/
Laws can be changed. And when I was 13 i didnt mind engaging in sexual acts with my history teacher. In a similar note- werent MY rights being infringed upon because of the law you mentioned. And it has a little to do with being Christian and A LOT to do with health and well being. Incest is nasty. Full stop. Just because a so called biochemical response occurs dosent justify getting it on with your sister. If scientists were peadophiiles, all of a sudden they would find a startling new discovery. Later to be disproved- And to the detriment of young boys and girls. The same with homosexuality. Mix thetwo together and youve got a startling nasty combination.
Men are also discriminated against...whats your point???? a bunch of black guys rob a bank. I go in an elevator a white women suddenly puts her purse tight under her arm. some Stupid white women dont know that im already loaded (which would lead me to believe women are more judgemental and snobby when i experience this scenario more)......And im not like my other counterparts. But...If you cant identify with her something is wrong with you. If a member of group is known to have a bad repuation of some sort...ITS NATURAL to stray away from them. Which makes stereotypes. Some of which are partially true. And feminists often try to do their best to emasculate man and de-femenize women. For example..its true that the speech section of the female brain is more developed. As opposed to society making them so. Let men be Men Let women be Women. Though i admit society does have its faults in rearing boys And girls. And feminists always try to play the victim (sounds pretty subordinate) but thats another story.
"gay couples are just like straight couples"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. That was funny.
Two men-Same as below.
Two women- One takes the "dominant" role, The other takes the "submissive' role.
Heterosexual- The naturally dominant gender takes his place, while the naturall submissive gender (by no means inferior)takes her place.
Gay couples are trying to be like straight couples. Behold the correction. Last but not least Gays cant reproduce.
Seriously.... the very physical act is rather unhygienic..the bonding that is done can be found between two Heterosexuals-minus the Evolutionary mystery and Acchiles heel, and Biblical fact that is homosexual attraction. Ya the Bible is says its.......SIN.oops. Bad word.
"Gays should not have to explain that it's a choice or it's a hormone imbalance or a genetic mutation or a disease or anything. No explanantion. Gays are human. PERIOD! END OF STORY"
How eloquent.
Pedophiles should not have to explain that its a choice or its a hormone imbalance.....THEIR HUMAN. Period. (Sarcasm). IF gays were born gay pedophiles were born pedo. Therfore they should not be jailed due to an evolutionary mishap.( More Sarcasm). Realize the double standard......
http://www.cfsh.net/3.html Read that. Why would you want your children to suffer the things you are suffering, all because of deviant/corrupted behaviour? (same thing with promiscuous heterosexuals)If you're evolutionist Homosexuality does not fit in a Darwinian world. What sense dose it make for someone to be exclusively homosexual? Dosent profit natural selection in ANY way. And as you will read, Increase Anal Cancers, Prostate Cancer and Syphiliis (for guys) and Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer in women To name a few ailments that plague both genders.. Sorry to be so insenesitive, but its the truth. Homosexualilty is wrong, No evolutionary OR spiritual evidence shows You were born like it, but you can change. And beside gays are the ones talking about choice.. If your kids dont want to follow your disease ridden,out-cast like lifestyle, let him be. Gender, Race, Culture shows what a person is---but a blatant homosexual shows simply what a prson DOES.
As i said b4, right now im not arguing. Simply show how the world is going downhill.
And what this guy thinks Is THAT two horses will make NOTHING more than horses. as opposed to evolution which believes In mankind to have ape ancestry etc "Evolution makes no such statements"
Stop trying to be politically correct.If what you do has no consequence in the after life, and it is possible to get away with it while you're alive, that creates a sense of anarchy in the individual.Im SURE it happened to ALL you evolutionists LOL
Though I will never support homosexuality, Christians have a huge problem. God gave people free will and their gonna use it. And a mere mortal-Christian or not wont change that.
Yes, but for some reason, They seem to slyly trace pretty much eevry problem in society to manfolk.
I am not trying to draw a correlation between the two, Im simply saying that someone, if involved in something seen as deviant or as disgusting ( that probably is), with a little science can make laws to approve any destructive habit.
Naw dude i think HOMOSEXUALITY is evil.But not (necessarily) the person.
So what your saying is people can be born with a sexual orientation that does not contribute to this life processes' function?
What type of evolution is that?If that were true that probably makes homosexuality a disorder...( Not saying I believe in evolution LOl)
Oh and the Bible says God would rather if all would be saved and not have to go to hell.Thats clearly SOME type of concern ain't it? Hate is too a strong word for this era, In fact he never did hate Homos, He just HAS a strong abhorrence for it.
The people on this argument are disturbing me with their ideas of sexual freedom LOL
Incest ok?
Beastialty-pending
13 yrr olds- THEY CAN CONSENT, not by law,but they do know what they are doing.Pedophiles according to your logic can have sexual relationships with out hassle if allowed. And since most of you have no belief in morals, This is also Pending.
LOL You guys are Hilarious. Whats next? Bestiality?
Soon you guys will be saying people were born with desires to sleep with their brothers and sisters, And That penetrating horses is "natural".
Incest-use a condom or get an abortion. problem solved. you really think the only reason its wrong is because of the deformed child?Do evil deeds need a tangible outcome to be considered evil? Pedophilia-i agree.
Homosexuality- Read Incest argument...
P.S i dont support abortions.
Are you Crazy?! if people were born gay, explain identical twins with divergent sexual orientations...surely both of them should be gay. and its not christian logic that says God hates gays. If that were true, He would hate heterosexual liars,murderers, people like you,(who make fun of the Bible which you so beautifully described as "bullshit"), and pretty much everyone in the world! But naw a real christian knows God loves all of us..Including The homo.
Are you Crazy?! if people were born gay, explain identical twins with divergent sexual orientations...surely both of them should be gay.
SURE!!! Let them marry! Just not in churches, and don't allow priests to be Gay.If they are,remove their title! Al matters solved.
So in other words you're a homosexual...since Ashley's a boy and all..
If you don't know what the bible says about a topic, Shut up. Lev. 18:22, "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination. "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper.""1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals,nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
