Yeah, I got that. Why do you do it?
Because just like you said pal, he has the mind of a child. Probably why he finds children attractive in the first place.
This from a guy who literally admitted he is addicted to child pornography.
Lol. Notice how he immediately shuts his stupid face when you bring up his past. Thanks for exposing him.
Its hilarious watching you back track
It's hilarious watching you pretend to be laughing while you simultaneously ban every account which argues with you.
ROFLMAO. Your desperation is pathetic. You are a pitifully fucking stupid Irish lowlife and a barefaced liar.
A lib saying there's evidence
Stop lying for thirty seconds you farcically stupid wanker. No lib has claimed there is evidence. YOU, a NEO-NAZI and COMPULSIVE LIAR, claimed that "libs still have found nothing on him". You are brazenly trying to shift the burden of prrof for your own claim onto other people because you are a LUDICROUSLY stupid and filthily dishonest, sad little Nazi wanker.
There are no laws that govern the peniton particle because there is no such thing as a peniton particle.
Let me try to illustrate why this analogy is false.
Imagine you lived 10,000 years ago.
Would it be true to say: there are no laws which govern the movement of the wheel because there is no such thing as a wheel?
Spacetime is physical
No, space-time is a mathematical construct used to explicate the standard model of the universe. To call perfect emptiness "physical" is a contradiction in terms (i.e. a paradox).
If material doesn't exist, then the laws that govern it does not exist.
Wrong. You are conflating causes with effects, which I have already tried to explain to you once. If there were no water anywhere in the universe, then that would not stop H2O being the chemical rule for creating water. If there were no cars anywhere in the universe, then that would not change the rules one has to follow in order to build a car.
There are no laws that govern the peniton particle because there is no such thing as a peniton particle.
This is a false analogy. There are laws which govern all particles, regardless of what you decide to name those particles. Were your premise correct that the laws governing them simply vanish when one removes them all, then it would be quite an astounding coincidence when one puts them all back and the exact same laws begin to take effect, would it not?
Obviously, if one returns all the particles to their original positions, and the initial effects are repeated, that proves the universe has retained information absent all physical matter.
Yes. No religious zealots and no political extremists.
Which would rule out 97 percent of this website.
I did and you removed it and pretended you couldn't see it.
I intend to file a formal complaint with your alien overlords.
Gravity, for example, does not exist in a universe devoid of mass.
I am afraid that you are confusing the law of gravity with the effects of gravity. The law of gravity would still exist if all the mass were removed from the universe, but it would not affect anything because its effects are dependent on mass.
Similarly, if you removed everything from the universe which has colour, it would not change the rule which governs colour.
There is no information without interpretation. That requires an interpreter.
Edit: I just saw and responded to your post in the other side. I’ve never thought about it in the way you described. It wouldn’t necessarily be accurate to say that matter is an interpreter, but the information still relies on the physical for existence.
I understand why you might think so, but as strange as it might sound to you, it is actually the other way around. A hundred years of quantum experiments have yielded the repeated observation that, without an interpreter, the physical itself ceases to exist, and becomes only information. Without an interpreter, reality itself deteriorates into a set of mathematical probabilities.
I can certainly agree with you that there is a symbiotic relationship between (certain types of) information and interpreters, but simply because they both exist simultaneously (and depend upon one another) doesn't necessarily mean they both have to be physical.
Those laws, which are information, are properties of the physical universe.
Well, your statement is sort of true, but firstly, let's discuss your loaded language. If you remove everything from the universe which defines it as physical, then how can the universe still be physical? That is a paradox. If information remains in a perfect vacuum then obviously that information is not physical and your claim that "all information is physical" is false.
Secondly, while I again acknowledge your statement to be partly true, what is not true is that this gives these laws any physical form. Whether they are properties of the universe or not, they still do not exist in the physical sense. You could not burn the law of gravity onto a hard drive and take it with you to another universe.
I mean no. Information and the experience thereof is strictly physical.
No. If you removed all the matter and energy from the universe you would still be left with a universe which has laws. Those fundamental laws represent an example of information which is not physical, yet nevertheless must exist in order for the universe to adhere to them.
The fact that information relies completely on matter does not make matter less real.
Matter is information. Everything in the universe is information. There is nothing except information.
I plan to be a robotics engineer so I think I can add insight.
I plan to be supreme ruler of the potato people so I think I can counter your insight.
A.I may never get advanced to the point of being destructive.
Then again it may. In fact, it probably will. This can be ascertained simply by observing the fact that it is becoming more advanced with time, and adding on ten thousand years.
Most is primitive and harmless
Yes, but time doesn't stand still. AIs are becoming more advanced every year. Plus -- and potentially most importantly -- developments in technology tend to be exponential rather than linear. We learn twice as fast when we know twice as much.
As long as we don't give it significant control, we should be fine.
I think that if we ever reach the level of AI where the decision has to be made whether or not to give it control, at that point it becomes inevitable that it will happen. Again, because of the passage of time, and the curiosity of human beings, eventually someone will try it just to see what happens.
Bill Maher thinks Islam is dangerous and psychopathic.
Donald Trump thinks poor people were black in a previous life and God is punishing them.
You think it's nuts need rubbed.
You think children are sexually attractive.
And banned.
Pretty simple Nom. Would you like pictures?
Your picture seems to evidence that America does indeed have a national ideology, which means you are contradicting yourself.
We have left wing, moderate, and right wing press
All press is supposed to be politically neutral you fucking retard. You furthermore do not have a "left wing" press. You are deliberately conflating the left (i.e. Marxism) with the American left (i.e. liberal capitalism). The fact that America has politicised the press to be biased in favour of capitalism literally proves the other guy's point.
He works for MSNBC.
And he was viciously attacked by the American press on the basis of the allegation that he once voted communist, so what is your point?
Please define the word "handled"
I volunteer for that task, Herr Bronto.
We are further along with North Korea than under Barack Obama.
If you consider "further along" to be threatening to start a nuclear war with them:-
Trump Threatens Use of Nukes While Canceling North Korean Nuke Summit
The Nobel committee will have to keep the president’s peace prize on ice
We are no longer funding Iran.
Trump killed a deal which forced Iran to reduce its uranium stockpile by 98 percent:-
Iran's uranium stockpile was reduced by 98%
It is highly suspect that you can make a sandwich or get your pants on without assistance
That's hilarious Bronto. But it doesn't explain why you think I can time travel.
"There is no source validating this claim"
In the post I was replying to, fuckwit.
You need to give us the source to your lack of sources.
That makes no sense. Your claims = your responsibility to prove them.
Thanks retard. Bye.
Hmmm. Trump has a Jewish son-in-law.
Who is an Israeli nationalist with property in the West Bank and who was implicated in the Russian collusion scandal. Kushner is as corrupt as they actually come mate.
Guess that killed your "Trump's a Nazi" theory.
On the contrary, several high-ranking members of the Nazi Party were also Jewish. See:-
Notably, there were several high-ranking Nazis of Jewish descent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ListofNazisofnon-Germanicdescent
Also see:-
Cambridge University researcher Bryan Rigg noted that there were two field marshals and fifteen generals (two full generals, eight lieutenant generals, five major generals) who were Jews or of Jewish descent.[2] Rigg estimated that there were 150,000 men of Jewish descent that served German armed forces during World War II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ListofNazisofnon-Germanicdescent
Try again.
Dow's 35 all-time-high closes in 2017 put it halfway toward a record
There are sources.
I didn't say there are no sources. I said your sources are bunk, which they are.
I guess you didn't do much of a search.
I didn't do any search because they were not my claims. Your attempt to hold me responsible for evidencing claims made by yourself only illustrates what a thoroughly dishonest troll you are.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/
I did not dispute this claim. I pointed out that you did not provide any source validating it. I also pointed out that Obama himself appointed two Supreme Court Judges.
I showed you that it is true.
You had not shown me it was true at the point I wrote my comment you annoying cretin. Do you think I can time travel?
Obama was President 8 years.
Your comment had nothing to do with how long Obama was president for, therefore this is a stupid and bizarre attempt at misdirection.
Furthermore, you have responded only to one sentence in my post with you personally cherry-picked, and ignored the other 95 percent of my post in which I meticulously pointed out the fact that your sources did not match the claims you made.
Hi Bronto.
I tried matching the first half of your claims against the sources you linked to support them.
Got rid of penalty for no insurance- yes
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna936866
The story is about a bill (i.e. the First Step Act) which hadn't passed when the story was written.
Did prison reform that Obama promised but never delivered- yes
https://youtu.be/4J6nXrhCheA
This is a promise about how Van Jones intends to "team up" with Jared Kushner (i.e. the corrupt Jewish nationalist behind the presidency). Again, it is a prediction of the future which hadn't come to pass at the time your story is from.
Put 2 Supreme Court justices in place- yes
There is no source validating this claim. Assuming it is true, Obama put two in place also. See:-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ListoffederaljudgesappointedbyBarackObama
Set 100 record high closings with the DOW - yes
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dailycaller.com/2018/09/20/dow-jones-record-donald-trump
A false claim supported by a far right fake news website. A Media Bias Fact Check confirms that The Daily Caller has a "mixed" record for factual reporting and published several articles from notorious right wing terrorist Jason Kessler:-
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/
Furthermore, the following website puts the real number at less than 30:-
https://www.thebalance.com/
To be perfectly honest, given your long track record of lying and shilling on behalf of Israel, that is as far as I am prepared to dig. Your claims are false and/or misleading.
It looks as if this guy thinks those crossing the border from the South are coming with degrees from Harvard.
It looks like you are still trying to replace the topic with your own retarded alt-Reich agenda, despite the fact that I have already banned two of your accounts for doing this. You are insane Bronto. Literally, you are the most insane person I have ever stumbled across in four decades on Earth.
Where do you keep your klansman suit at nom?
I keep it next to my ban button you insane little rodent.
It must be those excellent educations.
Education is definitely not responsible for your apparent belief that making money is the same thing as being intelligent. That's just traditional stupidity, coupled with the fact that you want to mislead people because you're insane.
The "uneducated" conservatives that liberals make less money than on average.
The uneducated Conservatives who are less intelligent than average.
And it's a low average.
The bloody Yank
I'm not a yank you halfwit.
Stopped being able to think nonlinearly at age 7
Rejecting your insanely stupid fairy tale on the basis that it is supported by literally no evidence = losing the ability to think non-linearly. I don't think so retard.
You have to pass a background check dumbass.
No you don't Bronto, you literal Nazi halfwit.
Do you read the English?
About 48 percent of state prison inmates surveyed said they got the gun they used from a family member, friend, gun store, pawn shop, flea market, or gun show. Most states only require a background check if the purchase happens at a gun store, according to the Giffords Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
You believe in atheism because you were raised to.
Nope, I was raised to be a Christian. Not my fault I developed common sense somewhere around age seven.
There is no evidence and no reason whatsoever why you should believe in atheism
Atheism is the denial of your own baseless claims about the origin of the universe. The time atheists will need evidence to support that belief is the same time you find some evidence that God is real.
If they were in control of things, America would be no different than Nazi Germany.
Your country is literally an idiocracy. The Nazis were on the far right. You all appear to have missed the fact that they have taken over again, and that this is why you are being taught stupid fucking things which contradict the historical record.
Laura Kleiner, a Democratic activist who lives in Staunton, said she dated Kessler for several months in 2013. She said Kessler was very dedicated to his liberal principles, and that he was a strict vegetarian, abstained from alcohol and drugs, embraced friends of different ethnicities and was an atheist.
This is obviously fake news. It isn't corroborated anywhere else and Laura Kleiner is a ghost whose claims cannot be verified. The unsupported claims of random individuals do not constitute evidence of anything, and especially when those claims contradict the fact that Kessler was the head of a violent far right protest less than five years later. Even Mike Godwin, inventor of the infamous "Godwin's Law" called Kessler a Nazi, so your obscure story which does not appear in any trustworthy publication anywhere on the internet appears to fly in the face of the facts.
the Alt-Right Turns Against ‘Unite the Right’ Organizer Jason Kessler, Labels Him ‘Soros/Deep State Plant’.
Lol. The paranoid conspiracy theories of the far right are not evidence of anything, silly boy. The same idiots spent over an entire year propagandising fake news about a liberal sex trafficking ring housed in the basement of a pizzeria which does not even have a basement. When liars accuse other liars of being liars, then chances are good nobody is telling the truth.
The saga of 'Pizzagate': The fake story that shows how conspiracy theories spread
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
I am also still waiting for you to present your evidence that Jason Kessler was "objectively" a part of Occupy Wall Street. Will I be waiting long? I think probably so, given your overt attempts to change the subject yet again. I'll give you one more chance to present this evidence so I can respond to it. If you continue to use logical fallacies in your replies then I will continue to ban you.
You should get you a history book
See:-
Why Did the Democratic and Republican Parties Switch Platforms?
So, sometime between the 1860s and 1936, the (Democratic) party of small government became the party of big government, and the (Republican) party of big government became rhetorically committed to curbing federal power. How did this switch happen?
https://www.livescience.com/
You are being banned for the exact same fallacies of omission and selection as your extremist brethren, Bronto. Mining for only the facts you wish to acknowledge while ignoring all the others which prove your narrative false is the behaviour of a Nazi. I'm not exaggerating. This is literally how the Nazis obtained power in Germany.
He claimed to have voted for Obama
Whether he voted for Obama or not is conjecture.
prior to Donald Trump
Yes, this is true. He is now a neo-Nazi, a white nationalist, a Donald Trump supporter and the organiser of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville.
You also didn't address him being objectively a part of Occupy Wallstreet.
You didn't offer any evidence or proof that he was objectively a part of Occupy Wall Street. I don't have to address unsupported claims made by confirmed liars.
Attacking millions of minorities again
Banned for the repeated use of logical fallacy.
Carlin wasn't a Democrat or a liberal.
Banned for the repeated use of logical fallacy.
You reference the 1988 study
Again:-
Irrelevant conclusion,[1] also known as ignoratio elenchi (Latin for an ignoring of a refutation) or missing the point, is the informal fallacy of presenting an argument that may or may not be logically valid and sound, but (whose conclusion) fails to address the issue in question. It falls into the broad class of relevance fallacies.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Banned for the repeated use of logical fallacy.
Conjecture
It is also "conjecture" that he voted for Obama simply because he said so. See:-
Double Standard.
Description: Judging two situations by different standards when, in fact, you should be using the same standard. This is used in argumentation to unfairly support or reject an argument.
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/
Banned for repeated use of logical fallacy.
So he ran as a Democrat.
He ran as a Democrat thirty years ago, BEFORE he became a Republican and a grand wizard in the KKK.
Banned for repeated use of logical fallacy.
That destroys the logic of your use of a study from 1988 on the media.
Irrelevant conclusion,[1] also known as ignoratio elenchi (Latin for an ignoring of a refutation) or missing the point, is the informal fallacy of presenting an argument that may or may not be logically valid and sound, but (whose conclusion) fails to address the issue in question. It falls into the broad class of relevance fallacies.[2]
Jason Kessler himself says
Jason Kesler is a LIAR. He LIES constantly, and was charged with PERJURY, which is the crime of LYING under oath.
Are there any more pathological LIARS you would like to use as news sources, other than Hitler and Jason Kessler?
David Duke ran for President as a Democrat
THIRTY YEARS AGO you fact-mining nincompoop. Since that time he ran for President as a Republican, began denying the Holocaust and became a grand wizard in the KKK.
Read it you Nazi halfwit:-
Selection bias is the bias introduced by the selection of individuals, groups or data for analysis in such a way that proper randomization is not achieved, thereby ensuring that the sample obtained is not representative of the population intended to be analyzed.[1]
This may be the stupidest argument I have ever seen.
This from the far right neo-Nazi who doesn't understand the difference between "non-whites" and "Latinos".
Ahahahahaha!
You calling anybody else stupid is a hoot, Bronto. Within the last twenty minutes you have claimed Jason Kessler is a liberal, David Duke is a liberal, and illustrated that you cannot add up simple percentages.
54% of them being Hispanic doesn't mean the other 46% are all white.
Stop changing your story and learn to read your own sources, Nazi. Your initial claim was that the majority of Border Guards are non-whites.
From your own source:-
The expanded border agency is now 54 percent minority. Hispanics like Caballero comprise 52 percent of the agents.
I looked through apprehension pictures. Most apprehenders looked brown.
Hi Bronto. That's because you are looking through the eyes of a lying Nazi shitdog who hates people of colour and wants to "exterminate them".
Good comeback. Did a 4 year old come up with that for you?
Stfu you horrible little Nazi prick. I've literally been here for twenty minutes and already today you have claimed that both Jason Kessler and David Duke are liberals. You are a lying extremist piece of shit and that's the reality of the matter.
