It took Obama 22 months to get first legislative bill passed & idiots complain about Trump
Feburary 2009 is not 22 months https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American RecoveryandReinvestmentActof2009 March 2009 is not 22 months. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OmnibusAppropriationsAct,_2009 February 2009 is not 22 months https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/ January 2009 is not 22 months https://mobile.nytimes. 1
point
Your examples are not legislation; as they were not laws passed by congress and signed into law by the presidents They are "executive orders". My examples are most assuredly acts of congress, passed by the legislature and then signed into law by Barack Obama. These are all acts of congress so are by definition examples of legislation: each of which are significantly large than anything signed by trump. But, by all means explain to me why you don't consider a large infrastructure bill that was passed as an act of congress isn't "legislation". September 2009 is not 22 months http://www.politico.com/story/2009/10/ 1
point
The sources you are using are lying to you. Every one of the links I provided (news articles, and Wikipedia) show examples of obamas legislative passages. These are all laws. Im sorry you've been caught with your pants down, but saying that Obama took 22 months to get his first legislative bill passed is a lie. Any basic google search tells you that it is false. Any Wikipedia google of legislation passed by Obama tells you it's false. Any news search about Obamas first year tells you it's false. How you can defend it, is beyond me: especially as you're argument of choice is shouting at people for being dishonest. Your two responses so far have to been to argue that "acts of congress" and "laws passed by congress" do not count as legislation: which is the most absurd claim I've ever heard. I doubt even you believe it. Now, despite evidence that you're claims are wrong, and despite you posting the claim; I can't challenge it? And instead of calling you out for posting this rubbish, I have to challenge some unnamed unsourced "news site" that you won't reveal, and that lied to you? What you're doing is nothing short of denial of reality. It's okay, you made a mistake and quoted propaganda; and didn't check it. Everyone will have more respect for you if you admit it and we can move on: trying to defend something that is so obviously wrong makes you look like a liar or an idiot. |