The Left hates cigarettes & call them cancer sticks, while trying to legalize hard drugs.
So what are you more pissed at? The fact that cigarettes cause cancer and there's been a movement to reduce the amount of smokers out there? Or that they are trying to legalize marijuana, which does have proven medical benefits, and you are mistaking that as a hard drug again? 1
point
I'm most angered by deceptive people such as yourself. Just for the record, in California where Pot is legal for any reason, a spokesmen involved with the laws of marijuana just estimated that approx. 90% of the pot use is for recreational use, and only 10% are for medical reasons. But as always, you used pure deception to try and infer that pot legalization is all about medical benefits. Most Americans were fine with medical uses if they truly work, just as most Americans are ok with extreme case abortions. But what does the Left constantly do? They use these rare cases to justify making it legal for the vast majority of people using the drug for pleasure and the vast majority of abortions for convenience.
I'm fine with shaming smoking because I know shaming irresponsible choices works. Democrats could not care less about the lives of smokers. They wanted the tax revenue and they are getting it big time. Did you know that in NYC, a pack of cigarettes might cost $13? "De Blasio announced a package of proposed bills that would, among other things, raise the base price of a pack of cigarettes from $10.50 to $13, making New York home to the costliest cigarettes in the country." Same with marijuana, there will be huge tax revenues. I was not speaking to marijuana, but as always, you could not address the actual point of the debate and chose to change the subject. If you want to continue on in this debate, try addressing the point of the debate. 1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
|