CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Scarecrow13

Reward Points:41
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
97%
Arguments:37
Debates:1
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
0 points

Yes, why not? The only time the Bible speaks negatively of nudity is when there is some other negative associated with it. As for Adam and Eve, it was their shame that was the problem. They tried to cover themselves and hide from God. Once the environment became harsh, clothes were now required, also the clothes God made could be seen as the first example of animal sacrifice.

Scarecrow13(41) Clarified
1 point

Why should we not be naked? That Is an assertion, not an argument.

1 point

Protection from the elements is a legitimate reason for clothing. However, our society is so prudish, they require it for perceived modesty and that causes problems with people being uncomfortable in their own bodies.

Scarecrow13(41) Clarified
1 point

I think there is a good point. There is an aspect of consent involved. If there is a voyeur watching people, they are wrong.

1 point

The human body is completely natural. It is a shame we fear nudity so much when there is nothing wrong with it. Yet we are fine with letting kids watch violence on TV which is much more damaging.

1 point

Sure. People will bring up that God clothed Adam and Eve. However, he did this to protect them from the elements after they had already attempted to cover themselves up due to shame. So the real sin was not nudity,but shame. There is also the modesty argument,but when the BIble talks about modesty, it is talking about not dressing overly fancy.

1 point

People often think nudity is inherently sexual, but it isn't. If You Have ever been in a nudist environment you will quickly see how quickly it becomes no big deal. We have such a fear of nudity that is crazy and makes us scared and uncomfortable of our own bodies.

1 point

Absolutely. Not on every topping perhaps, but it works well on pizza most of the time.

1 point

The argument was that it was acceptable because it ended the war quickly. It wasn't as simple as that tough. Japan had several factions, some of which were willing to negotiate surrender. They wanted a condition, that they keep their emperor. The US said no, we wanted no conditions, but after the bomb we let them keep their Emperor anyway. EIsenhower and MacArthur as well as other military leaders opposed its use but Truman didn't consult them about it. The biggest issue is we deliberately dropped them on cities we knew had lots of civilians in them. That would be a war crime if our enemies did it.

1 point

When a fat person goes skinny dipping it is called CHunky Dunking.

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Independent
Country: United States
Religion: Protestant
Education: Masters

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here