CreateDebate


Scarecrow13's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Scarecrow13's arguments, looking across every debate.
0 points

Yes, why not? The only time the Bible speaks negatively of nudity is when there is some other negative associated with it. As for Adam and Eve, it was their shame that was the problem. They tried to cover themselves and hide from God. Once the environment became harsh, clothes were now required, also the clothes God made could be seen as the first example of animal sacrifice.

Scarecrow13(41) Clarified
1 point

Why should we not be naked? That Is an assertion, not an argument.

1 point

Protection from the elements is a legitimate reason for clothing. However, our society is so prudish, they require it for perceived modesty and that causes problems with people being uncomfortable in their own bodies.

Scarecrow13(41) Clarified
1 point

I think there is a good point. There is an aspect of consent involved. If there is a voyeur watching people, they are wrong.

1 point

The human body is completely natural. It is a shame we fear nudity so much when there is nothing wrong with it. Yet we are fine with letting kids watch violence on TV which is much more damaging.

1 point

Sure. People will bring up that God clothed Adam and Eve. However, he did this to protect them from the elements after they had already attempted to cover themselves up due to shame. So the real sin was not nudity,but shame. There is also the modesty argument,but when the BIble talks about modesty, it is talking about not dressing overly fancy.

1 point

People often think nudity is inherently sexual, but it isn't. If You Have ever been in a nudist environment you will quickly see how quickly it becomes no big deal. We have such a fear of nudity that is crazy and makes us scared and uncomfortable of our own bodies.

1 point

Absolutely. Not on every topping perhaps, but it works well on pizza most of the time.

1 point

The argument was that it was acceptable because it ended the war quickly. It wasn't as simple as that tough. Japan had several factions, some of which were willing to negotiate surrender. They wanted a condition, that they keep their emperor. The US said no, we wanted no conditions, but after the bomb we let them keep their Emperor anyway. EIsenhower and MacArthur as well as other military leaders opposed its use but Truman didn't consult them about it. The biggest issue is we deliberately dropped them on cities we knew had lots of civilians in them. That would be a war crime if our enemies did it.

1 point

When a fat person goes skinny dipping it is called CHunky Dunking.

1 point

I have seen that quote and it is pretty stupid. Ideologies can motivate people yes, that includes religion but also political ideologies as well. The fact is people naturally have evil tendencies, if they didn't they wouldn't be inclined to do evil. If you don't think people are naturally evil spend some time witha group of young children..Unless they have had really good discipline early on, they will know nothing but selfishness.

1 point

Breastfeeding is a natural process and the healthiest way for the baby to eat. If they have to eat they have to eat. If you are offended by that then it is you that has the problem.

1 point

The Bible doesn't say anything one way or the other. Some might while others might not. Perhaps they all do, but there is nothing in the Bible that states it.

1 point

This does depend but I will say in general yes. WHile many will claim they merely lack a belief, when pressed it becomes obvious they are making the positive claim that they believe a God does not exist. Which is a belief statement. If they were truly agnostic they would simply say 'I don't know".

1 point

I am all for it. It would probably be much better than a world where people are forced to wear clothes in public.

The only problem is if it ends up like this, which is pretty much how we treat nudists now.

https://vimeo.com/52739155

1 point

I have been to nude beach, nude resort, nude bike ride, and nude comedy shows.

1 point

Sure why not? Many cultures do it and don't have problems. The reason why people freak out over female breasts is that they are only used to seeing them covered. Normalizing it makes it no big deal.

1 point

If you are getting sexual pleasure out of something other than your spouse, which is what porn is for, then yes it is adultery.

1 point

It is your house you should be able to do what you want. If someone is peeking in your windows and is offended, that is their problem.

1 point

Sure why not. However they should avoid sxually explicit parties, simple nudity however need not be.

1 point

Most people go there for sexual pleasure so yes it does count.

1 point

I think we would be more accepting of other people and there would be less people desperate to see a naked person as they would be all around. They would also see that not everyone looks like supermodels.

1 point

"Everyone imagines going to a nude beach expecting to see people that look like movie stars and playboy bunnies. " That was never my expectation. I wanted to be free and hang out with other people of all body types that felt the same way.

1 point

WHere are you getting this idea they weren't naked at all? it doesn't say that anywhere in the Bible, quite the contrary. Genesis 2:25 clearly states they were. In fact everything you say comes from somewhere other than the Bible. It is really necessary since I can not find anything you are claiming anywhere in the Bible. So cite chapter and verse.


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]