“Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?” Douglas Adams..... I think this is enough.......!!
And I Dont think god can exist. And even if he existed, he might have commited suicide by now after living in those clouds for so long..!!!
Your question is wrong. everything except atheists bully theists. theists are living under the grace of priests hidden behind mask of gods. they live as almost slaves which you think is a boon, a blessing, a gift from god. So stop protecting your god, i think god does that according to you, but if you see properly, you are protecting god along with priests. because if god is lost, they lose their slaves........!!
I dont think atheists ever lose to theists...... I mean those who became atheists themselves, not those who are due to other people's influence. Its just sometimes they get irritated how to change the minds of these stupid, foolish theists who are just like sheep, following their foolish ancestors who taught them to be theists...........
First of all, there is no god. so universe would not be different. and about society, it would be far more better because the religious god made by priests has made life on earth real hell.......... so i wish even this imaginary god perishes fast.....!!
About women, it was gautam buddhas idea. he never had a women disciple. and he never let any women come near his ashram. i had also heard a story of him which was telling tht he warned his disciples to stay away from women when they set off to spread of buddhas philosophy. and also im against celibacy. i think its totally against nature.
I know roughly about taoism but not about their philosophy. but i know buddhism, there are many points i dont agree with, like they believe in reincarnation. they consider women a disturbance in the path of enlightenment, etc........ i have still not found an perfect religion. and i dont think buddhism can be called a religion, it is simply an idea, a philosophy...
Wrong question, absolutely wrong thinking. Love is not dependent upon beauty or ugliness. and what are these things?? these are just comparisons.... and all great philosophers like buddha, osho, sekito, mahavir said, "comparison is illusion".. If you remove all the so called beautiful people from earth, you are not ugly then. this means beauty is beauty only when there is uglyness.... it is not independent.. then what is this beauty when it needs support of ugliness?? world runs not on adjectives but verbs... Nature is an artist, it has made everything different. if you pick a stone and go around the whole world, you will never find an exactly similar stone. just remember you are unique in the whole world. so dont try to be someone else because you will lose your uniqueness... people are stupid who classify beauty or ugly when they cannot be classifies, seperated...!! and if there is beauty somewhere, it is inside a person, which cannot be seen but felt.......!!!
After life, i think that as we have been made by nature we will also get lost somewhere in the nature. everything will be dispersed, not destroyed. There can be no heaven or hell, these are just made so that there is no fear of death. all that you have is with you now. so after death, there will be nothing left...... so enjoy life which is in our hands, stop worrying about the next one which i dont believe is there..........!!
Im not against god, i am against religion itself. so it makes me more than an atheist. and i have not said atheism is cooler anywhere...... I said being yourself, free from religion and god is cooler.....!!
P.S. - can you tell me the name of this religion you mentioned. i really curious and want to know because i havent heard of it yet....thanks in advance.....!!
I think perfection is simply not being yourself. you mould yourself into the form of perfection but i think this changer your
"you-ness". you try to be someone else, try to lose yourself. so instead of trying to be perfect, being yourself is more difficult. and it is very difficult to find such a person.....
China is not in a state of becoming a superpower. it has a lot of problems to deal with. besides, a superpower can emerge only with unity.... which is i think more in United States of America.....!! And i dont think there is a lot of difference in technology in both countries.... And the thing china has along with it is man power is great alliance.... so all countrys in asia (India, and mainly russia) support china. but asia lacks unity... so america all the way.......
No, you cant blame an entire family for the wrong doing of a person. it depends on the influence. If a person is under a bad influence, it is his mistake entirely i think. he has to know himself what good is and what bad. this is the only quality which can be called human quality. should everything be told to that person - don't do this, do that, this is good, this is bad. there is a saying, you are the sculptor of your life.. Very much true.......!!
christianity is the most successful ""business"" because of the extremely cunning priests. so many lies in the bible are made truth so cunningly by priests and people get fooled also very easily. example they said existence of earth 6000 years ago but when skeleton of peking man in china, fossils of sea animals and remains of mohenjadaro haddapa civilisation were found which were of earlier than 6000 years, priests said god created these things just to chech mans faith in god...!! So rubbish answer and people still believe it........!!!
christianity is the most successful ""business"" because of the extremely cunning priests. so many lies in the bible are made truth so cunningly by priests and people get fooled also very easily. example they said existence of earth 6000 years ago but when skeleton of peking man in china, fossils of sea animals and remains of mohenjadaro haddapa civilisation were found which were of earlier than 6000 years, priests said god created these things just to chech mans faith in god...!! So rubbish answer and people still believe it........!!!
being yourself is much cooler. if you are believing some god, you dont remain yourself. you try to be the man who god loves. you try to be a model of perfection thats all. just to attain an imaginary heaven. I say instead of thinking about the heaven after death which is not known, try to create heaven on earth itself because this life is in your hands. so coming to the point, being yourself, knowing yourself and living yourself is much much much cooler that living about in god fantasy.........
First of all there is no god. so this question dosent arise. but to answer you, the religious god created by priests, unfortunately, is not all loving. if there was an all-loving god, he would not have made restrictions or laws. he would have said, enjoy the life i gave you and be happy. this imaginary real god is really all-loving. but the manmade fictious god is non all-loving. And this fictious god is against godliness. If god never wanted us to be angry, selfish, greedy he wouldnt have given us these qualities, as simple as that. but the priest god goes against this godliness....... So cant say about biblical god, but the innermost god, our godliness is really all-loving......!!!!
All theisms are made to just fool people. N=but between monotheism and polytheism I would choose polytheism because it gives people in choice. Now in india, there are 33000 or more gods. so anyone can worship anyone. angry person can worship angry god like shiva and compassionate can worship krishna, brahma, vishnu, etc. Monotheism dosen't give choice. monotheism is easy to bind people....!! But both are rubbish, no doubt about that.....!!!
I never said monkeys. I think maybe from some animal with close resemble to us and with a tail. because we wont have that tail bone otherwise. And do you think that this whole earth is created in a single day?? all these species were created by a man up there in the clouds??? Come on, be logical...!!
Yes, its evolution. And the ones who say that it is creation just want to support their religion eg - CHRISTIANITY. Read charles darwins theory, it proves almost all. and even charles darwin was hated all over the world because he shook the basic foundation of all the religions........
Yes. I will give you best evidence ( which i have read). Even the name "christ (KRISt)" was derived from "Krishna" from hinduism. Krishna was the most famous and well-known personality all over world. He is also depicted in many greek sculptures and writings.
If you believe that there is god but you don't worship him, that means you are not a beggar. because worshipping is nothing but begging. give me this, give me that, give happiness, etc. And also you believe there is god. I think you should read a bit buddhism and osho! you can replace this god with many words - existence, godliness, meditation, etc. God is a fiction and these all are truths.... If this is about you, I liked your view....!!!
I think it is totally the choice of the parents whether to have their child or not, it is absolutely their decision. If they don't want their child, why should they have it if it. it will also not be good for the growth of child. besides, what about population. I think even orphanages are overpopulated now. So abortion is necessary... Let the parents think about their child, no law should be made against abortion........
It is not possible to have a create. Creation means to make, invent. Topic over. But earth is not created, is is a result of evolution and it is still evolving. So the idea of creation is wrong and so.... there should be no creator. So there is no god.
Of course it should be allowed..........!! No one has the right to restrict the pleasure of sex. Our life, our decision....!! If you look, in no other living creature there is restriction on sex.... they do it when they want. even we should have no restriction. but there is one problem, all animals have sex during their season. during the other times, they never think of sex but enjoy their life. but humans think of sex every now and then and hence forget to enjoy other pleasures of life......... !!
I would love to explain this. This question arose 2 years ago before me.
According to Christians God created
the world only six thousand years ago. It is absolute nonsense, because in India we have found
cities of great culture and civilization -- Mohenjo Daro and Harappa, which Christian explorers, Christian scientists were excavating. They could not believe it -- God destroyed those cities
seven thousand years ago... before God created the world! And in Peking, China, the skeleton of
a man has been found called the Peking Man, which is eighty thousand years old.
Certainly the world is far more ancient than your God. Perhaps man created God six thousand
years ago -- that may be right. But idiots are idiots....
One great scholarly bishop was very much puzzled about the Peking Man, about Harappa and
Mohenjo Daro, and about the claim of a man who lived in Poona, a famous scholar, Lokmanya
Tilak, that the Hindu Vedas are ninety thousand years old.
And his evidence is such that it cannot be contradicted. His evidence is not logical but scientific,
astronomical.
In the Rigveda, a certain constellation of stars is described in absolute detail; this happened,
according to scientists, ninety thousand years ago. Unless Rigveda was written by people who
had seen that constellation they could not have described it in detail, and since then that
constellation has not happened again. Perhaps sometime in the future it may happen, but for
ninety thousand years it has not happened. The description is a solid proof that Rigveda was
written by people who had seen the constellation; without seeing that constellation there is no
way for them to have described which star was in which position. And they have described it so
scientifically that there is no possibility of making any improvement on it.
On the Himalayas, on top of the highest peaks of the Himalayas, sea animals' skeletons have
been found. That simply means that at a certain time -- perhaps a hundred million years before -
- there was an ocean in place of the Himalayas. Otherwise, sea animals cannot move from the
ocean, pass through the whole of India and go on top of the Himalayas to die there.
The only possibility is -- and this is now a scientific fact -- the Himalayas arose out of the ocean.
And as they arose out of the ocean, many animal fossils must have remained on these tops. The
Himalayas went on being forced up and these fossils were covered in snow. And as this vast
range of mountains called the Himalayas rose, the ocean receded.
The Hind Mahasagar, the great Indian Ocean, used to be where the Himalayas are -- one
hundred million years ago. Those animals prove it, because they are one hundred million years
old. There are ways to judge how old a skeleton is, and now those methods are absolutely
accurate.
The bishop was mad, because it was all going against the Bible. So he invented a theory -- this is
why I say a fanatic will not see the truth; he will try to continue his belief in a lie, will make all
kinds of excuses. This excuse is certainly worth understanding. The bishop invented a theory
that God created the world six thousand years ago as it is told in the Bible, but, as he is allpowerful, he created sea animals and put them on top of the Himalayas. And he created them so that they would appear one hundred million years old. He created the Harappa and Mohenjo
Daro ruins making them appear seven thousand years old; the Peking Man as if it is eighty
thousand yeas old... just to test the Christians' faith! What a great logic!
God seems to be a con man: "It is just a question of your faith."
But the fact is, this earth is four thousand million years old according to science. e. And man is at
least one million years old..!!
1. Is sin is considered sin outside marriage then for surely this is a by-product of marriage. Marriage as caused this because it must not have been a sin before marriage system. And i say marriage system was created to bind females, to make them a possession.
2. I will skip the children point because i was giving an example that before and you didnt understand what i meant to say.
3. I am saying nothing in 100% guarantee. I know world is changing. I am talking about about majority of people. Concerning politics, my idea is that half should be of female. If nature has given you 50% rights, then why not in society. I say, everything should have two chiefs, male and female. and males should male and females female. I think many problems will be solved. It is wrong that men decide whats good for women.
4. As I said, I am not talking about a particular religion or country. I still, i dont think it has completely changed in america.
5. I dont say there are mistake in marriage system. I say marriage system itself is a mistake. It brings many rules and laws and sadness. even the sad things in marriage as considered a part of love because this has been going on for generations. To me, love is natural. What is unnatural is binding people in the name of religion, in the name of God, for their whole life. In a better, more intelligent world, people will love, but will not make any contracts. It is not a business! They will understand each other, and they will understand the changing flux of life. They will be true to each other. The moment the man feels that now his
beloved holds no joy for him, he will say that the time has come to part. There is no need for marriage, there is no need for divorce. Then friendship will be possible.
6. I say, marriage is a shackle. You say, in some parts it is of gold, of silver. nut i say it is a shackle. Built to enslave females. and things may be changed in america to some extent not because men have changed or thinking has changed. It is because females have become independent.
7. again saying earlier point, things you say that are emerged from cultures are just byproducts of marriage. The world wide problems have been arisen due to marriage. Even prostitution is a byproduct of marriage.
8. Women are doing two things now, trying to be dependent. which is the best way to erase the domination in one way. and other is, they are trying to imitate males. This is not going to help i think. Losing your feminism just to prove your strong is wrong.
9. So hard to get accurate articles on witch-hunt and you said im full of shit. Ok, i will not continue this but christianity has tried to cover up this topic so that they dont lose people in the same way they tried to cover the truth of existence of earth. Christianity surely has lot of intelligent priests and foolish people who get fooled so easily...!!
The first thing to be clear about is that it was Christianity who condemned the word
`witch'; otherwise, it was one of the most respected words, as respected as `mystic' -- a
wise man. It simply meant a wise woman, the parallel to a wise man.
But in the Middle Ages, Christianity came to face a danger. There were thousands of
women who were far wiser than the bishops and the cardinals and the pope. They knew
the art of transforming people's lives.
Their whole philosophy was based on love and transformation of sexual energy -- and a
woman can do that more easily than a man. After all, she is a mother and she is always a
mother. Even a small baby girl has the quality of motherliness.
The quality of motherliness is not something connected with age, it is part of
womanhood. And the transformation needs a very loving atmosphere, a very motherly
transfer of energies. To Christianity, it was a competitor. Christianity has nothing to offer
in comparison to it -- but Christianity was in power.
It was a man's world up to then; and they decided to destroy all witches. But how to
destroy them? It was not a question of killing one woman but thousands of women. So a
special court was created for enquiry, to find out who was a witch.
Any woman said by Christians to have had an influence on people and who people
respected was caught and tortured -- so much so, that she had to confess. They wouldn't
stop torturing her until she confessed that she was a witch. And according to the Christian mind, to Christian theology, the meaning of witch was changed: a witch is one who is
having a sexual relationship with the devil.
You don't hear any more of any devil having a relationship with any woman. Either the
devil has become a Christian monk, a celibate, or... what has happened to the devil? Who
was it that was having sexual relationships with thousands of women? And these women
were mostly old women. It doesn't seem to be rational. When young and beautiful women
were available, why should the devil go to the old, the very old women?
But to become a witch, it was a long training, a long discipline, a long experience. So by
the time a woman was a witch -- a wise woman -- she was old; she had sacrificed
everything to attain that wisdom, that alchemy.
They forced these poor old women into saying that they were having sexual intercourse
with the devil. Many of them tried hard... but the torture was too much.
They tortured these women in many ugly ways, just for one thing: they should confess.
The women continued to try to say that they had nothing to do with the devil, that there
was nothing to confess. But nobody listened to them; they went on torturing them.
You can make anybody confess anything if you go on torturing him. A point comes when
he feels it is better to confess rather than to unnecessarily suffer the same torture every
day. And it would have continued for his whole life. Once a woman confessed that she
was a witch and was having a sexual relationship with the devil, her torture was stopped
and then she was presented before a court -- a special court made by the pope -- and
before the court she was to now confess. And once she confessed before the court, the
court was able to punish her -- because it is the greatest crime in the eyes of Christianity.
In fact, even if the woman was having a sexual relationship with the devil, it is none of
the business of anybody else -- and it is not a crime, because she is not harming anybody.
And the devil has never complained to any police station, "That woman is dangerous."
On what authority was Christianity burning these women?
The only punishment was to be burned alive so that no other woman dared to be a witch
again. They destroyed thousands of women and completely removed a very significant
part of humanity. And the wisdom that those women contained -- their books, their
methods, their techniques of transforming man, transforming man's energy....Don't think that witch is a bad word. It is more respectable than `pope' -- because I don't
think a pope is a man who can be called wise; they are just parrots and nothing else. It is
possible that it may be connected with your past life, and the wound has been so deep that
still some remembrance in your unconscious goes on reminding you. And that creates the
hate for men, because what was done to you was done by men.
So it is a simple association, but that association has to be dropped. It was not done by
men, it was done by Christians. And the Christians have done so many crimes, and they go on doing them. It is unbelievable. And they go on talking about truth,talking about
god...speaking lies..And these are religious people trying in every way to deceive the
world, to deceive the human mind, to pollute with ugly lies.
So don't be against men as such; just being against christian astrocities is enough...
For two thousand years Christianity has been killing people in the name of religion, in the
name of God, in the name of Christ, in the name of the nation -- so it is perfectly right to
condemn them. But not every man is a Christian. To be a Christian is a degradation; it is
becoming subhuman.
But it will be good to go through a hypnotic process to find out more clearly. Perhaps you
may remember what were the techniques of the witches -- how they functioned, how they
managed to change people -- because unless they were a danger to Christianity,
Christianity would not have killed them.
It was a real danger, because Christianity has nothing to offer in comparison....!!
Atleast you are aware of one thing I told which was important.
"" The practice of marriage has been.....well......practiced.. since before the Christian or Abrahamic religions, it simply wasn't called marriage, marriage is a fairly “new” term."" - please tell me what you know about this. I didnt understand what you wanted to say. I dont say sex is a sin in marriage system, i say sex is a sin especially in marriage system..
I didnt say children improve relationship, I said they give happiness. however bad the relation may be, it always makes the woman happy. cant say the same about men.
""The rule of thumb phrase used to be a sexist usage, but the usage has slowly changed and now no where near meant in a sexist way."" Ok, I agree it has been changed in some parts of world but so many years have gone and a very little change! what about the rest of the world where it is still going on??And how many more years will it take to change completely. Should it change according to men or are women going to ask for their right??
""I'd love to hear your evidence. How do you know how my family and my marriage with my spouse operates?"" - this is everywhere, maybe also in your (dont take personally). Male dominate in every marriage system with maybe love or anger. But they dominate, not women.
""Yet I feel as if your mind is already closed to a marriage unlike what you describe."" What did you mean exactly??
I stated that because If we both insist on what we are saying, it is more likely an argument.
In every religion, female is possession. I think sufis can be an exception. So many problems are created by marriage system and you say saying this is absurd. It is only in some religions. Come on, dont be so over-protective of this system. This system is unfair, especially to women.
""vulnerability of pregnancy led to the enslavement of women."" this is absolutely correct, no doubt. And this is applicable to those females who are really feminine. Now females are just trying to imitate men and hence they are losing their compassion, love and delicateness. And these things are not at all bad. As I told earlier, men and women cannot be compared. two unique things can not be compared.
I said "you" in general.
And I know completely about witch-hunt. I have read all possible. The first thing to be clear about is that it was Christianity who condemned the word
`witch'; otherwise, it was one of the most respected words, as respected as `mystic' -- a
wise man. It simply meant a wise woman, the parallel to a wise man.
But in the Middle Ages, Christianity came to face a danger. There were thousands of
women who were far wiser than the bishops and the cardinals and the pope. They knew
the art of transforming people's lives.
Their whole philosophy was based on love and transformation of sexual energy -- and a
woman can do that more easily than a man. After all, she is a mother and she is always a
mother. Even a small baby girl has the quality of motherliness.
The quality of motherliness is not something connected with age, it is part of
womanhood. And the transformation needs a very loving atmosphere, a very motherly
transfer of energies. To Christianity, it was a competitor. Christianity has nothing to offer
in comparison to it -- but Christianity was in power.
It was a man's world up to then; and they decided to destroy all witches. But how to
destroy them? It was not a question of killing one woman but thousands of women. So a
special court was created for enquiry, to find out who was a witch.
Any woman said by Christians to have had an influence on people and who people
respected was caught and tortured -- so much so, that she had to confess. They wouldn't
stop torturing her until she confessed that she was a witch. And according to the Christian mind, to Christian theology, the meaning of witch was changed: a witch is one who is
having a sexual relationship with the devil.
You don't hear any more of any devil having a relationship with any woman. Either the
devil has become a Christian monk, a celibate, or... what has happened to the devil? Who
was it that was having sexual relationships with thousands of women? And these women
were mostly old women. It doesn't seem to be rational. When young and beautiful women
were available, why should the devil go to the old, the very old women?
But to become a witch, it was a long training, a long discipline, a long experience. So by
the time a woman was a witch -- a wise woman -- she was old; she had sacrificed
everything to attain that wisdom, that alchemy.
They forced these poor old women into saying that they were having sexual intercourse
with the devil. Many of them tried hard... but the torture was too much.
They tortured these women in many ugly ways, just for one thing: they should confess.
The women continued to try to say that they had nothing to do with the devil, that there
was nothing to confess. But nobody listened to them; they went on torturing them.
You can make anybody confess anything if you go on torturing him. A point comes when
he feels it is better to confess rather than to unnecessarily suffer the same torture every
day. And it would have continued for his whole life. Once a woman confessed that she
was a witch and was having a sexual relationship with the devil, her torture was stopped
and then she was presented before a court -- a special court made by the pope -- and
before the court she was to now confess. And once she confessed before the court, the
court was able to punish her -- because it is the greatest crime in the eyes of Christianity.
In fact, even if the woman was having a sexual relationship with the devil, it is none of
the business of anybody else -- and it is not a crime, because she is not harming anybody.
And the devil has never complained to any police station, "That woman is dangerous."
On what authority was Christianity burning these women?
The only punishment was to be burned alive so that no other woman dared to be a witch
again. They destroyed thousands of women and completely removed a very significant
part of humanity. And the wisdom that those women contained -- their books, their
methods, their techniques of transforming man, transforming man's energy....Don't think that witch is a bad word. It is more respectable than `pope' -- because I don't
think a pope is a man who can be called wise; they are just parrots and nothing else. It is
possible that it may be connected with your past life, and the wound has been so deep that
still some remembrance in your unconscious goes on reminding you. And that creates the
hate for men, because what was done to you was done by men.
So it is a simple association, but that association has to be dropped. It was not done by
men, it was done by Christians. And the Christians have done so many crimes, and they go on doing them. It is unbelievable. And they go on talking about truth,talking about
god...speaking lies..And these are religious people trying in every way to deceive the
world, to deceive the human mind, to pollute with ugly lies.
So don't be against men as such; just being against christian astrocities is enough...
For two thousand years Christianity has been killing people in the name of religion, in the
name of God, in the name of Christ, in the name of the nation -- so it is perfectly right to
condemn them. But not every man is a Christian. To be a Christian is a degradation; it is
becoming subhuman.
But it will be good to go through a hypnotic process to find out more clearly. Perhaps you
may remember what were the techniques of the witches -- how they functioned, how they
managed to change people -- because unless they were a danger to Christianity,
Christianity would not have killed them.
It was a real danger, because Christianity has nothing to offer in comparison....!!
Very Beautiful Question...!!
Firstly know the meaning of faith. It is - Complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
To have faith in god is to have faith in those people under whose influence you are believing in god. But even those people have been told about god. A small child never thinks there is a man who is the creator of everything. So, god is a man made concept.
Not to have faith in god means not denying god but yourself trying to solve the mystery of god. I solved it and found it was not a mystery. It was a conspiracy. The god conspiracy. So not having faith is going against over half the world and having faith in yourself. So, For sure, It take more not believe in god because that means you have more faith in yourself, Which is a very great thing....!!!
Instead of saying bad parents, say bad influence. Because the world goes on due to influence. Everything is done in the mere idea of comparison and small children imitation. So, awareness should be created among small children. They should not only be told good things 'but also which is bad'...!!
Don't know the exact time, but surely not created by Mr.God....... because create means made - topic over. A thing created doesn't change. But as everything evolves according to theory of evolution. It is not made, it is evolution....!! And I answered because you said "a god" indicating an ordinary term....
If it was "dominated", surely there would be no difference. Just the places of male female would interchange. But females have love and compassion their weapons as men have power. So world would have been loving and caring. It would discuss problems on love rather than war. And surely, population would be low. But I don't think they would "Dominate", because domination requires power. Women would have controlled and that too very efficiently.... But it would surely have been better compared to today's world....!!
It is really a pleasure replying you. Hence, i'm am not disputing but clarifying. I saw your profile and it said two things - "married and female" That is why we will talk out till the end. 6 statements and you say all are wrong and you explained and I liked it. So i will elaborate them because you didn't get what i intended to say. You cant understand the film by its name - i think this happened in this case.
1. Marriage system is a conspiracy not just in case of christians but in every religion. It was created to bond "Woman". Women were (and even now) considered a property, a possession in every religion. try to understand, this is important. I am explaining because even you are a woman. Adam and eve, I hated this concept when i was 14. I don't understand how people believe it. And your statement that " the practice and concept of marriage far exceeds the life of the Christian religion". please can you explain. I didn't understand what you wanted to say!
2. Marriage has made those happy who only look for happiness. If you search garbage, you will surely find something good. Eg- if you are not happy with your husband you will hate marriage but if the same man gives you child, you will be happy and you should also be. Marriage has put women on the inferior side, the are just used to fulfill mans desire and fore reproduction. Ask yourself, who is the head of family- your husband. And why, because he is male. marriage is of male dominance. Many say, men and women are not equal because science says, man is strong. And this is right, man is strong but that doesn't make you men superior. In this sense even donkeys are superior to us. Man and women are unique, the cannot be compared. Some aspects which gives happiness are not due to marriage - love, having children, these things make happy even without marriage. If A man loves you, he loves you. There is not a compulsion that this is a result of marriage. Are you understanding. Please understand with open mind and then think. If you continue saying you are right then we are arguing and we are debating. I will explain this in brief if you want to listen, i.e if u find something right, you can tell me. I will skip to next point.
3. As I told, marriage system (or religion or man) has made women a possession. He has used women just to fulfill his desire. A man can have sex as many times he want but a women should remain a virgin till she gets married. Why is this difference. Don't you find this unfair? All this is the marriage conspiracy. Women have been enslaved very lovingly and kindly and this is easy. Because women is very loving and compassionate. She has motherliness which only she can have. And you have been tricked, you think this is love but this is truly a punishment. Do you know what happened to the witches? The christians burnt them. Thousands of women were burnt alive by christians because they were beating christianity. I don't think you would know about it. If you don't, I'll tell the whole story if you want to know..... I'll explain the rest points latter. Waiting for your reply.
I went to thank god many times but I found him no where. I searched him a lot and finally found him in the dictionary of my brain. It was a synonym for "Fiction". I will give you an example - A person who gives us, we love them in return. Our parents gave us life and we love them and this is case everywhere. But what did fictious-god ask in return. He asked us to worship him, pray to him, beg before him and I don't think the god you imagine can't be so selfish and foolish. God was an idea used by priests to fool people and make them slaves. And this is what people have become, Slaves and beggars asking for everything to god. Stop begging and live life. Break the shackles on which god is written and are binding us....!!
See, I don't believe in creation, I believe in "existence". Creation is a very thinner concept while existence is very vast. Our mind cant be made understood if he insists that the thing he is saying is right. I say, If god is the creator, it becomes a great problem. He makes us a puppet, he makes us any time and can kill us anytime. We are his slave if you think of him as a person.... are you understanding what I am trying to say? Don't Consider some person with name god. This is a fiction. This existence has been always present, it was, it is and will always be. I know it is difficult to grasp but it is true. No one created world, it has always been there, just we weren't there. There is no god to create it....!!
there was a chinese zen master, a very enlightened man named sekito. he has made a very important statement. Many Philosophers have said, the world is illusion but he said "attachment to anything is illusion". I a=other words anything compared is illusion i.e tall, short, fat, good, bad, evil etc all these are illusions. Even equality is this, comparing all which is also an illusion, hence I would say no. there is nothing called equality. I will tell a simple statement and you will understand. See, Freedom and equality are opposites, If you are trying to make people equal, you will have to take away their freedom. Hence,equality is an illusion....!!
there was a chinese zen master, a very enlightened man named sekito. he has made a very important statement. Many Philosophers have said, the world is illusion but he said "attachment to anything is illusion". I a=other words anything compared is illusion i.e tall, short, fat, good, bad, evil etc all these are illusions. Even equality is this, comparing all which is also an illusion, hence I would say no. there is nothing called equality. I will tell a simple statement and you will understand. See, Freedom and equality are opposites, If you are trying to make people equal, you will have to take away their freedom. Hence,equality is an illusion....!!
See, first of all dolphins have their own language and they are very intelligent. they live very freely happily. The difference is man created a small part of world as their society but dolphins have made all of the world their society and hence they are far more happy and free than us. we are binded altogether if you see properly. I wish I could be born a dolphin because they don't know stress, sadness, misery, anger, revenge, ego etc. they just go on living. this is the real meaning of life....!! People say life includes all these things good and bad but I say no. Life only consists of living it fully, completely... If this is wrong then either we humans are "Living" or all other living species....!!!
look, it may be normal for children to live with that parents all their lives but it is not natural. these a lot of difference between these two things. Being normal isn't being natural. Only human parents are alone who spent their whole lives thinking about their offsprings. Rest all living things allow them to create their own identity. Parents continue to live their lives while humans live their children's lives. The don't live for themselves and this is wrong. Life is completely of the one who lives, no one - god, children, husband, wife has any right to be an obstacle. Let parents live and even children should live,....!!
The biggest conspiration made by the priests in order to enslave people besides "The god conspiracy", was marriage. marriage has made people unhappy. the biggest pleasure is sex which the marriage system has made a sin. I think marriage is more like a punishment. Staying with a person because of law is very wrong. Man should enjoy..... this is life.... And this can be done only when there are no rules to bind us.....!!!
The biggest conspiration made by the priests in order to enslave people besides "The god conspiracy", was marriage. marriage has made people unhappy. the biggest pleasure is sex which the marriage system has made a sin. I think marriage is more like a punishment. Staying with a person because of law is very wrong. Man should enjoy..... this is life.... And this can be done only when there are no rules to bind us.....!!!
"Abortion" is seen only in humans and not in any other living things. This is an interesting fact, no animal ever thinks of not letting its child come into this world. So all think abortion should be stopped. but there is one more point to consider. Animals have sex during a specific part of the year, and not all the year on. But humans are the only creatures who have nothing to do with the time. the have sex throughout the year, all seasons, day and night, this results in unwanted offsprings. because man want sex for pleasure and not for child (in general). but animals have only for offsprings. so it is very essential to have abortion. If the birth givers don't want their baby in thw world, why should they then give birth due to fear of society?? It is their independent problem and they have full licence to solve it themselves.... So if one wants an abortion, let them have it...!!
See, at very ancient times, men worshipped women because they gave birth. Primitive men considered this sacred and divine because it was something different. Hence women became the centre of all, many old religions worshipped women. Also, sufi people have their god "female". All around the world god is male. sufi people address "O my beloved, my love" to their god. Thus, EVEN GOD AND RELIGION WORD ARE OF MALE DOMINANCE. Now when pregnancy became common, MAN made women's greatest power their (male) advantage and hence tried to establish power. When civilized society stopped wandering stooped and cultivation began, man started making property of land. In this way, women became property of man. Hence, I would say, If male were pregnant, women would dominate.
Why do most of the people try to insert god in everything?? On one hand, your god created great things and then created man to protect his other creations. and everyone knows well how man is protecting his other creations. so either god must be a psycho who is not constant or he is a fiction. because only a lie can give birth to a plenty of lies. and these lies may be beautiful or not. but is a lie for sure......
