CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic


RSS IAmSparticus

Reward Points:1517
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
90%
Arguments:3568
Debates:41
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.

You're getting a litttttttle unhinged.

She has no policy on same sex marriage, as the issue is already settled by the courts.

I've been struggling for some time to come up with an understanding of that comment that isn't incredibly fucked up and I just can't.

I'm guessing you haven't actually studied American history, right?

Because to call her the most corrupt American politician of all time ignores the politicians who were actually, legally corrupt.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/lists/most corruptpoliticians/george-ryan.html

Here's a basic list that shows you what legitimate corruption looks like. Hyperbole serves you no good.

Did not want to discuss the mishandling of classified information.

Did not want to discuss having an illegal server to bypass the freedom of information act.

She did discuss it, and appologized for it. There's nothing else she could have said about it while still being a smart politician.

Did not want to discuss her arming and backing ISIS.

She didn't.

Did not want to discuss Bill's sexcapades or her assault on his plethera of victims.

No shit, she isn't Bill Clinton.

Did not want to talk about TPP which she rejects in public, at least this week, but supports in private per wikileaks.

She did discuss it.

Did not want to talk about Her globalist agenda per open borders per wikileaks.

"globalist agenda" really is meaningless. She did discuss immigration and trade.

Did not want to talk about the danger of thousands of Syrian refugees flooding into Europe and America causing violence, rape, and anarchy in every European country they enter to the point of civil uprisings to stop it in those countries.

Probably because that isn't happening, and isn't going to happen.

Do you even read your wikileaks citations? Because the actual content in them hasn't backed up anything you've claimed, short of her not supporting same-sex marriage.

It's hilarious how horrible your perception of gender relations is.

So if someone's genitalia works then they must imagine sexually assaulting people?

What kind of toxic-as-fuck perception of sexuality do you have?

So every male politician is guilty of of sexual assault

No.

and most likely you are too... or?

No.

In most likelihood, you are a liar.

Still no.

You'll try to honestly in a religious-like self righteous position, try to convince us that you have neither ever said or thought about doing the things he said out loud?

Of course I did, when I was a child who didn't know any better.

You my friend, are? A liar, which makes you worse than him

Except you really have no basis for calling me a liar. You don't know me, and have never met me, yet are trying to claim you know how I think about women. It's silly, to be honest.

And let's fully ignore that it was 12 years ago.

Yeah, except he still talks about women in incredibly disrespectful ways. Currently.

Your clan are the same geniuses defending a 60 year old pedaphile's right to be in the stall next to a 7 year old girl.

Not a single person has "defended" that, oddly enough.

The liberal problem lies right there painfully in...the mirror.

Still not a liberal. Seriously, enough with the partisan shit.

A large number of presidents spent more money than all their predecessors combined.

That's nothing new, at all. On top of that, Republicans contributed substantially to that debt.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Donald Trump Tax Write-Off: Thoughts?
Winning Position: Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget Report on Presidential Policy Price Tag
Winning Position: The Alt-Right: What's Your Opinion?
Winning Position: Moral Realism
Winning Position: Trump: Birthirism Reborn?
Winning Position: The Way We Discuss Welfare Recipients
Winning Position: No, because...
Winning Position: Yes, because...

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Independent
Country: United States
Religion: Agnostic

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here