Your schtick is literally insane, pal. Your information comes exclusively from fascist maniacs like Hitler, Mussolini and Kessler, but you want other people to believe we are the fascists? We aren't getting our information from Hitler buddy. That's you.
Actually you paraphrase their quotes and logic often. Request examples, and I'll give you a list longer than your nose Pinnochio.
So the leader of "Unite the Right" is on the left?
That looks like it's kind of the point of the debate, and the links showing they are both Democrats openly. Care to address that?
Fred Waldron Phelps Sr. (November 13, 1929 – March 19, 2014) was the American minister of the Westboro Baptist Church and a civil rights attorney who became known for his extreme views on homosexuality and protests near the funerals of gay people, military veterans, and disaster victims, whose deaths, he believed, were the result of God punishing the U.S. for having "bankrupt values" and tolerating gay people.
Occupation
Pastor, lawyer
Organization
Westboro Baptist Church
Political party
Democratic
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FredPhelps
We, too, have spoken to Kessler, and we’ve looked into a number of the claims these and other sources have leveled against him to make the case that he’s a left-wing operative. This is what we learned:
Was Jason Kessler a Barack Obama supporter?
True. He told us (and has consistently said elsewhere) that he was an Obama supporter and voted for him.
-Snopes
https://www.snopes.com/news/2017/08/17/
And here's where Nom runs off and hides once again with no rebuttal....
Fred Waldron Phelps Sr. (November 13, 1929 – March 19, 2014) was the American minister of the Westboro Baptist Church and a civil rights attorney who became known for his extreme views on homosexuality and protests near the funerals of gay people, military veterans, and disaster victims, whose deaths, he believed, were the result of God punishing the U.S. for having "bankrupt values" and tolerating gay people.
Occupation
Pastor, lawyer
Organization
Westboro Baptist Church
Political party
Democratic
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/
We, too, have spoken to Kessler, and we’ve looked into a number of the claims these and other sources have leveled against him to make the case that he’s a left-wing operative. This is what we learned:
Was Jason Kessler a Barack Obama supporter?
True. He told us (and has consistently said elsewhere) that he was an Obama supporter and voted for him.
-Snopes
https://www.snopes.com/news/2017/08/17/
And here's where AlofRI runs off and hides once again with no rebuttal....
Bronto, I'm REALLY beginning to worry about your mental health!
On second thought, I began that a long time ago, but NOW it's getting worse. Do you have a gun permit?? Look down the barrel, pull the trigger and make sure it's empty … before you hurt someone!
Ad hominems when you are uable to challenge any of the points makes you look weak.
Care to address both "far right" extremist groups being led by Democrats?
And let us not forget that Hitler was a German familiar with Marx, also a German, and we both know fully well Marx's views on the neccessity for certain races to be exterminated.
https://fee.org/articles/
Anti-Racists Should Think Twice about Allying with Socialism
Modern racial justice movements like Black Lives Matter are embracing the historically false assumption that socialism is anti-racist.
Speaking to the Los Angeles Times last August, the co-founder of Black Lives Matter, Patrisse Cullors, stated that BLM would not sit at the table with President Trump because he “is literally the epitome of evil, all the evils of this country—be it racism, capitalism, sexism, homophobia”.
Trump’s views and actions aside, calling capitalism evil and conflating it with racism is noteworthy. The same goes for the increasing tendency among racial justice advocates to embrace the left-wing economic agenda.
So much so that Ryan Cooper, a columnist for The Week, wrote a column titled, "Is Black Lives Matter turning socialist?" As Cooper approvingly noted, BLM has adopted a “hugely aggressive—and firmly leftist—economic program”.
On the other side of the Atlantic, Natalie Jeffers, who cofounded BLM in the United Kingdom, urged her followers to: “Fight racism with solidarity. Fight capitalism with socialism. We must organize—dedicate ourselves to revolutionary politic power.”
The Black Lives Matter Movement, a separate British organization, was founded by Gary McFarlane, a representative of the Socialist Workers Party, who writes for the Socialist Review and the Socialist Worker, and claims that “Capitalism is racist from the top to the bottom.” His cofounders, including Kate Hurford, Harold Wilson, and Naima Omar, have also written for those two publications.
There is, in other words, a growing assumption among racial justice advocates that more socialism would result in less racism and, even, that socialism is, in itself, anti-racist. There is, in fact, no such necessary connection between socialism and anti-racism, as a closer look at early socialist writings amply shows.
Socialists Had a Lot to Say About Race
To begin, it is important to note that the meaning of the word “race” changed over time. Today, most people think of races in terms of color, as in “black” and “white.” Historically, however, race was also a synonym for a nation or, even, a family. In his 1933 book, Marlborough: His Life and Times, Winston Churchill noted: “Deep in the heart of the Prussian state and race lay the antagonism to France.” The English artist Mary Granville, in turn, referred to Churchill’s family as the “Marlborough race” in her 1861 book, Autobiography and Correspondence.
Race was always a part of socialist thought.
But race, whether narrowly (black and white) or broadly (skin color, nation, and family) understood, was always a part of socialist thought. In 1894, for example, Friedrich Engels wrote a letter to the German economist Walther Borgius. In it, Engels noted, “We regard economic conditions as that which ultimately determines historical development, but race is in itself an economic factor.”
In his 1877 Notes to Anti-Dühring, Engels elaborated on the subject of race, observing “that the inheritance of acquired characteristics extended … from the individual to the species.” He went on, “If, for instance, among us mathematical axioms seem self-evident to every eight-year-old child and in no need of proof from evidence that is solely the result of ‘accumulated inheritance.’ It would be difficult to teach them by proof to a bushman or to an Australian Negro.”
It is noteworthy that Engels wrote those words 16 years before Francis Galton, writing in Macmillan’s Magazine, urged humanity to take control of its own evolution by means of “good breeding” or eugenics. Speaking of which, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, who were both socialists and eugenicists, bemoaned the falling birthrates among so-called higher races in the New Statesman in 1913. They warned that “a new social order [would be] developed by one or other of the colored races, the Negro, the Kaffir or the Chinese”.
Che Guevara, the Argentine revolutionary and friend of the Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, offered his views on race in his 1952 memoir The Motorcycle Diaries, writing, “The Negro is indolent and lazy and spends his money on frivolities, whereas the European is forward-looking, organized and intelligent.”
Karl Marx came close to advocating genocide.
Socialists Are Historically Pro-Genocide
In addition to racism, early socialist writings contained explicit calls for genocide of backward peoples. The toxic mix of those two illiberal ideas would result in at least 80 million deaths during the course of the 20th century.
In the New York Tribune in 1853, Karl Marx came close to advocating genocide, writing, “The classes and the races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way.” His friend and collaborator, Engels, was more explicit.
In 1849, Engels published an article in Marx’s newspaper, Neue Rheinische Zeitung. In it, Engels condemned the rural populations of the Austrian Empire for failing enthusiastically to partake in the revolution of 1848. This was a seminal moment, the importance of which cannot be overstated.
From Engels' article in 1849 down to the death of Hitler,” George Watson wrote in his 1998 book The Lost Literature of Socialism, “everyone who advocated genocide called himself a socialist.”
Demonized a right wing Churchill, and allied with Communists to invade right wing Poland, while demonizing the church.
Demonized Marxists, was mortal enemies with the USSR and murdered left wingers in the German government.
1)referenced Marxism too many times to count.
2)demonized the church and glorified Islam.
3)Demonized a right wing Churchill, and allied with Communists to invade right wing Poland while later being allied with Palestine, whom the left still sides with to this day.
I hear a lot of right wingers say that catholics are liberals
Which isn't the same as threatening them with death or muzzling their priests with lethal force. And most white Catholics vote Republican by far, which would be the particular Catholics Hitler demonized.
and Jews are socialists who control the Illuminati
Name one.
He got them from a very capitalist PRIVATE doctor who profited most profitably from Hitler's right wing drug habits.
He got them from a doctor living in a socialist country with allegiances to the state, and his employment was by the state.
I honestly don't understand what you think is socialist about Hitler. You must have no idea what socialism means or something
All of his quotes on socialism and capitalism by name and you declaring your disagreement with him was that he thought the government should control the means of production. And you were right. He did claim that.
You're full of such shit. Hitler attacked everyone who wasn't a Nazi or an ally of the Nazis.
Mainly Catholics and Jews, just like the left today. If I provided a link of Hitler quotes, no one would say the rhetoric was right wing. Hey look, here's a link.
I've never even said that. This is you literally making shit up like the lying douche nugget you are.
Sure you have. You've called me a "Jewish capitalist prick". Remember Adolf?
Hitler's drug cocktail abuse is a left wing habit.
Drug use has nothing to do with the left wing. People in all places on the spectrum use drugs
Not these drugs. These were left wing.
He killed communist Jews and said communism was a jewish conspiracy
And you make his claim that capitalism is a Jewish conspiracy often.
(He also abused drugs. Another not very right wing thing to do.)
Alcohol counts as a drug, marijuana is safer and better for you than alcohol.
And Hitler's drug cocktail abuse is a left wing habit.
Hitler was an occultist and the Nazis had an esoteric pagan religion. That doesn't stop him from being a fascist right winger.
No, his socialist ideology does.
I thought muslims were right wing Bronto, they chastise christians don't they?
Muslims are right wing. They attack Christians due to a holy book's words. Hitler attacked them because he was a left wing bigot.
His greatest critic was a devout right winger.
He was praised by right wingers in America and europe.
He was attacked vigorously by the American and European right, including Churchill and George Patton.
(Hitler allied with the USSR to invade a right wing country.)
No he didn't.
The Invasion of Poland, known in Poland as the September Campaign (Kampania wrześniowa) or the 1939 Defensive War (Wojna obronna 1939 roku), and in Germany as the Poland Campaign (Polenfeldzug), was an invasion of Poland by Germany that marked the beginning of World War II. The German invasion began on 1 September 1939, one week after the signing of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact between Germany and the Soviet Union. The Soviets invaded Poland on 17 September following the Molotov–Tōgō agreement that terminated the Soviet and Japanese Battles of Khalkhin Gol in the east on 16 September.[14] The campaign ended on 6 October with Germany and the Soviet Union dividing and annexing the whole of Poland under the terms of the German–Soviet Frontier Treaty.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion ofPoland
(Goebbels also claimed the USSR as an ideological relative.)
No he didn't.
Lenin is the greatest man, second only to Hitler, and that the difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is very slight.
As quoted in The New York Times, “Hitlerite Riot in Berlin: Beer Glasses Fly When Speaker Compares Hitler to Lenin,” November 28, 1925 (Goebbels' speech Nov. 27, 1925)
Left wing. Nom himself already let the cat out of the bag earlier when he claimed the thing he disagreed with Hitler on was that he thought the state should control the means of production. The state owning the means of production is left wing. Right wingers believe in a capitalist market that is as free as is reasonable. They want the state fiscally removed from as much as is possible/reasonable.
-----
BRONTO: Still waiting for you to list out what you disagree with Hitler on, aren't we Nom?
NOM: That the state should control the means of production
(4th response on the right column)
http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/
Let's cut the shit Con, and let a real black civil rights leader sum it up for us.
These people are the types of people who see 2 people fighting, and about the time both people get over it, you start prodding both people to hate each other again. That is sick, and that is exactly what many white liberals choose to be. Schemers. Dividers. Spreaders of strife. Slanderers. They intentionally stir up conflict. People who speak peace, while planning to divide in their hearts. They devise treachery all day long. Their hearts are like an oven slowly cooking as they approach their plotting. They devise evil against others. Their hands are always in the pot stirring, stirring, stirring.
The white liberal sticks a knife in peoples' backs nine inches and pull it out six inches, there's no progress. If you pull it all the way out that's not progress. Progress is healing the wound that the blow made. And they haven't even pulled the knife out much less healed the wound. They won't even admit the knife is there.
I believe in the brotherhood of all men, but I don't believe in wasting brotherhood on anyone who doesn't want to practice it with me. Brotherhood is a two-way street
I have more respect for a man who lets me know where he stands, even if he's wrong, than the one who comes up like an angel and is nothing but a devil.
You don’t change the white liberal's mind. You can’t change his mind, and that whole thing about appealing to the moral conscience of the white liberal, ha, America’s left wing conscience is bankrupt. She lost all conscience a long time ago. The white liberal version of Uncle Sam has no conscience. They don’t know what morals are. They don’t try and eliminate an evil because it’s evil, or because it’s illegal, or because it’s immoral. They eliminate it only when it threatens their existence. So you’re wasting your time appealing to the moral conscience of a bankrupt man like the white, liberal version of Uncle Sam.
-Malcolm X
Take it up with him Con. He's the black civil rights leader, not me.
I've been sitting here for a while, trying to think of a way to respond to that
Objective truth is hard to rebuttal because you have to reject reality. Even if the right were all Mother Teresa, the left would label them Nazis.
but, it is SOOO ridiculous
We didn't create identity politics and the library of buzz words and racially dividing concepts of the left. Libs did. When I was highschool, people acted like we were past that crap overall, and tv depicted it as such. Libs spent the last decade trashing the peace that existed through race baiting and demonizing half the country like it was a war. White privilege, cultural appropriation, sanctuary cities, etc are the perfect terms and ways to divide people by race and guarantee tribalized divisions within a country. Now they're pissed that for the first time in modern times, the right is hitting back, not playing polite, and is telling you to STFU. It should have been done back when the left started this shit in the first place.
These people are the types of people who see 2 people fighting, and about the time both people get over it, you start prodding both people to hate each other again. That is sick, and that is exactly what many white liberals choose to be. Schemers. Dividers. Spreaders of strife. Slanderers. They intentionally stir up conflict. People who speak peace, while planning to divide in their hearts. They devise treachery all day long. Their hearts are like an oven slowly cooking as they approach their plotting. They devise evil against others. Their hands are always in the pot stirring, stirring, stirring.
The white liberal sticks a knife in peoples' backs nine inches and pull it out six inches, there's no progress. If you pull it all the way out that's not progress. Progress is healing the wound that the blow made. And they haven't even pulled the knife out much less healed the wound. They won't even admit the knife is there.
I believe in the brotherhood of all men, but I don't believe in wasting brotherhood on anyone who doesn't want to practice it with me. Brotherhood is a two-way street
I have more respect for a man who lets me know where he stands, even if he's wrong, than the one who comes up like an angel and is nothing but a devil.
You don’t change the white liberal's mind. You can’t change his mind, and that whole thing about appealing to the moral conscience of the white liberal, ha, America’s left wing conscience is bankrupt. She lost all conscience a long time ago. The white liberal version of Uncle Sam has no conscience. They don’t know what morals are. They don’t try and eliminate an evil because it’s evil, or because it’s illegal, or because it’s immoral. They eliminate it only when it threatens their existence. So you’re wasting your time appealing to the moral conscience of a bankrupt man like the white, liberal version of Uncle Sam...
Like you try to paint me with that fuck Farrakhan, when Outlaw yells NIGGER, YOU are gonna get ACCUSED of racism..
The difference is Democrats who are actually in power actually hang out with Farrakhan then quickly hop to accusing others of racism as a weapon when they lose debates or fall behind in polls. Mitch McConnel and Ted Cruz aren't hanging out with Farrakhan or anyone similar.
Screw the words and official condemnations. Screw the PC horse shit. Democrats go have drinks and pass out hugs with the son of a bitch.
And even better? Then libs elect some people just like him, and not that they say things that are edgy or on the fringe. They call for the genocide of Jews. You know? The ones they refer to, not as "my black guy over here" but as...insects. Imagine a Republican calling an entite race...insects...
Hell Trump was condemned as evil for saying "look at my black guy over here".
Could he use better PC speak? Sure. But his critics are openly antisemites, so excuse my angst.
Perhaps I can clear it up this way. When leftists who hate Jews call you a Nazi while you support Jews, it's a natural instinct to put your hand in a ball and focus on their face.
And then there's that extra salt in the wound. When Democrat Jews call you Nazis while you support Israel and your holy book demands you support Jews, and all the while they continue to defend and bring in people commanded to kill Jews in THEIR holy book.
There's no arguing or convincing logic like that.
Let's take a peak, shall we?
Bible: (Speaking of Israel and the Jews)
"I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you."
Genesis 12:3
https://biblehub.com/genesis/12-3.htm
Quran:
Allah's Apostle said, "You (i.e. Muslims) will fight with the Jews until some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray them) saying, 'O 'Abdullah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.
Sahih Bukhari 4:52:176
https://muflihun.com/bukhari/52/176
I can give you many more examples, but I'm sure you get the idea...
Now pause and ponder. Who in their right mind demonizes a group commanded to love you and coddles a group commanded to kill you. Well Democrat Jews. That's who. But, we continue to defend them while they call us Nazis nonetheless. Isn't that interesting? Perhaps we should find a group of psychologists to dissect this phenomenon for us...
I would guess it fits somewhere in the realm of the girl that keeps loving, defending and going back to the abusive boyfriend, but that's just me. I don't understand that crap either, so it's really not particularly helpful in the end.
I got it.. You don't read his shit, so you can pretend it's not there.. But, you went back into the archive to prove I said some shit.. Look.. It's ok.. You ain't gonna condemn him
There are no right wingers in my quadzillion lib responses in my mailbox list. Are you familiar with Al's responses? I doubt it. The two of you don't debate each other.
You've got very conservative Sinclair Broadcasting, one of the LARGEST broadcasting companies in the nation, and they're not doing it.. They're VERY SMART businessmen.. IF there was a market for a right wing late night host, they've GOT the TV network..
Because talk show ratings suck, so they produce shows that get better ratings, rather than sacrifice profit to spread propaganda and feed the ideology.
Yet, they DON'T.. Is that because those nasty libs aren't hiring?
Yes, libs don't like hiring conservatives for anything. They prefer feeling multicultural and hiring someone that beats their wife, thinks Jews are insects, and thinks gays should all be murdered in a mass slaughter. For some reason that feels better to libs than hiring a Conservative that believes in none of those things.
Retreated from the other debate you were losing, eh nom? Surely you don't need Alinsky tactics and can come up with your own...
Maybe that's an overstatement...
Were you really not smart enough to put your link in link form? Yes, you were that stupid.
Oh. Come back here grammar Nazi. Socialists doesn't have an "e" in it.
Carry on.
His literal biggest enemy was socialist USSR and he murdered socialists after he got into power.
Hitler allied with the USSR to invade a right wing country. Not a very right wing thing to do. Goebbels also claimed the USSR as an ideological relative.
He also murdered Jews, who he referred to as right wing capitalists. He also abused drugs. Another not very right wing thing to do.
He chastised the church. Yet again. Not very right wingy.
His greatest critic was a devout right winger.
but also capitalists and intellectuals.
So he demonized people like Trump, me and Jews. Just like you.
But wait. That can't be true because Bronto just told me the Nazi Minister of Propaganda was a Communist
Goebbels-
The NSDAP is the German Left. We despise bourgeois nationalism.
Der Angriff, (Dec. 6, 1931) written by Goebbels. Der Angriff (The Attack) was the official newspaper of the Nazi-Sozi party in Berlin.
Goebbels-
The people's community must not be a mere phrase, but a revolutionary achievement following from the radical carrying out of the basic life needs of the working class. A ruthless battle against corruption! A war against exploitation, freedom for the workers! The elimination of all economic-capitalist influences on national policy. Maintaining a rotten economic system has nothing to do with nationalism, which is an affirmation of the Fatherland.
Written by Joseph Goebbels and Mjölnir, Die verfluchten Hakenkreuzler. Etwas zum Nachdenken (Munich: Verlag Frz. Eher (1932). “Those Damned Nazis,” (Nazi propaganda pamphlet).
The worker in a capitalist state—and that is his deepest misfortune—is no longer a living human being, a creator, a maker. He has become a machine. A number, a cog in the machine without sense or understanding. He is alienated from what he produces.”
Written by Joseph Goebbels and Mjölnir, Die verfluchten Hakenkreuzler. Etwas zum Nachdenken (Munich: Verlag Frz. Eher, 1932).Translated as “Those Damned Nazis,” (propaganda pamphlet).
He was literally chief of propaganda for the German Nazi Party you impossibly stupid cretin
And was a Communist who said Nazism was basically Communism.
Goebbels-
Lenin is the greatest man, second only to Hitler, and that the difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is very slight.
As quoted in The New York Times, “Hitlerite Riot in Berlin: Beer Glasses Fly When Speaker Compares Hitler to Lenin,” November 28, 1925 (Goebbels' speech Nov. 27, 1925)
In other words, the difference between you and Hitler isn't much.
Hitler frequently claimed his single greatest aim in politics was to forcibly eradicate Communism from Europe
He said Capitalism was a Jewish conspiracy. Then he allied with Communists to invade right wing Poland.
Of course, you deranged lunatic. Just like "Cohen's crimes had nothing to do with Trump, right?
Nope. His tax fraud happened years before Trump ran for President. That's why the lib media was in a frenzy for about a day.
Your own debate title says "harrassmment
And no harrassment has happened under Trump, per the military definition, meaning, being fired upon.
-
https://www.macleans.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/JAN08OPRAHTRUMPPOST01.jpg
-
https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/donald-trump-10.jpg
-
https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/donald-trump-17.jpg
-
https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/donald-trump-15.jpg
-
http://commonsensenation.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/jackson-and-trump.jpg
-
https://i.imgur.com/mqyoCH0.jpg
-
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/ac/TrumpMagazine.jpg/220px-TrumpMagazine.jpg
-
-
https://am14.akamaized.net/med/cnt/uploads/2011/04/Picture-611-245x300.png
-
https://www.clothconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/0-4.jpg
-
https://sites.create-cdn.net/siteimages/5/5/8/55872/81/2/8/812849/293x400.jpg?1
-
http://www.magazinemix.co.uk/wp-content/
-
-
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/media/oldwire/img/upload/2011/12/07/
-
But Obama is a very smart man
His results say he wasn't very smart.
and you are the brainless one
I didn't have to go into politics to obtain wealth.
He was president of the United States
So was George Bush.
You are a cancerous shill who hangs around on the internet switching user accounts
List of Nom dupe accounts
ColonelFry
BurritoLunch
Carterusmbot
TheCreator
BobBarker
Hootie
Impirum
YousifDuck1
Quantumhead
DarthSidious
Rusticus
ArchonElite
ChiefToad
NumberNine
NumberFive
KyloRen
Warjin
TheSnake
Ramshutu
Sv3rige
Nomenclature
NumberOne
TheDevil
TheNotorious
Ctrlaltdel
Justicebaker
Justignoreme
Dreadnought
JoeTheJew
JoeBloggs
Rothschild
Mrcatsam
borisdecker
TheNotorious
Deathwolf666
Jamesbody
AlMualim
grapesNcrepe
HyperComm5
Waylife
Freyr
AveSatanas
Factfanx
Funtits
Waylife
Saggyballs
Iameerah
Spartacus
Kalamazoo
ModusPonem
Rogerfederer
Gruffalo
Lizarrd
ChiefToad
WormNugget
Winterhold
Misery
JoseAquacate
Since you're positive that it's the Democrats who're the racist SOB's
Both sides have racists. You just aren't permitted by the hive to condemn yours.
and since you DEMAND that we CONDEMN our bad actors, it ought to be EASY for you to CONDEMN your fellow right wing poster who LIBERALLY uses the "N" word all over these threads..
I don't debate right wingers, so you'll have to provide examples.
Except that we have video and pictures of the same libs that now hate him, loving him in the past. We also have Con saying he "loved Trump before he had this power".
Hello bront:
Nahh.. I LOVED Trump when the MOST he could do was FIRE Meatloaf. But, now that he can SPLIT the country right down the middle over a stupid wall, not so much..
It's not only about that wall. Trump proved that the Democrats will let the people they cry about go for months without a check over peanuts. Once a fair amount of the populace stops believing the left's fake sob face, Democrats are done.
It may already be too late.
That's why nobody wants you in government
I love how when libs say "we", "us" and "nobody" they just mean libs. Screw the 270,000,000 Americans that didn't vote Democrat in the American Presidential election.
Anybody interested in "compromise" would never shut down the government because he can't have his own way.
Oh cool. That counts out all Democrat Presidents in modern history.
Then by your very own definition of "doing their job" they should immediately shut down and hold their participation up for ransom. They should then demand Trump gives them a plan for compromise and force Trump to do his job.
Trump has offered a solution. Libs have offered no solutions. They also in mass defended his exact position before he became President.
Your neo-Nazi propaganda is slimy, stupid and irritating
BRONTO: Give us your list of things you disagree with Hitler on.
NOM: That the government should own the means of production.
I hate Islam because it's a retarded religion. The reason you are under the impression that I defend Islam is that when you attack Muslims I like to point out how your religion is just as bad.
No, actually you did a full debate defending that Muhammed was not a child molester, which is demonstrably false. You became emotional and butthurt during the debate.
Sermon on the Mount and Holy Jihad teach the exact opposite concepts. When the 2 leaders of 2 religions teach the exact opposite teaching, it's physically impossible that they are equally bad. Your position violates The Law of Noncontradiction.
The list bront provided was a bunch of B listers and has beens.. They couldn't fill a large club.
The live audiences on night talk shows aren't exactly large.
Those guys or younger comedians like them might get more eyeballs. Who knows? Libs aren't hiring Conservatives.
It's not like the lib talk show hosts are exactly spring chickens.
