CreateDebate


DanBongino's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of DanBongino's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Come on lib. Tell us about you 5 bazillion puppet accounts. Tell us about how Daddy dressed you like a princess as a child, and that's why you whine like a little girl nonstop.

1 point

Come on lib. Tell us about the fantasy world you wake up in every day and try to convince yourself exists.

2 points

How do ya feel about the last adult leaving the room?

It's the liberal media talking point word for word. Do you guys get together and pass out pamphlets so you use the exact same talking points every day? Is that what is happening here lib?

3 points

Well lets think about it a minute lib. Libs tell us the Earth is about to be uninhabitable, and we should colonize the moon. What's going to protect you in space? Walls? Is the answer walls lib?

If the reds start attacking us with futuristic weapons in a hundred years, can we put up our futuristic wall like shields? Is that allowed lib, or should we all bend over & grab our collective ankles because libs want to use feelings and emotions to dictate military policy?

1 point

How do you go about funding the left? Is there a website or a "the left fund"?

1 point

Judge Judy is a Jewish broad

She's literally fully, 100% Lebanese.

(Picture of Lebanese people)

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9c89d6886e19060d1cfb0ac12dd0ac5d.webp

2 points

Whataboutism, is EXCUSING Trump because some Democrat did worse

Whataboutism is a word hypocrites use when trying to get you to not point out their bigotted standards towards only one group of people.

2 points

But, she cannot keep her contempt for people of color under wraps..

Lib. You missed a very important fact. Judge Jeanine is a person of color.

Jeanine Ferris was born 1951 in Elmira, New York, to Nasser "Leo" and Esther (née Awad) Ferris, both first-generation Lebanese-Americans

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeanine_Pirro

1 point

There was one for a short time.. It was struck down because it's not Constitutional..

Let's examine your statement lib. 95% of the Muslim world had no ban.

There was a ban on a handful of countries that Obama had on his own list of "unvettable nations".

The Supreme court held up the ban. Looks like you're wrong once again. Are you tired of being proven a liar or ill informed? Are you ready to tap out lib?

1 point

Show us one shred of evidence of Trump and Putin. Wait a second. You have none. We only have proof of the left selling them our weapons grade uranium that we don't have much of but need. Treason. You have heard of it lib?

1 point

Dude.. I'm a full on supporter of trans peoples rights

Can a conservative tran make a pro Trump post on facebook or give a speech at Harvard? Defend them you panty waste. Or are you all mouth and no show?

1 point

Nahhh… I can handle horrible.. It's the lawbreaking that concerns me.

Oh yeah. We watched the Democrat Party infested with corruption and unethical behavior for decades and you were outraged. You can't even lay out the fundamentals of any case against Trump for anything..

1 point

However, today we have DIRECT evidence of a crime..

Present it to us. We'd love to see it.

Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to a felony. In his elocution, which is under oath, he IMPLICATED Trump in that crime

In what way?

0 points

That's an excellent argument, and one Trump is using.. You SAY there's no crime.. But, the PROSECUTOR, the JUDGE, and the JAILER say there is.. Dude.

Name them, then do another thing and quote them.

1 point

You couldn't impeach Trump in 2 years, not that it would matter in the Republican Senate even if you did. So how long will it take to impeach Trump AND Pence? 500 years? And what are you going to nail Pence on? Being clean as an alcohol swab? How many times have you been wrong now Rusticus? Do we need a calculator to add up that number?

1 point

All that might be true about Cohen.. But, it's NOT true about Trump.. He's been implicated in a felony.. The judge does NOT have to sentence him like he did Cohen.. He can give him the max, or no time at all..

Which part of "can't indict a sitting President" is sailing over your skull? Do you think we'll give a flying rat's behind if you go after Trump in his 80s while another conservative runs the show?

Next, you contradicting the law and actual lawyers isn't a good look for you.

1 point

It's NOT where the money came from.. It's where the money was spent. The violation came because he PAID the money in furtherance of his presidential run.. That makes them campaign contributions..

Lawyers disagree with you lib, but forget the lawyers. Point out to all of us Trump not stomping Obama on any fiscal policy. Prove Barack wasn't Trump's inferior. We can wait here all day for you to find some monkey poo to throw our way. Come on lib. Throw some poo.

1 point

Ahahahahaha! You just rejected a far left wing source lib. Did you put your head in a blender this morning?

1 point

I'd maybe look for a Catholic one this time, they seem to be better at "covering up things".

And Catholics vote Democrat.

Here's a real beauty.

How the Catholic Priesthood Became an Unlikely Haven for Many Gay Men

https://slate.com/human-interest/2017/04/how-the-catholic-priesthood-became-a-haven-for-many-gay-men.html

The Vatican’s Secret Life

Despite headlines about a powerful “gay lobby” within the Vatican, and a new Pope promising reform, the Catholic Church’s gay cardinals, monks, and other clergy inhabit a hidden netherworld. In Rome, the author learns how they navigate the dangerous paradox of their lives.*

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanityfair.com/culture/2013/12/gay-clergy-catholic-church-vatican/amp

1 point

Should soldiers run their orders through their political ideology BEFORE they obey them?

It depends. Are they being ordered to protect the country or practice enforcing a police state or a mass genocide?

-1 points

Oh my lord, children using naughty words!

Exactly. The left tells us what words are not allowed nonstop. Correct or incorrect?

only a superstitious fool would be more outraged about people making the wrong sounds with their mouth

Not been paying attention have you wolf? It's the left making it illegal to say the wrong words and phrases and censoring everything. Would you like to address that for us, since you just made a fool out of yourself and got destroyed by yourself?

Can the words "Islam is Nazism" come out of my mouth? Tell us.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2017/03/canada-passes-103-motion-islamophobia-170324074557381.html

How about "transgenderism is a mental illness"? Can we say that? What about "that's gay". Can we say that?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/24/using-gay-mean-crap-bullying-gap-people

Hold on. I have another one. Can we say "monkey this up" to refer to a politician messing around if he's black? Tell us lib. Show your ass to us again.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article217507400.html

A preacher of moral relativism telling us to not use morality. You did all of the work for us. You lose again. The stupid lib owned himself. ROFLMAO

1 point

Enlighten us wolf. Are dreams, which are not material, real? Give us your knowledge.

1 point

It's better to go bankrupt than become racist sexist homophobic and transphobic like Adolph Hitler!!!!!

Not condemning Islamic sexism, homophobia and Hitler worship today are you oats?

1 point

I'm getting silly? You keep saying we who control the military are going to give up our weapons and vehicles to you before the fight.

Tell me how deranged that sounds to you. Read your post again and think about it.

We control the military. Right wingers man the military and make up most of it. We aren't giving you any Apache's. You will be Apacheless.

1 point

Look.. You can't count.. You can't win a war if you can't count.. Clearly, there is NO monolithic block known as the military.. If there was, you'd WIN.. But, there AIN'T, and you lose.. I need go NO further than that..

This contradicts your "the military does as its told" statements from earlier.

You think HALF of the military will betray their country..

They won't see defending us as "betraying the country". They are pro flag and pro us.

I say HALF won't.. But, here's the deal.. You don't think YOUR half is gonna be able to QUIT the military, and TAKE their tanks and helicopters with them, do you???

We have control of the military. We wouldn't give you the tanks and jets.

1 point

You SAY the military will stand behind Trump. but that's just you flapping your gums...

I've watched video of them receiving him and Obama. Two different reactions.

Let's talk some REAL numbers

Your problem is every number you've given isn't backed with facts. You just made them up off the cuff. I say it's 80%. See? I can make up numbers too.

Let's say that 39% of the military would abandon their post and blindly follow Trump. That leaves 61% of the military who wouldn't.

Forget your made up numbers for a minute.

Excon quote:

"Soldiering ISN'T a popularity contest.. With the exception of a few traitors, I believe our soldiers WILL obey their orders.."

I think you're right.

That leaves 61% of the military who wouldn't

If we used this bogus number, 61% who walked away can't beat 39% still in their jets and tanks.

But let's face reality. Our number would be closer to 90%. Guess how many vets would side with flag burners and Christian haters. Not much.

1 point

I seem to remember a Democrat running for President that was caught cheating on his sick wife and misusing campaign funds. HE never made it.

Edwards was found innocent. It wasn't a crime according to the FEC. Trump is innocent of a crime by your own argument.

"John Edwards' Hush Money Was Not Illegal, FEC Told Campaign"

Good Morning America May 14, 2012

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.yahoo.com/amphtml/gma/john-edwards-hush-money-not-illegal-fec-told-121722338--abc-news-topstories.html

Edwards not guilty on one count; mistrial on five others"

May 21, 2012 The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/01/us/edwards-jury-returns-not-guilty-verdict- on-one-count.html

1 point

Who may have violated the law

That includes you and me and everyone on the planet. That's why you have to have a crime first. Would you want the "might have committed a crime" policy used on you and your family? Do you support Nazism? Investigate you, rather than a crime? Hey look. The FBI asked you to name every speeding ticket you ever got. You left one off. 10 years in prison for lying.

WE have been investigating Trump's "illegal looking" activities

Tell me what they are and why he's not in prison. Have you noticed that Russian Collusion and Obstruction aren't even discussed anymore. Tell me why you think that is.

and found several people involved in them. THEY are in prison … or headed that way.

None of them had to do with Trump. Cohen and Manafort's crimes were years before Trump ran for President and had nothing to do with him. Are you actually familiar with what has happened? It looks like a big fat no.

1 point

Let's get it ON..

We've got the military, the cops, the generals, the Presidency, an armed populace and the militant groups. You've got men who think they're girls dressed in pink with green hair and nose rings who don't work and are lying on the floor high on acid. Good luck.

1 point

So, let's say you DID that.. Trump would EITHER defend them, or say "both sides are at fault". I suggest that if he DID respond that way, he would be REMOVED from office, either by law, or by force..

How are you going to enforce it? The generals and military are loyal to him and their right wing families, not Democrats. Same with the cops.

1 point

But, let's start at the beginning.. NOTHING is gonna happen unless one side attacks the other.

That's what the left is doing. Attempting to apply to Trump and Conservstives but not to their own.

If you're gonna march in and take the Democrats OUT, like you said, that's war..

You're damn right it is. You must realize that the more Stalinist they go on Trump and us, the more they push us to the far far right and use of the military against Democrats out of neccessity?

1 point

You DO know. You elected a bunch of Democrats who want to apply the law only to conservatives, and you support the practice. Correct?

All I'm saying is, bring it on..

You think Democrats sitting at the Capital building can stop a military commanded by Trump and right wing generals? Good luck with that.

What? You think Donald Trump, supported by a huge base, won't use the military once your tribe proves it cares not about the law or a one tier justice system and tries to take him down with Stalinism?

1 point

I don't need military service to know what's happening and what military personel are saying.

There is a clear reason you have still not told us who gives the military its orders. It's not Pelosi is it Excon? So tell us who it is. It's a simple question.

You've targeted us and the President. Guess what we're gonna do. Tell us who commands the military. Hit me with it buddy.

1 point

I thought you wanted to MARCH, not go to war.

I don't want either. The left has forced us to weaponize against them. We didn't create this "target conservatives only with the law" system. You did.

1 point

Okay. Google me. Then tell me what it says.

After that, I would like you to respond to my points rather than deflect.

1 point

You've NEVER been in the military, have you?

I never said, so you don't actually know.

Soldiers DON'T have a political ideology.

Everyone has a political ideology.

They have ORDERS. When I was in the military, we didn't run our orders through our political ideology to see IF we'd obey them.. No.. We OBEYED them, UNQUESTIONABLY. In wartime, if we didn't, we'd get SHOT

You didn't fight during 2018, and your party wasn't having Stalinism inacted upon it.

Do you really want a soldier to THINK about his orders BEFORE he obeys them?? No, you don't..

Why not? If our soldiers were told to mass rape a toddler barn, I'd prefer they thought about it first. You wouldn't?

1 point

Soldiering ISN'T a popularity contest.. With the exception of a few traitors, I believe our soldiers WILL obey their orders.

And who gives those orders? Chuck Schumer or someone else?

1 point

Not familiar with how Muammar Gaddafi or Saddam Hussein went down are ya Excon? The armed populace walked in, dragged them out to the street, beat one to death and hung the other. That's how it goes when you become a police state tyrant like the Democrats and give people no choice. They hunt you down as you had hunted them. They show you the civility and mercy that you showed them, which means none.

1 point

I'm sure there are SOME right wing soldiers who would betray their country.. I suggest, however, that MOST would follow their oath and defend this country from all enemies foreign and domestic..

Correct. And when you are targetting their political ideology, guess who "enemies domestic" is.

If you wanna march, go ahead.. IF you wanna make war, be prepared to get FLATTENED..

By who? The military and the police that Democrats like to trash see your party as the problem. Not us.

MOST soldiers would follow their oath and defend this country from all enemies foreign and domestic..

The Democrats are the police staters targetting the right with intelligence agencies, the courts, and on social media. Soldiers cheer Trump like a rockstar. They looked at Obama like an alien. Guess which side they'll take.

1 point

DUDE! IF they happened, WHY is Mueller still hot on Trumps tail

I never made a video about "Mueller isn't on Trump's Tail".

and WHY isn't Hillary and Comey in jail??

I never made a video about "Hillary and Comey are going to jail".

1 point

But, if THIS headline is just another headline in your long list of headlines that NEVER happen, I'm NOT gonna waste my time..

But they've all happened. If you had watched them, you would know that. You didn't watch them, so you have no idea what you're talking about.

2 points

Anything LESS than equality in arms, DEFEATS the intent of George's quote.. It leaves the American people UNDER the boot heels of an all powerful government

The difference here is Democrats were stupid enough to try to police state the right when the right has the military on its side. The right has the nukes. The right has the jets. The right has the allegiances. Not the left.

That's the point. The left has decided to say screw the law, civility, and come after us by its own choice. The law and us agreeing to it is all that keeps the left from being militarily dismantled by the armed populace and the military itself.

1 point

In your headline, you mention ALL OUT WAR.. Apparently, you think ALL OUT WAR is nice. DUDE.

Police State Democrat tyrannts haven't considered war, and have forced us to act. Once you start investigating, censoring us, and using mob rule against us without any predicated crime, taking Democrats down by force is literally our only option. Correct or incorrect?

1 point

Lemme ask you this.. If a right wing militia ATTACKED Fort Hood, do you think Trump would DEFEND it, or say "both sides are guilty"??

The right wing militia is going to march on D.C. and yank the defenseless police state Democrats and RINOs out of the building while the military does what the right tells them. Your tyranny of militarizing the courts and the law towards the Jews, I mean Conservatives, will be over in about 10 minutes.

1 point

In order to ACHIEVE that goal, we'd have to arm the right wing militias with nukes..

That's a great idea. A bunch of right wingers are running around all over the place so drop a nuclear bomb on your own country. Genius! Nothing's left and D.C. has radiation flooding the streets, but oh well. I'm sure the Air Force will gladly blow their home states, the innocent, their kids, and their own homes into puddles.

Now. Let me get this straight. You think a military crawling with right wingers will attempt to protect a left wing government that is weaponizing against Conservatives? How bout dat! I'm sure that will happen. You might want to cross your fingers on that one. Nevermind that the Nukes took out Seattle, there is no Space Needle, and your own ass is on fire.

1 point

Right wing militias aren't anything new.. But, our military can take care of 'em..

Who controls the military? Go ahead. Tell me. Who controls the military? It's not Letitia Stalin James. I can tell you that.

1 point

Not a whole lot of migrants would be voting there Roger. Are you against migrants? You told us minorities were too stupid to get a voter ID. I guess they won't be voting either. Tell me who's left to vote. Come on Roger. I'll give you a chance to answer. Tell us who's left.

1 point

In this case the lawyer actually sold the pot. You telling him to sell the pot wouldn't matter. He's a lawyer. You're not a lawyer. He's a stupid lawyer who chose to sell pot. Not your problem.


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]