CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
Is There Any Evidence That Jesus Christ Ever Existed at All From a Historic Perspective.
I have entered a debate with a friend on this subject. My position is that Jesus is completely mythical and there is no evidence to offer that even the person described in the Bible ever existed. My friend however is a Christian. So I would love any input on the subject.
I have read thousands of pages form books by theologians as well as secular and non-secular historians on the subject of the man named Yeshua of Nazareth. I am also a Born Again Christian who was saved a couple years ago and is planning to devote his life to the Ministry. I begin in the Fall at Unity Seminary in MO.
Here is what I believe about Jesus...
He did in fact exist and conducted a brief ministry in Roman occupied Palestine from roughly the years AD 29-32. He was crucified by Roman authorities under the command of Pontius Pilate for political insurrection and rabble rousing.
He had a cult-like following of Jewish peoples, who were a splinter sect from the traditional Judeans. They were also enemies of the Pharisees and the Sanhedrin.
Jesus probably did perform some spiritual healing, and he won many converts. His message was bascially that the Kingdom of Heaven is indeed upon us, but it can be attained from within out own minds and hearts. He probably claimed to be a Son of God but at the same time was telling us that we too can be sons and daughters of God.
this is what he meant by The Kingdom of Heaven is Within.
He was not divine, nor certainly was he not God. But he was very in touch with our Creator's Will and Mindful Force, which can be tapped into by is today if we accept Him.
Jesus' Resurrection was not a physical one but rather a Spiritual one. After his death His disciples had spiritual awakenings as to what His Message was.
Jesus was more of what we now would call "new age" than most people think. He likely believed in Reincarnation and maybe studied with the Eastern Mystics or the Essenes during his so called "lost years" from between his ages of 14 and 30, when the Bible says nothing at all about him.
The whole "Jesus is God" dogma was invented by his followers in the years after his death, and JC's attributes steadily increased as Christian persecution did. This is why in the Book of John, the last Gospel written, Jesus is all of a sudden "God" and the alpha and omega." the farther we get from his death in the gospels, the more his Divine qualities seem to grow. this is why Paul--whose letters preceded the Gospels--say noting about Him being God. Nor does Mark, the first written Gospel.
He DID exist. He was a wonderful Holy Man and Philosopher. Our lives can be greatly enriched from his teachings.
But he was NOT God.
There is one God...our Creator God. Who was Jesus' Father and is ours too.
Boob will present a bogus list of "historians" which includes who knows how many people who are not historians and did not record history, such as "Plliney the Elder". I'm sure if you research the list of names he provides you will find many if not most and maybe even all of those names were not historians.
Boob will also try to copy and paste impressive lists of disinformation designed to prevent you from investigating the facts for yourself as his junk is presented as authoritative so you are supposed to feel like you are informed when in reality you will be disinformed and misled to think you know things you have not worked to research to prove your knowledge.
Boob is angry at God and is obsessed with insulting Christians. He's a nasty guy toward Christians, but somehow he claims to be Mr. Nice guy and I don't buy his act.
Take the time to watch the video presented, it answers Boobs key points extensively and if Boob springs something like his "list of historians", take it with a grain of salt...of that long list, it only took me a minute of googling the names to see it's bogus to say they were historians.
Boob has not researched his own material, and that was obvious by the way he tried to tell me Pliney the Elder was a historian......Brittanica online proves Boob is using bogus material, and that is because his argument is bogus and depends on using bogus sources or calling good sources bogus......Bob just plain hates God, hates Christians, hates the Bible because he wants to escape his problems in death and God won't let him off the hook so he's throwing tempter tantrums at God and Christians.
Lets be honest Saintnow, the list of authors & historians that were writing relevant historically correct information has grow to over 100. This can all be independently verified by a large number of sources.
I have never posted disinformation or you would have been able to refute the info instead of banning me from the debates where I supplied real information.
As always you somehow make the claim that I am angry yet I have never spoken an ill word to you or about you and I have no animosity toward Christians at all.
Last as I have stated so many times before I'm an atheist which by definition means that I can't hate God as you claim. There is no such entity to hate. You think that since I won't acknowledge your imaginary God that equates to hatred, Untrue.
If you care to offer evidence instead of spiteful rhetoric I would welcome the debate. Normally you just insult and ban me from your posts so it is going to be way out of your comfort zone.
Liar, your list of historians is disinformation. You act like Pliney the Elder is the main proof of your point that your list of historians never mentioned Christ, but Pliney the Elder was not a historian. I researched it, you obviously did not research anything, you simply go with copy and pasted garbage assuming it is true and presenting it as if it is true. Do your homework Bob, google Pliney the Elder and you will see he never was a historian. He did some work in natural history studying animals, that is not a historian. He was a man who preferred to stay out of political areas, never recorded human history. Your just a big mouth pretending like you know stuff you don't know, typical atheists, you hate God you hate the Bible and you hate Christians and when you say you don't, you are a liar. I can see the hatred oozing form your eyebrows in many of your long rants of combined dozens of insults hurled at Christians, God, and the Bible.....you can see it in Dawkin's face when He speaks with a real Christian, I'm sure you get that same demon look on your face.....and the same fake face of playing dumb which atheists get when they say "God? I don't know of any God?" and they sit there like little children with cookie crumbs on their face trying to deny they have been in the cookie jar. You're only fooling yourself, Bob, you don't fool me at all.
You're a liar, Bob, you posted that garbage about Pliney the Elder, I spent three minutes researching Pliney the Elder and proved you had never researched the list you presented as true and proved the list is bogus disinformation. I ban you because you can't be honest about anything and you just want to go on and on jumping from one stupid rabbit trail to the next, and when I hit the rabbit with a bullet you leave the rabbit on the trail and jump on another trail trying to get me to chase you. I can't stop you from going to Hell, Bob. Run, rabbit, run, you are your problem, not mine.
I ban you because you ignore anything that proves you are lying, such as how you ignore the fact that your list of historians is a compilation of disinformation after you claimed Pliney the Elder never mentioned Christ in historical writings , said he was a historian who preceded his son, Pliney the Younger. I googled Pliny the Elder which is probably ten times more research I put into your garbage which is fake disinformation, only took me a couple minutes to see you obviously never research the things you copy and paste to see if they are honest. Pliney the Elder did not write of Christ for the same reason he wrote of nothing regarding the annuls of anything to do with the Roman Empire.....HE WAS NOT A HISTORIAN. I'm sure since Pliney the Elder is held in such high regard as a historian on your bogus list of historians that many, most, and maybe even all of the "historians" you quoted never were historians AT ALL!! Prove me wrong, I have seen enough to know you are using fake garbage which you have not researched, garbage compiled by liars like yourself who have no morality when it comes to insulting and lying about Christians, God, the Bible, Hisotry, Science, or anything you feel like distorting to make you feel like you really do get to escape your miserable hopelessness in death and you get out of your life unpunished. Keep on smiling Bob.
Pliny the Elder's writings contained a combination of facts and fables yet didn't mention anything about Jesus. He was interested in magic, superstitions, and miracles which if he were aware of the stories pertaining to Jesus Pliny the Elder would have definitely written about him. I will give you the fact that Pliny the Elder may not actually have been a historian but he was a person who if he was aware of this Christ he would have included that in his, Natural History.
Say I make the statement that dragons exist. You certainly wouldn't believe such a baseless assertion taken at face value. Same thing, just replace dragons with hell.
what are the dragons going to do, eat me alive? why should I care, I'm going to heaven when my time is over here, I don't care if I get eaten by a dragon, a bear, or a lion, it will be over and then I will be in heaven. I don't care if dragons are real or not.
Why should you care if Hell is real or not? Why? Why not just wait and see for yourself, and quit asking for proof....or keep on saying you must have proof to believe it is real, and you will get your proof, but you won't like it because you won't get out.
If you say dragons are real, why should I not believe you? Are you a liar? Who cares if they are real? I really don't care. Who cares if Hell is real? Why should you care? Your assertion that there is no Hell is baseless. Why do you make that assertion, when your assertion only allows one way of proof or disproof...finality of death, and you are asking for proof of Hell? You're being a fool. You might get that proof tomorrow and then could you blame God for giving you what you asked for? Be a fool if you want to. Pat yourself on the back for being so smart, brave, and strong. Look in the mirror and cheer for yourself ....WOOOWOOOOO!!!!
YAYYYYY! You are the man, so sure you can't end up in Hell, so unafraid of death. WOW!!!! You are the greatest!!!!
I'll tell you how you can get proof for yourself.....just wait and see, you will wake up on the fire of Hell. Just keep saying "I won't believe Hell is real until I get proof".....keep on saying that until you are blue in the face and you close your eyes in death....and then you will get the proof you really don't want to get the hard way. Go on and see for yourself, try to prove me wrong. Do it.
For all you know you know nothing. You do not know what I know because you don't want to know. Keep asking for proof that Hell is real and see if you travel through dimensions outside of the fire of Hell. Keep looking for what is not there because you don't want to see where you are going. Go and see if I'm making a baseless assertion. Do it. Why bother with me? Why ask for proof of Hell? Just wait and see.
I'm afraid that's just too bad for you. You are asking for proof of Hell being real, and the only way you are going to believe it is to find yourself unable to escape the fire, and you won't be satisfied with that any more than you will be satisfied now.
It's not my problem if the only way you will believe Hell is real is for you to find yourself unable to escape the fire. That's your problem. Why are you trying to put it on me? I can't save you, I can't keep you out of Hell, I can't tell you there is no Hell. What is your problem? Who cares if Hell is real or not? You don't care, so why bother me about it? Why should I care for you if you don't care? Go on and forget about it.
hold on to that 99 percent until you are blue in the face, and with the last 1 percent say "I wont' believe Hell is real until I get real proof", and then when you can't hold on any longer, guess what you get? PROOF!!!!!!
You need to be saved now before it's too late, you can be saved from Hell now and know it and never have to worry about that 1% chance of error. I am not worried about it at all, 100 percent certain I will go to heaven and I can swing like Tarzan on a twine vine over the fire of Hell and I'm not falling it. I'm not pushing fear, I'm pushing safety. I know how you can be safe and never think about the possibility of being wrong about Hell. Repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, He is risen from the dead, willing and able to forgive your sins and save you from Hell if you ask Him to do it for you, believing He can and will.
You're goofy, Bob, Pliny the Elder studied and wrote about animals. Natural history had nothing to do with politics or Roman culture, Pliny the Elder stayed out of those areas. You're making a huge stretch of truth to say the reason he didn't write about Jesus is because Jesus did not exist. The stories of Jesus would have been an entirely different area which had nothing to do with Natural History which recorded Pliny's observations of animals and nothing else.
You knew none of this when you presented your "list of historians", proving you copy and paste garbage without checking on it's veracity, and now you are going through more long drawn out excuses for stretching the truth and inventing lies. You are a liar, Bob, I caught you presenting lies as truth and now you are trying to cover it up with more lies and more stretching of the truth. Why in the world should I believe YOU???????
Who are YOU to call people who came before you liars, Boob?
This is why I'm ignoring you. You can't tell the truth to save your life, and then when you get caught lying and you know it, you still can't admit you were wrong but you invent more twists to spin your story just incapable of letting go of your imaginary version of history. Take a hike, Bob, I'm not interested in your garbage any more. If the only way you will believe the fire of Hell torments sinners throughout eternity is to find yourself unable to get out of the fire, that is not my problem. I tried many more times than you deserve the time I gave you trying to talk you out of your foolishness. Go on and see for yourself is Hell is real, if that's the way you have to find out. It's not my problem. It's on you.
And another thing, Bob, you dupe, Jesus's activities were centered around the Jews, His work was among the jews, the crowds who followed him were mostly Jews. He was not a focal point pertaining to Roman history until the Jews requested that he be crucified under Roman Law. He was not much noticed by the Romans because he was breaking no law. He challenged the religious leaders of the Jews, taught in their temples. He was not a rabble rouser, the Romans generally paid no attention to Him as He was a Jewish side show as far as they were concerned, He was not a lawbreaker in any way, was not disturbing the peace of Rome. You just throw common sense out the window, Bob, ignoring history and inventing your own lies as you ignorantly copy and paste other people's lies before you use your brain for a minute to see if you can trust the people teaching you how to make a fool of yourself. There is nothing anywhere that says Pliney the Elder wrote anything about Roman history or culture, and the fact that most of Jesus's ministry was involving the Jews would have been even more reason Pliney the Elder would not have been paying any attention to Jesus or his followers. Pliny did not want to be involved in recording or commenting on history or culture of Rome. All of his worlds focused on the natural world of animals and plants and medicine uses of plants.
You're clinging in desperation to a huge stretch of truth to say "surely Pliney the Elder would have written of Jesus if Jesus was real" Admit it Bob, your're making a fool of yourself. Why in the world should I believe what you think people 2000 years ago would have or would not have done? You go by your feelings, I'll use common sense and read the facts of history for myself. If you want to believe your own twisted mental gymnastic stretch of truth, go ahead. Whoever taught you to believe that way sure is making a fool out of you.
Pliny the Elders interest in facts and fables was in relation to medicinal plants and animals. Your stretching the truth, Bob, ignoring your own reference links. What a liar you are, Bob, keep pushing the "Jesus is a myth" garbage, but tweak your story enough to make it sound a little more convincing than the liars you copy and pasted from earlier, and maybe you can write a new and improved "Jesus is a myth" book with better intricately woven lies and spins on reality, common sense, and ignorance of history replacing it with your own imaginary version.
You should completely forfeit this whole line you used from the start when you included Pliny the Elder in your list of historians and used him, the father of the Younger, as the main key in your fake story of all historical references to Jesus being errors or stupidity on the part of the writers. You should acknowledge what was always considered factual for 2000 years, that Jesus of the Bible was the real character who changed the world. If you have a shred of self-respect or honesty, you should admit you are wrong, admit that Jesus lived and was crucified 2000 years ago, the same Jesus told of in the gospels, and focus your stupid hatred of God on trying to disprove the divinity of Christ and His bodily resurrection.
Common sense should tell you that you have allowed slick tricksters to make a sucker out of you with this whole "Jesus is a myth" thing. Just admit it Bob, it won't kill you. I have admitted to being wrong more than once in the last month on this site. The truth is always good for you, even if it does hurt your pride.
I saw enough of how to torture and kill Christians, started with crucifying Jesus Christ, thanks for the link anyways. I'm sure you can enjoy it without me.
Crock crock crock, if you die today, are you sure your sins are forgiven and you are going to heaven? God loves you and you can know now and forever that you have eternal life...but you don't want to know, do you?
what makes you so sure? do you want to share, or do you want everybody else to burn in Hell? Please tell me so I can know how you are sure your sins are forgiven and you are going to heaven.
As I suspected, you're a liar.........................................................and for a moment I thought maybe you knew what you are talking about.
Bob, those people who started this "Jesus is a myth" garbage are smarter than you, they know there are a lot of fools like you who are desperate to believe Jesus was wrong when He said liars will be in Hell fire forever, so they came up with this "Jesus is a myth" garbage based on falsified purely fantasy versions of history knowing fools like you will promote or pay for their books.
The same with Richard Dawkins, making a sucker out of you. You sound like a Dawkins trained parrot, repeating the ten or twenty arguments Dawkins uses and not accepting any logical or scientific contradiction....you're duped, Bob, and if you wont' believe the fire of Hell torments sinners except by finding yourself in that fire and unable to escape, that's the way you will have it. You're being a fool, following liars and haters, and making yourself into one of them. Wake up Bob. You don't even know I'm your friend/.
I'm pretty sure that no historical evidence proves that Jesus of Nazareth existed. Do I believe that he existed? Absolutely. Do I believe that he was the Son of God? Absolutely Not.
Boob will present a bogus list of "historians" which includes who knows how many people who are not historians and did not record history, such as "Plliney the Elder". I'm sure if you research the list of names he provides you will find many if not most and maybe even all of those names were not historians.
Boob will also try to copy and paste impressive lists of disinformation designed to prevent you from investigating the facts for yourself as his junk is presented as authoritative so you are supposed to feel like you are informed when in reality you will be disinformed and misled to think you know things you have not worked to research to prove your knowledge.
Boob is angry at God and is obsessed with insulting Christians. He's a nasty guy toward Christians, but somehow he claims to be Mr. Nice guy and I don't buy his act.
Take the time to watch the video presented, it answers Boobs key points extensively and if Boob springs something like his "list of historians", take it with a grain of salt...of that long list, it only took me a minute of googling the names to see it's bogus to say they were historians.
Boob has not researched his own material, and that was obvious by the way he tried to tell me Pliney the Elder was a historian......Brittanica online proves Boob is using bogus material, and that is because his argument is bogus and depends on using bogus sources or calling good sources bogus......Bob just plain hates God, hates Christians, hates the Bible because he wants to escape his problems in death and God won't let him off the hook so he's throwing tempter tantrums at God and Christians.
Even if your bob enters historians that you refute, it is the remarkable LACK of record that makes his point. Where is the historical reference? None of the apostles are known to have historical writings. There is no independent source to substantiate anything in the bible.
Your faith based beliefs are fine so long as you remember they are faith based.
His point is not made. His point is based and ignorance, it's willful ignorance, so desperate to discount the deity of Jesus Christ that his leaders dupe him into accepting practically any slander and they presenting it as if it is documented and supported by evidence. His whole point is believing in being willfully ignorant.
People of God kept God's word. Roman Historians recorded Roman History. Religions events of the Jews were not tracked in Roman History, correct me if I am wrong on that point, but I'm sure you will find equally little attention given to all of Jewry in Roman History as we given to Jesus Christ who came to the Jews. Jesus' ministry was to the Jews, not to the Romans and the Romans generally did not pay much attention. There are several references to Jesus Christ, some events around His crucifixion, and Christians in Roman history. The reality of the person of Jesus Christ was never doubted by scholars, and generally is not doubted today. I saw college history books/ Western civ books recently which teach Christ was the one we know today as the same Jesus Christ referred to in the Bible. Until this recent movement of ignorance bought by a multitude of easily duped haters like Bob, and promoted through intellectual dishonesty shown in one example of a list of 120 "historians" who were not historians, and then completely trashing the integrity and validity of historians who actually reference Christ and some events which happened around His crucifixion, even though those are the real historians of Rome and the list of 120 is probably completely bogus as it upholds Pliney the Elder as the strong point of it's purpose for slandering all historians who actually referred to Christ............
If you want to be an ignorant buffoon like Bob and talk about stuff you don't know about and pay people to write books to make you feel like you know something if you are ignorant, keep running with Bob saying Jesus Christ never existed. If you want to see the facts, look at the video I presented. I don't much care what you do as I have already written you off as being completely given over to your sin, loving your sin more than life, destined for Hell and gone beyond the point where you could repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ who died for you and is risen from the dead and will be your Judge if not your Savior.
My faith is based on facts you idiot. Your faith is based on willful ignorance.
I get so sick of fools like you talking like you know more than God, and you hate me for telling you the truth, so you feel like you just have to ride my back and insult me and I just want to get away from you. While you are on me I'm going to tell you that in your rebellion against God, rejecting His Son, you will be cast down and find your place in Hell where sin belongs. As for me, people like you will try to ride me into the ground to silence me if I can't walk away. I want you to get off my back, go your merry way and see for yourself if you can escape the Judgement of God .
Saintnow, there were very prolific Jewish historians of that time. None of them mentions anything of the man or the events of this supposed "Son of the Hebrew God"
1.Philo Judaeus- who wrote around 50 Hebrew literary works where there is not one mention of this character Jesus, the Christ, the events mentioned in the Bible.
2.Justus of Tiberias- Jewish Historian living where Jesus would have been the most popular if the Bible had any historical value. Discusses any Jew worth discussing yet never discusses this Jew Jesus of Nazareth.
3.Flavius Josephus- Even though Eusebius Pamphili, inserted Christian propaganda into his works it is known that Josephus wrote nothing of this Jesus character either.
These are three Jewish writers not Roman or Greek writer. You can try to discredit me but facts are facts and historical evidence is what it is. There is no historical evidence to support the idea that Jesus of Nazareth ever existed at all
prolific jewish historians? Comeon, Bob, are you really that dumb? Jewish historians were ruled by the Jewish religious leaders. It was a horrible thing for a Jew to be barred from entering the temple to give their sacrifices, they became outcasts, shunned, unemployable.......the Jewish leaders killed Jesus because He threatened their control over their religion....He threatened their source of income. Jewish historians would write what they were told to write, they would not write what they were told not to right. The whole situation having been unable to keep the body of Jesus for proof that He was not God was an embarrassment and they didn't want it recorded. Give me a break, Bob, are you really as dumb and incapable of investigating facts as you seem to be?
All of Jesus's followers were Jewish. Those who knew He is God the Savior and risen from the dead wrote the true historical account, passed it along verbally and in writing in spite of brutal torture and executions at the hands of Jewish religious leaders given freedom to persecute the Christians under Roman law. The passed the word along, it could not be stopped, and they wrote it down. Eyewitness accounts, Bob. Christian historians writing as commanded by God the word of God telling the good news of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Are you really so mind numbed that you can't look at the facts of history?
So this does nothing to explain why there is nothing stated no mention of this Jewish trouble maker claiming to be God, (or the son of God) depending on what belief system you follow. Why would Jewish, Roman and Greek historians write of John the Baptist yet never mention Jesus? Why if the Jewish God were on earth in the flesh would any Jew not mention this "greatest event in history" How could it be kept such a secret throughout the world that no one wrote about it until at the bare minimum 40 years after murdering God in the Flesh. Why is there no mention of something so amazingly rare that in millions of years it only happened once?
What was written about Jesus was not written by Jesus. It was not written at the time of the events. The Gospels read as fictional stories rather than a biography, because they are. None of the writers claim to be eye witnesses, because they are writing of fictional events. Jewish history doesn't even support any of the events of the Gospels. Herrods killing of the boys under 2 in Bethlehem. How could something so tragic in Jewish history be left out by the Jewish historians, unless it never happened?
Christian historians didn't start writing about Christians until about 100 years later. As if that would be relevant eyewitness testimony. You can just make stuff up if you want to but you can't offer anything but the Biblical writings (written from 40 to 100 years after the events discussed would have occurred) which are designed to begin a new friendlier to mankind religion.
The Christian historians, moron, were ALL JEWS!!!!!!! All of Jesus' disciples were Jews. Jesus' ministry was in Judea, in the Jewish temples and cities. The Romans paid little attention, is was a Jewish matter. John the Baptist was executed by Herod under Roman authority and was a Roman Issue. The Jewish religious leaders pressured the Roman procurator, Pilate, to allow them to crucify Jesus. Pilate washed his hands of it. It was not a Roman Issue, Pilate simply put if off on the Jews. When the Jews found they could not keep the body of Jesus in the grave, they were embarrassed and afraid. Jesus's followers who were ALL JEWS were the Christian historians who passed the word along verbally and in writing under severe persecution of the Jews who were desperate to keep people away from believing Jesus is risen from the dead and is the Messiah. Their livelihood as priests and their control over Judaism were at stake, and they did everything they could to stop the story from being told, the story of the gospel, the good news of God that Jesus had conquered death to set men free.
A little common sense and awareness of the circumstance of the society and culture of the Jews under Roman rule easily answers your stupid implications of Jesus being a myth. Even ungodly atheist evolutionary colleges TODAY in their history and western civ books recognize Jesus Christ as the man talked about in the gospels of the Bible.
Your just a sucker to fall for this modern myth garbage built on intellectual dishonesty and relying on people like you who are intellectually lazy to buy it.
Of course they were all Jews. Just like Jesus was.
I know all this. And none of it contradicts my point as to what the Temple Veil splitting meant. It was the gentile soldier who was the only one who saw it! That was the significance. Gods Kingdom was now open to non Jews! To all! As long as they believed. You really should have known this. I know it since God used it on me. Ask your pastor if I am right about the Meaning of the story. It's as I said. The barrier was down for the gentiles and pagans. As long as they took Jesus for Savior. Research it yourself. Then I promise I won't say I told you so.
You are overemphasizing a minor point and ignoring the major point. I don't have to ask my pastor about it, he wrote his doctoral thesis on the temple and did a series of teaching on it which lasted several months. You are hung up on one minor point of the meaning of the veil being torn from top to bottom. You once again prove you are uneducated and not a Christian as you ignore the fact that the whole temple pictures God the Savior, Jesus Christ, and the torn veil was His flesh torn on the cross, and only through Him can you enter into the holy of holy place, and only by His resurrection can you come out of it alive.
You are turning the whole thing upside down to make it all about you, and your power to push forward on what you think is a mission from God when in reality you are being driven like a wild horse on a mission from demons to ride you over a cliff.
"The Christian historians, moron, were ALL JEWS!!!!!!!" How contradictory is that? I would say that Justin Martyr was an early Christian historian the key here would be Christian. The Jews that created Christianity were not historians just religion inventors or modifiers depending on how you look at it. Is it me or is it just a Christian method of denial, that if this "son of God/God in the flesh" were truly here on earth for a reason wouldn't that have been more important that what the Jewish leaders or Roman leaders thought or did? According to your statement,"Their livelihood as priests and their control over Judaism were at stake, and they did everything they could to stop the story from being told"' So what you are saying is that the Jewish leaders had greater authority than God. God made it a point to come to earth and live as a human so that the Jewish leaders could suppress this information from all but a very small percentage less than 1% of the human population. You claim that this God cares about mankind as a whole. This is too contradictory to be true. That is what common sense would say. If the creator of all things were to be present on earth that should have been the most important human event in history. Yet there is nothing written about it for decades after the events were suppose to have occurred. What is written is not clear or concise, it is nothing more than a story written about a demigod which contained the same Demigod trials and tribulations as all of the previous Demigods stories.
The reason for this belief that it is all just a fictional story is part of the information age. People have better access to the ancient literature and more pieces of ancient literature have been discovered. It becomes clearer that Jesus was not a person or a God but just another mythical character from ancient times.
You're ill informed and intellectually lazy and promoting garbage compiled by people who are intellectually dishonest. If you want to be that weak minded, that's your problem and not mine. I don't need to respond to you. Go on and be ignorant. I'm tired of your incapacity of being honest. You double talk in your hatred against God so much, you must think it's not you that you look at when you look in the mirror. I'm done with you, Bob. Just go and see for yourself if you are correct in believing you have the right to exist outside of Hell. Have a long life and enjoy yourself all you can, do good Bob, The more good people do in the world, the more evil is restrained. Do good, have a long life, enjoy yourself while you can, Bob. Until you get the proof you insist cannot be forced upon or given to you, I have given you the best of my regards for the best you can hope for as a person who believes God does not rule over you.
The reality of the person of Jesus Christ has never been questioned until recently by intellectually dishonest people who get away with twisting facts because we have a mind numbed lazy brained generation who are eager to believe anything they read which claims to be true as long as it supports their bias against God.
Until modern times, for almost two thousand years, the issue debated has always been the same...the Deity of Jesus Christ. Now some geniuses have figured out that fools will believe anything they publish no matter how outlandish if they present it as factual based on twisted reasoning and half truths...because people generally are intellectually lazy, like you Bob, and will not research the facts before declaring them valid.......and they make fools out of people like you and laugh their way to the bank because you idiots buy their books when you could go to the library and research for yourself and see it's all at best half truths and twisted reasoning which all adds up to being nothing but a lie.
No, you are right. Jesus most likely existed. Cults don't form, thrive, and THEN pick a figure head. They form from around a focal point. Tacitus is the best reference and all he did was say that Christ started Christianity (otherwise they would be called something else) and that their bad ideas spread to Rome. It only stands to reason that there was a somebody at the start of it.
People of God kept God's word
As long as you're ok with those people being in the Vatican for over 1000 years.
Jesus' ministry was to the Jews, not to the Romans and the Romans generally did not pay much attention
If Jesus was a simple wise man this would make sense. But he raised the dead and walked on water. Water that he could turn into wine. These are things the whole world would notice right away, not years after time has washed out the facts.
My faith is based on facts you idiot
1. That's not faith.
2. Knowing the Bible is not synonymous with knowing facts.
I get so sick of fools like you talking like you know more than God
Just more than you. You always conflate the two.
you hate me for telling you the truth
I don't hate you or the truth. I dislike Christian zealotry.
keep running with Bob saying Jesus Christ never existed
You're right, I should have paid more attention to the OP. I am certain that a single man, now known as Jesus Christ, sparked the beginning of Christianity. I find no reason to biblical accounts of the mans life, thus I find almost no historical evidence concerning the details of his life.
Ok, well at least you see Boob's idiocy for promoting this nonsense which some tricksters have actually put in book form and made a lot of money off of.
The debate about Jesus Christ, ever since He started preaching which got Him in trouble with Jewish religious leaders for naming their sins publicly, has been about His claims of being equal with God. It was those claims which the Jewish religious leaders used as their excuse for wanting Him killed, and it has been those claims historically which are debated, not the reality of Him walking the earth in Judea under the Roman Empire 2000 yrs ago. The reason those claims are still published today is that He rose from the dead and told His followers to spread the good news throughout the world and they did, gladly, and no threats of torture or persecution by the Romans could stop them. The word and the message have been preserved and passed along and Jesus's followers today are hated the same as they hated Jesus when they killed Him. I get nothing but hate for saying God loves us and proves it in Jesus Christ, I get no reward on Earth for doing what I am doing here, and I pray God will give me the grace to keep doing it no matter how strongly and violently I may be hated. In America my rights to freedom of speech and religion allow me to go without physical persecution, but that is changing rapidly.
You dislike Christian zealotry and you would cheer if they crucified me...not hating me of course, just cheering to see a Christian zealot put to the test to see if they can be forced to renounce their Savior......and if they can't be forced to renounce, well, they said they are sure they are going to heaven so you did them a favor anyways.
You dislike Christian zealotry and you would cheer if they crucified me...not hating me of course, just cheering to see a Christian zealot put to the test to see if they can be forced to renounce their Savior
Nothing in my arguments against you would indicate that I condone murder. Keep me out of you fanciful dreams of heroism.
You said that if you were God you would do everything and feel everything, moron. That is the most airheaded answer given in this whole discussion, and you supported Jerksy for saying the same thing. Doing everything would including doing every evil thing imaginable you idiot. You said it....airheaded moron. Why in the world did I think idiots like you would contribute constructively in this discussion?
Time's up. Apparently the simple OP was too much for your brain to grasp. You can criticize God like a maniac, but you can't imagine yourself to be God and tell us what you would do and how you would feel. Maybe it's because you are afraid of being criticized?
I was away.
How can you not see that my answer is to not criticize God. If I say I would do anything different, as if I know better, then I would be criticizing God. My answer amounted to saying I would be Godlike (omniscient, omnipresent etc.) and not do anything different. Rather than pretend that evil (a creation of God. Isaiah 45-7) should be eliminated, I told you why it is necessary. Rather than pretend to be better than God, I explained God. Of course that would not be good enough for you. You want me to pretend that God has the attributes of a man (how should an omnipresent being feel?). But I'm not like you. I don't worship a man. A false idol. Your own book forbids it.
Oh, got my debates mixed up, but that's ok. I'm done with you maybe forever. If you think you have the right to exist outside of Hell as a sinner, that's not my problem.
There you go again making yourself out to be some sort of crusading and persecuted martyr, being unfairly maligned by all of us sinners only because you try to promulgate Gods word and tell us He loves us. And that He elves this by offering up Sonny Jesus to pay for our sins
Please. What a joke. Your self aggrandizement and persecution complex is hilariously pitiful. As is your stone age intolerant hateful and bigotted theology.
You are not hated by telling us that God loves us, but rather, for being the biggest hypocrite on this entire forum. Rarely since I have been Saved have I met a so called Christian as loathsome and just plain old unlikeable as you. And you make me remember the types of Christians I used to laugh at and detest, and also pity for their ignorance, when I was an atheist.
Your not hated here. Because one has to inspire strong opinion and emotions to inspire hatred. No, you my sad, deluded, angry friend, are laughed at here more than hated. In short, your a cartoon character religious Zealot straight out of a Saturday Night Live sketch. So you make for merely good entertainment.
Fact. We are dying and need to be saved or we will die.
Fact. Only God the Savior can save us from dying.
These are facts on which my faith is based....some of the facts.
Jesus gained his fame by the miracles he did. It was the miracles which gained followers. There are always people around seeming to have healing powers with people flocking to them. I don't pay much attention to them. The biggest crowds recorded for Jesus were around 15.000 people. Many people were offended by some things He said and quit following Him. After He was crucified and rose from the dead, suddenly his disciples who feared being turned in by Jews as rebels against Rome for having sought to have Jesus for their King instead of Caesar (the threat used by the Jews to force Pilate into allowing them to crucify Jesus, saying it was unlawful to have any king other than Caesar) became fearless in spreading the good news that Jesus had conquered death and is alive and all who believe on Him and receive Him as their Savior will be forgiven and have eternal life. The persecution of Christians was carried out by Jewish religious leaders under license of Rome, whose historians paid no more attention to the issue than I give attention to the modern day healers. It was a Jewish problem and the Romans allowed the Jews to handle it, and they killed Christians as quickly as they could. The Romans generally did not care and were not interested, though some of the events could not be ignored by Roman historians and the movement of Christianity forced some notice by Roman Historians. It is Christians who kept the record of their faith, and the history of Christians, and the written word of God as given by Jesus Christ for the New Testament. It was kinda hard to put it all down in book form and make a lot of copies when they were being burned at the stake and thrown to the lions.
Use some common sense logic. It's not hard to figure out. Christ is risen from the dead, and this is a fact. The record has been kept and passed along at the cost of the life blood of believers and can never be stopped because Jesus conquered death and His followers cannot be denied their place in eternal life with Him, through Him, and for Him.
Sir Lionell Luckahoo, recorded in the Guiness Book of World Records as the worlds most successful trial lawyer and twice knighted by the Queen of England is quoted as saying "I have spent more than 42 years as a defense trial lawyer appearing in many parts of the world.....I say unequivocally the evidence for the resurrection of Jesus Christ is so overwhelming that is compels acceptance by proof which leaves absolutely no doubt"
Napoleon Bonaparte said "I know men; and I tell you that Jesus Christ is no mere man. Between Him and every other person in the world, there is no possible term of comparison. Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and I have founded empires. But on what did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force. Jesus Christ founded His empire upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him......There is not a God in heaven, if a mere man was able to conceive and execute successfully the gigantic design of making Himself the object of supreme worship by usurping the name of God. Jesus alone dared to do this.
People who say believing on Jesus is faith and not facts are people who are not looking at the facts.
Fact. We are dying and need to be saved or we will die.
Fact. Only God the Savior can save us from dying.
You don't know the meaning of the word "fact"...These are not facts.
Christ is risen from the dead, and this is a fact
Zombies aren't real. This is fantasy. Not fact.
Sir Lionell Luckahoo and Napoleon have opinions on the matter that are irrelevant. A lawyer and a tyrant who lived at a time far removed from the life of Jesus can only comment on the state of Christianity, not the life of a man they never knew.
Also, the early attempts by Jews to stamp out Christianity was political in nature and short lived. They experienced about as much trouble as did the Essenes from whom Jesus likely got his ideas.
Who cares about Neptune or Venus? Who cares if they are real or not? Is Dickens trying to kill them the way he's trying to kill God? No. The only thing Dickens cares about is killing God who is Jesus Christ. Duckins is a murderer at heart.
Jesus' ministry was in Judea, in the temples and towns of the Jews. The crowds who followed Him were Jews. He was not noticed by the whole world because He was a Jew and He was sent by God to the Jews. They did not have television to broadcast his speeches around the world. Some of the Romans heard of his miracles and some came to see him, but those were few. For the most part, Romans and gentiles were on the outside and not interested in Jewish events. They generally watched from a distance. You have to be aware of the culture of the Jews and how they operated under the Roman Empire.
My faith is based on facts. You are not listening. You won't get the facts from people who hate the truth. The twelve men, minus Judas who was replaced by Paul, who followed Jesus and say His miracles and the crowds who followed and saw the miracles made Jesus famous in Judea. After He was crucified, all his followers were disappointed as they thought He was the Messiah and would set up the Kingdom of Israel to bless the whole world. They all ran in fear of the Jews, in fear of being killed the same as Jesus was killed for not following the Jewish religious leaders. After Jesus rose from the dead and proved He is alive, His disciples could not be stopped from spreading the good news......and they were persecuted, tortured and killed for 300 years before Catholicism started and gave SOME rest. Real Christians did not join and conform to Catholicism and they were persecuted by the Roman Catholic Church throughout the dark ages and beyond for two or three hundred more years.
Why are people so dense like you so they can't see common sense and figure things out for themselves?
While we have historical evidence in support of other figures mentioned in ideologies (Mohammad, Buddha, etc.) there is nothing there in support of Jesus, which is actually kind of surprising. One would assume that there was at least a person alive at the time who could have represented Jesus of the Bible, however as far as we know there wasn't. This is because there aren't any documents - and the Romans sure as hell loved to document things.
If Jesus had been real we would have had a birth certificate, travel papers, letters written about him, warrants for his arrest, etc. but we don't. It is highly unlikely that someone as (in)famous in Rome as described in the Bible as Jesus would have existed without some sort of documentation mentioning him.
This is a fine example of the dumbing down of people through orchestrated disinformation. It's to the point now where people accept the wildest lies as truth, and then they repeat those things thinking they are intelligent when they have never studied the things they believe. Evolution and Atheism are that way, you have to start with a wall in your brain to block out contrary scientific data and common sense logic which contradicts your beliefs. Isn't it funny how near the end of the Book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ, how it finishes stating many people are to be left in their wicked ways (Rev22:11 He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.
And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.), while the invitation to all for them to trust God and receive eternal life remains extended to them? Time is limited.
17 And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.
Every word of your first paragraph can be turned around to YOU!
"...the dumbing down of people through orchestrated disinformation." That is religion, in a nutshell.
"......you have to start with a wall in your brain to block out contrary scientific data and common sense logic which contradicts your beliefs." Just pick up a Bible, all your questions will be answered ...... by this book of myths with nowhere NEAR the, at least logically theoretical proof, of the studies of highly educated people with open minds! WHO, has a "wall"????
The people who are pushing this "myth" stuff are intellectually dishonest and if you believe them you are being intellectually lazy, and there is no point arguing with a rock head.
No. "The people who are pushing this myth stuff" are comparing the Christian "facts" to facts of the Roman, Greek, Egyptian, etc. ideas about their "gods", and see little "proof" that "God" has any more relevancy than Zeus, Neptune, Isis! I mean, there was at least as much "evidence" that THEY existed as that the Christian God, or the Islamic "Allah" existed! I have said many times, show me and I'll believe! Pointing to a "happening" that can be attributed to luck, coincidence, or imagination just doesn't cut it!
The people who are pushing this "myth" stuff are intellectually dishonest and if you believe them you are being intellectually lazy, and there is no point arguing with a rock head.
The comparison you are referring to is extremely dishonest, and it's hard to believe it was not intentionally composed knowing it is dishonest. If you research the facts yourself instead of being lazy and taking the words of liars as true simply because you want to believe Jesus is not God and He is not alive, you're intellectually lazy and by making assertions that lies are factual, you prove that you are a fool who believes anything somebody tells them.
Look at the videos I have referenced for enough of the real facts that anybody with have a brain and an ounce of honesty would reject this myth garbage. You can open the books and look for the real facts or you can believe liars on the internet and then make yourself look like a fool talking about things you do not know about.