By stating that healthcare is a human right I assume you mean free healthcare for all.

If so, who is going to provide the finance for this human right?

The average citizen will, through taxation.

Let's get our facts right here: The US government spends, per capita, more than twice the tax-dollars on subsidised healthcare for American citizens, than a fully socialised healthcare country like the UK spends, and Americans STILL have to fork our for private insurance.

You want to cry about costs: your current system costs your government, and yourself, three/four/five times what it costs the average citizen in a socialised healthcare system.

The cost argument against universal care is absolute nonsense. A socialised system is cheaper and more effective in several ways:

1. It forces private medical companies to reduce prices, so as to secure large contracts (an entire country buying your medicine at 40% the usual price, is better than a few private hospitals buying it at 100% the usual price);

2. It incentivises legislation that allows for cheaply made generic versions of high-cost branded medicines (it benefits the government of a subsidised healthcare system to instate laws that reduce the length of time a chemical formula can be patented);

3. It tends to provoke governments to instate public medical companies which can manufacture equipment and medicine for much lower costs than profit seeking entities can;

4. It forces hospitals into public hands and, due to a lack of shareholders seeking profits, it means that the hostpitals can be run much more cheaply and cost effectively (no shareholders means no need to charge through the teeth for services, nor to provide yearly "growth");

5. It removes the need for citizens to pay twice for their healthcare: once through taxation and once through insurance premiums;

6. It promotes a culture of quality-of-care rather than profit-seeking -- any costs that are cut will be cut at the behest of committees of doctors committed to the Hippocratic Oath, not at the behest of boards of directors committed to sales targets;

7. Owing to the fact that public money is used both to manufacture medicine and to provide it in healthcare settings, there is no institutionalised profiteering at any stage of the chain: all money spent is public record, and none ends up in the hands of shareholders. It is reinvested in the system.

Look at any socialised healthcare system in the developed world: they are all cheaper, by a helluva lot, than the American model. And yet, nearly all of those other developed countries have higher life expectancies and better overall health than Americans. In fact, the WHO three year study has ranked the UK as the best health system in the world for decades now.

Who pays for the research and development for the drugs and medication necessary to treat the great range of constantly evolving new illnesses plaguing the world's population?

The NHS is, in medicine, the highest contributor to medical research in the world. It is the world's 5th largest employer. Yet, out of the world's 11 most developed countries, it puts the 4th lowest percentage of GDP into its healthcare system.

Do you know which country puts the most?

Yep, the USA.

If you believe in healthcare for all, would you along with other like minded people be prepared to donate 75% of your income so everyone can enjoy this human right?

75%? Lmfao. I can earn the equivalent of $16,000 before paying ANY tax. Then from about $16,000 to $60,000, I pay only 20% of my income in taxes. And I have access to the NHS.

75% is a made-up number.

SOURCES:

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2017/jul/mirror-mirror-international-comparisons- 2017

This is my body. I have the right to choose what happens to it.............................................................