CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
1
It does it surely does
Debate Score:4
Arguments:3
Total Votes:4
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 It does (2)
 
 it surely does (1)

Debate Creator

CrapWeasel(537) pic



Marxism has a rabid sexism problem

"In examining the classical Marxist literature, we have been struck by the quasi-absence of an analysis of the situation of women in our society, as in previous societies. In fact, we can clearly state that if the Programme of IS! contains serious weaknesses, omissions and errors on the question of women, this is because our Programme is a faithful carbon copy of the classical Marxist line on the question, and that Marxist theory contains the same weaknesses, omissions and errors."

National Women’s Committee of In Struggle!

Feminist questions about Marxist theory


It does

Side Score: 3
VS.

it surely does

Side Score: 1
2 points

Jesus Christ you are so comprehensively full of shit. See:-

Marxist feminism - Wikipedia

Marxist feminism is feminism focused on investigating and explaining the ways in which women are oppressed through systems of capitalism and private property.[1] According to Marxist feminists, women's liberation can only be achieved through a radical restructuring of the current capitalist economy, in which, they contend, much of women's labor is uncompensated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist_feminism

Side: It does
1 point

Marxism has a rabid sexism problem

Hello Crappy:

Yeah, Marxism sucks.. So, what's that got to do with the price of tea in China??

Ohhhhh, that's right.. You think us liberals are COMMUNISTS, MARXISTS, and all around bad people..

DUDE!

By the way.. Here's why liberals want higher education for people.. If they were educated, they'd KNOW that Marxism is DEAD.. They'd KNOW that Communism is DEAD. But, they DON'T know that.. I have NO idea why.

excon

Side: It does
1 point

Not surprising really as Marx the champagne socialist was also a rapist and a vile bully boy racist ,

In reference to his socialist political competitor, Ferdinand Lassalle, Marx wrote, “It is now completely clear to me that he, as is proved by his cranial formation and his hair, descends from the Negroes from Egypt, assuming that his mother or grandmother had not interbred with a n. Now this union of Judaism and Germanism with a basic Negro substance must produce a peculiar product. The obtrusiveness of the fellow is also n-like,” according to the book “Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy.”

Regarding Mexicans, during the Mexican-American War, he wrote: “Without violence, nothing is ever accomplished in history.” But then he asks, “Is it a misfortune that magnificent California was seized from the lazy Mexicans who did not know what to do with it?”

And Engels, the co-author of the famed (or infamous) “Manifesto of the Communist Party,” added: “In America, we have witnessed the conquest of Mexico and have rejoiced at it. It is to the interest of its own development that Mexico will be placed under the tutelage of the United States.”

Marx—whose grandparents were Jewish, but whose parents converted to Christianity—wasn’t a fan of his ancestral religion either, writing in his essay “On the Jewish Question”:

“What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money . … Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist,” Marx wrote in the book—which critics have later described as virulently anti-Semitic.

And in what sounds like a 19th-century version of a screed penned by a Holocaust-denying, white supremacist on a web forum, Marx continues:

“Money degrades all the gods of man—and turns them into commodities. … The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange. … The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.”

Side: it surely does