1: I'm much more familiar with Star Wars but from what I've seen of Star Trek it seems less impressive to me.

2: Star Trek is fraught with physics fallacies and petty attempts at sounding scientific when it's clear to anyone who has basic knowledge that 99% of their quantum bullshit is a gross misrepresentation of how shit actually works in order to bend and stretch the mechanics of reality to conform with the whims of the show's writers.

3:Both Star Wars and Star Trek are blatantly inaccurate in their portrayal of the technologies and social structures one should expect from advanced civilizations. Take into consideration the simple fact that these are fictional type one and two civilizations being conceptualized by people from type zero civilizations, our values and psychological traits are therefore projected onto beings who should be vastly more advanced than us, it's like expecting an ant to behave like a human. When you consider that, it's pathetic how in Star Wars (wherein larger galactic governments exist but the technological level is technically Kardashev 1 if you discount the warp drive tech, which technically shouldn't be in Star Wars when you consider how advanced that is compared to other Star Wars tech.) there are still type zero governmental and socioeconomic structures and a significant lack in certain tech such as nanotech and renewable or highly efficient energy sources, while at the same time their ability to travel through space is blown out of proportion. Star Trek is even more pathetic in this regard because Star Trek has Type 2 Kardashev civilizations with the same socioeconomic bullshit and even more technological fallacies.

4: Star Wars actually has a point, Star Trek is more about wandering around through space and getting into conflicts with random aliens, Star Wars is about a cosmic force being kept in balance and the battle for freedom and justice in the galaxy.