- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Europe is a union of separate nations. However, I am suggesting a union of states, sub-nations if you will, all connected to the parent nation conglomerate. The benefit of this is in increasing the power of the nation as a whole relative to various smaller independent nations, safeguards against the type of balkanization that has occurred in Europe and elsewhere, greatly increases the strength of the Military/defense force from foreign threats (i.e. outside of North America), and maintains a much more robust economic world power. Additionally, of course, it allows the citizenry to choose the general type of lifestyle and legal structure they desire to live in, and have control over what is in their reach and no further (in principle)--rather than smaller groups influencing the governance of 330 million, many of which do not agree with the state of affairs at all; which, of course, is the current predicament.
Should we give libs the west coast and New York, and create our own country?
It would be wise, in my view, to break-up the nation into the states as mostly independent entities which relate to the country as a whole through the union of the flag, military, and generalized economic system, though with few federal oversights. That is, embrace a variation of Anti-Federalism.
Does the fact that Atheists on average are more intelligent and educated show that Atheism is more logical than Theism?
They are not--many atheists are SJWs and pseudo-science fan-boys/girls.
Neither group (religious v non-religious) is inherently more intelligent.
Are Jews Really Smartest Race?
Note: Comments below are not limited to any one person nor group, as they apply generally out of principle
No, there is no reason to suppose that--other qualities factor in to establishing control, particularly through an artificial source such as money. For instance, the willingness to use deception, manipulation, and other vice-ridden tactics in order to achieve a means, particularly when opponents are not, or are otherwise naive due to a failure of recognizing not all people want the same thing nor abide by the same (or any) moral code.
Learning Cello on my own in mid 30
And, yes, one is able to pick up on any skill from playing the cello, learning to draw well, video editor, golf, mathematics, so on and so forth.
Plan and Strategize.
Execute with Discipline.
Positive Results Will Come.
The message inside of the entertainment is crucial, as is the way athletic events are played/held as well as what they are intended to stand for. As of current, the overwhelming majority of entertainment and sports are a poisonous drug, though occasionally some great, positive stuff gets through.
Change the entertainment==change the ideal==change the culture
Defeatism is a very dangerous mind-set to get into.
Also, I think it is unnecessary. If one wants to reach the people, they have to identify where the power is at, and meet them there while wielding it. A tremendous amount of power in our society is in entertainment and sports, therefore they can function as conduits for being heard and taken seriously. Therefore, training in such as as music, art (i.e. video making, comic books, etc.) and extreme, impressive athletic feats that captures the public's attention is a potential route to being heard, if so desired.
Building readily available alternatives to the mainstream, often and overwhelmingly degenerate mind-poison, is a very challenging and likely highly rewarding endeavor.