CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic


RSS XMathFanx

Reward Points:1537
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
84%
Arguments:1847
Debates:195
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
3 points

@marcus

Yes, you're right. I just wanted to point that out. Also, I think you are right about the Bible--that is, it may not have even been written with the intended purpose to ever be taken literally (i.e. as written), but rather as (mostly) fictional stories that reveal deeper truths as is the case with most literature.

xMathFanx(1537) Clarified
1 point

@Marcus

The Koran most definitely asserts it to be the truth, and the stories are claimed to be true--as well as the 'revealed truth' in the text.

1 point

Should senior citizens be required to retake the driving test at age 65?

I think that is a good idea, yes. Though, a shortened version of it could be made available--it is more of a general check-up.

1 point

As you likely know, I am very skeptical of any claims to the existence of Chi as a real phenomena--as it is discussed in traditional martial arts. Now, that doesn't mean I do not think those who developed the concept were not on to something--they were. However, as I see it, it is not 'Chi', but how our body internally functions that they were discovering.

There are many techniques in DBZ where the fighter is 'center their Chi' when powering up, that IRL, would also work well--though for different reasons. For instance, static & dynamic tension is a phenomenal technique often depicted in the show, which most gym-goers do not use nor understand. Some do, as I have seen Michael Jai White (the actor/martial artist) use it properly before, however it is often overlooked. There is a lot more to this effect in the show (and traditional martial arts style/training/wisdom), however it is often overlooked or even mocked by stupid, ignorant people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with what you are saying--and yes, there is often a lot of wisdom from ancient people that is often dismissed (foolishly), due to the superficial packaging of it. As for electricity in relation to Chi, I think you are correct. Actually, we know now that the true source of peoples strength, speed, power, etc. is coming from their nervous system--not their muscles. People already have the potential for extreme strength, etc., however their joints, tendons, ligaments, muscles, etc. are ill-equipped to keep up. That is why under extreme circumstances people are capable of 'super-human' feets of strength (actually, there is nothing 'super-human' about it--people just do not know how to train up to it and control it properly) however afterword they are often seriously injured; e.g. shoulder popped out, torn ligaments, muscles, etc.

This is also why people tend to have serious misconceptions about a one-to-one match up with peoples musculature and functional power/athletic ability. Many 'gym-rat' guys are very confused on this front--as they keep training their muscles while neglected to seriously train their nervous system; which is the true source of their strength (or lack thereof). Anyone familiar with martial arts, gymnastics, calisthentics, etc. would understand this on some level. Look at what chicks can do with gymnastics and no real muscular development. Or martial arts guys who look 'normal' but nonetheless are athletically impressive and posses high functional strength. Again, Callisthenic athletes are a good example of this.

1 point

@OmegaPan

I am on a College Campus currently, and I generally agree with what you say. I know these kids, and (most) of their 'troubles' are imaginary in nature--unlike AA which is geared toward an actual issue that they actually attempt to solve, together. I am simply pointing out that the idea of 'support networks' and 'safe spaces' under their original, intended purpose (e.g. AA, drug rehab, etc.) makes perfect sense and is quite helpful. The problem with what the kids and/or neo-Marxists are doing is distorting the notion beyond absurdity and demanding it be taken seriously.

1 point

Karate VS Kung Fu: which one is superior?

Neither Karate nor Kung Fu should be predominately relied upon in a legitimate fight--however, of the two, Karate provides a more solid base to build from.

5 points

Books or Movies?

Both have their place and can be phenomenal when done correctly. As for building strength of imagination, I think books tend to be superior.

1 point

@OmegaPan

I submitted my position posts ago--that is, I agree that (overwhelmingly) College Leftists are acting as Concept Creeps and extending the idea of 'safe spaces' and 'support networks' beyond their actual usefulness to a point that is (often) absurd or even dangerous. However, the idea of 'support networks' and 'safe spaces' when used properly (their original intended purpose; e.g. Alcoholics Anonymous, or even tight/true friendships) is very much valid and helpful.

0 points

@OmegaPan

Yeah--that's wrong. Having a network of support is tactically sensible just as having true friends in life is. Now, it often works out in real life that true friends are hard to come by and your network of support runs thin to non-existent, in which case you must be prepared for that. However, that hardly diminishes the positive value of friends and support teams--just that you need to have an awareness that may not be available to you if/when an issue arises.

Selfish/self-absorbed people fail to realize they are making life much more difficult on themselves and others than it has to be as they necessarily have everything function in 1 stick units rather than band up when appropriate. Ultimately, there are ways in which we have to be individuals and ways in which we should function in teams in order to optimally accomplish tasks.

1 point

It is a support network of people going through similar experiences. One stick is easy(er) to break, a bundle of sticks is difficult to crack.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: School Shootings: The 'Elephant in the Room'
Winning Position: Stephen Hawking: Died at Age 76
Winning Position: For the Motion
Winning Position: Sensible Policy

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Independent
Country: United States
Religion: Atheist

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here