CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Hostiles
View All
None

RSS XMathFanx

Reward Points:673
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
88%
Arguments:672
Debates:90
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
xMathFanx(673) Clarified
2 points

@NathanAllen

Says the one who blatantly trolls this site with you fake news, and your blindness to the truth. You bully everyone that is not a blinded liberal like you. Again get the hell off this site.

Is this intended for me?

xMathFanx(673) Clarified
1 point

Do you agree that Globally we are having an increasingly serious overpopulation problem developing?

1 point

When their time is served and are released, then they should have voting rights reinstated.

xMathFanx(673) Clarified
1 point

@michelle02

Right. So first, I am sorry if I worded the debate in a confusing manner. What is meant by "myth/fraud" is not that it is not accurate that women's salaries on average are about 80% of men's. Rather it is stating, is the "equal pay for equal work" a fraud (due to some of the factors you listed as well as others)?

That is, yes, men earn more, but is that simply because on average they work harder (more dangerous, labor intensive) jobs for longer hours, have more STEM and Business interests/pursuits, are more ambitious in the workplace, ect while women's efforts tend to be placed elsewhere (e.g. different career paths, raising children, ect.) that doesn't translate into the same kind of financial success OR is it due to large scale societal Patriarchy, oppression (in this respect), ect.?

xMathFanx(673) Clarified
1 point

To even ask such a question when America's abortion trade has reduced our birth rates to record lows. There are not enough children being born to support our retirees, or keep our economy going at full speed.

This would suggest that there are issues with the social program within the society designed to help support retirees and other solutions may be necessary. However, this does not imply that there is an under-population problem. We have quite a substantial over-population problem accumulating both here (the US) and world-wide that is becoming increasingly dire

xMathFanx(673) Clarified
1 point

Hey, you stole my shit. Lol

It is too good to confine to one person. I think it should inspire a movement on CD to the point where Nomenclature and his many alt-accounts are bombarded with this by the other members here until the behavior is corrected. It is for his own good really (Lol)

1 point

@EldonG

Obama committed some truly horrific offenses and much of it is utterly counterproductive - though he didn't start the drone wars, he clearly owned it. I'm willing to bet it's created more terrorists that it's destroyed - and he's clearly violated the airspace of several independent nations in doing it.

Yes

1 point

I agree, traits, experiences and situations can (dis)advantage people and research into these (dis)advantages can be useful.

Okay. I think we basically agree, I was just clarifying a particular point

1 point

Have you read my posts at all? It is by no means only Hilary Clinton..

I cant help if you are triggered by simple truths..

xMathFanx(673) Clarified
1 point

"Not at all, though I do find it hard to think of a useful reason to need to measure one individual's "privilege" relative to another, if such a thing were even feasible.

I know that this has been your point all along. I have been arguing that there are clearly ways to quantify advantages in some respects and is useful to measure in some areas. A prime example of this is the Higher Education System. As in, Higher Education oppurtunities vary greatly from individual to individual based on their economic background, presence of willing/responsible guardians/adults in their life, ect. ect.

I object to the typical "Check your White/Male/Gender/Sexual Orientation/ect. ect. Privilege" as it is typically conceived and applied. However, there are still legitimate measures that should be taken into account

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Against the Motion
Winning Position: For the Motion
Winning Position: Against the Motion
Winning Position: If you are traveling at 80mph, how long will it take to go 80 miles?
Winning Position: Against the Motion
Winning Position: Myers-Brigg Personality Test: What is Your Personality Type?

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Independent
Country: United States
Religion: Atheist

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here