CreateDebate


ProLogos's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of ProLogos's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Yes I agree.......

2 points

Seriously? This AGAIN? First say you your gay then straight, then bi.

Atheist then Christian then a rapist. Now yours saying you aren't a military vet?

Lemme ask you this, Do YOU even KNOW who YOU are? Smh

1 point

Joe do you have friends offline? . . . . . .

1 point

I choose Unicorn and OrangeAndBanana.

I've always imagined being fucked by unicorns and while they do it, I'd like to deepthroat the banana.while the orange part smacks my chin like some nuts.

1 point

It hurts my eyes when I look at.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

The key , is shoes.

When we started wearing shoes with thick bottoms it separated us from the earth energy...

1 point

Your definition is over simplified.....

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

That was not a typo.

1 point

Dogs work as an alarm system burger deterer animal hunting wagon pulling guard apparatus, while cats just lick themselves and eat all day.

Dogs are objectively better.

1 point

Hey, looky here...it's the same boring, old , routine bullshit.

1 point

Interesting concept. Will you elaborate?

2 points

Not worth studying if you don't understand that the descriptions of the 4 letter type templates and cognitive function descriptions are not static.

Not worth studying if you're incapable or too lazy to lay out all the details and make connections with real life observations.

Most people that call it bullshit, hardly do any research.

I kind of find it funny that it indirectly explains why someone that has educated themselves on the subject , would still call it BS.... As it gives explanations for the way we cognition... But it does so in a very annoying way.

Using words like "Introverted Intuition" and "Extroverted Thinking" confuses a lot of people because they try to extrapolate meaning from the term name rather than actually studying the term. "Drrr I know what Introverted and Intuition means! Da answers am clear now." The names are not to be taken literally...

I'd like to study it academically. The unwise have tainted Google search with their inaccuracies.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

OK? That's the result I got from the quiz. So you're confused.

1 point

If that was cogent, then working for the gov. wouldn't be a job.

1 point

Your political beliefs would be considered Centrist on an ideological scale.

1 point

But that is their job.

It's how they make a living.

Making a living is what a job is.

Therefore they have jobs.

Mooching is a skill.

As nauseating as it is.....

1 point

Ok but youre not really disputing my argument.

No, really, I am. Trust me on this one pal.

But it doesnt cease to be true. It just ceases to be true because youve changed the labels.

You seem confused. So i'll connect the dots for you.

You said:It doesn't cease to be true.

Then in the subsequent sentence:It just ceases to be true.

Is it still true or is it no longer true?

as what is the accepted definition of that term to 99% of people) plus 2 = 4 (as what is the accepted definition of that term to 99% of people). Nobody agrees 5 = 4.

Argumentum ad populum.

And for 2 plus 2 to = 5 you would have to explicitly tell who youre speaking to that for the sake of your argument that 5 = 4

What's your point? That for it to be true I have to state it? So you agree with the philosophy , that simply stating something makes it true.

Which means that it's a matter of we want to be true, because we choose what we want to believe. What we believe is based on personal feelings

Therefore the truth is subjective.

And if you do that then youre essentially agreeing that 2 plus 2 = 4. Because 2 plus 2 does equal 4.

Begging the question.

Sure but one must be incorrect. Saying "its true for me" is a bullshit phrase.

Sure but the truth must be on personal feelings. It's what you choose to accept. "Truth is objective", is a bullshit phrase.

Something is either true or its not.

Anything can be true.

If i have 2 apples in my hands i say there are 2 apples. If someone then says "well i believe there are 3 apples and that is what is true to me". Then theyre just wrong. I am correct, they are incorrect. End of story.

If there are 2 piglets nestled in a poptart and my friend Ronnie steps up and says , "Yo homie. Can I wrestle with one of those 3 nestled piglets?", I'll know he's talking about the 2 nestled piglets. Who am I to tell him how to say it?

Just because it's the norm? Do you know what the norm is over in sand nigger land? Fucking goats. Are you a goat fucker, AveSatanas?

Take for example colorblind people. I say the sky is blue (on a clear day). And someone who is color blind may say that the sky is gray. Who is right? Well to him the sky is gray. He sees it as gray through his own eyes. However the sky is not gray, the sky is blue to a correctly functioning eye.

Once again...Appeal to popularity.

Things can only be true as far as the things being discussed have concrete definitions. Such as with mathematics

No definitions are concrete.

Thats a fine interpretation. However it essentially agrees with my point that accuracy is subjective. So i guess we agree on that point

Wrong. It does not agree with your point.

Accuracy is defined as "exactness". My point is that it is objectively exact.

I will reiterate a portion to emphasize the evident....

"then it's a factthat you were accurate, regardless of what anyone says and even if you arbitrarily decide that it wasn't..."

1 point

And it's always coming out of the mouths of people who frequently show that they're delusional.

1 point

I'm sick of hearing this "there's so many viewpoints so how do we tell which is right or wrong? Herpa derpa."

Pisses me off.

Perfectly valid when discussing opinions.

Invalid when the issues are about the causes and effects of things.

1 point

2+2=4 is just your choice of symbols used to express the quantity.

2+2=5 , while still expressing the same quantity, is my choice of expressing those quantities.

Accuracy is different because different people can consider things to be accurate.

Truth is the same because different people can consider things to be true.

For instance, if im throwing darts at a dartboard and i get it within 5 inches of the bullseye i would think that was pretty accurate. But a pro dart player may only consider being within 1 inch of the bullseye as accurate. Because he is more skilled at darts his standard for accuracy is much higher than what mine might be as an amateur.

Both would be wrong because to be accurate, you only have to hit exactly where you are aiming.

The standard for accuracy is determined by where you decide to aim. If your goal is to stick the dart into "that big ass wall over there" and you stick it there, then it's a fact that you were accurate, regardless of what anyone says and even if you arbitrarily decide that it wasn't...The standard was already set.

If your goal is to hit within 1 inch of the bullseye or dead center, and you do so, then it is a fact that you were accurate.

1 point

That's just your way of viewing it though, and I respect that.

Who am I to judge you.

1 point

You won't get into yet it's something that you think most people are unaware of?

...

...

...

And we need to guess?

...

...

...

...

The answer is cultural diffusion!

1 point

I like pie. This is true.

Me liking pie, is based on personal feelings.

Therefore, me liking pie is a subjective truth.

1 point

And why can't something which is absolutely and unequivocally true in every regard exist?

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

You're so silly.

1 point

Oh I see. I looked up "hugbox".

That's a helluva jump you made there.

Save the psychological observations for the highly educated and professionals.

1 point

Your argument refutes itself.

1 point

Seems like you still feel responsible.

At least you're remorseful.

1 point

Oh shut up Joe. That was my point from the start. You troll.

1 point

Why?

I like to listen to other people's side before I give out mine.

1 point

I've angered you or irked you for some reason?

What's wrong? Did something bad happen to you today?

1 point

Reason for Banning the dadman

I don't like you.

1 point

How is truth objective and what do you mean by "accuracy is conditional"?

1 point

What is an absolute truth?

And how can you know that it doesn't exist?

1 point

Isn't "my truth" contradictory? In that "my" indicates based on personal feelings and "truth" is defined as based on fact , which based on fact is the definition of objectivity. Something can not be both subjective and objective.

What is your reason for saying this. Have you an explanation?

1 point

Why isn't truth subjective? How can accuracy be subjective?

1 point

"What may be true to you may not be true to me."

What does this mean? And how do those truths become subjective?

1 point

Hahahaha I see wut you did there.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Hahaha

Hahaja

Ha

Ha

Wowkleelke

1 point

And if you only meet the minimum while others go beyond that, then you suck without getting fired.

Hope you understand now.

Thanks.

1 point

So everyone on the job performs the same?

1 point

So someone can't suck at their job and stay hired, is your assumption.

1 point

I've been doing that a lot lately. Made that same correction twice today. It sounds OK when I don't spell it out... There is a There's a. There's chickens in the coop. There is chickens in the coop... There is a chicken in the coop. There's puppies everywhere. There is puppies everywhere. There is a puppy over there. Jdjskks. There are chickens in the coop. I just don't feel a difference.

But what was your point?

1 point

There's levels of logic. What's your point?

I've met logical idiots before. Not saying he's an idiot. But what's your point?

1 point

Because even the most rudimentary engineers can get paid well.

It's fucking engineering.

1 point

i bet he sucks at it though.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

That didn't make any sense.

But I accept it as your concession stand.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

Nah. That it makes it harder to pin it on any corporation.

Or trace it back to.

1 point

I noticed you said "contrails".

Those hover. Chemtrails don't.

What you're seeing isn't the same.

1 point

Because that would give people direct access to the chemicals.

It would be easier for the public scientists to analyze the fuels and release solid evidence to the public.

1 point

Why would the man put chemicals into jet fuel to dump it over vast swaths of ocean and desert when they are already dumping it on places were people live?

1 point

Shouldn't we all be?

1 point

Put them outside so they can keep other bugs out.

1 point

I suggests worldwide lobotomies.

How else do we change the way people are wired?

Let's shower the world with chemicals from the sky.

No one wants to change that?

Can it be changed? Is the question.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

Dooooo it. The truth must come out.

1 point

Your statement is false. More people have actually become violent because of the media.

For example, ISIS using the media for political warfare.

With the existence of the media, it makes it much more easier to spread hate.

Hate is the primary breeder of violence.

Also, we aren't less violent it just seems that way because we direct it towards different activities, e.g football, rugby, hockey, UFC among other things.

The armed forces! There is much violence here.

Don't forget verbal violence. The word has taken place of the sword.

Also, the same reasoning could be applied to the more peaceful side of the past, it only seemed more violent because not much of the peacefulness is mentioned. There wasn't any social media to report most of the good things happening.

1 point

You've still got it, Joe.

Hope you never lose it.

1 point

I'm rolling.

Seriously. You've put me in a better mood. Thank you.

It can be attributed to my masochistic personality trait, I'm sure.

1 point

Don't look at them as issues with morality, but rather , methods of survival...

1 point

Because it'd be racist to put a black man on display with gorillas.

Because Asians are typically the poachers.

An Indian wouldn't be anywhere near a jungle.

White people are always losing their kids when they go on trips.

1 point

Umm...noo we didn't learn that. Leaders stood up and set the example and the majority simply followed the trend...

Go ahead and ask most people, they'll simply respond "because it's the right thing to do". They didn't evolve to that point...there's no reasoning behind it.

1 point

But I don't care to do either.

Probably because I'm retarded ahem ..I mean intellectually disabled.

1 point

For what reason is Hillary an extremist.

I heard Hillary is pro holocaust, does this not make her an extremist.

1 point

So Hilary is an extremist towards abortions.

How does one prove that she isn't an extremist towards abortions.

This is what I'd like to know.

1 point

If Hilary doesn't like abortions, then why is she an extreme abortionists.

Have you no answer.

1 point

Hilary is an extreme abortionist. This is the case.

For what reason would it not be the case.

1 point

If Hitler isn't an extremist then hilary isn't an extremist.

I agree with this.

For what reason do you not agree.

1 point

For what reason do you say no.

Hillary is an extremists, this is proven.

What will you do to keep her out of office.

1 point

Her democracy may not be what's extremist.

Her Abortion Policies are what make her extremist.

For what reason do you agree.

1 point

Hitler is an extremist. You agree.

Hitler had as many followers as hillary. You agree.

So Hillary is an extremist.

For what reason do you agree.

1 point

Conceded to what. That Hilary is an extremist.

Do you agree.

1 point

Hitler represented a larger portion after the 1.2% interval

Was he no longer an extremist.

1 point

He only represented 1.2% of the population for an interval.

Hilary represented no population for an interval.

Therefore Hilary is an extremist.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

Exactamundo.

Do you have any contention?

1 point

Because only vegans eat onions.

For what reason do only vegans eat onions.

The answer is for you to exonerate.

1 point

So Hitler is an extremist.

For what reason is he not an extremist.

2 points

Fuck your bullshit. Me and my people are voting TRUMP.

Trump 2016

2 points

Then if over Twenty Million Americans support it, that does not make her an extremist, does it?

So Hitler wasn't an extremist.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

No worries, bro. My boxers/briefs are nowhere near bunched.

Terrible Joke.

2 points

Don't take it so literally.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

Hillary will be arrested....

Sorry but Trump is the victor

The only thing they have on him, is that he's a dick.

1 point

You wouldn't say any of this to me in person.

You wouldn't even meet me in person.

Haha.

Makes it easy for you to sound tough when you're behind a keyboard.

Damn...I really wish there were people with a mouth like yours IRL. Hahaahaha.

Listening to hopsin doesn't make you black, so stop using ebonics. It's pathetic.

1 point

Since when has trolling the government ever turned out well for the citizens? It never has.

Voting for non candidates is just puerile rebellion.

1 point

I immediately noticed the trend. Lmao. And I don't even watch the news. Just been watching the users here bitch about it.

1 point

You're not convincing anyone.

1 point

Your link fails to show an adequate amount of blacks testifying that Obama did good for them.

The rest of your response is simply an ad hominem.

0 points

Hey, Cum guzzler

I've been broken for years now, if you havnt noticed.

1 point

I think if we got the south pissed off at the government then we'd have a fighting chance.

They all have guns there.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

What and Where exactly is this so-called "boob tube" and why hasn't it become more prevalent.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

How the fuck is prediction a fact?

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
0 points

What the fuck are "Internet Muscles"?

All a faggot ass keyboard warrior like you would develop a phrase that gay.

1 point

Is that sarcasm. But you want Hillary for president. Why would you mock her policies.

1 point

Hahahaha. You said "dick". Hahahahababa. Hilarious.

1 point

Why would changing names have to do with intelligence.

There is no sense in your response.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
0 points

Oh shut up. You're a damn teenager.

1 point

These guys in the study have counted the genome strand to extreme lengths. It's like following a trail of genetic markers, or bread crumbs, that lead to a final destination, on a path.

So it is NOT walking aorund blindly,but following exact and proven methods.

Following a path and hoping to come across something, is called walking around blindly.

If you refute the findings in this article, you are saying that Geneticists don't know how to read DNA.

No saying that people will bullshit their way to a pseudotruth.

ProLogos(2794) Clarified
1 point

Ooooh you corrected him on a definition but not on Luca

Which is what the debate is about.

Way to go smarty pants


1 of 33 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]