Me too. I prefer dogs since they are easier to train and they`re are`t as cranky as cats. They also make great jog buddies.
I have already disputed your statements before. Therefore you clearly are`t paying attention to what my arguments are about. I was only adding additional scenarios for you to understand how little does gender play in the morality of a person.
Reeeeaaaaallllyyy? So I guess I should never bother to explain to my sons that "no means no?" Any age girl is fair game? And if they get pregnant they should just run off and find someone else ASAP. I'll make sure my daughters never learn that by being irresponsible, she could be robbing her child of a chance to have a decent father and a whole family. It is better to go around tracking down 15 different men for paternity tesets just hoping for some child support.
This statement dose`t even make sense. The topic is about homosexuals being involved in adoption not straight people letting their children be adopted. The moment for an example your child gives your grandchild to the orphanage as per your statement, there is no certainty that your grandchild would have a decent home even with straight people. As for your daughter`s case what if she is`t just ready? Would you rather risk her and her child`s future just to be a family even though they would only end up in poverty?
True. People are only brave enough to make arguments on how wrong that person is but when it comes to doing anything they just don't care.
That`s right. When a women gets murdered people go raging on males when if a male gets murdered almost no body cares. If we want equality then we must care for both sexes.
We are given free will to make our own decisions. He helps us by giving us choices. Therefore he cannot directly help us since he already gave us free will which would contradict his gift.
Obviously you are a narrow minded person. You said it yourself that being educated and straight does`t have to do anything with each other therefore why restrict an educated homosexual to adopt if they are worthy to do so.
Let me make another example that even a person like you can understand. Who would you rather be with in a room, a straight murderer or a homosexual who has good morals? In these times gender is only a small factor in the thinking of man. Nurture plays a bigger role than a nature in the decisions of an individual in our society. Try improving your argument rather than putting stupid and moron in your arguments. You only sound like a sore loser.
Sexuality is only a small factor in teaching ethics. Maturity, educational attainment, experience and the like play a bigger role in teaching ethics. Would you rather have an illiterate straight couple rather than an educated homosexual couple who can provide you what you need?
Students should be able to love learning not fear it. Having a strict teacher only puts stress in students thus making learning a chore rather than a fun experience.
I believe that he also prioritized money rather than inventions. He also tried to ruin Tesla`s hard work with ac just to make him the big man of the light game.
Karl Marx. I believe that his ideologies got out of hand which resulted to countries like North Korea who value very little of life.
Inaccuracies are meant to occur during experiments. It helps us perfect our prototypes.
I referred to the Torah since it was the one that contains the Genesis, the book where the moderator was referring to. I believe that the Torah was not written by Moses alone, I believe it was the Israelites who were with him that completed the task. He was attributed to the Torah because he was the Israelites` savior from Egypt which would probably explain his prominence in the chapters.
The Bible was written by Jews during their enslavement in Egypt therefore they still have some basis on what they write in their texts. Not all of them are insane.
Mice can easily reproduce unlike humans. I know it can be immoral but it is necessary to develop our scientific field.
No since we need to do so for the development of science and technology especially in the medical field. I would rather see a mutated animal than a mutated human.
If they can provide for the needs of the child and be able to shape them into good individuals then they are eligible to do so.
Yes since no one has the right to control your own happiness.
Your arguments are already going far from the said topic since people control is`t synonymous to population control. Anyway, laws are present in our society to keep people in their place. We don`t necessarily need a dictator, only a leader to follow.
Just because something its`t evident dose`t mean it is completely non-existent since as a race, we still have more to discover in our universe so counting God`s existence out is made by pure assumption.
Yes since there has been no present scientific and logical evidence to prove or disprove God.
Inter-specie intercourse causes more diseases than regular intercourse therefore it is wise to choose the lesser evil. How can the animal say yes or no regarding the matter wherein animals have no voice of reason. They merely act upon instinct. Animals look at humans as their master or their superior being since humans are the alpha race.
Population can be easily controlled through proper family planning since it is much more practical, cheaper, and environment-friendly. Remember that diseases evolve along with us so it would be wise to prevent it rather than to cure it.
No since abortion can only be committed if premature baby also known as the fetus is aborted from the female.
Smoke is a leading cause of diseases that lead to death and is also a major contributor in world pollution.
But it can still cause diseases with humans therefore must not be done. Prevention is always better than cure and viruses also evolve along with us. As per your statement you said that you had sex with your German shepherd and it would mean that you forced it to have sex with you. Animals are less likely to develop a sexual relationship with their master unless the latter forced them to. This can be also attributed to animal abuse which is against the law.
What about the detrimental effects of over population in a small country? How would they be able to sustain their people if they cannot feed them?
yes because the quality of life must be prioritized over its quantity.
Not every Christian is like that you know, only the narrow-minded ones. Christians also value respect to others and engage in charity which help people in need. In my country religion has helped people find homes, food, and education.
Yes since it serves as a guide to the lost and gives hope to the hopeless. Although its leaders are give trouble to the world, its teachings help humanity become more humane although one must not believe in everything they read in spiritual texts. Its fine to follow religion as long as it does not hurt anyone.
No since society itself is not ready to accept a naked person in public. People with different beliefs would judge the person immediately leading to chaos and misfortune of the nudist. Children would also misinterpret the act of being naked their own way and may go wayward in their beliefs and delve into something they are`t supposed to.
No since they only worsen the situation instead of helping the country. They also engage in their own interest rather than helping the country itself. The US also abuses the people whose country they occupy. Therefore its not their place to do so.
No since they are the proof of genetic or external diseases which affected the human body.
What do you think would happen to you then after the death of the human race?
No. Eventually I would be sick of living since every last one of my loved ones would be dead and I would be left alone in this world. Knowing that you may die in the near future makes the present moment more precious and life worth living.
I believe that the holocaust was worse since a fully living and sentient being is subjected to death compared to a premature fertilized human being.
I believe not since your rewards or punishments are tantamount to your actions no matter where you look at it.
No since Science can be easily be followed even for a Christian.
No since God is a being beyond capable understanding therefore his actions span beyond time we are capable of knowing and thus invalidates our own understanding of 'day'.
Killing humans would only lead to a cycle of hatred which would go on forever. The loved ones of Magneto`s victims would try to kill him and if they do, his children would try to avenge him. Therefore the cycle will go on forever until nobody knows what started their dispute in the first place. Look at it this way, if world war 2 never ended the present generation would still be fighting against each other even though the ones who started the trigger were gone forever. Therefore something must be done to stop this cycle of hate, either both sides get eradicated or both would work together for a better future.
I learn better with textbooks since tablets are distracting and I find it harder to memorize stuff using it. Tablets are also more susceptible to being stolen from kids since it costs more than a textbook.
They should`t since it is a way of teaching them the value of responsibility and cooperation in the house hold. It would also help them in the future when they move out of their parents house.
Engaging in sexual acts with animals may cause certain diseases which are harmful to the human race. It is also a sign of physical abuse to the animal since it would likely to be forced into having sex with a human.
Well as he is believed to be omniscient I think that he does.
Obviously, prayer would not be enough to get what one wants. One must strive for it himself. Praying and believing is only a part of being Christian. Like everyone striving to achieve something, action must be taken what ever your belief may be.
