Debate Info

install flash for graphs
Yes No
Debate Score:78
Arguments:53
Total Votes:89
Show More Stats

Argument Tags

side graph
 
 yes (41)
 
 No (27)
 
 absolutely disgusting (1)

Debate Creator

perspective1(68) pic



Is burning the American Flag as an act of protest acceptable?


Yes

Side Score: 41
VS.

No

Side Score: 37
Vote Up Vote Down
5 points

As law? yes, under free speech. As a practice? Not sure. It depends on why you're burning it.

78 days ago | Tagged As: yes
- ThePyg(3122) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Think about this. If you are burning the American Flag as a protest, ALL that you can be doing is disrespecting the country you live in and all the people who died to protect this country.

So as a practice, that is the only result of burning it.

If it is not out of protest (which the topic doesn't claim) than it's for ceremonial purposes. Any flag that touches the ground must be burned in a ceremony, commemorating the importance of America and Independence.

I'm fine with it as free speech. But I disapprove of the act.

78 days ago | Tagged As: No
- Pineapple(1063) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
3 points

It's representative of the country "going up in flames."

Just like any act of protest it is done to bring attention to a particular action, or lack there of, that the protestor disapproves of.

So just like any act of protest, you must shock people into seeing or understanding your point of view.

If you think that the country is failing, burning the flag respresents that pretty well.

78 days ago | Tagged As: yes
- Prevaricate(57) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

attn ThePyg:

have you read the Supreme Court's ruling on why flag burning is acceptable?

77 days ago | Tagged As: yes
- Awen27(403) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I wasn't sure whether to click support or dispute, because I both agree and disagree with you here. Yes, it's wrong to disrespect all those who died to protect you and your country, BUT someone could burn the flag in protest of America becoming something they can't believe in. Right now is it appropriate? Probably not. But could it ever be? Maybe. I'm just hesitant to say that ALL flag-burning protests under any circumstances, at any time are or would be wrong--I'd have to know the specific circumstances and reasoning.

78 days ago | Tagged As: No
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Absolutely.

It's ironic that burning a flag is considered one of the only acceptable ways to destroy a tattered one yet burning for reasons of protest is perceived as near treason.

The fact that it's offensive is not enough to deem it unacceptable and is in fact why it's an effective act of protest.

Furthermore, for the dissenters, the flag does not represent the same things it does to the patriotic majority. The right to disagree is one of the most fundamental rights we hold in this country. And just as flag burners are welcome to disagree via their flag burning, you are welcome to disagree with their actions. That's the beauty of the USA.

78 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Detestable? Arguably, yes.

But "acceptable"? Certainly. Free speech is free speech. It matters not if one disagrees with the idea(s) being expressed.

77 days ago | Tagged As: yes
- Prevaricate(57) Supported
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

amen !!!

you said it and i 100% agree with yah

too many people (not you) don't truly understand the concept of free speech.

they think that any speech or expression of speech that they deem in unacceptable and unpatriotic must be banned

77 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Any act of protest that does not infringe on another's rights is perfectly acceptable.

However, this kind of protest is not very persuasive.

76 days ago | Tagged As: yes

It's perfectly acceptable. Why not? I understand the symbolic meaning, but, really, when it comes down to it, it's just a piece of fabric in the hands of an angry person with a lighter.

I'll never forget my years as a camper at Girl Scout camp. Every morning and evening, we had a flag ceremony, in which a group of girls--different age group each day--would unfold and raise/lower and fold the flag as we recited the Pledge of Allegiance and sang "Taps." A group of six-year-olds had this responsibility one day, and one of the girls accidentally let a corner of the flag touch the ground. I can still remember how horrified everybody was, while I was just like... come on. She's six. And it's a flag. Get over it.

75 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

absolutely you should be able to burn a flag. you have the freedom of speech in this country. to protect your self while doing it always have a gun handy.

76 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Yes, it always has been so but never more so than in the Viet Nam era where there seemed to be a flag going up in flames every five minutes. People felt disenfranchised from their own country during this time and they showed it by marching burning the flag and dozens of other types of protests against the war. It was a tragic time.

76 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I think it is very scary when people say things like "burn these stripes and you'll see stars"- this is America. We were born rebels, and we fought for freedom of speech, among other things. What I find really sad is how un-familiar most people are with the proper handling of the flag- like how it should never touch the ground, or how the proper way to retire a flag is to burn it- usually while playing taps. No lie. I am am Eagle Scout, and I know these things.

Also, I think it is as offensive to yell "you lie" to a sitting President during a speech to both houses of congress as it is to burn a flag in protest.

70 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
4 points

Acceptable as law? Sure. This is America and we have the right to free speech.

But acceptable as an action? No. I don't find it acceptable at all. You can do it, but I will look down on you for doing it.

78 days ago | Tagged As: No
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

I would say yes, but there is no real reason to it. It's like saying "fuck" only when you're angry... it means something because you don't usually say it, and it's a pretty bad word, especially to some people, but it's meaningless or useless to say.

So as an acceptable means of protest, no. If you're protesting you should have something more meaningful to demonstrate than burning flags.

78 days ago | Tagged As: No
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

yes i agree with the person named thepryg. Yes we have the right of free speech and we can protest but burning the flag is unacceptable and by doing that just shows how much respect us American citizens have for our beloved country

77 days ago | Tagged As: No
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

Isn't it against the law? So it's like not acceptable by the norms of society. If you burn a symbol of your own freedom than isn't that asking to be enslaved or deported to a third world country? So no! It most certainly is NOT acceptable!

76 days ago | Tagged As: No
- Awen27(403) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Some people may not see the flag as a symbol of their freedom. They may see it as a symbol of a country they feel has wronged them or other countries.

73 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

"Hey thanks for this freedom of speech America. Now I will use it to disrespect you!"

Go burn it somewhere els! D<

78 days ago | Tagged As: No
- Awen27(403) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

I completely see and sort of agree with your point...BUT at the same time, is it really necessary to insist that everyone who lives in America respects it? What if they don't have the means to move, or all the people they love are here? I just think it's a bit fascist to for a country to demand that its citizens like it...but on the other hand, it does seem kind of stupid to let people in your country burn your flag. I mean, assuming your flag-burning actually does symbolize disrespect for America and not something else(as Pineapple suggested), it is sort of dumb to do that IF you have the means to leave. If you don't, then yeah, that's actually okay with me, I think, because you don't have a choice about living in this country, and you have the right to express your distaste.

Another thing is, consider the point of governments. What authority do they REALLY have? All that the people let them, because the people want a good society, and don't want anarchy. But does the government REALLY own this land, if you think about it? In world politics, possession actually IS 9/10ths of the law. Maybe this is a tangent, but what I'm saying is that governments really aren't around to get respect. They're around to help create a decent society. If they're doing a horrible job, but nowhere else is all that better, why can't people protest that on the land that the government "owns"? I'm just saying that governments should have only the amount of authority necessary for a decent society--rules to maintain respect are unnecessary and almost childish(You are on what is "my" land and so you have to be nice).

Now...I'm REALLY not sure if that made sense...I was kind of forming my opinions and ideas throughout that, so don't judge me too hard, but go ahead and take it apart(anyone on here. x]).

76 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

no how can the burning of flag represent the sign of protest............................it is utter foolishness......................according to me it will increase the pollution rather increase the protest............

77 days ago | Tagged As: No
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

It is absolutely Unacceptable. It is an illegal act under U.S. Code Title 18, Part1, ยง "Whoever knowingly mutilates, defaces, physically defiles, burns, maintains on the floor or ground, or tramples upon any flag of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both." It is irresponsible, and is grounds for imprisonment.

73 days ago | Tagged As: No
- perspective1(68) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
2 points

ummm.... I'm pretty sure that law was overturned in the 1980's. Look up "United States vs. Eichman". Eichman took this issue to the Supreme Court and won against the United States. His main point was that just because it is offensive to some people DOES NOT mean it should be illegal... I think... I might be wrong, probably not though :)

73 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

That is not acceptable if you don't like our country get out!

72 days ago | Tagged As: absolutely disgusting
- MisterGuy(2) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

America is NOT "love it or leave it". Americans have freedom of speech & expression, and burning the American flag is (fortunately or unfortunately) a part of that important history.

21 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

Well the constitution says it is acceptable, but it's just about the worst slap in the face for all the people who have made so many sacrifices to give you the best life possible. If saw someone burning the American Flag, I might just hit them back.

7 days ago | Tagged As: No
Vote Up Vote Down
0 points

According to Nancy Pelosi your all just a bunch of ignorant crazy Nazi's out of control.

71 days ago | Tagged As: yes
- MisterGuy(2) Disputed
Vote Up Vote Down
1 point  

You've offered absolutely ZERO support of your wild, baseless opinion.

21 days ago | Tagged As: yes
Popular Debates in Politics: Which side has more "bigots"? Will Obama win in 2012? Obama and socialism


bottomAd


About CreateDebate
The CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Help/FAQ
Newsletter Archive
Sharing Tools
Invite Your Friends
Bookmarklets
Partner Buttons
RSS & XML Feeds
Reach Out
Advertise
Contact Us
Report Abuse
Twitter
Basic Stuff
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
Creative Commons



©2009 CreateDebate, LLC All Rights Reserved. User content, unless source quoted, licensed under a Creative Commons License.