Will Dem's ignore Trump's locker room talk as they did Bill Clinton's? Hypocrites?
|
Bill Clinton doesn't get a walk, but Bill isn't himself running for President. Trump is. Hillary is. Now let's talk about both. 1) He's hated by the majority of US women for good reason. It isn't just comments from a live mic years ago, its the way he talks about and treats women every day. There are plenty of other examples the media or Hillary could go to if need be. 2) It isn't just his rhetoric about women but his policies against them, including coming out (recently) as pro-life, and supporting a childbirth leave policy that the majority feel is a short change to parents, and saying childrearing is completely the job of the woman. 3) The fact that it takes an old interview for Republicans to balk and start withholding support is proof they've had their fingers in their ears going na na na na throughout this whole campaign. It takes very very little research to come up with these sort of dumb and offensive statements from Trump, yet until this one interview he was still allegedly the most qualified candidate for the job. Bogus. Now Hillary: 1) She wasn't the cheater, she was cheated on. 2) It's alleged she was in on it but then someone show me a really good article with convincing proof of that. It seems to me instead she's just a wife who tried to hold things together even as her foolish husband kept blowing them apart. 3) The Clintons have policies women actually like. Hey look, if you're going to back a dark horse then sooner or later you're going to get its crap all over yourself. That's what the Republicans have now done thanks to your foolish foray into Trump. You'd have been so much better off with any one of the moderate classic Republicans, but like I've said before, you just called them all RINOs and kicked them to the curb. Now you get to ride your diarrhea spraying dark horse right off a cliff. And no, you won't be taking the Clintons or anyone else with you off that cliff. You were so close. Your debate title actually described hypocrisy. If Democrats ignore someone talking about how easy it is to commit sexual assault while berating Trump for when he talked about sexual assault then yes, that would be hypocrisy. But, as you clearly demonstrated, you don't actually believe Bill Clinton made statements like Trump. You want to compare apples and oranges. If someone doesn't like apples, but they do like oranges, they aren't a hypocrite. The Democrats not condemning someone who was never convicted of a crime, but not approving of someone who says he can get away with committing crimes is not hypocritical. It's possibly wrong, but not inherently contradictory. What is contradictory is believing the exact opposite of something you think is hypocritical. 2
points
What Donald Trump said was ugly, but was it no more that the standard bragging of an Alpha male. To hear Hillary Clinton you'd think butter wouldn't melt in her mouth, or anywhere else for that matter. With all the theatrical dramatics, hand wringing and feigned exclamations of shock you would think he had raped a convent of nuns. Or should that have been, graped a convent of nuns, as there as a bunch of them? Anyway, this is the proverbial storm in a teacup being whipped up by the sensationalist media and his spiteful Democrat rivals. 2
points
2
points
What Donald Trump said was ugly, but was it no more that the standard bragging of an Alpha male. You do realize that what Trump was bragging about was forcing himself on non-consenting women right? If someone is bragging about that, they aren't just some "alpha male"... that's someone who needs serious help... 1
point
Yeah, this is a debating Forum where people express their views. If everyone agreed with each other it would be rather boring don't you think?. What trump said was no more than juvenile machismo, whilst what Clinton did with her email episode was criminal and placed the security of the nation in jeopardy. You should try to develop the ability to be able to distinguish between boastful machiso talk and criminal negligence. The truth is that it is good only one of them can become president, but Trump is the lesser of the two evils. I am not sure about the relevance of Bill Clinton to this debate. Surely his wife is running for president? Not Bill... As for Bill's locker room talk, which you make reference to in the title. We have no evidence to believe he spoke of women similarly to Trump in a private setting. It is conjecture. Whereas, in relation to Donald Trump, we see the hard evidence of his misogyny in the released video footage. As well as that, there is no evidence to prove Bill is a rapist. We have "accusations" -- not hard evidence. What we do have is evidence of an affair. An affair does not a rapist make. hypocrisy, maybe yes, however using that as an argument simply will not work it covers up two essential facts here. number one Donald trump is a game show host and in that sense he is good, but the presidency is not a game show. another words he has no qualifications to president what so ever. she may be flawed, however he qualifications cannot be dismissed. his can. number two he is completely out of his league running for president. he does not have the intellect or the attention span to be effective. please do not feed me the line about how he runs his own corp. he does not he has others run stuff for him. to be president you need attention span and intellect, he has none, that has become very clear. number three he has never studied issues and by now this has become very clear to all except for his supporters. I would think by now that he would have studied the issues and he has not. what excuse is there for not learning the issues and at least having have a working knowledge of the issues and having some thoughts on how to solve these problems. his supporters would never put up with so little knowledge in any other candidate and they should demand more of him. the only plan he seems to have is tax cuts. but tax cuts alone will not solve all problems. he says he is going to make America great again. great slogan no doubt but how is he going to make that happen. these are slogans but one cannot govern on slogans. another words where is the beef. these most recent allegations on him are simply more proof that he is not qualified in way shape or form to be president. 1
point
|
