CreateDebate


Ezekiel_roma's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Ezekiel_roma's arguments, looking across every debate.

What do you think would happen to you then after the death of the human race?

No. Eventually I would be sick of living since every last one of my loved ones would be dead and I would be left alone in this world. Knowing that you may die in the near future makes the present moment more precious and life worth living.

I believe that the holocaust was worse since a fully living and sentient being is subjected to death compared to a premature fertilized human being.

I believe not since your rewards or punishments are tantamount to your actions no matter where you look at it.

No since Science can be easily be followed even for a Christian.

No since God is a being beyond capable understanding therefore his actions span beyond time we are capable of knowing and thus invalidates our own understanding of 'day'.

Killing humans would only lead to a cycle of hatred which would go on forever. The loved ones of Magneto`s victims would try to kill him and if they do, his children would try to avenge him. Therefore the cycle will go on forever until nobody knows what started their dispute in the first place. Look at it this way, if world war 2 never ended the present generation would still be fighting against each other even though the ones who started the trigger were gone forever. Therefore something must be done to stop this cycle of hate, either both sides get eradicated or both would work together for a better future.

I learn better with textbooks since tablets are distracting and I find it harder to memorize stuff using it. Tablets are also more susceptible to being stolen from kids since it costs more than a textbook.

They should`t since it is a way of teaching them the value of responsibility and cooperation in the house hold. It would also help them in the future when they move out of their parents house.

Engaging in sexual acts with animals may cause certain diseases which are harmful to the human race. It is also a sign of physical abuse to the animal since it would likely to be forced into having sex with a human.

Well as he is believed to be omniscient I think that he does.

Obviously, prayer would not be enough to get what one wants. One must strive for it himself. Praying and believing is only a part of being Christian. Like everyone striving to achieve something, action must be taken what ever your belief may be.

Yes since Christianity does not denounce such acts as inappropriate. As long as he does not do harm to others then it can be done.

I believe so since there have been scientific evidences of unexplained phenomena through out the world.

Both genders are smart. It just depends on how they use their intellect.

Yes. But maybe it would be proper for them to concentrate on the medical divisions in the military. I think they will be more productive there since they have a physical disadvantage among men in the battle field.

Yes but not totally. It would somewhat create a negative consequence over a negative action therefore the child would avoid that negative consequence.

Death of the sun .

No since everyone is intelligent. It is only in the manner of using that intelligence where one may be termed smart or stupid.

Evil is the absence of good. Therefore it reflects upon the absence of God. He also did something to prevent it. It was the sacrifice of his son to save humanity and the 10 commandments.

Evil is the absence of good. Therefore God did not create evil, man created evil since man refused to accept the goodness of God.

Religion does not depend on Science. Therefore it may seem so little to you but it means much to its followers. Call us fools if you want. I don`t care. Even if there is no way to prove it thus far. Its God`s principles that make us follow the religion. Religion on my perspective is not perfect but is a way to commune with one another and understand each other`s sufferings. Whether what deity we cling to may be true or false. It does not matter. Its how we interpret the message. I don`t need to find truth in everything that exists. I just want to enjoy life on how I find it to be. Like you, people judge you as someone different because of your beliefs. But you make the most what you see in life.

It means that God created the Universe using the laws of Physics. So therefore that may be termed as the big bang theory. He was probably the catalyst.

"What i mean is, everyone always says when someone dies that it is god's will. Well if it is his will, why cant he just poof the person dead on a whim? Why does he depend on diseases and other accidents to do it for him? Why did he need a shooter and bullets to take those 26 kid's lives? Why is he so dependent on the natural processes that he created spontaneously?"

As I have said, he does things according to the nature of his creations. For an example, a person has to die of some cause so that he may be termed as dead. If not, then that would question the validity of the death of the being. He probably just chooses to act upon the nature of things for man to properly understand natural phenomena.

"Until we somehow fucked up and he intervened to flood the earth. Then send his son to be sacrificed. and if you ask me, id say were worse now than back then. So why isnt he interveing anymore? Where is he?"

He may not be present in our universe but he is intervening since phenomena out of human control happens. He also acts upon a different timeline from us. That proves that change or evolution does not happen overnight but through succeding periods of time.

He knows every result no matter what choice we take.

One should not resonate on the concept of punishment alone. It was said to discourage a person from doing such evil to another person. Hell is for me is a state of being and not a physical place. When one commits evil, then one gains adversaries and through such adversaries, then hell shall be brought upon by them.

I do not invalidate omnipotence. I only state that it is illogical for him to do so since it will violate his very nature of omnipotence.

I would like to write it more since I want things to go exactly as i dream t of .

I like Batman since first of all, he has the storyline closest to reality aside from Iron Man. Plus he is secretive and only helps the others in need with out fame and b.

Republic since there are more people in control and that a balance of power would be practiced.

I think it is alright since it is`t detrimental to society and that it only fulfills the fantasies of people.

Personally I believe that public transport is more efficient since the vehicles shall be maximized most of the time and the destinations would always be in one place. Further more it also adds to the proper utilization of energy since trains and other nature friendly vehicles are much more efficient and less hazardous to nature.

Somehow I find the Simpsons decreasing in its comedic acts. Well, for me I find Peter`s retarded actions and Stewie`s faggot antics most amusing.

He cannot, not meaning that he is a weak creator but it will violate the nature of his omnipotence. God acts upon the nature of things. An example would be the creation of the sky, if God creates a sky made up entirely of soil, then that would violate the nature of the sky and the earth since it is impossible for the sky to be made out of soil since there is already a substance that exists that is made of soil which is the earth. Same goes for God. There already exists a being that can do everything therefore he cannot create something that he cannot undo.

It does not necessarily mean rest like what we do when we are tired. The Hebrew word, shabath, translated "rest" does not really refer to a requirement to sleep or take a break due to weariness. It means that God stopped and ceased to let his plans into motion.

Then what is this new law ?

Yes since the continuity of the human race consists of innocent beings uninformed of the future vices they may commit. It is the system of our civilization that is rotten, not the race itself.

ezekiel_roma(526) Clarified
1 point

Sorry, I made a mistake. This was supposed to be on the other side.

I believe it is since it believes in Christ. Even though there are practices not approved by the Bible, there is no purest form of Christianity so if one will consider Christianity as not a Christian religion, then I believe almost all protestant religions should be classified as such since we have our own interpretation of the Bible itself.

I believe it is since it believes in Christ. Even though there are practices not approved by the Bible, there is no purest form of Christianity so if one will consider Christianity as not a Christian religion, then I believe almost all protestant religions should be classified as such since we have our own interpretation of the Bible itself.

I think that he should first lower out the budget of those actions of America that is`t in utmost importance. An example would be the reduction of military funding since it is more important to take care of the civilians first before the military. Another would be the increase of taxation from the higher class Americans. Let`s face it, they don`t need money as much as an average person does, so even a 10% increase in taxes from the higher class is`t such a problem. Further more is the proper resolution of corrupt government officers and proper spending of taxes. As what Mahatma Gandhi said: There is enough resources on Earth to satisfy Man`s needs but it is insufficient to satisfy Man`s wants.

No. Peace can never be permanent. Even the slightest disputes can lead to war. Diplomacy is at least better than war in settling problems. But I don`t think that peace will be attained permanently by any means necessary.

I don`t think they should since they run through donations and they have no private businesses. If they would be to pay for taxes, then they would have to start their own business as well. It is also in the law that charitable institutions are exempted or at least reduced from the burden of taxes.

I don`t think that Atheism itself is a piece of crap. It is just a form disbelief in a divine being. Both Theists and Atheists are subject to ignorance, only in different forms are they presented.

It is a form of removing waste in the body similar to anal secretion. Thus it is perfectly natural.

I think it is good. It helps us dwell deeper into the abyss of human emotion and comprehend ourselves hence if we are subject to the same condition.

No since Nuclear radiation has detrimental side effects in which not only the Pakis would suffer from. It would also render their expedition useless since the land would have to heal first before being used. Approximately thousands of years.

It is the responsibility of the school to uplift its quality of education since the government is not always present in the vicinity. Therefore if the standard of education should be increased, then the school should increase its qualifications in being a teacher. Adhering to the increase in the quality of the teacher`s skills, a higher salary is its just reward.

You cannot raise a family and live in our society with passion alone. Money is a necessity to all.

Well scum bag teachers should first of all be filtered properly by the school. I don`t think it is the government`s responsibility since the school itself must create its own standards and thus these scumbag teachers are only present since they allowed them to be so.

If you give them less, then less students will take up being a teacher as profession and the problem in education would increase.

ezekiel_roma(526) Clarified
1 point

Personally I think both. No matter how we came to this existence, regardless of what or who may it be from. I believe that is our purpose, to know the unknown and take care of the things we hold dear.

I don`t think it is wise enough to do so since there may be accidents that could happen in the intercourse. It also increases the rate of the distribution of AIDS. It also shades the path of the young into a brighter future if they accidentally start a problem. Pills and abortion is detrimental to one`s health so it is not practical. Condoms have a high percentage of failure, so it is risky.

But then again, it is up to them if they will let it happen.

I believe that they are underpaid. Seeing that some of them are not motivated in teaching and some are even using the act of being a teacher for perverted purposes with their students such as blackmailing them using their grades so that they can have their way with them.

Teachers should be given higher salary so as to motivate them in their work. Even if you have a calling in your profession, if your salary is not enough for your family then you would`t be motivated in your work thus succumbing to ineffectiveness in teaching.

I don`t think you should. There is a high possibility of her being awkward with you. Try being clear with your feelings first, then make your move.

I believe that the purpose of humanity is to develop one another in anyway possible. I also believe that man has the responsibility of everything around him from animals to plants. Man also needs to journey the unknown to understand more about oneself and of course reproduce and continue the specie.

If it were to be made, then it would be swell. But such as man creates unlimited wants, I believe that would never be satisfied since greed and envy are usually the traits of man.

Yes you can. Most people do anything they want anyway .

ezekiel_roma(526) Clarified
1 point

it is just the image itself and the free will. It does not say the validity of attitude.

You have a point. I understand how the market works. I am just basing my argument upon the mere importance of their role in society as a whole and not only their function in the market.

Yes. it may be observed in humans since we are not perfect. It is logical to do since creating a perfect being would only violate the nature of God being the sole omnipotent being.

There is no certainty that you will go to heaven. Even if you accepted him, it does not give you full access to heaven. You still have to work for it in your present life.

Your theories has not disproved an entity yet since Science itself contradicts its theories on a divine being. Therefore your claims of using logic and reason are full of hypocrisy since the Scientific community has not cemented on claiming that God dose`t exist.

It does not rely on the existence of a deity but the practices that must be pursued in order to have an effective and well-lived life. You only blame religion to be the problem of man but the problem of man is this system of hate. It is where men forsake each other for their own benefit. That is the problem of man and not religion. Even if religion did`t exist, Man would still have problems since logic and reasoning alone is not enough for man to live harmoniously with each other. If people used logic then vices of man would still exist since it is only rational for man to fulfill those desires. Without the moral teachings of religion, society would still succumb to chaos and your fantasy would cease to exist. As long as Man lives, suffering will always be present, with or without religion and that double-edged sword can still kill.

It does sine it follows the 10 Commandments and it keeps constant practice to the teachings of the Bible.

There is no "correct" way of worshiping Christ. Even if we are part of the same belief, we still have our own practices ranging from the community to oneself.

I would also say emotion since people often succumb to error and weariness when ravaged by deep emotion.

For me, I would first want to graduate Medicine school then I would like to establish my own Health lab in which I could hire health professionals to perform laboratory procedures. If all goes well, then I would also like to develop that Health lab into a hospital so that I may be able to help more people.

I believe they should since they are punishing the innocent and the helpless because of their stupidity and immaturity.

I am still in both fronts in this so I ll just post on both sides.

The Government usually uses the tax money given to them by the people. But the Catholic priests use the money laundered from religious. So I think they are equally corrupt.

I am still in both fronts in this so I ll just post on both sides.

The Government usually uses the tax money given to them by the people. But the Catholic priests use the money laundered from religious. So I think they are equally corrupt.

ezekiel_roma(526) Clarified
1 point

Well, I wanted to ask this on a universal degree, such as from the A-list starts to the D-list. You can even compare them with other foreign celebrities.

I think they are. Compared to jobs that save lives such as Policemen and Fire fighters, they have it easier and usually get more respect, money, and even power.

ezekiel_roma(526) Clarified
2 points

Sorry, I am not trolling. There seems to be an error which is why my argument was posted 3 times.

This debate is more of a survey than an argument. But nonetheless, I am a Catholic since I believe and respect the teachings of God.But I hate corrupt Catholic priests since they don`t deserve the trust, power, and wealth given to them. I also respect Atheists since they grew up in a different culture than mine. Lastly, it is incoherent to divide people due to their beliefs since it us useless for humanity to argue about things in which none would give way.

This debate is more of a survey than an argument. But nonetheless, I am a Catholic since I believe and respect the teachings of God.But I hate corrupt Catholic priests since they don`t deserve the trust, power, and wealth given to them. I also respect Atheists since they grew up in a different culture than mine. Lastly, it is incoherent to divide people due to their beliefs since it us useless for humanity to argue about things in which none would give way.

Attitude since knowledge is useless if you are caged in arrogance and unwise decisions.

This debate is more of a survey than an argument. But nonetheless, I am a Catholic since I believe and respect the teachings of God.But I hate corrupt Catholic priests since they don`t deserve the trust, power, and wealth given to them. I also respect Atheists since they grew up in a different culture than mine. Lastly, it is incoherent to divide people due to their beliefs since it us useless for humanity to argue about things in which none would give way.

Yes. That would be the best option. The rich are the ones who usually evade taxes.

Taxes are misused since the government uses it usually through their own interest. The lower the taxes, the less money the government will use to be corrupt. They don`t even maximize the potential of the money given to them.

Why did he need to rest?

It does not necessarily mean rest like what we do when we are tired. The Hebrew word, shabath, translated "rest" does not really refer to a requirement to sleep or take a break due to weariness. It means that God stopped and ceased to let his plans into motion.

Why does he punish humans for doing what he knew they would do?

He has given man free will. In anyway whatsoever, depending on our choosing, he would know the results and he would then render judgement depending on the choice. Imagine you are a teacher, you know what to do and what will happen to him if a student passes the tests and fails it.

Where is god today, in a world where there are so many heathens?

The heaven meant by the Bible is a place out of reach and would only be travelled at in death. It does not necessarily pinpoint any location.

Why was he bound by human ideas of time lengths (ie. Days)?

The Bible was written by humans therefore their time frame would most likely be days.

If its gods will whenever someone dies, why does he rely on natural processes to do his work (ie. cancer, bullets, ect).

God does things according to its nature. An example would be that a man cannot die of giving birth since it is impossible for him to defy the nature of the things he has created and the man has no ovaries. Another would be that God cannot create a triangle with four sides since that would already change the object into something different and would defy its existence.

Why after genesis is god suddenly incapable of poofing things into existence?

It does not necessarily say that God is not capable of doing so. The world was already complete and he acts through indirectly into things.

It is alright since it is up to the person if he will know when to stop. Alcohol, drugs, and sex can be addicting too. So there would`t be a need to outlaw something if it does not necessarily kill you.

I believe so since there are numerous workers in the country and they deserve to be noticed for their hard work. Without them, the economy would collapse.

it is not an eye for an eye. it is about giving the fair punishment people need since life imprisonment is a sham and people always get away with it.

yes since that would highly discourage people in committing murder and rape. Lately, people have not fear in the life imprisonment since they have the magic of money and power. So death is the only being they can`t bribe or scare.

Yes. Since not all citizens in a country is religious, therefore it would only be fair that the 2 institutions be separated. The Church must not interfere with the laws of the government since they act only upon their interest. The government must not interfere with the church since the religious are also under the Pope or the Archbishop. These 2 monsters of corruption will only be more powerful if they work together, so it would only be logical if these 2 split.

Science has not disproved God since its Theories are still incomplete. Their theoretical claim s are still into question. An example would be Stephen Hawking`s theory of the Universe. We are still not sure if life did came from nothingness and that there is no time in the black hole.

The government since it is their propaganda that their interests be made into motion by any means necessary. It would be obvious since the governments of the major super powers of the world decided on creating world war 1 and 2. They did `t even ask for the approval of their citizens.

10 points

Dragon Ball was based from a great classical novel in Chinese literature and somewhat related it to modern culture. The name of the novel is Journey to the West. So I would`t think of it as a poorly made story.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_ball

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journey_to_the_West

10 points

I learned the value of self-sacrifice and respect to your parents and spouse. I learned some Chinese culture. I also learned some behavior of humans when succumbed with tragedy or loneliness. The fights are just there for the kids. But there are still values in it as well.

10 points

I also like anime since I find their stories intriguing and has a much deeper storyline since it tackles topics too taboo in other countries. I also learn a lot of values, history and culture, and science in anime.

I like watching Animes like Dragonball, Slam Dunk, Yu Gi Oh, Yu Yu Hakusho, Flame of Recca, Death Note, Naruto, Conan, and Fairy Tail.

I think that public schools are necessary since not all people have the resources to study in private schools. An example would be the people who earn minimum wage. Its bad enough that they have to struggle for their basic needs, how much more can they afford private schools?

Yes you are right. Even though a country is rich yet its citizens are experiencing poverty, they would only succumb to rallies and chaos. I believe that a sign of good politics is the transparency of the government and an orderly system where the citizens are satisfied and feel safe even though they are not wealthy.

Then what would be number 1 the first group of Christians and number 2 what would be the "right way" of worship?

ezekiel_roma(526) Clarified
1 point

It is somewhat being used. But now English is more popular. But in the provinces, Spanish is still being spoken especially in the Southern regions of our country. We use Spanish words to indicate time and money. Nonetheless, Spanish culture is still widely observed since we also do siestas during the afternoon, we pray usually and have novenas and fiestas. We even look like Spanish as well. No matter what happens, those 333 years of Spanish colonization will never be forgotten.

In the Philippines, it is also compulsory that we learn English. Since the Americans occupied our country a few years back it is quite normal for the people to absorb English in our culture since Filipinos are quite open to changes and new culture.

But for me I believe it is important since it would be easier for us to communicate with others. But it dose`t need any special hype since it is just an ordinary language. It was only chosen as the prescribed language used in economy and politics since UK has numerous colonies. But Spanish, French, Dutch, and Portuguese are good universal language candidates as well.

Personally I don`t think that man is good or evil in nature. I believe that by definition, nature is something that is inborn and is an action done without the intervention of external factors. Therefore I believe that good and evil are just terms created by man. Such example of concepts inborn in men is its survival instinct and emotions.

I believe that it is alright if a person does not go to mass regularly. As long as he follows the teachings of God and be a good person, then I don`t see why they should be condemned. But then again there is still a flaw. That person will violate 1 commandment. It would be keeping the Sabbath day Holy.

By saying Christian meaning that one that follows the teachings of Jesus Christ.The only difference between Catholicism and other Christian religions is the way of worship. Its deity is the same therefore Catholicism is Christian.


1.5 of 4 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]