CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS WinstonC

Reward Points:1156
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
95%
Arguments:1168
Debates:50
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

For a while he did that to my posts too, I wouldn't react to it, if you don't take notice then he's just wasting his time.

WinstonC(1156) Clarified
1 point

the plant that doesn’t exist is not worse off, it’s not anything at all.

Does this not mean that you can't say that being alive is better than being dead?

Only from the position of existence. A reality where things matter is what we have. The reality in which nothing matters doesn’t exist, but that’s not a worse off realitybecause it simply isn’t in existence.(...) My position is that this is only the case because existence is the case. The hypothetical universe wherein there is nothing, doesn’t actually exist.

So can we not compare hypothetical states?

Since it is fundamental, it necessarily is the case.

The reason I believe consciousness to be fundamental to the universe is because a place where nothing has any significance may as well not exist. This is why I think the ability to make significance is transcendentally significant.

Given existence is the case, it is preferable to non-existence.

So, and correct me if I'm wrong, there are better and worse states? Moreover, existence is better than non-existence?

1 point

I voted to leave, the EU is becoming a federal superstate and the laws are written by an unelected commission. Sure, we elect the EU parliament, but they cannot write laws, they can only vote on the laws created by the unelected commission. In other words when people claim they want to reform the EU they are actually saying "we will hope that the EU reforms itself". This is because we have no power to elect people that can actually propose legislation.

WinstonC(1156) Clarified
1 point

I get your point but the alternative here is having the British equivalent of "Herr Gropenfuhrer" (great name by the way) control what can and can't be said on the internet.

WinstonC(1156) Clarified
1 point

This made me giggle.

WinstonC(1156) Clarified
1 point

From my current perspective of existing, yeah that’s worse. But had I never existed, I can’t say I would care.

Existing is better than not existing regardless of whether you are capable of caring about it though. So does this not show that there's something missed in your conceptualization of better and worse states?

On a macro scale, if nothing ever perceived this universe because perceiving entities never existed, it wouldn’t matter.

Nothing at all would matter, and surely a reality where things can matter is better than one where things cannot?

WinstonC(1156) Clarified
1 point

By my view, reality is only in a better or worse state from a given perspective... Nonexistence is only a worse condition from the perspective of existence.

So, and correct me if I'm wrong, if you didn't exist tomorrow that wouldn't be a worse state for you because you wouldn't exist to be able to perceive that things were worse?

WinstonC(1156) Clarified
1 point

Every human should use their own logical reasoning and fact checking to figure out the truth for themselves, the way that it has always been.

By the way, it's the British conservative party that are in power and bringing in this legislation.

1 point

There is some degree of pretending to be the hero as escapism but I think it's deeper than that. Dr. Peterson would say that while people are watching these hero stories they are trying to learn how to become heroes themselves. They admire the archetypal hero's struggle and watch it as a target for emulation.

WinstonC(1156) Clarified
1 point

I think the root of our disagreement here is the concept of "transcendental mattering" and so I'll try to explain what I mean. There are better and worse states. Since there are better and worse states we can say that some things transcendentally matter because they can create better or worse states. This is the point that I tried to make with consciousness not existing; if consciousness didn't exist then reality is in a worse state. If nothing is important to anything then everything may as well not exist or act.

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: No
Winning Position: Excuse
Winning Position: Have we changed natural selection for the better or worse?
Winning Position: What makes chemical weapons so much worse than conventional weapons?
Tied Positions: No vs. Yes

About Me


"I'm not here to be belligerent. I prefer the dialectic style to classical debate."

Biographical Information
Name: Winston 
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: United Kingdom

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here