i downvoted your arguemtn again because i see no other reason than to harass me. Im not a troll.
This site is about debating. Not trolling who is getting downvoted. Grow up and wake up. It is nonsense to argue with this. Im 20 years old, i don't need this.
You got me all wrong. I am not a perverted dude. I am just expressing my ideas on pedophilia and child molestations. I don't need negativity from you. You are so wrong in many ways, and that is not even the debate to even discuss that.
You jump the border and start to label me for something that is not true. Yes, i have many pedophilic questions but that does not mean im a pedophile. A person who has a ciagrette in his hands does not mean he is smoker. You need evidence before you label.
I hope you don't get the comments that everybody is giving me. It hurts me bad. real bad. And the worse part about it is that maybe it is all true. You don't deserve to debate my friend.
Sunset, i didn't mean to troll and say "ha ha." I saw you as a friend and i thought i would like to be honest with you. I question myself a lot. "am i bad because i laughed at the fact that this happened to her?" It is hard to say yes, because i don't like to be an outcast.
But you don't understand why i couldn't lie to you. Friends don't lie. Yes i giggled a little bit but you can't control your feelings. That debate which got deleted was about the idea that you can't control your feelings. You think you can but you can't deny that that inital feeling of laughter came. I can't deny that to you! How do you think i feel when i get comments that im a sicko and that i hold dicks in one hand?
i hope you forgive me and understand that i never meant to disrespect you but want to be honest with you.
Hey. I don't mean to get on your bad side. I don't want to argue with you because i hate that feeling. Although some parts of me like it, i just can't handle that rage. Im not a pedophile. You think i am but i am not.
I honestly think you are worse than a pedophile. My opinions alone. :)
I am not a pedophile. YOu guys don't seem to understand me. Do you even understand what you are typing. I feel like commiting sucidie because of your comments. It is not wrong for me to laugh because feelings come natural to people. You can't control it or initiate it. If you can think yourself happy, can you be happy. No, feelings are consequences of things such as music.
you never said in your last argument what you said here. Your last argument was trollish. Im not trollish. But that is my opinion.
you fail at debating because you fail to contradict me. So what if cigarettes and alcohol can kill you. This is about weed. And downvote me. I don't care. It is not like i am going to cry or be sensitive like you. I am going to downvote you because your comments was a troll comment. Not a debating comment.
lol im the nut job for not supporting cancer and death. Look in the mirror and see how much a hypocrite you really are.
if a man rapes a lady, there is a possible chance that they can do it again. That is why i believe that they deserve to go to jail. If it was 100 percent possible that they wouldn't do it again, then don't put them in jail.
I don't care for justice because that is crap. It is wrong to put someone is jail for a long time. Nobody has the right to ruin someone life like that. And that does not mean i support rapists.
I hate how people say "let them go to jail and get raped." I think that is wrong and satanic to say. I guess i see the good in all people. I want to help everybody including the ciminal.
I think God would do it too. :) Life was meant to be happy. That is what God intended. I know that without unhappiness, there is no happiness. That does make sense on some level. But isn't that life better than this.
I want to die and go to heaven. But i am going to let life kill him, instead of my own actions. :) Death is looking more beautiful everyday.
I feel fat and retarded if i do. but everybody is different and so this is me. And i think im gangsta if i put one of my hands in my pocket.
yeeea
I think God should put someone in hell (if implied by relgious people) if you are changing your body. There are things that we change like fatal deformities of a child.
But if you really think about it. A child who is born with a deformity, why is that looked bad upon. It just means that the child is different. Like the two children that head their heads stuck together. They are not unhealthy, they just have their heads together.
AND IF IT WASN'T STUPID SOCIETY FAULT TO GO AND LABEL PEOPLE we will now see everything as a beautiful thing and not ugly.
It is society's fault to go and say "this person is not right." Why CAN a child grow up and have a cleft lip or no arms at all. Why is it wrong for a child to have six arms. it is beautiful. We think it is wrong because society calls it wrong and we are all robots to society.
Now if it was a health issue, then yes change your body. If it not a health issue, i do see it wrong in God sense and religion sense.
I think God is benevolent. So benevolent and wise to understand that we change our looks to bring confidence. And i don't God has a reason against that because understand the corruption of society: Advertisments for bigger penis. I see that a lot on televison. I never thought before i should have a big penis, but NOW I do. and it does not make sense to have a big penis. Now these commercials are bringing people down if they have small penises.
Society sucks. I wish i can die and go to heaven where i know it doesn't suck.
have bigger boobs can cause back pain. having a bigger penis means you need bigger pants and i bet society has not create huge pants if a penis can grow ten feet long in length and width.
So a really huge penis is not the best thing to have. I just proved you wrong. one point for me. lol :)
I say yes because the creator of this site can do whatever he/she wants. If old accounts are corrupting the service, then delete it.
freedom of speech. It really depends on the rap what is says and not just individual words.
Saying the "f" word, "b" word, "c" word (and i should not be afraid to say the word cunt but i grew up in a way to not like it). Words are not bad. It is the uses of the word that makes it bad. Words express feelings and they evolve. Saying the word "bad" was TERRIBLE in the sense of feelings. But nowadays, if you say it is "bad" the feelings is like a poke at your arm.
If you say the "f" word, then it hits you like a bricks. But that is because society hates words like that and it makes no sense to not say it.
Saying that life is "f" up is not wrong. But saying that in a way to disrespect people is wrong. I don't like to disrespect people unless it is for the greater good. Such as disrespecting Hitler. You can disrespect him by saying "release the jewish people" but that is for the greater good. Saying words to just hurt people is wrong.
Who cares? Im not being rude to you by the way but who cares? I think it is racist only if people take it the wrong way.
lol racist? I disagree if there was a WET. A white entertainment television is not excluding black people or any people except whites.
Just like BET. It is not racist because it is not excluding white people.
I also think you are forgetting that everybody is different. If i hate competitions, then that does not mean you would. There is no normality in this world but i doubt you know what i mean. If you do, i apologize.
You wanna know something, you arent a friendly dude. Grow up and read this:
I have not done anything wrong. Can you honestly go to the bathroom and look in the mirror and say Im perfect.
I came on here to express my beliefs and get an answer. And all i get is some rude comments from idiots who like to hurt people feelings.
lol you wanna know something. You are worst than a pedophile because you hurt my feelings with how you use your language. Oooo i bet you are going to say that "what! are you a sicko. pedos are worst. and if you haven't known that, you are a freak."
let me educate you. Pedophilia is not wrong because you are sexually attracted to kids. You might probably be sexually attracted to someone in your life. And who cares if you reply "well i was sexually attracted to people my own age."
You have sexual feelings for someone like pedos do. But that does not mean you rape them. Rape is wrong and feelings are not. Feelings are natural. can you control your feelings? At time, you can. At times i can. but i can't because these past days, i felt like my life has gone down a spiral because you guys think i am a pedophile.
I may be a pedophile. I think i am! And it hurts because people like you and outcast them from society.
And that is wrong because FEELINGS are uncontroable. I think pedophilia is natural. and you won't understand because you feel that it is wrong. Guess what, pedophilia is not wrong because you too have sexual feelings. The wrong part is when "rape" comes in the picture.
I CAN RAPE KIDS. AND YOU CAN TOO. EVERBODY CAN UNLESS THEY ARE PHYSICALLY UNABLE. Wanna know why we don't want to rape, because we CHOOSE not to. We CAN kill. You CAN Murder. Guess what, no matter how much you choose not too, you are still a physical threat to society. Everybody is unless you are paralyized in your entire body.
I send you a comment saying that you are a freak and a sicko for killing people. And i apologize because you did nothing wrong and i am judging you with your thoughts and like. i think killing people is fun at times. I never did so i can't really answer. But i played Red Steel for the wii and it was awesome.
And another thing. What if i liked to kill or rape children? Does it mean i am wrong? NO! BECAUSE I NEVER RAPE OR KILLED IN MY LIFE. except bugs. lol.
does liking killing people make you wrong? No. It is just how you feel and you can't control it. You can control it but can you admit that it is perspectively hard? And i feel like many people judge me with their emotions and my beliefs and thoughts. You should judge people for their actions.
My motto is that if you don't like to be rude to, then don't be rude to others. If you were intentionally rude to me, then i think that is wrong. But people are different. I can take that as a complement. But if i don't tell you how i feel, then it is my fault. so here you go. i told you how i felt and i still think you guys are wrong.
LapTops?!!! lol they are now called notebooks because if you place it on your lap, the laptop will overheat.
i kinda don't want to see competition on this site. It ruins the fun out of debating.
When the world was created, there were no rules. Thus, nobody had rights. Society created rights for people later in life but the reason why is just not there. I think at first we did not have rights to begin with. But i think rights were created to prevent riot and diasters.
People do what they think is right. NO matter what you think. If people think you are unfair, they are going to protest and riot against you.
The reasons seem unclear. And i hate to think this deep. If you are happy within society rules, then let the society control you. What is the harm if you are happy.
you think i am sick for my pedo debates! lol you are a creep and a sicko if you like killing people.
I am not here to argue with you angrily. I think you are forgetting the "what if" scenario. What if God told you the love was pure between two people. The reason why i say that is because everybody is different. There may be 12 year old that may be more mature than you think. Maybe there has not been a twelve year old girl that experience true love in the entire world, but there CAN be one. I believe in all possibilities but i know that there are some things that are not possible. I can't grow wings lol. But what if God told you. Not the fact that God will never tell you. He may never tell you, but what if he told you the love was pure. Would you still allow it? I use to read the christian bible. I view of God is that he is all benevolent and he wouldn't hurt child molestors or rapists. I believe that infact if was to turn human and see a gang fight upon a child molestor, he would come in and help him. Because he is God and everbody is his children. I believe that there CAN be a child that can be experience true love, but it is unlikely becuase of the history of violence in this world. Do you think i am thinking wrong? I think that God can create whoever he wants. And he can create a twelve year old child that can learn love. Look at Issac Newton and other people who acheive above the normality minds in this world.
I think saying that you were willing to kill a child molestor is wrong and satanic. Yes, i don't blame you for thinking it becuase nobody deserves to die and that includes child molestors and Hitler. Maybe i am thinking wrong, but i see the good in everyone. If i see a child molestor about to be beat up by you, i will stop you. But that does not mean i support the pedophile. i think it is injustice to hurt somebody. You are no different than a child molestor if you hurt them.
ok if you weren't looking for sympathy, i was wrong. But it think God supports the good in everyone, even pedophilies. pedophiles are not bad people, they are just people that other people should be concern about. They never molested children. There is a difference between pedophiles and child molestors.
What if there was a rapist or a murderer in your home. Would you then be at peace. I believe someone might would, but i wouldn't.
not even a debate. Don't leave but come one, you do want sympathy. That is how i see it.
It really depends on the person.
The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.
puppies are delicous. lol i have never tasted puppies but i am kinda interested. lol i won't taste feces and semen but i do want to know what it taste like. i read that semen taste salty. gross.
I feel retarded saying this but do you think it is bad for me to say this. Is it bad to be curious? I don't think so but i feel society will reject me based on my own curiosities.
I can't believe this question. It is a no brainer. Terrorism is the biggest threats unless you are a really homophobic person and a terrorist at the same time. So it depends on the society. In our society, it is terrorism.
It is hard to say no because how do we actually know if that medicine is proved worthy. But this feels like to me giving up your own daughter to scientists so they can experiment on her. And that is just wrong in my opinion. I don't have children by the way. Treat others like how you want to be treated. Do you want to be in the animal's position and possible die? I don't want to.
sometimes is it better to warn the assailants that the police is coming. I saw the video on youtube (just youtube "baltimore mcdonalds") and it look like nobody even cared. An old lady intervened and i respect her for that and one of the employees. But that employee seemed like he did not care to the fullest and he did not protect her fully. So depending on the situation, it was better to get those satanic women out of there.
It is quite silly to say that is it unless you speak to the two black woman, the black employee, and the white girl and whoever knows more about the situation. But should we really care if it is a hate crime. Besides, how can you really tell if it is a hate crime? If the two black woman say that it was a hate crime, they could be lieing. It is really hard to detect the truth. But what we do know (and this the most important part of the crime) that two black women beat up on a innocent white woman. And the black employee should be charged for stealing her phone. That is the most important part of this investigation in my opinion.
You cannot really answer this question unless you get the statistics of every white person and black person. I doubt that one of you commentors did that. The easiest way to answer this question is that people are racist. People and not white people and not black people. People in general are racist.
If he said that, then that is confusing because the history is about music and talent.
A lot of people forget that normaility, in a world wide sense, does not exist. There may be perspective normality but not a normality in a worldy sense. People love to judge other people who are different than them. People say that he/she is weird, stupid, ugly, etc and etc. It does not make sense to call them weird because not only they are different than you, you are different than them. So now you are different, and thus you should be labeled or judge like how you judge other people.
So in reality, if you call something strange a mental disorder, then you must have a mental disorder because you are strange as well from other people's perspective. Society creates a norm and anything outside of its norm is considered a disorder. Don't forget that this society is as well outside the norm of a different society and thus labeled.
Everybody has a mental disease. Everybody is different. Norm in a worldy sense does not exist.
lol, don't allow your duaghter to walk alone to your job. I bet she is careful and caution around strangers but you can't trust strangers. I wouldn't take that risk.
By the way, i am not yelling at your or mad at you. comments seem that way to me sometimes. :)
just wear a milky way condom and everything will be fine. Those condoms will never break.
It is not fair of you to hurt somebody's else feelings. I read a comment on youtube and it reflects what you said: "everybody have only one life in this world, why make it hard for one person to live." You may be a nice person outside the internet, but i am ashamed of what you said. If you are not a bad person then prove me wrong. :)
I hope you are not seriously taking this guy's comment for real. I don't know who you are but i don't believe that someone like him can say words like that to you. I can sense that you are a beautiful person and don't take crap from people like "the way it is." I don't know if you are hurt by his comment but i would. :)
I would at least first tell the boy/man or girl/woman to stand back and really think about the situation and come up with ways to help. It may be just me, but i won't let the person commit suicide because i think it is the wrong choice. It may be selfish of me, but i will stop the attempt.
Never lose sight. There is always a cure and a light at the end of the tunnel.
Think about it. What would chopping off their balls would do? They can still rape and use objects to hurt the child with sexually. Sexual attraction is a feeling and lies within the brain, not within the penis. That is why therapy is more suited because therapy fixes the problems within the brain.
I don't want to do it either but this world runs on money and love. The fact that this world runs on money means that this world is corrupt. Anyway, if this was the only job i had, then yes i will have to do it to support a living.
Your basing your judgement on your own emotion. And please don't think of me rude. :) Think about what you said. "he is only eight." Let me ask you this, what you were the police officer and the child had a gun. Would you not pepper spray him?
If i was the police officer, i would suggest another way to handle the situation because i think pepper sprays ruin the eye's sight. I don't think the child would be suicidal or is willing to hurt himself. If the child was, then the pepper spraying was one of the best way to handle. (Maybe not the best out of the best, but acceptable).
You can say yes. And maybe this world can become better with christians. But you can't say that the nicest religion has the nicest people. The way im thinking is about people and im not trying to focus on religion. People are bad and people are good. If you eliminate the bad people from this world, there will be no more bad things. That does not mean good things will happen because how can you say that good things happen in a world of all good people. It really depends on the person.
Religously, i feel like i have to say yes. But in my own opinion, if you want to have sex, have it to produce a child. It is hard to resist the idea of having sex for pleasure but i don't think that is against God. If you and your partner want to have sex, just know the consequences: stds and pregnancy.
One Day at the Sony Office:
(everybody is sitting at the table)
Employee: "The playstation move motion controll is brilliant sir. Where did you come up with this idea?"
Boss: "It just came to me since November 19th, 2006."
I think the people at sony took the wii remote idea and just stuck a plastic ball at the end of it to make it different.
I can't really say it is a problem at all. It really depends on the child/person. If the child is unhappy, then yes it is a problem to their lives. I notice i have OCD and it is a problem to my life because i hate the feeling of it.
Pedophila is not wrong because pedophilia is the attraction towards children. It is not the actions against them. However, someone did tell me a book where pedophila meant also meant action. The google dictionary states that pedophilia is just attraction. So i am not sure. But i am going to continue this comment with the belief that pedophilia is the attraction towards children. How is it wrong to be attracted to someone. I think it is should be only a concern, but not anything severe like actually harming a children. child molestation and pedophilia is different things.
I do believe that actions speak louder than words. Actions don't have mouths but i am assuming that the term speak is a pun. Or is it? But i am going to assume it is a pun. Anyway, without action, how can things be resolved and discovered. Words doesn't mean a thing unless there is action to support it.
True love does not have an age. Don't consider me a pedophile because i am not but a six or ten year gap does not mean a thing when it comes to true love. For example, a twelve year old and a twenty year old. You might say it is wrong because sex blows off in your mind. But what if true love is involved. Then questions arise to if the girl at that age can really love and if the older man at that age is only interested in sex. When i mean true love, i don't mean sex. Sex is not love and there is no such thing as sexual love in my perspective. If i have a child, i will be cautious of who he/she dates and at what age. But if true love is involved, why fight it? But it is hard to know if the other person is not interested in sex. I believe in all possibilities and i do believe a 12 year old and a 20 year old can have a full love relationship. Does that mean i won't be cautious with my own child? No. If pure fun and love is involved and not sex, im all for it.
The idea that teachers can chew gum where students cannot does not make sense. Studies have shown that chewing gum has increased attention. But that really depends on the student. When i chew gum, i like to pay attention to the flavor.
I believe the right thing to do is to throw it away. Children can do things that are out of sight of adults. I don't have children but i am assuming that parents don't always have a watch on their children. It is the right thing to do because not only you are keeping your child safe, but other children safe. I see it as more of a right thing to do than common sense.
I don't know why you decided to dispute my comment because i agreed that bullying build characters. When i think about it more, anything can shape your character and ideas. But it really depends on the person. I was lucky enough to benefit from bullying whereas others have not. Most people commit suicide because of bullying. Because of the fact that there is a chance of suicide, whether it is small or not, i am against the encouragement of bullying. There is lots of other ways to encourage character. And besides, nobody deserves to feel like crap. If a person likes to feel like crap, then good for them. But i don't want to feel like crap.
OMG! Yes! We are all going to die and experience a horrific death. Are you guys happy now! Case closed.
Why not both? It is called human rights not "human rights except..." :)
how are homosexual disgusting. Just because you find them disgusting does not mean that they are. I don't believe that things in general are disgusting. They just don't simply exist because everybody is different and brings something different to this world. You can find homosexuals disgusting, but don't forget that you are different too. You are a different person out of a billion different people. So do i have the right to exterminate you for being different. Nah! I got better things to do like college and wii. And ps3.
how are homosexual disgusting. Just because you find them disgusting does not mean that they are. I don't believe that things in general are disgusting. They just don't simply exist because everybody is different and brings something different to this world. You can find homosexuals disgusting, but don't forget that you are different too. You are a different person out of a billion different people. So do i have the right to exterminate you for being different. Nah! I got better things to do like college and wii. And ps3.
Nobody cannot answer that for you except yourself. You have to close your eyes and think what you like.
Nowadays, there is so much more to a system than to play games. PS3 has a virtual world where you can roam and meet new people. PS3 and 360 has netflix where you can get your family together and watch a movie or episodes.
You got to ask yourself, for what reason why do you want to have a game system. And maybe the answer is to only play games, or the above mentions i provided.
If you want to play video games more, then look at the library of games that Sony and Microsoft produced. And whatever the amount of games that you like the most, then that is the system for you. Also, don't have the library of games online such as arcade shooters, puzzles, adventures, etc. I believe that Xbox arcade has a bigger library.
If i had to choose, i would choose PS3 because i don't like to pay for online. If you like to pay for online, then go ahead.
I have all three systems, wii, ps3 and 360. But if i had to choose only one, i would choose wii. It is just something with me and nintendo and that is enough for me to pick wii. :)
Both men and women can be:
smart
strong
strong minded
passionate
able to love
strong hearted
brave
courageous
scare and to be scared
love
fight to the end
manipulate
etc. etc. etc. (and many more)
With the invention of steriods women can be physically strong as men. Without steriods, brute physical strength will be the only factor that separates men from women.
THERE IS NO SUPERIOR SEX...and that is great things.
Violent videogames induces negativity in kids. So the fact that kids have no interest in violence before games and after games is false.
Everything is this world has a degree of violence. Mowing the lawn can be violent. Pac man is violent because pac man eat ghosts. yeah, we don't think of it as violence, but that is because the degree is so small.
There are games call Rapelay in Japan where you can rape anime girls. I bet that if that game was in the hands of children, children will think of rape as a good thing.
That is what games these days do to kids. Kids with the wrong mind will think of stealing and killing as good things because we all know that humans love the feeling that comes from violence. That angry feeling is what humans crave. I like that feeling but i know right from wrong so it does not matter.
And this question is not basically saying that teens will commit crimes. It asks if they become more aggressive and yes, they do. Whenever i play Grand theft auto, i want to kill strippers and steal cars. I love doing those things because in nature, human love violence. We crave it. And although it may sound wierd to say that, i am not alone. Grand theft auto is sold by the millions. (i believe).
What?? My statement showed how those teens acted out Grand theft auto. This game put ideas in their head that they think were cool.
And i never said that teens never committed acts of violence. But the main idea of this passage is not what you have stated but that teen like to act out violent games.
Whenever you read a passage, look for the main idea: good advice for you.
What?? My statement showed how those teens acted out Grand theft auto. This game put ideas in their head that they think were cool.
And i never said that teens never committed acts of violence. But the main idea of this passage is not what you have stated but that teen like to act out violent games.
Whenever you read a passage, look for the main idea: good advice for you.
"A gang of teens in love with the blood-drenched digital killfest "Grand Theft Auto IV" - in which players slaughter hundreds during endless crime sprees - copied the video game's violent hero with a two-hour campaign of real-life robbery and brutality on Long Island, cops said yesterday.
The wild rampage featured such staples of the mega-popular game as a mugging, several break-ins and attempted carjackings at an intersection in tony Garden City, police said. They even allegedly knocked one man's teeth out.
"They decided they were going to go out to commit robberies and emulate the [lead] character Nico Belic in the particularly violent video game 'Grand Theft Auto,' " said Nassau County Police Detective Lt. Raymond Cote. "These teens have difficulty separating fact from fiction, fantasy from reality . . . It was quite alarming."
The series of attacks started at 11:30 p.m. Tuesday, allegedly carried out by a gang of four teens led by 15-year-old Brandon Cruz. The youths had been sitting in Memorial Park in New Hyde Park, looking for something to do, when they allegedly decided to live out the game.
In "Grand Theft Auto IV," players assume the role of Belic, a criminal who murders and robs to rise to the top of the underworld in "Liberty City," which closely resembles New York City.
"They were bored, and they decided this was a good idea," Cote said.
Cruz and his pals - Samuel Philip, 16, Gurnoor Singh, 14 and Jaspreet Singh, 17, no relation - allegedly found their first victim waiting at bus stop near the park. The teens, all of New Hyde Park, beat him and stole his cash, police said.
"They knocked his teeth out," Cote said.
They then broke into garages and sheds and stole bats and crowbars, police said.
They soon met up with other kids. Two of them joined the original four, police said, and they decided to take their crime spree to another level by acting out "Grand Theft Auto's" signature crime - carjacking.
The teens went to nearby Garden City and allegedly set up a human roadblock.
There they menaced a 23-year-old woman in a 2008 BMW with bats, cops said. She sped away and called cops.
When police arrived, the youths were trying to rob a man in a van, cops said.
All four of the teens were arrested, along with the two youths who joined them, Stephen Attard, 18, of New Hyde Park and Dylan Laird, 17, who was visiting from Southborough, Mass. They were all charged with first-degree robbery, except for Jaspreet Singh, who was charged with possession of stolen property.
Philip, Cruz and Gurnoor Singh were held on $300,000 bond. The others were slapped with lesser bails. None of the teens was able to post bail after their arraignment yesterday.
After the hearing, Gurnoor Singh's dad admitted his son played the game but said he was innocent. "We don't believe anything," he said."
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/
Yes. Video games make teens agressive. Enuff said.
There is pictures and stories on youtube where demons had take place. Youtube has actual footage of an actual exorcism. If demons are real, then God is real.
It is never justified to kill someone. If you kill someone i love, then i want to kill you. If you then kill me, then there is others who will want to kill you. Tensions and revenge will always arise and arise again until each and every person dies except you. Instead of bombing, come to a mutual agreement. Why is bombing the answer. Violence is never the answer!
And if the Japanese were cruel to you. What gives you the right to be cruel to them. Be the bigger person. It is pathetic to kill. Cowards kill.
It is never justified to kill someone. If you kill someone i love, then i want to kill you. If you then kill me, then there is others who will want to kill you. Tensions and revenge will always arise and arise again until each and every person dies except you. Instead of bombing, come to a mutual agreement. Why is bombing the answer. Violence is never the answer.
It may stop the war. But it does not stop the wars because tensions always arises unless two sides come to a mutual agreement.
Do you want to be put to sleep? Treat people and animals like you want to be treated.
I don't blame people who think of putting stray animals asleep. The most reasonable reason why is because the animal may or may not be vicious. What if you woke up and say a tiger in your house, the first thing is that you want that animal dead. I think like that but i also know that it is wrong! What if you were the animal, you would not be shot. And yes, you would be scared knowing that you are somewhere you don't know. You will want shelter, food, and love. It depends on what you need though. So it is wrong because i don't want to be put to sleep.
People here are saying that even though there is 100 percent gun control, people can still buy guns. Hello! If people are able to buy guns, it would not be called 100 percent gun control. 100 percent gun control in the United States means that no one should be able to get a gun unless allowed. And! If people are able to buy drugs, then there is no 100 percent drug control.
I am not saying that it will prevent her death. It could though. If no guns, he may have used bombs. If no bombs, he can use a bat, or rocks. Death is every where and you can't avoid it.
I wish guns can become high tech. I want someone to make an electronic gun that has a speaker and a 911 push button. You press the button and the gun can activate and you can shoot. If someone tries to take the gun apart, then the police has the right to take the gun away from that person. dunno
IF there was a 100 percent drug prohibition then people would not even buy drugs. It does not seem 100 percent to me.
I believe so. Stricter gun control would mean of higher chances of a person NOT to have a gun. If there was a 100 percent strict gun control, then i proudly said yes. And for those who say not, seems mental to me.
Neither. The question should be: "Which is Worse: Titanic or 2012?" But i am assuming that is what you meant from the beginning. Well i am going to say, Titanic is worse. For one reason, 2010 has not happened yet. Second, 2012 might not going to happen.
God gave humans free will to pursue our interests and not his. But all he wanted in return is to acknowledge that he exists and that you love him. I think that is what God wants human to realise before pursuing their dreams.
I don't know what dictionary you are carrying but pedophilia is the attraction to children only. Google dictionary is my evidence.
I don't have kids but i believe that non convicted pedophiles should stay. Pedophilia is the attraction to younger kids (don't know exact age) but that is not a harm towards society. That is only a concern. A pedophile who acts should be locked up. This question needs to be more specific.
Would you keep a murderer in your house? That is the same thing when you keep a murderer in society. Most of me hates the death penalty because i will always have sympathy. I don't believe humans have the right to kill other humans. Because we are not God but i know God is understanding and kind. And in our shoes, we would agree to the death penalty because it meant saving more lives than just one. He allowed his Son to die on earth so he can save us all from harm. And he kicks Satan out of Heavan. These two examples is revelant to keeping the death penalty open.
This type of question cannot be a debate. It is impossible because people have their own favorite style of music. If you go to a group of country artists, they will say that country music is the best. If you go to a group of rap artists, they will say that rap music is the best.
It depends on what you like.
I can say that today's music there is more a variety. And that is a great thing.
I am a guy. So i will probably get back with her and talk about why we broke up so these kind of things won't happen again. But if she breaks up another time, then the best thing to do is to walk away. I believe that someone who breaks up with you multiple times is either clueless of what he/she is doing or that they don't care about the other partner.
I think in some cases yes, and in some cases no. If you are focusing too much on a specific somebody you have a crush with, then sit in from of him/her. right? I can compare this to separating whites and blacks. I fear that if one is separated from the other, one might feel more superior than the other. I fear that male will fear more superior than women and might believe that they have the right to rape them or disrespect them at their will. Or it can be the other way around. I know this sounds crazy but i believe that anything or thought can be possible. Honestly, i don't know. If grades are better and the understanding of the other sex is perfect then i see nothing wrong in single sex schools.
Detention is like jail. Once you go in, you want to come out. Its purpose is to teach students how to be good and respectful to others. Nobody has the right to hurt others emotionally or physically without permission. You don't have the right to call me names that i don't want to be called. But if i allow you to call me the "b' word or the "f" word, go ahead because there is nothing wrong.
In other words, detention teaches student on what is permitted and what is not permitted. It teaches them to be respectful of other people wishes. Permission is the key factor because everybody have their own lines of respect and disrespect.
Is it neccessary. Honestly, no. I wish detention can be changed to Therapy. You can fear someone to not comit a crime because of the scary nature of prison. But fear can vanish. If you do therapy, you can unlock deep hidden issues to why the person did what he/she did. I can't say if these issues may rise again within the mind, but the results are better than fear.
If i have to choose ONLY one, i will choose the old lady. In my opinion, i think that it is the best choice because you are going to save a life. There is no best choice, but there is a best perspective choice. I believe that my friend will understand my choice and i find it selfish to pick the soul mate because you shouldn't put your needs before others.
I think any answer is the best answer. It all depends on what type of character you are.
Bro, you did not mean anything bad. I have friends who will think of this as a joke. They first need to know what kind of person you are to understand where you are coming from. I don't see this as how you are sexist. Your friends need to take a joke but also respect the fact that they don't like it. People have their likes and dislikes and you seem like the guy who can respect that. If we were friends and you gave me the pic, i will be like "whoa." Then i will call you see what is the deal and you will explain it. lol i have friends who loves to talk about fat girls. It is funny between each other but we won't press the subject on those who find it offensive. For those who read this and become offensive of "fat girls" i apologize.
When you are racist, you are limiting yourself from a wider range of people than being homophobic. Yes, there are a lot of homosexuals but when you are homophobic to a homosexual black man, you are limiting yourself from him, and not a whole race. (And i am not saying black people are homosexuals). In other words, what would you rather choose: have lots of opportunities of benefits and friends, or have less opportunites and friends. Well that depends on you, but i will choose the first option.
Actually it is hard to say yes or no in this question. Because, we need to test important products such as medicine to see if the product is successful. Feeding or doing something to other animals (humans are animals too) that can possible kill them is wrong. I find it extremely wrong and sad because animals who are forced in these activities do not have a say.
I don't want somebody to test products on me that can possible affect me in someways. It is abuse.
I believe that no one should die on this earth. This may sound ridiculous but this includes Hitler and other extreme murderes out there in this world. This world is a gift from God (if you believe in God) and we as humas therefore don't have the RIGHT to put somebody's life on the line. We do not control other's faith, only God.
Besides, why would you want to kill a murderer. Let that demon suffer in prison.
If we look closely, guns don't kill people. People kill people. But there are millions of ways to die and everyday, it is a miracle to stay alive. If guns are taken off the streets, then something is going to replace guns. Instead of a gun, a criminal might threatened me with a bat. Now, should we then ban bats? That is like banning the Yankees and the Red Sox. lol We should not ban guns, but we should limit guns. We should limit guns to the people who can protect us...the law enforcement; police officers; the people that know how to use guns.
You can take the guns out of the Mafia. But you cannot take the Mafia out of the crimes. I bet if the Mafia does not have guns, they will still comit crimes.
I understand what you are saying. But it should never be encouraged because it can scar the child and the woman for life. I don't think you need violence to have defensive instincts or skills.
Everybody is made different. What makes me happy is not what makes you happy. But when the act is not harming anybody, why interfere? I beleive that if the homosexual wants his genitals off, then that is his decision. This is a personal question.
I agree that violence is never the answer. The only thing that violence can end is war but it will never end the tensions between one person and another person. And these wars are a products of these tensions. The Haiti earthquake was one violent stage in the American history. However, this violent act showed that every person on this earth have a heart that beats the same. We all came as one unit or family to help a cause. Should violence be encouraged? I don't believe that you need violence to love. But i believe that because of violence, we are loving more than ever.
What is wrong with loving another person even if that person is of the same sex as you?
If everybody was bi then there will be no hatred for homosexual people. There will be one less unecessary trouble in this world.
