Stupid liberal logic.
True.
Side Score: 25
|
Wait..., what? No!!!
Side Score: 16
|
|
|
|
I'll agree on this one. If you think the system is out to kill you then you shouldn't trust it. Now let's apply your lesson. If you think minorities and liberals are dangerous degenerates then you should not keep fighting for an unlimited right for them to arm themselves. Side: True.
1
point
It's true. They tell us how dispicable the system is, all while trying to give the system full social control. The cops are bad, but we should only have the evil cops armed... the government is "tyrannical", but should have full control of healthcare and control to tell us what we can and cannot say like Nazi priests. No one understands the logic. Hardly anyone even attempts to defend the logic, but mark it down, liberals will wink and nod at each other as they try to implement said logic nonetheless... Side: True.
I am sure you are mistaken to characterize the Liberal position is to provide guns only to "evil cops". I cannot speak for all Liberals but I believe it would be more accurate to say that they believe cops who are evil, racist bigots, should be weeded out of police forces. Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1
point
1
point
They consistently bring up disproved arguments and are almost always never open to debate there stance do to lack of supporting evidence.Most of there there arguments are your a nazi or your white or your a man. There attempt of ending racism creates more the have no common sense there parents should have beat them more in my opinion so they wouldn't be pussies Side: True.
|
1
point
Depends how you're defining liberal. Is it a classical liberal merely concerned with toleration and equal rights? Or is it a policy focused liberal like bernie sanders? Or is it a "liberal" who is really just an SJW with no political savvy whatsoever who calls themselves a liberal for no reason? i suspect youre talking about the 3rd option. Side: Wait..., what? No!!!
1
point
You are correct; the shorthand of Liberal/Conservative can be confusing and the terms mean different things to different people. I find it best to clarify the debate using my own mind and then stick with that unless my mind is changed by the argument. It is similar to Left/Right. We all probably have a good idea which is which once we see it. As for the Opening Post, I cannot see it as I write and I forget the examples. There was something about Liberals in favor of gun reform whereby civilians could not legally own firearms and allow only the police to be armed (and the military of course) but Liberals are also supposed to be critical of the police while Conservatives always support the police. The question is not one of 'logic' but of consistency. How consistent is it to criticize armed police and to propose that only the police be armed? The response to this is that a well-trained police, free of racist bigotry could be armed but wherever the police do wrong they should be criticized and prosecuted. Side: True.
|