I highly doubt DBCooper was advocating for mass genocide. Most likely he was just advocating for the idea that we should end Muslim terrorism.

We are all dying, but all the while we are we are living. If one does not believe in an afterlife then they may see worshiping or practicing a religion as a waste of their short yet precious time on Earth. We are allowed to spend our lives how we want to, and even Christians have to admit that because of Free Will.

Although I don't want to "burn in Hell forever" there is no objectively best religion as there is no proof for any of them. If there were solid, concrete proof then everyone would be Christian, or Muslim, or Buddhist, etc.

It's up to the owner what they think of it, but I feel like your pet has been loyal to you and as a sort of symbol of appreciation you can bury it.

"If the rock is made of a ridiculously dense substance, made by God, the rock cannot be greater than God or God would not be omnipotent and would be a thing which is not God. God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent eternally. There cannot be anything bigger than God. There cannot be anything more knowledgeable than God (including you). There cannot be anything that is everywhere as God is omnipresent."

Starting off I never claimed that I am more knowledgeable than God, and this is not an attack on your religion. If anything this is a thought experiment. According to the Bible, you are correct, but this statement proves God could not do the impossible unless you use the argument "Humans can't understand it." which I think is a fairly valid argument as we still do not understand a lot.

"Your question is absurd, the thing you are trying to prove is not God indeed is not God. God is the creator of all things. Your statements and questions here are void of reason other than that you do not want God to rule over you."

I have stated that it is simply a thought experiment through which you can determine that an omnipotent being who can do the impossible is impossible at least through our current understanding of logic. This again is not an attack on your beliefs/religion.

This is my last post as I have outlined all of my arguments. Thanks for debating.

In the proposed situation God (or the omnipotent being) would have made the rock.

Some trolls are just in it for the fun and they succeed in making people laugh, even when they are the subject of said trolling. Those kind of trolls are the best kind of trolls.

It is absurd to say that in order prove He is omnipotent, God must be able to do something proving He is not omnipotent.

This will most likely be my last post as I have said the same thing multiple times and still do not understand what it is you are missing or I am missing. The statement itself doesn't exactly make it so an omnipotent being is impossible, just not in the way that most people would think. If you were omnipotent you would be all powerful, which would mean that, at least in my understanding, you could do anything, even if it is contradictory. In my honest opinion the simplest answer for the side of "Yes" is to say that God is able to do everything, including things that are contradictory and still be omnipotent, but the means of such a feat are not understandable to humankind.

What makes them evil? The fact that they don't believe in a god?

The idea the words represent is God making something that He cannot overcome. It's an impossibility and the goal of this statement, at least in my mind, is to prove that an omnipotent being cannot do absolutely everything anyone has thought of unless they have the ability to alter logic (which they very well may have considering they would be all powerful).