- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
You mean like spending a 100 trillion dollars over the next 100 years to move the temperature .03 degrees. Talk about getting your moneys worth. LOL The Earth itself will move it much more than that all by its own. Cooler, then warmer, then cooler, etc. It is just as likely the average temperature in 100 years will be a few degrees cooler than it is now with humans doing absolutely nothing.
The Paris agreement was a massive transfer of wealth from rich countries to poor countries, nothing more, nothing less. If the other 200 countries are so concerned about saving the planet they will find a way to reduce their emissions without US funds. The US has drastically reduced our emissions over the past 12 years and we will continue to do so. We do not need an agreement to do our part, we already are.
The USA is on track to meet its carbon reduction set forth by the Copenhagen talks in 2009. We will have lowered it by 16.3 percent from 2005 levels by 2020. The USA doesn't need to be in the Paris agreement to reduce it.
All this Paris agreement is is a massive transfer of wealth from rich countries to poor countries. 100 billion a year starting in 2020. Why should US taxpayers subsidize third world shit holes?
I love how they say over 200 nations are in agreement. Yea, well how many would be in favor of it if they had to give money instead of receiving it.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!