some students prefer listening to music as they study, but while learning, i disagree that a student can listen to music and concentrate on chemical problems. it has to be either one of them.
i agree that music could be allowed in a few classes, maybe during gym, or art, but during classes that require full attention, i think music would only be a distraction.
i agree i haven't really looked up what i stated here. that came from whatever stories i'd seen and heard. but i did look it up right now, and i don't know to what extent it is correct, because i admit i didn't do any heavy research on it. but anyway, even though it could be wrong,
lots of things. it could be a selfless act, a random act of kindness, anything that could help somebody or something or make them feel good. most things that seem insignificant to one could actually be extremely important to another person.
maximum people who you meet online are not like it offline. not all, but maximum. and you may have met somebody who doesn't come under this category. but there's always more chance of things not working out later on.
most people also say a lot of things online that they wouldn't normally say as a person. and there can be one person controlling multiple accounts on some site too. and we know that
you need to travel for a couple of months. you have five books you wanna read while you travel.
i like seeing my suitcase or bag filled with books. besides, while traveling for a few months, most people tend to buy books on the go instead of taking them with.
i guess its far better to carry a kindle.
i could agree on this. kindle does take a lot less space than material books. but that is probably its only advantage. otherwise, books are more preferable.
its pretty old. but a favorite. ^_^
i'm not a vegan myself and i don't, in general, support it. this could be because i'm more vegetarian and milk and its products are a necessity in my diet. occasional meat doesn't provide me with the basic proteins that i need.
i don't mind people being vegan. its annoying when they want everybody to follow their business.
according to hindu scriptures, our soul is an eternal being. and it'll soon leave the body when it doesn't like living there.
hence it would be necessary for us to keep the body clean and healthy so as to give the soul a better place to live in (and therefore it stays there longer).
this may or may not be true. but it does make people keep themselves healthy so that their souls may rest in there bodies for a longer period of time.
which in general leads to healthier people and healthier states of mind.
its usually like that when things suddenly take pace and go a bit faster than they were before(a week or so) on CD.
people probably finally find something they can fight for and things go mean for a while then on..
and then everyone soon loses all this energy that they had and things get back to going slow.
its a whole cycle that keeps repeating itself over and over again.
the site could go viral and all, but i don't think i'd leave. i've come to like the closeness and tolerance amongst debaters around here.
i could go off for a while though not for ever.
besides the site does show symptoms of going viral occasionally and there's a hoard of debaters who come along, but they soon disperse in a month or two.
he's almost always been around. when i left, when i returned. he was there every single time. and trolling. clever trolling.
there was this one time though, when he hadn't been around for a while. maybe about a week or so. i don't remember. but that was definitely when he lost his place on the weekly leaderboard.
A lot of things are put straight on the internet, or on the computer's hard drive of whoever is creating it now a days.
okay, agreed my point was a bit incorrect initially. i should have written almost all.
I'll say it's a moot point because both could have taught me, but the internet got me there sooner.
and a lot of information on the internet can be incorrect or misleading because it does not go through editors as books do. people can upload what they think helps which may or may not be fully experimented upon.
That's why you narrow down your search. That's like saying the library can be misleading, what with all that information there.
books do not usually mislead. they might give you extra information, but they almost never give you wrong information.
also search engines work on the amount the word in an essay or article. not on the exact topic. so all the searches of 20 pages and everything do not always have to be the information you are looking for.
Just like one individual site.
which might just give out wrong information and false prediction. not all posts on the internet are checked.
Do you see how that's a better argument in favor of computers and by way of them, the internet, with it's vast collection of articles, sites, quotes, pictures, etc that you could also look to while in search of the information you originally desired.
and wasn't all the information on the internet initiially taken from a set of books and manuscripts?
I know I've personally gotten side tracked while searching one thing and learned tons more than I expected to just googling something as simple as some song lyrics.
agreeably. but you will also realise you've not learnt a tonne of other things which you could have while reading a book.
besides this, the internet can be misleading. there's so much information on it that may or may not do you good.
a book, whereas, will only speak on a specific topic and articles related to it.
i don't think people are born bad or good. its their choices which define them at a certain time. but i don't agree that a person can be understood in his/her choice at one time or another. everybody makes mistakes and one mistake shouldn't be used to define their whole life.
i think children are born unbiased. their choices depend on what they like or dislike. this may not necessarily be similar to your own likes or dislikes and here one may call them evil or good.
however, in both cases it's the thought that counts. so what one may think is good could be evil to somebody else and vice versa.
it gives you a peace of mind. why do you think people invite others to party when they can. its happier when you share your happiness. similarly when you invite people to funerals and such, the pain does reduce considerably.
although i'm sure people will say its bad when its a piece of chocolate cake et cetera. but that's just a small part of it. ;)
that way one doesn't stay in conflict with oneself whether his possessions may get stolen or lost or taken. sharing helps us lose that pressure.
and finding pleasure in materials isn't exactly helpful in the longer run.
sharing sadness halves it, and sharing happiness doubles it.
i'm sure you'll do well... gut feelings. ;)
in india, we are expected to join colleges or universities at about 18. sometimes 19(if we prefer that).
how's baby noir? still living with you in college? she must have grown. they grow like crazy the first few months. ;)
this is a well known concept in the Hindu scripture(because i'm slightly more aware of that than others. it could be available in other scripts as well).
2 ears and 1 mouth signify more listening and less talking. this makes man more wise and helps him observe and understand people and his environment better.
i agree some emotions might be linked genetically and run in the family but the fact the environment and surroundings in which a child is brought up does alter and affect a lot of his/her emotions.
therefore it would be wrong to say that we are born evil (or born good).
but good here may be considered as innocent and impartial.
There is also research indicating that attributes commonly conceived of as "evil" or "bad" (e.g. jealousy, anger, lust) fulfill just as much of a necessary function as do those conceived of as "good"
agreeably here. what may seem good to one can look bad to another.
but speaking in general here, wouldn't being born good seem more valid?
i was just going make a debate about this. i understand when i get downvotes sometimes, but i've never really had downvoted argument all through my new argument activities.
i never really cared about the points, but its annoying me now.
do you have any idea as to who they could be?
although i don't think most normal mothers would have the energy to do it, i think if she can, its okay. as long as her kid isn't affected or influenced.
and young mother or old, isn't that going to about the same thing. maybe the only difference would be that older mothers would seriously be exhausted throughout and have lesser fun.
but otherwise i don't think there should be much of a difference.