authoritarian ultranationalism[1][2] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, as well as strong regimentation of society and of the economy[
Aka what the left is doing today in real life.
Regimentation is very strict control over the way a group of people behave or the way something is done. The left demands speech codes, gender codes and the abolition of police and monuments...
Not really. I can't judge individuals I do not know. I can judge the people Democrats are electing and the personalities they are supporting, and those people were considered insane just decades ago.
Ok so like Trump then?
Not really. To be more specific, I meant what the left used to consider insane. The left had no overt problem with Trump during those times. He also supports none of these measures.
Regarding sex change, personally I find it abhorrent that they would allow young children to get a sex change before they can even vote. But then I also think you shouldn't be able to register to fight and die for your country before you can even drink alcohol legally.
Well, let's assume the Biblical God, who gives us weights and measures, was judging alcohol vs child abuse, he never says it's better to have a millstone tied around your neck and to be thrown into the sea for alcohol...
Schools have stepped over the line countless times before, so of COURSE it's going to make the news that a principal forced a girl to dance with a boy that made her uncomfortable. Rightfully so and that principle should step down if he can't see why he was in the wrong. And?
Just pointing out that the left keeps moving its feet towards that ledge? Would you prefer I mentioned it after they fell off or now?
Again, a few people say (wrongly) that pedophilia is an unchangeable sexual orientation and you think all Dems think that way?
I think Dems are very susceptible to "tolerance", thus making them an easier target than the right for this crap that keeps getting just a little bit deeper with each year.
It's not. It's a sexual perversion that harms others and should be lumped together with killers that get a high off murdering.
CNN disagrees with you. A lot of Democrats watch and agree with CNN.
This year, at least six states are trying to restrict transgender kids from getting gender reassignment treatments
By Scottie Andrew, CNN
Updated 12:31 PM EST, Wed January 22, 2020
(CNN) State lawmakers can't stop fighting about the rights of their transgender citizens: Their access to bathrooms. The sports they can play in school. Whether businesses can turn them away because of their gender identity.
But they've never weighed restrictions to transgender healthcare that are this extreme.
Since the start of the 2020 legislative session, at least six states have proposed to restrict transgender minors' access to gender reassignment treatments, including surgery and hormone therapy. Some bills would make it illegal for physicians to administer the treatments. Others would classify the act as child abuse.
The number of states contemplating whether to restrict transgender youths' access to healthcare is "unusual," said Ryan Thoreson, a Yale Law School lecturer and an LGBT rights researcher at Human Rights Watch.
No states have enacted a blanket ban on gender reassignment treatment for transgender minors. But the sheer volume of proposals this legislative session is concerning, he said.
"There are alarming signals that things like this could pass in conservative states," Thoreson told CNN.
Well Mint, looks like something you equivalated with murder is mainstream in the Democratic Party.
Don't look back when you run away. I'd prefer you were an intact person than a pillar of salt...
Creating something and being the cause of something else don't always sync.
Seems logical.
The Wright brothers invented airplanes, does that mean they are responsible for every plane crash in existence?
I'd say they were involved, aka "indirectly responsible", but not directly responsible, meaning "of no guilt".
I would say you can be responsible for something but not be guilty of wrongdoing at the same time. For example, if nothing in our history ever moved, but a first thing moved, whatever made it move in the first place could theoretically be responsible for all things that move afterwards. But, they wouldn't be responsible in a guilt oriented way if 5,000,000 moves later a kid is hit by an asteroud. Nevertheless, they would still be the first cause.
A child shouldn't have a sex change until they are age to fully consent. Pedophilia is as much a sexual identity as murder....as in it's not. Girls can say no to boys for dancing and boys can say no to girls for dancing.
That's good to hear.
Anything else needing to be cleared?
Nope. I already knew those things instinctively.
You keep wanting to lump everyone in a group that's easiest for you to judge them.
Not really. I can't judge individuals I do not know. I can judge the people Democrats are electing and the personalities they are supporting, and those people were considered insane just decades ago.
Now, let's actually take a peek, shall we? You can use your own mind to figure out whether you think these are right or left wing phenomenons...
Sex-change treatment for kids on the rise
FEBRUARY 20, 2012 / 8:12 AM / AP
CHICAGO - A small but growing number of teens and even younger children who think they were born the wrong sex are getting support from parents and from doctors who give them sex-changing treatments, according to reports in the medical journal Pediatrics.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/
Did a TEDx Speaker Say Pedophilia Is an ‘Unchangeable Sexual Orientation’?
A TEDx talk broadcast prompted widespread controversy over the speaker's comments about the nature of pedophilia.
SNOPES: True
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/
School In Utah Says Girls Can’t Say No To Boys At Dances
One mother in Utah is rightfully furious at her childs school after what transpired at the school's Valentine's Dance.
Her 11 year old daughter was so excited about the dance but it was ruined when her principal intervened.
While at the dance, a boy she had told her mom made her uncomfortable asked her to dance. Not wanting to, she politely declined.
When the boy told on her, the principal said it's against school policy to say "no" at dances.
The mother of course is irate at the situation and has contacted the principal but he stands firm on the situation.
https://b985.fm/
At judgement day, I'll definitely have some things on my plate to address, but supporting this will not be one of them. That'd be a hard pass from me...
Let's make that a super, duper hard pass. Heck, why not make it 4 passes with some pass sauce and a pass cherry on top while we're at it.
If you were running a race and your enemy wanted you to slow down, would you?
No. They'd double down, and I'd triple down. The left hate people like me because we were raised on the left, know how to beat the left at their own game, know too much, and are no longer on the left. They couldn't keep up with me on their best day, but most Conservatives are nice, polite people who don't want to rock the boat. I'm not. I say rock the f*ing boat. Hell tip that baby upside down. If the left suffers the consequences of their own tactics used on them? That's their problem. Better learn to swim.
If you burn a flag or say/do anything they disagree with, then "punch 'em in the face", send them to jail for a year, etc.
Talk is cheap, especially seeing the left thinks silencing dissent is normal. We both know the right isn't physically censoring anyone, and we both know the left embraces censorship, violence, cancel culture, draconian measures, shoutdowns, "politicaly correct" speech, using force to stop right wing speakers, riots, looting, and burning down cities.
The left has no fear of a mass mob of conservatives destroying cities and rioting like psychopaths. You know it, and I know it.
And all the Trump-supporters who follow his lead by not wearing a mask.
I know libs get confused by the definition of "hypocrisy", but I'll give it a go anyway.
Ya see, when your party condemns anyone gathering, not social distancing, or not wearing a mask, then overlook it suddenly based on who is doing it, that makes your party hypocrites.
When your party doesn't condemn those things, your party are not hypocrites.
Leftists condemn it until it's them. Righties say go outside. Do what you want. It's your life.
Did I slow it down slowly enough? That is the real question...
If my government defended the man I would go after it. So are you? Defending her or him?
Well, the Democrats in your government say a child can have a sex change, that gender is a construct, that pedophilia is a sexual identity, that a girl can't say no to a boy if he wants to dance because of his need for inclusion, and that a male can win female sports. I used to say "the next thing you know, the left will be pushing for..."
I've learned not to say that anymore because they always take me up on that offer.
The point? I wouldn't put it past them. Get those mammaries ready. Leftist men are around the corner, and leftist politicians need to pass some legislation to prove they are still useful...
ANYTHING anti-fascist is a good thing.
ANTIFA are openly Communists. Communists literally created Fascism.
Giovanni Gentile (30 May 1875–15 April 1944) was an Italian philosopher, politician[1] and an educator known as the "Philosopher of Fascism." He contributed to the rise of Italian fascism and was the ghostwriter of Benito Mussolini's essay, The Doctrine of Fascism. He was influenced by Karl Marx, Engels and Friedrich Nietzsche among others. Under Il Duce, Gentile became the Minister of Public Education and started a reform of Italian edcuation.
Nahhh... Not knowing by a lot, isn't different than not knowing by a little.. Either way, you remain ignorant..
Might wanna get caught up on the Communists and ANTIFA's plan for liberals, eh Con?
You either test absolutely as much as you can, or you don't BELIEVE in testing..
Or you believe in efficiency and taking cost effective measures seeing that the virus is nothing like it was and can see the left isn't interested in science or facts, but rather in using draconian measures due to its sick, twisted nature. We know this because they say rallies are virus spreaders, and they have no comment on riots and protests bigger than rallies...
The novel coronavirus is gradually becoming weak and losing its potency. This is what's trending on various social networking sites these days. As per some media reports, an Italian doctor named Dr Matteo Bassetti recently claimed that due to some mutation in the structure of the COVID-19 virus, it is becoming less dangerous and will soon disappear on its own.
Dr Bassetti is the head of the infectious diseases clinic at the San Martino hospital in Italy. The Sunday Telegraph quoted Dr. Bassetti saying, "The clinical impression I have is that the virus is changing in severity. In March and early April, the patterns were completely different. People were coming to the emergency department with a very difficult to manage illness and they needed oxygen and ventilation, some developed pneumonia. But in the past month, the picture has completely changed in terms of patterns."
the Senate was spied on"
Not authorized by Obama. (or Brennan, etc.)
1)Then tell me who it was authorized by.
2)Well, look here.
CIA admits it broke into Senate computers; senators call for spy chief’s ouster
An internal CIA investigation confirmed allegations that agency personnel improperly intruded into a protected database used by Senate Intelligence Committee staff to compile a scathing report on the agency’s detention and interrogation program, prompting bipartisan outrage and at least two calls for spy chief John Brennan to resign.
“I have no choice but to call for the resignation of CIA Director John Brennan,” Udall said in a statement. “The CIA unconstitutionally spied on Congress by hacking into Senate Intelligence Committee computers. This grave misconduct not only is illegal, but it violates the U.S. Constitution’s requirement of separation of powers. These offenses, along with other errors in judgment by some at the CIA, demonstrate a tremendous failure of leadership, and there must be consequences.”
Another committee member, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and some civil rights groups called for a fuller investigation. The demands clashed with a desire by President Barack Obama, other lawmakers and the CIA to move beyond the controversy over the “enhanced interrogation program” after Feinstein releases her committee’s report, which could come as soon as next week
Many members demanded that Brennan explain his earlier denial that the CIA had accessed the Senate committee database.
“Director Brennan should make a very public explanation and correction of what he said,” said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich. He all but accused the Justice Department of a coverup by deciding not to pursue a criminal investigation into the CIA’s intrusion.
I dont wanna silence anyone's speech through government force.
Welcome to the Republican Party.
Also you bring up those folks as if Im in favor of them. Which leads me to believe you have no idea who you're talking to. Though I am rather curious what sort of things have those people said that led to deaths.
Obama used free speech to call ISIS the JV team. Soon after they had taken over countries and vast spreads of land throughout the Middle East and North Africa. They also began infiltrating Europe and the U.S. and committed terror attacks in mass. Theoretically this speech led to the Boston Marathon bombing, San Bernadino, Fort Hood, the Bataclan, the London bombing, and the list goes on and on.
Many Democrats use speech to demonize the police. Cop killings are on the rise and so are cops killing citizens.
Speech defending illegal aliens has led to gangs multiplying and killing people in the streets.
The point? By your standard, I could silence every leftist on planet Earth, and no one could stop me because "speech is violence" and speech can theoretically lead to violence... I could say that about any speech I dislike or that comes from a political opponent.
So were Democrats. Guess who wasn't. Me and Donald Trump.
Okay? Im not defending the democrats? I dont even know why tf you even bothered to bring up the democrats. My point is that she was in favor of it. Good for Trump he's correct on something. I dont care about that.
By your standard, Obama and Biden orchestrated terrorism via speech, and they should be censored.
Ooooh comin out with the strawman arguments I love it! My point was that I dont feel sorry for her because her rhetoric has been proven to cause terrorist attacks. Furthermore I said I wasn't in favor of the government silencing her speech. So what point are you trying to make?
1)Your speech causes terrorism and violence, so your speech needs censored. Oh, and check your privilege when you speak.
2)Name these terrorist events caused by Anne Coulter.
So is punching a leftist in the head. Now what?
I didn't know burning a piece of cloth was equivalent to punching someone and thus causing harm to them.
Flag burners are known for both.
Very interesting. Love these false equivalences. I guess its fine if we outlaw certain art since its not "speech" in your book either.
It's your standard being applied, not mine. And the left is already banning art, from statues, to movies, to books, to any old African American image used by companies as logos such as Aunt Jemima on syrup and Uncle Ben on rice.
Being against something is...free speech and...freedom of expression...
Okay now I realize who Im dealing with here. You're either very dishonest or very stupid. Perhaps a combination of both. Pick one or both. Now I know not to take you seriously though you fuckin clown.
If you didn't have an annoying personality to the point of it being like fingers on a chalkboard, you'd be harder to spot...but you do...
Pretend I don't know, and tell me what it symbolizes.
It could mean either dissatisfaction with your government or even further to your overall country essentially
Cool. Seeing the left controls almost every megaphone and system in America, I suppose he unknowingly feels oppressed by a system controlled by leftists. Maybe he should burn it.
I have no clue who that is. I was a user on here 5 years ago and left.
Sure ya were.
This is a new account of mine.
1)Then why didn't you use your original account?
2)Tell us the original name of this account.
Quit wasting my time with this bullshit
Nobody bought it buritto Hootie Quantumhead the Snake, Redhot...
So, I didn't switch the argument, you have.
Sure you did. You asked "why is surveillance of foreign hacking bad" (a strawman) when the claims were surveillance not related to foreign hacking but to spying on the Senate and on incoming Presidential team members. Both of which you are still ignoring and either are uncomfortable addressing or cannot figure out how to address.
Yet, her post argues that god is not responsible for several physical phenomena
Which is why she was questioned as to why she would say God created everything, yet didn't create solar eclipses.
so why would you think she attributes others to god?
I didn't assume anything. I asked how God can create everything while not creating everything, including astronmical phenomenon.
Spying on foreign hacking is bad how exactly?
Strawman. That's like saying "why is putting sugar in cookies bad?" when the main claim was that you put poison in the cookie.
In this case, the Senate was spied on, and the next administration was spied on. And then the supposedly "hacked" DNC server was never even looked at by the FBI according to the FBI.
"Own your party."
I defend Obama more than anyone, yet am ardently independent.
1)Sure ya are.
2)He massively increased the surveillance state...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/
"The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you."
- Paul Graham
I'm anti Bush and pro Trump, have voted across party lines, and have went after ardent RINOs while being registered as an Independent. I am indifferent on politics concerning drug laws and gay marriage. Tell me what you theorize that I label myself as. If you cannot, it's probably because neither can I.
It's sad that you have convinced yourself of this amusingly inaccurate falsehood rather than go the traditional route and simply get an education.
I have multiple degrees and can assume you aren't as successful based on your fiscal positions and past comments concerning wealth. Do you have an actual point, or was your point that you are so smart that rather than accumulate enough wealth to be fiscally content, you'd rather bitch about what everyone else has with your astronomical genius? Do tell.
Frankly, the only thing preventing you spiralling into depression is your own stupidity, since it actually prevents you from realising how utterly fucking stupid you are.
Well, we're all smarter than you, and not depressed, so we win twice. Congrats on the double loss.
Hey look. A left winger takes my exact position.
Orwell was not opposed to socialism per se as the conservative interpretation suggests, but he was opposed to a particular kind of socialism, viz. any form of socialism which turned totalitarian because it neglected to provide suitable political institutions to mitigate the abuse of power. The conservative interpretation of Orwell’s fictions as anti-socialist thus carries an important kernel of truth. Therefore, Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four were not intended as criticisms of the abstract economics of collectivism in theory, but rather of the political dynamics of “decayed communism,” non-democratic forms of collectivism in practice. Though these two fictions have many differences – Animal Farm
being an allegorical beast fable about the very recent past, Nineteen-Eighty Four a relatively realistic dystopian novel set in the future – it is this polemical intention which they share in common. The Public Choice interpretation of Orwell helps us understand that Orwell was opposed to a particular form of socialism -the totalitarian kind – and why. Indoing so, this interpretation allows us to square the sensibility of the conservative anti-socialist interpretation with the fact that Orwell was a socialist.
https://www.econlib.
Isn't it strange how Orwell was a socialist that you pretend was on the right.
No one pretends Orwell was on the right. Show us any debate on this site claiming Orwell was on the right. Comfortable just making it up as you go along, eh Nom?
and Hitler was a fascist that you pretend was on the left?
Interesting how you pretend as if left wingers are physically incapable of warning against totalitarianism from either or both wings.
In this case, his warning describes what is now the modern left who has literally created its own political language, censored speech, created Covid snitch hotlines, arrested people for going outside while encouraging mass protest mobs, used mass political violence to stop speeches, destroyed anyone who dares the heracy of speaking against the group, and attempts to destroy memories of our history, etc.
Let's take a closer look, shall we?
Definition of Orwellian:
used to describe a political system in which the government tries to control every part of people's lives, similar to that described in the novel "Nineteen Eighty Four ,"by George Orwell:
We don't want to see a 1984 Orwellian type situation where neighbors are reporting on neighbors.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/dictionary.cambridge.org/us/amp/english/orwellian
▪︎
Headline-
Obsessed With Need To Control Others, Political Busybodies And Judges Trample On Liberty
That kind of “liberalism” was bad enough, but the disease has of late developed new and far more vicious strains. Those involve attacks on Americans for not holding the right beliefs.
In America’s brave new world, the law is more and more used as a weapon against people who challenge the governmental leviathan and even against individuals who quietly dissent from progressive orthodoxy and merely want to be left alone.
▪︎
Headline-
Mayor Bill de Blasio urges New Yorkers to SNITCH on those not doing social distancing
Defintions-
George Orwell is best known for his 1949 dystopian novel "1984," with its themes of social injustice and a controlling, authoritarian government. The word Orwellian is most often used to talk about real-life situations that are reminiscent of this kind of state control and surveillance, called "Big Brother" in the book. Any hint that our government is watching or listening to us as we make phone calls or do Internet searches feels at least a little bit Orwellian.
https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/Orwellian
Headline-
Rosenstein says, in hindsight, he would not have signed application to surveil former Trump campaign
Headline-
CIA admits to spying on Senate staffers
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/31/cia-admits-spying-senate-staffers
Headline-
Exclusive: US government wiretapped former Trump campaign chairman
-CNN
Headline-
The Obama administration expanded warrantless surveillance of Americans’ Internet searches, according to new National Security Agency documents released by Edward Snowden.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/
Pushing aside the fact that you have no idea what my party is
You hate Trump and run cover for the Democratic Party. Own your party. No one respects someone who pretends to be a milk toast fence sitter when it's clear that they aren't.
if a party is trying to force their religion on people they should abide by the rules of it. To be clear, religion and politics should not mix.
Ever looked around mint? This cultural Marxist religion is telling everyone which statues are allowed, what words can be said, who can say what on social media, who can act in Hollywood, who we are and who we aren't, whether we do or do not need police, who can or cannot report the news, which companies can or cannot exist, and who can or cannot have a gathering; and they are using schools as their churches. The only way to not see it is to not desire to see it.
When the evil one comes, I'm not convinced you won't bend the knee due to your soft stances considering Christianity and Nihilism.
I personally will take on Obama, Trump, Biden, Bush, the world, etc if they demand I renounce my faith and volunteer to bow to anyone or anything. I'd be defiant to the end. I'd prefer death. Can you say the same? Only you would know.
This is the same guy that blasted Obama stating it was "weak leadership" for the riots when Obama was President.
These are the same Democrats who said cages at the border and using tear gas was Fascism, yet Obama literally built the cages, and used them, and used tear gas over 100 times. See how that bs argument works as if anyone is politically persuaded by it?
SNOPES
Did the Obama Administration Use Tear Gas Once a Month at the Border?
Conservative web sites accurately presented the frequency of tear gas use during the final five years of Barack Obama's presidency, from 2012 to 2016.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/
SNOPES
Did Obama Admin Build Cages That House Immigrant Children at U.S.-Mexico Border?
True
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/
Anybody who doesn't acknowledge the blatant hypocrisy is a turd.
Two things are true at once. Trump has said hypocritical things. The left says rallies are coronavirus spreaders while endorsing protests with far more people than any rally.
So what was your point again? That nobody cares about your spitballs? You're correct. Nobody cares. People almost always vote based on fiscal policy and don't vote on hypocrisy. If they did, third party would have won in modern times. They haven't.
Why did AOC kick reporters out of her political debate
Because it's easy to give mindless rants when you are unopposed, and it's harder to mindlessly rant when a moderate Democrat stands across from you countering all of your statements and making you look dumb, and you can't just call her a racist if she disagrees with you.
Anything else?
aaah Candace Owens. You mean the same person who openly talks about the white replacement theory on how immigrants are coming in and genociding white people. Candace "You know hitler wasn't such a bad guy" Owens. Candace "You know George Floyd was a terrible person" Owens. LAUGHABLE
Cool. So give us some videos or proof of these exact quotes so we can analyze them and debate them.
No. But laws aren't written to change minds.. They're written to change behavior. Maybe minds will follow. Maybe not.
Cool. So why are Democrats systematically oppressing blacks in their cities, creating blacks only graduations and dorms and getting rid of Uncle Tom and Aunt Jemima? Why are they putting blacks back into a position of segregation and a lack of represntatives as company slogan icons? Do tell.
we know out of Trump vs the Democrats who would be the best chance to actually get any of it passed."
Yes we do - Democrats. As long as they aren't blocked by Republicans, as they repeatedly have been
Obama had both the House and the Senate at the same time. Never passed shit.
https://www.beaconjournal.com/article/
Trump can do it, but not Obama...
So I don't sleep? Eat? Wash? Take bathroom breaks?
This isn't a confessional. Stop that.
You see how literally EVERYTHING you write is OBVIOUSLY untrue? One has to gawp at the sheer idiocy of someone who thinks I should "disprove" every absurd statement he makes.
Or just start with one and work your way from there.
Also Coulter is literally a white nationalist and also supports the bullshit conspiracy theory of "White replacement" and "White genocide" and was in favor of the patriot act.
Cool. I didn't realize a political label garnered the relinquishing of free speech. I say you're a white nationalist. No speech for you.
The left has invited terrorists and dictators to speak to college kids. Should we have killed them when they got off the plane? Do tell.
was in favor of the patriot act.
So were Democrats. Guess who wasn't. Me and Donald Trump.
id be against it but additionally against her rhetoric is dangerous and leads to innocent lives being killed.
I say Soros, Pelosi, and Schumer's speech leads to death. No speech for them either. Don't you love when your standards are applied to the left?
You know damn well as much as I do its the symbolism of flag burning which is whats being debated here.
Pretend I don't know, and tell me what it symbolizes.
Thats clearly what Trump is against.
Being against something is...free speech and...freedom of expression...
Also freedom of speech also means freedom of expression you do realize that right?
So is punching a leftist in the head. Now what?
When I say "academic qualification" I mean more relevant than a Bachelor's degree in English.
So an actual slave or soldier that was at a particular event would be less qualified to describe that event than some Marxist professor on its tenth sex change?
Black is white.
It is to most Conservatives. To the left, you are correct. They are two distinct groups who need treated differently, one as people and one as pets.
Up is down. Left is right.
Technically it can be depending on gravity and your relation to the source or sources of it.
Nazism is socialism
No shit.
Trump admitted he is against the 1st amendment and freedom of speech
Cool. Burning the flag isn't speech. It's a physical act consisting of no words that could violate burn ban laws, endangering a minor laws, destruction of property laws, illegal rioting, inciting a riot, etc.
It's like trying to say that banning the burning of buildings is a violation of the First Amendment because you don't like the building. Nope. It isn't.
Neverthless I support the right to disgrace the flag because once and if the left takes over, I might want to use it as toilet paper and light that baby on fire myself.
No, YOU ignored the point. You tried to change the subject once again because I pointed out that NINETY PERCENT OF ALL DOMESTIC TERRORISM IS COMMITTED BY PEOPLE JUST LIKE YOU, WHO BELIEVE THE SAME CRAZY SHIT THAT YOU DO, and you responded -- predictably -- by attacking Muslims and then turning the facts upside down like the boring Nazi cunt you are.
Oh, and you also swapped accounts three times to do this, because that's how insane you are.
Random claims. No links.
Let's check it out. Here's a good debate for you. Huh. No comments by you. That's so odd...
https://www.createdebate.
Hmmm... here's another good topic for you. Huh. No comments by you here either. Isn't that strange? It's almost as if you either know the answer, but can't give the answer, or that you just aren't smart enough to come up with an answer. Oh well. I'm good with you drooling on yourself in confusement.
This is where you disappear to a deflection or another topic.
Translation: This is where I disappear and project my cowardice onto you because I'm a lying coward.
Point proven. Excellent job.
Plus, how can I disappear if I'm always here?
You can disappear from any attempt to show us all of these lies and still be here. I know basic physics is hard for leftists, but I try to dumb it down anyway.
Lol. God you're so stupid it's infuriating.
Yet you can never prove me wrong or even attempt to debate any topic concerning how a liberal city or organization can be systematically racist.
Because debunking every lie you tell about the left is literally a full time job.
You're never NOT on here, so what's the problem?
Sometimes you fit three into the same sentence.
Provide us a few examples. I know, I know. This is where you disappear to a deflection or another topic. Good chat.
You're just LYING, the same as you always do. Telling lies is the only thing you know how to do because you have the mind of a seven year old child.
Yet you've magically never proven anything to be nonfactual because that's what fact haters do.
How do you know they were white leftists?
Because white leftists have publicaly called for the removal of things related to Lincoln. Pretty simple, isn't it?
Tear down the Abe Lincoln statue in Chicago's Lincoln Park
Tear down the Abe Lincoln statue in Chicago's Lincoln Park
Heritage belongs in a museum
Interesting. Leftists hate Abraham Lincoln. I think we both know why.
Boston considers removing Abraham Lincoln statue with freed slave
Iconic Washington, DC, monuments defaced in night of protests
Numerous Washington, D.C., landmarks were the target of vandalism Sunday evening as protests in the nation's capital over the police killing of George Floyd entered their third day.
Photos posted on Twitter by the National Park Service (NPS) showed graffiti on several monuments including the Lincoln Memorial, the World War II Memorial and the Brigadier General Casimir Pulaski statue in Freedom Plaza.
Great list. You probably included ending the drug war, but it's worth mentioning again..
There's a great read entitled: Ain't nobody's business if you do
https://www.amazon.com/
excon
PS> Upon further thought, I'm gonna EXPAND my answer above to include ALL consensual crimes..
And we know out of Trump vs the Democrats who would be the best chance to actually get any of it passed. But...you seem to relish being lied to with a fake white smile over being helped by orange skin.
Seeing Trump seems able to do something in days, it would make one wonder if the Democrats who couldn't do anything in decades, actually want blacks treated fairly.
I suppose Nancy and Chuck are fairly aware that once blacks get these things, white, Democrat pandering and baiting won't garner very many votes.
The promise of a dangling carrot seems to be a better political tactic than actually giving someone the carrot...
Oh I forgot, it's Trump and he doesn't have to adhere to something as silly as the law.
••••••••••
Top 10 Ways Obama Violated the Constitution during His Presidency
••••••••••
“Criminal In Chief” — 78 Times President Obama Broke The Law During Presidency
I wouldn't doubt that once the tickets were sold the Trumpsters requested them knowing they wouldn't have to actually buy them just to be able to have a headline like the one above
Strike one. No one believes your assessment. Probably because people who called in, like me, had no idea it was sold out when we made the attempt. And also there was no guarantee of getting or not getting access to the BOK Center once registered. There's also expected to be hundreds of thousands in attendance outside with projector screens showing the event, so that doesn't really fit your subjective narrative.
By the way, is that an American flag with a picture of Trump superimposed on it? Is that legal?
Yes.
The laws relating to the flag of the United States of America are found in detail in the United States Code. Title 4, Chapter 1 pertains to the flag; Title 18, Chapter 33, Section 700 regards criminal penalties for flag desecration; Title 36, Chapter 3 pertains to patriotic customs and observances. These laws were supplemented by Executive Orders and Presidential Proclamations.*
https://www.ushistory.org/betsy/
There is a law against using the American flag for advertising.
1)Looks like you're wrong.
2)Prove it's advertising.
Facebook’s new ‘supreme court’ looks like a license to censor
The Facebook Oversight Board — a 20-member independent panel that will rule on which posts can be blocked as false or as hate speech or harassment — is a recipe for left-wing censorship.
Sure, there's a token conservative, such as Stanford Law prof Michael McConnell. But even he is potentially compromised, since his firm (Wilson Sonsini) represents much of the Silicon Valley corporate elite.
The first four members of the board, who all hold the title of co-chair, were selected by Facebook directly. Thorning-Schmidt is one, and is joined by two US law professors, Jamal Greene and Michael McConnell, and Catalina Botero Marino, a former special rapporteur for freedom of expression at the Organization of American States.
Helle Thorning-Schmidt (Danish pronunciation: [ˈhelə ˈtsʰoɐ̯ne̝ŋ ˈsme̝t]; born 14 December 1966)[1] is a retired Danish politician who served as the 26th Prime Minister of Denmark from 2011 to 2015, and Leader of the Social Democrats from 2005 to 2015.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HelleThorning-Schmidt
Jamaal Greene
Twitter:
If we are to insist on naming U.S. military bases after traitors, might I recommend Titus Cornelius, aka Colonel Tye, an enslaved New Jersey resident who fought valiantly for the British during the Revolution, to gain his freedom. That's a cause worth fighting for.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jamalgreene?refsrc=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
Michael McConnell
confirmed by a Democratic-majority Senate by unanimous consent.
https://www.hoover.org/profiles/michael-mcconnell
In January 2008, Botero took part in a seminar on "Media and Government," arranged in Washington, D.C., by the Inter-American Dialogue.[14] In 2012, she was the keynote speaker at a Mexico City event entitled "Change Your World," sponsored by Yahoo!, at which women from around the Americas gathered to discuss and exchange experiences and ideas relating to human rights and technology.
You literally accuse every site which has a problem with neo-Nazi propaganda of being a left wing site.
Your favorite source made that claim.
Shut your stupid mouth you boring fascist twat.
Thank you for posting this and proving to justignoreme that everything I stated was factually correct. You're a peach.
Thanks for posting this. Here's what your link says:-
Or it's your site, and it's your link. I used it because leftists accept no source outside the left wing echo chamber, regardless of its credibility or factuality.
High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing, supporting the consensus of science and a clean fact check record.
Yes, that's what leftists do. Reference other leftists' credibility, who then account for their accountability in a left wing reference circle jerk.
So the source is legitimate.
Or it's your favorite source, and even a left wing rag labels the site left wing, which is code for far left, radical, nutjob site.
Oh, and looky here. The facebook "oversight board" contains nerry a Conservative...
"no research has ever suggested that Republicans have been disadvantaged on social media platforms."
How convenient that your source is left wing.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/
I've been censored and banned from multiple leftist sites that never ban leftists, even for more vile offenses, including this one, despite the resident leftist regularly using the words "Nazi, "idiot", "stupid", not a Jew, Jewish prick, etc towards anyone and everyone still having the account he does this with.
And I'm not nearly the only one. Every single right wing, political friend I have on facebook, youtube, and twitter, including myself, have voiced it happening to them on those very platforms.
That's funny because I've never had a problem voicing dissent on Facebook.
I would explain to you why leftist sites don't censor leftists, but it would wizz over your helmet.
I've also never heard blind worship of an openly fascist president termed as "dissent" before.
Awesome. Trump passed Prison Reform, which destroyed legislation that was systematically oppressing blacks. Joe Biden, Obama's second hand man, passed anti black bussing laws... You support the guy who passed anti black bussing laws. I support the man who let them free.
•
I think you're confusing dissent with Nazism. You defend the former, which makes sense, seeing you agree with Hitler on racism towards Jews. You probably agree with him on other races as well.
Yup, I just checked and you definitely are.
It's cute how you think old ladies singing "Jesus Loves Me" are Nazis and not the leftists having moms arrested for going to the park with their kid.
Rioters and mobs don't have anything to do with transmitting Covid.
Good one, Doctor Imbecile. Can we have another diagnosis please?
Or so you and the left tells us.
That's literally the opposite of what the left keeps telling you. Shut your mouth you damned idiot.
Oh good. So you agree the leftists forming mobs in the streets are not only killing people and destroying black peoples' businesses, but they are spreading diseases like rats while condemning only the right who isn't a part of liberal city mobs. I've learned how to follow your logic over the years. I ask myself, "what would a fruit fly be thinking on this topic?" and that's always your position. Bzzzzzzzzzzz. Splat. Bzzzzzzzzzzz. Splat. Bzzzzzzzz. Take a dump. Bzzzzzz. Eat. Bzzzzzzz. Take a dump. Some random buzz about Nazis. Recycle back to taking a dump.
The FIRST thing I love about my country are the rights granted to us in the Constitution..
Like, oh...being able to voice dissent on facebook, twitter or youtube without being banned or censored that you seem perfectly comfortable with because you can't grasp that once you are no longer useful, you're next, and no kneeling will be tolerated?
I thought right wingers loved the Constitution...No, huh?
Well, we do, but we don't tend to use it as a noose around our own necks concerning people who are not dealing with anyone decent or normal in good faith, lie about what it says, and then claim it was written by racist slave owners who need to have their statues and memories destroyed. We assume that if you trash them, you think their Constitution is trash, just like them. And you do think that until you perceive that referencing it might help you in a particular instance for political expediency. The rest of the time you feign outrage and use it as toilet paper.
WHY??? Cause I AGREE with him, and I love my country..
Well, loving only people who bend the knee to the leftist, draconian state isn't really "loving your country. It's loving the anti American concepts of people who hate your country.
What? Don't YOU bend your knee when the KKK marches by?
I've rarely seen overtly racist Conservatives, but when I have, they turned out to be Obama voters who attended Occupy Wallstreet, or Jussie Smollett's imaginary white supremacists that exist so much that leftists have to fake their existence through fake attacks...
Oh, and this crap too while you're busy spinning yarns and focusing on the nonexistent right that CNN told you actually exists that the real right has never seen or met....
David Duke praises Rep. Ilhan Omar
https://apnews.com/
Former KKK Leader David Duke Endorses Tulsi Gabbard 2020 Presidential Campaign
The racist right wing exists so much that the KKK is endorsing the left because the right "isn't racist enough", and only Donald Trump can pass prison reform. Isn't that a daisy?...
Lock him up!! Lock him up!! Lock him up!!
This is interesting. Not only are you admitting Hillary was guilty of Chinagate, Benghazi and the Uranium One scandal, but you are now admitting that "she" is actually "he"...
Excuse me libs. We're gonna need a penis check on aisle 3...
It doesn't look like you have presented us the data needed to support your position. Probably because it's hard to demonstrate that Socialists practicing Socialism are not Socialists with any tactic other than leftists referencing leftists claiming that other leftists of old were not leftists...
That being said, there's nothing more American than protest. You're seeing the results. The GOP senators are all wearing depends.
Why would GOP Senators care that a liberal mayor is letting leftists take over parts of their city....
I would think they'd be indifferent towards the left killing each other in the streets and attacking each others' businessses...
It's civil disobedience... Kinda like throwing somebody's tea overboard..
It's nothing like that. The Boston teaparty was against a tax used to take our money and give it to others, and the left wants to tax us more...and give it to others...
Truth is, this country was founded in dissent..
Dissent against the establishment. Today, the establishment would be the left.
Is the NBA owned/run by the Left?
Well, almost all NBA cities are heavily Democrat, and then there's this...
LeBron James is the most powerful voice in his profession
His willingness to tackle racial inequality, police shootings and even the president has emboldened other players
'The losses are substantial’: the NBA’s trouble with China, four months on
Chinese television blacked out the league’s opening games after an executive’s support of the Hong Kong protests. Has time healed the rift?
what customs do you think immigrants are not embracing which infringe on local laws?
Racism against blacks. Until they become part of the gang they aren't welcome.
Kind of like black Republicans, but you meant blacks that do as you tell them.
Are you stupid? Manufacturing Consent is the title of a book about The Propaganda Model. I have just explained to you not five minutes ago that it is called a model because it predicts future as well as past behaviours.
Ah, my favorite. The left references the left referencing the left who references the left, making all left wing references the left...
I wish you'd shut up.
Yes. We understand that weak people are driven mad by hearing anything that contradicts that kids shouldn't have sex changes...
You are literally one of those people who thinks they are much smarter than they are, and those people are consistently annoying as fuck.
You literally are one of those people who's wing turns male toddlers into female toddlers, turns a blind eye, then claims Obama's cages were built by the next administration and thinks a penis is a construct......
Are conservatives unfairly censored on social media?
The opposite is true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Excellent. Your opposition to Conservatives being censored is a left wing site that can be altered by anyone at any time. This was the best Nazi propaganda you could muster? I expected more.
& runs none of the system
Are you fucking retarded, Bronto? The President of the United States runs "none" of the United States?
The President was a Democrat for 8 years prior to Trump. Liberal cities were systematically racist then as they are now.
just fucking stupid. It's stupid.
The left is having children get sex changes...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/
He passed a criminal reform bill that Obama had made and Moscow Mitch sat on until HE could take credit for it. ;-)
Obama started out with a Democrat lead House and Senate. And Democrats from the past could have passed it. They didn't.
You didn't address the part about Joe Biden's civil rights record. I suspect that you won't.
When Obama Had “Total Control of Congress”
https://www.beaconjournal.com/article/
Doesn't abolish the police just mean real bullets rather than rubber ones?
Yes, but the left never thinks more than one step ahead. That's why they bounce around like a ping pong ball on almost every single issue and begin sounding like Conservatives only after the nonsense the right told them about starts happening in real life.
Right wingers imagine what will happen at steps 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. Left wingers think of how it makes them feel right now, and right now they feel icky, thus? They need the steps 2,3,4,5 kicks in the nuts to think like rational human beings...
For a minute...
