CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
What? What the hell does living in a gated community have to do with political affiliation? Think Hollywood. And since when does being a Dr. Make one a right winger?
I was told the perpetrator was. Democrat. If it was political, the attack wasn’t because Paul isn’t right enough
Given the charge, there is probable cause to believe it was politically motivated.
Shut up you idiot. Given the charge? Disputes between neighbours are predominantly politically motivated are they? For once in your miserable life stop lying. You are pushing a false narrative about the motivation for allegations which have not even been proven to be true. It's the typical political opportunism I would expect from far right filth such as yourself.
Oh for God's sake you are such an infuriatingly dishonest neo-fascist twit. You're too crooked to even include a link to a source.
Rene Boucher pleaded not guilty Thursday morning in a Bowling Green courtroom to misdemeanor fourth degree assault charges stemming from the Nov. 3 incident in the gated community where the two men live.
Explain to us how the charge of fourth degree assault indicates a political motivation you Hitlerite idiot.
The two stories -- which have lots of similarities, including the quote above from Creed -- appear to represent a concerted effort by Paul allies to not only raise questions about the current story of the attack but also to suggest that the real motivations of Paul's attacker were political.
More recent? My articles are from yesterday you absurd child. Why do you constantly try to throw red herrings into the conversation every time you get caught lying? First you claimed that the charge indicates a political motivation and that is a lie. Now you are claiming the Lifezette article is more recent and that too is a lie because the LifeZette article does not contain a publishing date in either the by-line or the URL. The only information available is that it was "updated" at some point this morning. Assuming that it is actually newer by a few hours, are you saying that overnight the definition of fourth degree assault has changed?
You are a lying piece of far right filth.
Notes: LifeZette is an American news, opinion, and commentary website based in Washington, D.C.. It was founded in 2015 by conservative pundit and radio host Laura Ingraham. Typical right wing bias in reporting and wording. (10/5/2016)
Has anyone else here ever been called stupid by a downs child? It’s adorable.
Listen Nom. State charges were easy as the situation was plain as day. You know charges can take time right? That’s why there’s a statute of limitation. The Feds have told Paul to expect federal charges. That’s what this is all about. Prosecutors believe its political. The FBI (the investigating agency) believes it’s political.
The FBI (the investigating agency) believes it’s political.
More absolute bullshit. If I question this claim you will inevitably direct me to an obscure right wing blog which will quote an unnamed, uncredited FBI source. From this one spurious claim you can then build more false language, such as the line quoted, where you try to make it seem like the FBI is one singular hive mind which has declared a person guilty of a crime it has not even charged him with, and investigated thoroughly the motivations for it.
You're a joke. You know how to do nothing except abuse language and lie.
Alright fella. I’ll tell you what. I’ll get back to you when the federal charges are filed. Since it won’t be reported by any of the left wing sources you trust, I’ll keep an eye out for primary documents. If they are never filed, then I’ll admit to being wrong in quoting an over anxious report. When they are filed, you tell us what your actual diagnosis is. Deal?
Alright fella. I’ll tell you what. I’ll get back to you when the federal charges are filed
Get back to me when he's been declared guilty of something. Then you can discuss his motivation.
Since it won’t be reported by any of the left wing sources you trust
It has already been reported in the fake news sites you trust which is why we're arguing in the first place. Your news is fake, which hardly qualifies you to attack me for using established national media, legally accountable for its own accuracy.
using established national media, legally accountable for its own accuracy.
1)All media and individuals are legally accountable for slander in the United States.
2)Bwahahahahahaha! CNN has been proven to literally create news, use actors, and suppress news. Get out of here with that crap. The fake news msm is known for bullshit in the U.S.
All media and individuals are legally accountable for slander in the United States.
Oh shut up you idiot. Your obscure fascist fake news blogs close down every week and reopen under different names purposefully so nobody can find them. It isn't as if they leave a postal address so they can be sued you bloody clown.
I know, I know. Your liberal debate coach taught you to toss this word out at random if you can't win the debate. But guess what? You've met someone who doesn't give a shit what a dumbass with a blatant inferiority complex, who can't think for themselves spews into the forum out of pure desperation.
And I couldn't name one single site of this type because actual news outlets don't "close down every week". Do you seriously not know the difference between a random blog and an actual news site? Wow. Sad.
It isn't as if they leave a postal address so they can be sued you bloody clown
We get that common sense isn't your strong point, but I'll try anyway.
Ya see, if you don't get caught doing something illegal....it's still fucking illegal. I know, I know. I'm a genius for seeing that, and I understand why you would think so being from a country where it's illegal to be white, when you are white....
And we get that the Brits think America is as white as it is, but the right wing here is a mix of minorities, gays, blacks, Natives, Asians, Mexicans, moderate Muslims, pseudo whites, mixed breeds, etc etc etc etc.
Quit acting like America and Britain are the same and have the exact same issues. More Americans voted Trump than Britain has people. We have no queen. We need no queen. We have as many people as half of all of Europe in one country. We are like 50 countries, all with different cultures and ideas. We're nothing like you. We don't want to be like you.
Oh you're sooooooooo liberal, yet Parliament and ANTIFA are white...as...snow...
You tell us about liberal bullshit and hold your snooty British noses in the air from your 92% white demographic throne? Really? There are as many and sometimes more illegals in America as countries in Europe have people period, and we're not talking about the small countries.
Has anyone else here ever been called stupid by a downs child? It’s adorable.
Oh, of course Amarel. Your abject stupidity is the fault of mentally handicapped children. And you honestly wonder why people hate the far right? When you lie repeatedly and then finally, when you run out of lies, you attack handicapped kids with smug language? You're a cockroach. Plain and simple.
Listen Nom. State charges were easy as the situation was plain as day.
No Adolf, you listen. You said the charge indicated a political motivation. The charge was fourth degree assault. You lied, you got caught, and disabled kids had nothing to do with it mate.
If the article was updated this morning, then it is more recent than your articles dated yesterday. That’s how time works.
An article can be updated anytime after it is written you ridiculously stupid nincompoop. I have seen articles which are three years old receive updates, and sometimes for something as basic as a spelling mistake. How is it even possible that you are this stupid? "That's how time works", is it? If I update an article then the article necessarily needs to have been written that same day?
God, you're just so offensively dishonest and stupid.
Notes: LifeZette is an American news, opinion, and commentary website based in Washington, D.C.. It was founded in 2015 by conservative pundit and radio host Laura Ingraham. Typical right wing bias in reporting and wording. (10/5/2016)
Maybe you should listen to Laura Ingraham on youtube. She's sane. Rachel Maddow? CNN? Not so much. As a matter of fact, they sound like rabid groupthink cultists.
In the opening paragraph of her review of Just Facts, Media Bias Fact Check contributor Faith Locke Siewert writes:
On their article http://www.justfacts.com/racialissues.asp#affirmative, they use the Richard Sander’s (law professor at UCLA) essay “A Systematic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools.” To support much of their hypothesis, obviously against affirmative action (seeming also to support the notion of black intellectual abilities being inferior).
Those two sentences contain three demonstrable falsehoods:
“A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools” is not just an essay. It is a peer-reviewed journal paper that was published in the Stanford Law Review. Big difference.
Just Facts does not use this paper to support “much of” its research on affirmative action. The research contains more than 60 footnotes, and this paper is just one of them. Just Facts’ full research on racial issues has 498 footnotes, and this paper is two of them.
Just Facts does not offer any “hypothesis” in this research, much less “support the notion of black intellectual abilities being inferior.” To the contrary, the opening section of Just Facts’ research on racial issues covers the topic of science and presents multiple facts that challenge that notion.
The flagrant and simplistic nature of these bogus critiques suggests that Media Bias Fact Check is either inept and/or dishonest.
As could be expected, you used one of the top fake fact checker sites there is on planet Earth.
Shut up you ridiculous idiot. MediaBiasFactCheck is a well-known and trusted website. The fake news blog you linked doesn't load properly, nobody has ever heard of it except you and it was written by a known liar.
Chelsea Schilling has been a full-time WorldNetDaily reporter only since May 2008 -- WND touted her "perfect 4.0 grade point average" in college in announcing her hiring -- but she already has developed a reputation for making misleading and false claims in her "news" reporting.
ConWebWatch has already detailed examples that were so egregious that her fellow conservatives were compelled to correct her
Predictably, MBFC has drawn ire from several of the websites that file under "Conspiracy/Pseudoscience" or "Questionable Sources" — typically, in light of the complaintants' regular publication of fake news and/or general bigotry.
They hadn't spoken to each other in years prior to the attack
Shut up you stupid Nazi.
The attorney for the next-door neighbor who attacked Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul causing the senator to break ribs and potentially miss key votes said it had 'absolutely nothing' to do with politics – and was over a 'trivial' matter. But he failed to specify what the fight was about.
A D.C.-based New York Times reporter has dug up just how trivial it was, posting on Twitter that the problem between neighbors 'stemmed from a dispute over 'some sort of planting or flora issue around the properties.'
It’s a reasonable assumption. Most wealthy people are right wing. Are there a few wealthy lefties? Yes. But, I repeat. MOST wealthy people are right wing.
That's a nice opinion, but repeating it doesn't re-enforce it. Here, watch. Most wealthy people lean left. There are a few right wing richies, but I repeat, most are left....See, it's as substantial as your statement. Most famous people are left, and they are rich.
That's a nice opinion, but repeating it doesn't re-enforce it. Here, watch. Most wealthy people lean left. There are a few right wing richies, but I repeat, most are left
Bullshit.
New Evidence That The Rich Are More Conservative Than the Rest
But please, tell us more about this inverse square relationship between a person's class and their political beliefs. Does it work the other way too? The poorer you get the more you identify with elitist politics?
I love how you literally cite only left wing sources while screaming about everyone else being brainwashed by the media that creates a right wing bias. You could have cited people who at least pretend to be center.
I wouldn't be surprised to find rich people have a right bias, but simply saying it isn't good enough. Excon likes to just say things. Like the democrat who tackled Paul must be a right winger.
Demanding economic freedom makes sense if you have the means. While demanding shit that doesn't belong to you makes sense if you don't have much that belongs to you in the first place. Given the fact that poverty tends to decrease IQ, and the poor are less informed or educated, it makes sense that appeals to emotion promising free lunches is the preferred political strategy of the left. That's why there is a long list of lefty protest one liners that rhyme, but not so much for right wing causes. The left likes zippy little bits that feel good and attract the ignorant or less intelligent. Like yourself. But I digress
I love how you literally cite only left wing sources
Cool. I love how you literally turn the truth upside down, literally produce nothing to support anything you say, and then literally moan at other people for producing evidence which debunks your nonsense.
I wouldn't be surprised to find rich people have a right bias, but simply saying it isn't good enough.
If you'd have worded your previous post that way then I assure you you'd have had no complaints from me.
Demanding economic freedom makes sense if you have the means. While demanding shit that doesn't belong to you makes sense if you don't have much that belongs to you in the first place.
Here's where you and I fundamentally disagree. If I put in a 40 hour week and you take 90 percent of the profit my labour produces to make yourself even richer, then what you claim belongs to you actually belongs to me, and you have simply robbed it.
Well that killed the left's claim that a bunch of poor, uneducated rednecks elected Trump...
Or...you've become blind from leftist propaganda...
George Soros, Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, Brian Cornell, the Vanderbilts, the Rockefellers, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Mark Zuckerburg, Mark Cuban, Henry Weinstein, George Lucas, Queen Elizabeth, most NBA, MLB, and NFL players, and almost all of Hollywood and Academia, and Donald Trump a few years back......
If I put in a 40 hour week and you take 90 percent of the profit my labour produces to make yourself even richer, then what you claim belongs to you actually belongs to me, and you have simply robbed it
1) the labor theory of value is completely incorrect.
2) if you really thought this was happening, you could quit and go earn 100% of your labors value and be way better off.
New Evidence That The Rich Are More Conservative Than the Rest
Well that killed the left's claim that a bunch of poor, uneducated rednecks elected Trump...
Or...they left out George Soros, Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, Rockefeller, Mark Zuckerburg, Mark Cuban, most NBA, MLB, and NFL players, and almost all of Hollywood and Academia, and Donald Trump a few years back......
Well that killed the left's claim that a bunch of poor, uneducated rednecks elected Trump...
Or...you've become blind from leftist propaganda...
George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, Brian Cornell (Target), Bob Iger(Disney) the Vanderbilts, the Rockefellers, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Mark Zuckerburg (Facebook), Mark Cuban, Henry Weinstein, George Lucas, Neil Degrasse Tyson, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Bill Maher, most NBA, MLB, and NFL players, and almost all of Hollywood and Academia, and Donald Trump a few years back......
I don't know exactly what happened. But what I do know is if your next door neighbor body slams you and breaks a bunch of ribs then either the neighbor is a raging ahole or you are (or both of you).
Let's not jump to conclusions about his motive but it does make sense that simultaneously calling for violence against "Nazis" while portraying half the country as "Nazis" would lead to violence.
This is exactly why you can't take neo-Nazis like bronto seriously. They are so disingenuous it's absolutely spectacular. He opens threads like this pretending to be anti-violence when a right wing politician gets smacked in the mouth, but then has the opposite reaction when it comes to invading Iraq and killing a bunch of Muslims. It's completely pointless arguing with a prick who flip flops from pacifist to war junkie dependent on who has initiated the violence. He's literally just like Hitler, who was on TV every day denouncing "communist violence" while he simultaneously invaded half of Europe.
Allright. I condemn Obama and the EU killing a bunch of Muslims. Libs should be ashamed of themselves.
While we're at it, libs should be ashamed of bombing Japan with atomic bombs, having slaves, opposing the civil rights movement, creating Jim Crow, the Trail of Tears, electing Robert Byrd from 1953-2010, creating the KKK, and putting Japanese people in prison camps during WWII.
This is exactly why you can't take neo-Nazis like bronto seriously. They are so disingenuous it's absolutely spectacular. He opens threads like this pretending to be anti-violence when a right wing politician gets smacked in the mouth, but then has the opposite reaction when it comes to invading Iraq and killing a bunch of Muslims.
So then are you cool or not cool with Rand Paul being attacked?
We don't know anything about the circumstances, the motive, whether the other guy was provoked or even if the incident was as simple as an attack. The defendant has pleaded not guilty. The problem with people like you is that you are always trying to wrap language around your own political narrative.
