I know you are anonymous_12 and this is yet another scheme to get our IPs.

Most of the good debates from me and Mathfan get totally ignored while all your partisan parrots prattle on about the same boring issues over and over again, I am on a higher level of consciousness than you, I am God compared to the average user on this site, you are all parasites who have forced me to resort to this because you are all so fucking boring.

When I first started using this site I didn't even use profane language and everything I said was 100% serious but after days of hearing the same things being repeated over and over and seeing how EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU is a pseudo intellectual monkey-cunt just spewing rhetoric and subjective hogwash I simply had to lower your vibrational frequency like you have lowered mine and send those negative vibes to interfere with your prana-flow.

Logic and reason have no bias, they are the very absence of bias itself.

How long did it take you to write that?

Did Jesus help you write it?

I am a FactMachine

I have no bias or ideology, just logic and reason.

When are you going to leave like you said you would quantumsnake mcSv3riclaturesberg?

That's actually a good profile idea, Quantumsnake.

And you're not? You spend more time here than me buddy, you are also sniping at people you don't know on the internet, what part of that don't you understand? When people insult me it makes me feel better about myself, especially if it's a large group of people who all think the same garbage, I am glad to not be one of you and your insults only serve to prove that I am not conforming to your idiotic ideology and I am not a robot who has been programmed by the same garbage as everyone else. If you where to compliment me I would question my sanity, it is a good sign that you are against me and that the majority of people are against me in all things.

It doesn't matter what anyone cares about, it only matters what's objectively true, and what's objectively true is that you are ugly and stupid and making an appeal to popularity which in itself proves that you are trash because the majority is always wrong and innovators and great thinkers are usually never popular until after their death.

Nomenclature has vitamin D deficiency and cerebral hypoxia

My ten year old cousin made me listen to that song. I didn't kill myself when my parents died, I didn't kill myself when I was kicked out of school and sent to prison at age 16 for stealing a flute from the music room, I didn't kill myself when I found out I had cancer, but damn it, the more I think about jake paul the more I want to just end it all.

I just realized we have the same initials only backwards, I guess if I was someone else that would be incriminating but since I'm me I can tell you that's just a coincidence.

They actually have the highest conscious level since they do so little else.

Please tell me you're joking, rocks and toasters sit around all day too, they don't even have to waste energy metabolizing anything or producing seeds, so inanimate objects must be the most intellectually smurt

You iodine deficient rodent, why does everyone think I'm everyone? It's beginning to annoy me.

What makes you think I'm Sv3rige?

I hate Sv3rige, he's hilarious, but I hate him.

I'm not Mathfan either, what makes you think that?

Did you see how Nathan Allen tried to get my IP address? He used a site called grabify but I didn't fall for it.

He insists that you, me and bronto and GL are the same person.

Has he tried to grabify you yet?

There should be no "prolife" and "prochoice" because the bottom line is that we should all want to make abortion unnecessary and make it so that the conditions which necessitate abortion are eliminated and in that sense we should all be prolife but also abortion IS necessary in some cases and is sometimes the best option so when it's necessary we should support the right to have an abortion. prolife vs. prochoice is just more black/white left/right polarized indoctrinated ignorance.

We shouldn't just be having abortions at a whim but we shouldn't be stopping abortions when that is the best option, prolife and prochoice are both stupid, we must eliminate the need for abortion at a practical level rather than preaching the morality of it and we must allow necessary abortions rather than whining about womens "choice" to abort whenever they want.

You should make a montage of you kicking nomenclature's ass and use motivational music.

You will have to deceive them like you tried to deceive me only in a way that can't be figured out by a 2 year old.

I don't think Bronto is Nomenclature, that is ridiculous , think about how long they go on arguing with each other every day, who would literally spend ALL DAY arguing with themself?

22mins ago.

Write to FactMachine

pic

Delete | Block NathanAllen said:

I know for a fact that bronto is nom and nom is good.

Just need their IPs to prove it.

24mins ago.

Write to NathanAllen

pic

online

Delete | Block FactMachine said:

I'm not any of them, you people are all paranoid nut cases, I will tell you this though, I DO have alts none of which are nomenclature or bronto or any of those imbeciles.

26mins ago.

Write to FactMachine

pic

Delete | Block NathanAllen said:

Right now I think all 4 accounts are the same person

28mins ago.

Write to NathanAllen

pic

Delete | Block NathanAllen said:

Yes I am. You want me to belive that you are not bronto,nom, or good don't you?

29mins ago.

Write to NathanAllen

pic

Delete | Block NathanAllen said:

LOL, no I am not the one to fuck someones computer or phone up. Just trolling along. Got nothing else to do at the moment.

29mins ago.

Write to NathanAllen

That's not true, my IP should be available, if you can really get IPs you shouldn't have a problem. Nathan just tried to get my IP using "grabify" but I was too smart for his trick.

Do mine, that's the only way anyone can know for sure, one IP can easily be faked and Nomenclature will say it's not real either way but I will admit it if you get mine.

This is Hillary's campaign

"I'm a woman, Donald Trump is a nazi, I believe that...ahugh...ahuAAAACHK ACHUKHZAHUGH HUGH PLGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHTT AHUH AHUH! coughs up green slime balls and faints

The question isn't is it ethical to kill humans, it's WHEN is it ethical to kill humans when isn't it?

Is it ethical to kill someone for no reason? no.

Is it ethical to kill a child molesting clown who worships Hitler? Yes.

Some humans should be killed, like child molesters and pop singers

I hate to break it to ya, but no one in the scientific community would so much as bat an eye at your argument, because it is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how evolution works. You are simply making the assertion that macro-evolution must happen abruptly, that there must be a generation which suddenly just can't reproduce with the last and becomes a new species automatically, and that there must be intelligent design because of that. The only way you can believe this line of thinking has any credibility is if you completely ignore and refuse to even acknowledge the possibility that evolution is A GRADUAL AND INCREMENTAL PROCESS AND NONE OF YOUR ARGUMENTS HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH HOW EVOLUTION REALLY WORKS, THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO ASSUME ANY OF YOUR PROVISIONS ARE TRUE BECAUSE AS I'VE ALREADY POINTED OUT THEY REQUIRE YOU TO JUST AUTOMATICALLY ASSUME THAT MACRO-EVOLUTION IS AN ABRUPT SPONTANEOUS PROCESS AND IGNORE "BREED" OR ANY GREY AREA WHICH MAY LEAD TO A LARGER DEVIATION, THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON FOR THESE ASSUMPTIONS AND ASSERTIONS OTHER THAN TO SET UP A FALSE PRETENSE TO PROTECT YOUR ARGUMENT AND TO AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ANY ARGUMENT WHICH RELATES TO THE ACTUAL PROCESS WHICH LEADS TO SPECIATION, THE BASELESS ASSERTION THAT "new species magically appear abruptly because god" IS NOT PROOF OF ANYTHING EXCEPT REMARKABLE BIAS AND IGNORANCE

Why must macroevolution happen rapidly? Why why why why why? Where have you provided any evidence for that claim? Stop pretending you have proven something when you are just making unfounded baseless claims to support your position, you are not trying to reach an objective conclusion, you have already decided to believe what you believe and are just trying to confirm what you already assume to be true.

I would suggest basing your conclusion on evidence rather than deciding on a conclusion before hand and making up your own rules to support that conclusion, once again I will remind you for good measure THERE IS NO REASON TO BELIEVE THAT TWO DIFFERENT SPECIES MUST MATE FOR SPECIATION TO OCCUR AND THERE IS NO REASON TO ASSUME THAT MACRO EVOLUTION MUST OCCUR ABRUPTLY AND YOU WILL HAVE TO PROVIDE SOME BASIS FOR THOSE CLAIMS BEFORE YOU CARRY ON AS IF THEY ARE A GIVEN SO SHUT UP OR SUPPORT YOUR BASELESS ASSERTIONS

Perhaps we are miscommunicating, to me it sounded like you where implying that two entirely separate species have to mate for speciation to occur, if you are just referring to mating in general then that's a given, obviously they would have to mate

If the change isn't rapid, then I have disproved macro-evolution altogether. If it is rapid and widespread in spurts, this implies the type of ID rigging I said is plausible.

This is total nonsense, you haven't proven in the slightest that evolution can't exist as a gradual and time consuming process, which it is. Your hyper-reductionist assertions bypass the entire notion out of necessity, for it is the very gradual and incremental nature of evolution which destroys your logic and that is why you can't even acknowledge such a thing. And if it was rapid that would not necessarily imply intelligent design, there could be other explanations like quantum supersymmetrical hyper-string manifolds oscillating within the ninth dimension which are bound through the membrane field lattice of hyperspace through various field modalities to the Deoxy-ribo Nucleic Acid and produces the holographic resonance of order and complexity.

different species or sub groups of the same species don't have to mate for speciation to occur in the first place.

Your link didn't lead anywhere that disproved that statement.

There is no abrupt change which occurs that suddenly creates a different species that can't reproduce with the previous generation, it's an incremental change, so the differences from generation to generation are small but if you go back millions of generations the species might look entirely different.

So by 'evolution' I assume we are talking one species to another, not within a species things like race/breed etc.

There is no reason to exclude those things because they are a part of the process of evolution. In fact, they have central relevance to the reason you are completely incorrect. Cutting out the grey areas is the only way to give your little equation a fighting chance.

No two species can mate to produce grandchildren (in other words, no two species can produce fertile offspring together)

Let's take the neanderthal and the human for example, they are pretty much a different species, but they can produce fertile offspring, otherwise white people wouldn't be here. If that doesn't work for you, a roughly equivalent example would be a wolf reproducing with a dog. But that doesn't even matter, because different species or sub groups of the same species don't have to mate for speciation to occur in the first place.

In order for one species to evolve into another, the intermediary generations would involve two species mating.

Hyper reductionist oversimplification in order to satisfy a deeply rooted bias is the only explanation for such a radical failure to comprehend even the most basic principles of evolution. It's an INCREMENTAL and GRADUAL process, there is no need for two different species to mate, only for the right influences to act upon a species over a considerable period of time which causes individuals with certain traits to survive and adapt better to those conditions therefore those individuals reproduce more and the more the offspring mutate to accentuate those successful traits the more they in turn reproduce and therefore those traits are gradually proliferated and amplified until speciation occurs.

Macro-evolution is impossible for multi-celled organisms by natural means.

You must not have a multi-celled brain.

The only way for macro-evolution to occur in multi-cellular organisms is for there to be some form of intelligent design

Then how did the intelligent designer that is even more complex than life on earth get designed?

(AKA unnatural)

If God is real then he is the source of nature, so how can he be unnatural? The concept of something being unnatural or supernatural is self contradictory, everything that exists must be natural because "nature" is the universe itself.

@FromWithin

there is NOTHING any person could ever say or do to prove anything to a deceptive Liberal.

There is the black and white thinking again, everyone who disagrees with me is a deceptive liberal, everyone who disagrees with me is a far right neo nazi etc. This is just more proof that you are all robots and I am one of the few real humans left, because the level of linear polarized truncated narrow minded thinking displayed from within the monitor of my computer screen is atrociously egregious.

No matter how many times you present them with facts

Let's see your "facts" I have never had the pleasure of ripping you a new ass hole, how do you know I am like the others if I haven't even torn you a new rectum yet?

For you to try and tell others how God's existence is a proven fact, and you don't even know how the all knowing all powerfully divine consciousness mystically and magically popped to life out of nothing, means you are a waste of time to debate.

The problem with banning "junk food" is that there are grey areas and many potential disagreements about what constitutes junk food. Instead of banning "junk food" we should ban weaponized food and food that should be considered unfit for human consumption but which is allowed for the purpose of profit and eugenics. For example, MSG should be banned, anything made by Monsantos should be banned and all the "higher ups" at monsantos should be put in prison, Aspartame should be banned, High fructose diabetes syrup should be banned, specific chemicals, harmful ingredients and corporations should be banned. What should not be banned is "junk food" in general, what we must remove is the poisonous shit designed deliberately to cause disease and food addiction, or just to make food look or taste better at the expense of health like artificial colors, but if someone wants to bake brownies or cookies and not put carcinogens and ebola sauce in it they shouldn't be disallowed from doing so.

Sometimes I look at the ingredients on certain products at the grocery store and I see TITANIUM and ALUMINUM compounds being used as "preservatives" and "anti-caking agents"

Make no mistake, they are deliberately going out of their way to put the worst shit possible in the food as a eugenics operation against the lower classes in order to slowly phase out and kill them off in order to reduce the population.

Plastics

heavy metals

carcinogens

addictive substances

Neurotoxins

All of this is being put in your food if you buy the common crap that people buy in the west, it's all in the name of profit and eugenics, and some of it is out of sheer carelessness.

Another thing that should be banned is the unsanitary, inhumane and totally substandard conditions of large scale animal agriculture.

Israel does not have a right to exist, there is nothing "moral" about how Israel conducts itself. Israel's land is not anyones land by right, for thousands of years different cultures have been fighting over it, conquering and reconquering it, there is no justification for stealing that land and committing genocide so that wealthy fascist jews can set up their own government and be armed with nukes.

You're a homophobe and hater of women, and you are an ignorant baffoon for your beliefs.

What we should have is a one world "community" or a one world "system" but not a one world "government" or one world "nation" because a nation is an obsolete notion in the first place if everyone in the world is in the same system and there are no separate nations and the existence of a government is impossible for a society which is enlightened enough to sustainably maintain civilization on a global scale without descending back into separation through physical warfare, disputes over land and resources and cultural/ideological differences. For any type of global socioeconomic system to exist, human culture would have to change drastically and universally, all of the social constructs of the old society such as the monetary system and the entire notion of "politics" within it's current context would have to be replaced because the entire psychology and consciousness of humanity would have to be changed in order to accommodate a vastly more complex and symbiotic environment. To make a long story short, we will always have wars, cultural conflicts and separate nations until a new standard and a new norm of human awareness is reached which allows us to move out of the range of susceptability to institutions, social constructs and superstition because the unscientific approach of a type 0 civilization is inadequate when you are dealing with the prospect of making the resources and the ecosystem and the technologically advanced civilization of an entire planet all work symbiotically and mutually enhancing all of those systems as opposed to destroying the environment and engaging in wars with each other as we currently do.

Unless of course you are hoping for a technocratic dictatorship where humanity will be driven to extinction by our immortal AI overlords, there are more than one kind of "globalism" obviously, there mutually beneficial forms and mutually destructive forms, the kind of "global system" I described is substantially different from the lesser and more commonly reffered to forms of globalism like corporate globalism and multinational Rothschild banking cartel globalism, these forms of globalism along with the idea of a global government have the potential to drive the human race to extinction, so needless to say they wouldn't be very sustainable in the long run. Except for the AI overlords that replace the human race.

Because they are bleeding manginas and absolute pillocks and lobster back red coat dandies. Those cunt bags are on a guilt trip because they know that they have a history of slavery and genocide but what they don't realize is that everyone has a history of slavery and genocide so instead of raping minorities in the ass those troglodytes are now bending over and taking some brown, black, red and yellow cock in their white ass hole. It's just their way of saying "we suck so much that when we're not being evil tyrants we're being total effeminate british pussies!"

Nathan Allen I have had a problem with you since you first where born, the inferior DNA that lead to your existence and malformed miss-shapen face of supreme uglyness needs to leave this universe. You are nothing but a subhuman waste of resources with a pre-hominid level of cognizence and sentience.. Get YOUR shit(not you're you fucking retard) and get off this planet you lower life form. You do nothing and contribute nothing but bullshit,you have no idea how primitive and psychologically programmed you are like a robotic parrot cave monkey troglodyte neanderthal.Nathan Allen duplicates antiquated primitive anachronistic obsolete ideological manure to the extent that you can only see black and white, left and right, and anyone who disagrees with you and your conservative pals is just a "whining liberal" and that is why I hate you. You are a narrow minded robot, you are literally not even a person to me, you are a worthless object, you just recycle and reciprocate the same ideology you have been programmed with all your life and you have no semblance of independant thought nor do you have anything to say that hasn't been said before by millions of politically biased cunts like you.

Yeah I read it, I don't remember the exact percentages because I am replying to this 2 hours after I closed the tab but my results where very similar to yours.

I just took that quiz and got INTJ-A(also "the Architect")

You ran away from the last debate because I was "misrepresenting your argument" while you literally misrepresented my argument as you complained about me misrepresenting your argument.

Did you hear about the psychic midget who escaped from prison?

There's a small medium at large.

There should only be a draft if it is a matter of absolute necessity in the interest of national security.

Every war america has engaged in within the course of the last 50-60 years was a mater of globalism.

This is why Antrim is such a dim witted neanderthal barbarian, he glamorizes war and sees it as a patriotic duty to willingly and gladly except any draft without question or you are a "coward" but what he doesn't realize is that number 1 america is totally compromised and controlled by a multinational banking cartel that controls the american economy and has essentially bought the U.S government and number 2 america isn't fighting for any noble cause and it rarely ever has.

Antrim if you are reading this you are a sheep and a psychologically enslaved moron who thinks that blindly fighting for nothing but a foreign banking cartel's profit stream from the resources of poor countries is "courageous" and "patriotic"

Stop using the online insult generator Nomenstein

You don't even know what "sophist" means, cause' if you did you would realize that you are the epitome of it.

Those people may be abusing kids, but you are abusing the internet and it doesn't feel safe around you and your whopping horse bullocks of dishonesty.

Bing bing bong

Donald Trump is Nomenclature's dad.

Donald Trump was the best option for america, he's no where near optimal but he was the best choice.

Donald Trump raped Nomenclature.

Jesus Christ, The Most Perfect Image

Perfect compared to what? There is no perfect, there is only "what is"

The Supreme and Ultimate Reality can be seen. Through a glass dimly.

A communist frog trying to be poetic, how quaint.

pagan delusions

The ancient greeks where wiser and more advanced than any christian civilization before the renaissance, in the middle ages we where still wallowing in our christian monotheistic delusions compared to pagan empires of old like the greeks and egyptians and the people of ancient india.

It should be clear to anyone who leans not on their own understanding but The Word of God

That's the problem with theists, instead of using your own brain and relying on your own senses and discernment like a real homo sapien you trust in the word of ancient texts filled with the asshat psycho-babble shinanegans of savage desert monkeys who where starving in the wilderness and high on hashish and opium.

Antifa is a domestic temper tantrum convention for communists and SJWs

The Holocaust was an inside job and we all know it.

The Jews actually killed themselves in order to frame Hitler and make a sovereign Israeli state.

Stop pretending you aren't a zionist israeli co-intelclature

There are more Jews than any other on this website.

I am every race from western europe mixed together, I am an irish german italian british spaniard french norwegian scandinavian scottish viking

A Baby is innocent until his childhood shapes his humanity, or lack there of.

So you admit that there is no free will and that your environment/genetics shapes behaviour therefor the concept of sin is impossible?

I am not pro life OR pro choice, the issue is more complicated than the narrow dogmatic views of the polarized left/right paradigm. I see abortion not as an issue of morality vs. personal choice but as a symptom of the circumstances which make abortion necessary, and cause people to get abortions. Abortion is in some cases necessary, it is not "good" but rather an unfortunate necessity, so the issue should be about reducing the need for abortions rather than preaching morality or haphazardly murdering babies. Both the left and the right are looking at the issue completely wrong, instead of preaching morality you should be focusing on how the circumstances which cause abortions to happen can be abated, and instead of seeing abortion as a right and a luxury and selling fetuses to china the left should be trying to reduce the amount of abortions but still promote the right to have necessary abortions.

Your penis is the size of a quantum string and your balls are the size of neutrinos "little man"

At least I have an actual logical reason to say they are false as I've already pointed out and Bronto has pointed out, you are simply going along with whatever is the most liberal opinion possible.

Prove that the allegations are true or stfu. I'm all for due process, which is why I think it needs to go to court. I am not for you making an arbitrary judgement based exclusively on your own political bias and then pretending your baseless opinion makes me dumb.