CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
Socialism is socialism no matter what façade you wrap around it. The end result is always the same... Poverty, Misery, War, and Mass Murder if it goes long enough.
No. A capitalist society upholds the individual being an end unto one self as opposed to being an end unto the state, the king, the mob, the tribe, the gang, the common good and etc… ad nauseum.
The morality which urges each person to help one another is between the individual and God as opposed to the government forcing morality down each individual’s throat.
When capitalism exploits the worker and leaves 95 percent of people living from paycheck to paycheck then that isn't an anomaly caused by some bizarre variation of capitalism. That is the fundamental basis upon which capitalism is built. It's the entire point of the system. It simply can't work otherwise. The rich can't be rich unless the rest of society is poor.
The crap you are presently spewing is another excuse offered up by capitalists when they crashed the global financial system in 2008. They literally invented another system in their heads, called it "unfettered capitalism" and told you that was the cause so they could go right back to robbing you.
The only way to have to live paycheck to paycheck is if you have absolutely zero basic money skills of any kind.
Congratulations on winning the stupidest comment of the night award. Now switch back to your Brontoraptor account and read up about the 41 million hungry people in your country, you pitifully stupid mental patient.
A capitalist society upholds the individual being an end unto one self as opposed to being an end unto the state
The individual isn't an end to himself. That's a lie. The individual is exploited by other individuals who make profit from his labour. Grow up and learn how to figure out when people are lying to you.
From this connectivity you are sure to about the job that you have been trying to do and I have also done the same. From the same connectivity I have been able to increase the number of followers.private tutor las vegas
Nice post. Everyone is looking a informative and a valuable post. After reading this post i will say that this post is a very informative and valuable post. Thanks for it.Load Cell Signal Conditioning
Arthur talking to about of some important information related to hosted to know twitter lets see how. I am very impress to see in the work. I really like to it for here.houseboat hire sydney
Safety is a paramount consideration in the private jet charter industry. Operators adhere to stringent safety standards, employing experienced pilots, conducting regular maintenance checks, and ensuring compliance with aviation regulations. Private Jet Charter
Democratic socialism is socialism which is democratic social democracy is a hybrid economy with both capitalism and socialism. Bernie Sanders for example calls himself a democratic socialist but his policies are technically social democracy. Real democratic socialism is literally full on socialism with minimal centralised control.
So is democratic socialism what we in the USA have now? We do have a mix of socialism and capitalism.
A little bit but not enough to be called social democracy. Soc-dem is more balanced whereas in America there are a few very selective elements of socialism with a huge private sector.
Note: you said democratic socialism but I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you meant social democracy.
Recognizing that each home is unique, Expert Skylight Services offers custom design solutions tailored to the specific needs and aesthetics of the client. The company's experts provide consulting services to guide homeowners in selecting the most suitable skylight design, placement, and features that align with their vision and requirements.Installation
Moreover, the concept of repair extends to the social and justice spheres. Societal injustices and inequalities can be viewed as fractures in the collective human experience, demanding repair through systemic changes, policy reforms, and the active pursuit of justice. Repair
Repair in this context requires acknowledgment of historical wrongs, a commitment to rectifying systemic imbalances, and the cultivation of an inclusive and equitable society. Repair
California has, other than New York, the closest thing in the US to Social Democracy but because the Federal Government, under Trump, is lowering taxes and other things that force States to have to become harsher to the poor, it's not quite working out.
I have lived in a poor rural community in NY for most of my life. I work at a hospital another basically socialist entity. Here is a truth about the socialist portion of my world. In my youth there were a few "welfare families" in my area. We termed them that because they lived off of the system (socialism) It was not that theses people couldn't work like everyone else it was to make their lives easier. Most of them had troubles with the law and drug abuse stemmed much of that. Now in the same area there are a higher number of people than ever before living off of the system with the same drug abuse problems. GIVING PEOPLE AN EASY WAY OUT OF LIFE'S RESPONSIBILITIES IS NOT HELPING THEM
During Donald Trump’s State of the Union speech, many of the old, white, Republican Senators and Representatives must have gotten more exercise how to buy an essay paper than in weeks, jumping to their feet to applaud almost every sentence of the endless rhetoric.
I have lived in a poor rural community in NY for most of my life. I work at a hospital another basically socialist entity. Here is a truth about the socialist portion of my world. In my youth there were a few "welfare families" in my area. We termed them that because they lived off of the system (socialism) It was not that theses people couldn't work like everyone else it was to make their lives easier.
Capitalism is a pyramid system you idiot. The parasites are at the top, not the bottom. Frankly, I find it astonishing that you are sat here complaining about people picking up fifty dollars from the government so they can eat, yet say absolutely nothing about the 2008 stock market crash in which a million American families, working families, lost their homes. You begrudge a poor family fifty dollars, but have absolutely nothing to say about the banks stacking interest upon every dollar in circulation just so they can make you work forever to pay off a debt it is mathematically impossible to ever satisfy.
When you look down at the people beneath you and spit on them as a solution to the fact that the people at the top are making your own life shit, then that is fascism.
The part of socialism that is most disgusting is government corruption. Historically this is why socialism always fails. When you redistribute the wealth as the redistributors you chose who the money goes to. If you think that would change if we move deeper into socialism you are naive. Bankers are the people who tell the politicians what they are going to do. They would also be the people redistributing the wealth. They will take their cut first. The banking crisis was caused by too many people making a pact with the Devil(banks). When I purchased my home I had a set interest rate and payment for a set amount of time and I paid it no matter what so that I didn't lose my home. I sometimes had to work multiple jobs which was tough as a single parent but it's what I felt I had to do. I have little sympathy for lazy people.
I have read the title which you have made about self hosted. You have made a great effort in making this post which is appreciable.pest control malvern
Yes i connect with you. I subscribe your website. I am really very thankful to you. You have done very well job. Keep it up!combination wood propane boiler
What do Trump's tax cuts have to do with the rising homeless and human feces covering the streets of San Francisco.
What does Mexico, Venezuela and San Francisco have in common? Their is hardly any middle class. Extreme rich and extreme poor. Why? Because the federal government makes promises of free give-a-ways creating more poverty and taxes and regulates the middle class into an oblivion.
Good question. You see, the issue is that since the opposite of single payer healthcare system happened (which even Hillary supported, though she's less Left-wing than Bernie), healthcare in all forms is becoming as 'survival of the richest' as is possible. Imagine how hard a common cold would be if you couldn't afford the simple cold medicine, or at least paracetemol-variant without sacrificing meals for you and your family. You're that poor. Yeah, see when you can become that poor then we start to have a trap; everything is privately funded and you're begging for public mercy. It's not gonna work out. Charity is random and based on spur of mercy, it involves appealing to people's urge to give, rather than the government's urge to care for the worst off in the nation so as to appreciate that you're only as good (on a true scale of appreciating development in a nation) as your worst team member(s) and how you treat them versus how productive you are able to be AT THE SAME TIME, in the end.
Trump is making many, many laws (or removing them, more like) that cause states preferring to rely on things like obamacare to become confused what to rely on. It's not just healthcare, he's going to ruin public education for good and not just because the idiot is allowing school shooters to get guns easier and legislating it as 'defence against that kind'
Trump is putrid... A cancer much like all Republicans but none more so than Reagan and Bush Sr. (Bush Jr. was more duped than a maniac, once you study the history).
Ming. The government is incompetent. That is why healthcare is in the mess its in today. The private sector is being denied the opportunity making sure the poor are being cared for.
North Korea can’t even feed its own people.
Look at Venezuela.
Centralized government power fails every time.
Individual people must take responsibility for their own well-being. Final moral authority must be between the individual and God, not the government initiating the use of force against the population.
You haven't disputed me. You haven't provided a rebuttal.
The bottom line is...
No single human being reserves the right an enforces their code of morality by initiating the use of force against another single human being. Why? because no single human is God.
Each human being is born into the world.
Each mother and father is obligated to teach their child skills to becoming self sufficient, disciplined against being lazy and idle.
Upon maturity which should be around the teen years a human being should be at the point of being self-sufficient and go on their own ensuing that each day of their life they provide self. All this can be so long as the government doesn't deny free people an opportunity to live their lives free from government playing the role of God enforcing its brand of morality.
Government assumes the role of God (its brand of morality) by initiating the use of force, forcing those who are self-sufficient to sacrifice for those who choose to be lazy and idle and take care of them.
There is only one reason for the government to have single payer health care, because they are bought and paid for by Bankers (insurance companies) and big Pharma. It has nothing to do with helping people. If the government wanted to help the people with healthcare they would open up the federal run hospitals to the uninsured public which would cost a tiny fraction of single payer health care.
In Mexico, basic healthcare is super cheap, but that one lacks quality. The problem in the US is government regulation which completely removes less than ideal healthcare.
In Mexico, basic healthcare is super cheap, but that one lacks quality.
You're hilarious. What good is a healthcare system if it is confined to the rich? I've read two comments from you so far this evening and both of them have illustrated a naivety reserved for people who have never questioned anything in their entire lives.
The problem in the US is government regulation
Cutting regulation was already tried during the Bush Administration and it caused the biggest economic collapse since the Great Depression. Stop repeating corporate propaganda you hear on Fox News. Government regulation is there to protect the consumer you idiot.
Trump has done nothing which affects school shootings. There have been no repeals of gun regulation under Trump. and he has actually imposed new regulation and restriction on guns. Making the legal age 21 to purchase from federally licensed dealers outlawing bump stocks are a couple of examples
Trump may be offensive but he has increased the amount my money I get to keep with his tax cut. The racial tensions from the Obama era have subsided. The country is safe from foreign invaders. Life is good under Trump
Obama tripled my insurance premiums and raised my copays some 5 times what they were. One of my coworkers died due to the Obama care rate hikes. He was having chest pains and our Emergency copay was $50 prior to Obama Care then went to $250 after. He was going to just call his doctors office on Mon but he died Sun because he didn't want to pay the $250.
Do you know what kinds of programs they have for getting the people on public assistance off of public assistance? Rhetorical, the government gives them the wealth which they steal from producers and call it good.
Do you know what kinds of programs they have for getting the people on public assistance off of public assistance? Rhetorical, the government gives them the wealth which they steal from producers and call it good.
Strange how you claim to be poor yet have the opinions of a rich bigot.
Why is it wrong to be innovative or very ambitious and make lots of money? If someone comes up with a great idea why is it wrong for them to profit from it. Why is it wrong for a person to be ambitious and make lots of money. The people who offer the least to society are government who just steal the wealth of the citizens and spend it like drunken sailors.
Why is it wrong to be innovative or very ambitious and make lots of money?
Because that's the precise opposite of being innovative and ambitious. That's simply called doing what you've been told you should do. Perhaps this wasn't mentioned in the contract, but you get a limited time on Earth. The pursuit of money is not considered a worthy way to spend that time by innovative and ambitious people.
Your response makes no sense, with socialism or partial socialism like we have now. The government takes money from the citizens then uses that money in what ever manner they decide. This leads to corruption so politicians use their power and our money to conspire with wealthy bankers and business owner to control markets and prosper greatly. without the government interfering with business. The businesses remain competitive and innovation or ambition can bring great wealth. In socialist systems it's more about politics.
That can't be true otherwise you would have agreed with it.
The government takes money from the citizens then uses that money in what ever manner they decide.
That is not socialism you astonishingly ill-educated hillbilly. That's a system called state capitalism. Socialism is when all the people who dedicate their labour to enriching parasites they don't even know suddenly stop being robbed.
So in your imaginary system what is the chain of custody for the wealth? You have my attention
To understand that you will have to focus on reality for a moment and forget about the social constructs that exist under capitalism, are you prepared?
Everyone equally owns everything and owns nothing, wealth does not exist, and resources are allocated based on reason and need rather than fictitious wanker units.
So let's use transportation as an example of wealth. Some of us have low wealth transportation and have to fix it regularly to get back and forth to work,doctor, shopping, ect. Some have higher wealth transport which is new every couple of years. Others travel great distances on a regular basis requiring huge wealth for transport in socialism can everyone have a new car and fly around the world when ever they need. This socialism thing sounds great if that is the case I would love to travel the world with out a care knowing that socialism will take care of it.
in socialism can everyone have a new car and fly around the world when ever they need. This socialism thing sounds great if that is the case I would love to travel the world with out a care knowing that socialism will take care of it.
It depends what kind of socialism it is and what level of technology you are assuming exists. If it is full on socialism in a futuristic setting then there will essentially be free public access to whatever form of transportation you need. If it is a more moderate or early stage of socialism then access will be more restricted, only instead of being restricted by an individual's lack of money it would be restricted or granted based on how much/little you contribute.
If resources are not sufficient to supply everyone, who decides who gets what?
Money.
Reasonable people can disagree. Whose reason do we rely on?
Money decides who's reason you rely on.
Those would be my answers if I was a capitalist, in order to even begin to understand socialism, you first need to be not retarded enough to understand the problems created by the above.
I'm a capitalist. Those aren't the correct answers.
in order to even begin to understand socialism, you first need to be not retarded enough to understand the problems created by the above.
"You are all to stupid for me to answer any critical questions concerning my ridiculous position". You are the biggest fucking pussy on this site. Jesus, you bitch and moan about how stupid people are when you cannot even defend your own stupid opinions. Your knowledge of capitalism is absent and your knowledge of Marx is seriously flawed. When faced with someone who actually knows what they are talking about, and can reference the primary sources to prove it, you throw a fuckin tissy. It is just goddamn pathetic. What's worse is you rely completely on your own inability to justify your pretend superiority. "I can't answer your questions because you're a dummy. wha".
I'm a capitalist. Those aren't the correct answers.
That's what capitalism is. What makes you think you can understand the way the future will work when you look at the present and think it's a perfect utopia that will never change?
There you go getting other peoples thoughts wrong again. Glad you aren't in charge. And no, that's not what capitalism is. Read a book.
I don't know the ways in which the future will work. Neither do you. Capitalism is dynamic and can account for a wide range of modes of existence, including more socialistic modes.
If we can hang onto capitalism, the future will look very different in unpredictable ways. If we succumb to socialists, the future will look a bit like the past.
Reasonable people can disagree. Whose reason do we rely on?
Reason is objective. It doesn't come down to opinion. You might as well say, mathematicians can disagree. Whose math do we rely on?
The general premises you work off when you write are always astonishingly false, but you do your best to disguise them by loading your language as much as possible. In my opinion this implies that you could well be psychopathic.
Reason is objective. It doesn't come down to opinion.
Reason may be objective, but the most reasonable path for human action depends on values. You cannot reasonably determine what is reasonable for every aspect of other people's value structures. You can try. But when that tyranny fails, you will say it's not what you had in mind.
Furthermore, no one person has at there disposal all necessary information. This is why reasonable people disagree.
Reason may be objective, but the most reasonable path for human action depends on values. You cannot reasonably determine what is reasonable for every aspect of other people's value structures.
In the first sentence you say reason is objective, but your second sentence claims that what is reasonable changes based on whatever subjective values shape someone's outlook. This is because your values are not aligned with reason or objective truth, they are based in the subjective. But since mine are aligned with reason I know that subjective cultural values are not valid unless reason is what they value in and of itself. You see it as a tyranny to be correct because you value opinions and superstitions, I see at as a tyranny to perpetuate opinions and superstitions because I value facts and reality. You see it as an issue of individual choice, but it is all to obvious to one who has the IQ befitting of a human being that the values you speak of which go against reason are not a choice, they are dangerous cultural programming that is perpetuated in human cultures rather than critical thinking skills because humans are type 0 ape monkeys who live in conceptual worlds of bullshit.
Furthermore, no one person has at there disposal all necessary information. This is why reasonable people disagree.
That's why we need socialism, there will be much more think tanking and information pooling.
In the first sentence you say reason is objective, but your second sentence claims that what is reasonable changes based on whatever subjective values shape someone's outlook.
Think carefully. Reason is objective. There is a a most reasonable way in which to attain ones values. Values vary.
This is because your values are not aligned with reason or objective truth, they are based in the subjective.
That's a meaningless statement.
But since mine are aligned with reason I know that subjective cultural values are not valid unless reason is what they value in and of itself.
That's a baseless statement.
You see it as a tyranny to be correct because you value opinions and superstitions
Most of your opinions are wrong and unreasonable, yet you value them.
I see at as a tyranny to perpetuate opinions and superstitions because I value facts and reality.
There has never been a tyrant who didn't think he had the right of it. You are no different. It is better to know that people cannot properly dictate other people's lives than it is to think you would dictate them properly. Your assertions are no more than evidence of your arrogant ignorance.
You see it as an issue of individual choice, but it is all to obvious to one who has the IQ befitting of a human being that the values you speak of which go against reason are not a choice, they are dangerous cultural programming that is perpetuated in human cultures rather than critical thinking skills because humans are type 0 ape monkeys who live in conceptual worlds of bullshit.
Another baseless run-on. Every time you mention Types and RBE, I can't help but think how you are too stupid to even adopt good ideas, let alone have ideas of your own.
That's why we need socialism, there will be much more think tanking and information pooling.
Then the socialists will predictably say "but this time it will work".
That is not socialism you astonishingly ill-educated hillbilly. That's a system called state capitalism.
“The socialist movement takes great pains to circulate frequently new labels for its ideally constructed state. Each worn-out label is replaced by another which raises hopes of an ultimate solution of the insoluble basic problem of Socialism—until it becomes obvious that nothing has been changed but the name. The most recent slogan is "State Capitalism." It is not commonly realized that this covers nothing more than what used to be called Planned Economy and State Socialism, and that State Capitalism, Planned Economy, and State Socialism diverge only in non-essentials from the "classic" ideal of egalitarian Socialism"
Hi Amarel. Remember last week when you argued for three hours straight that RationalWiki was a credible source of information? Well, oops.
The Ludwig von Mises Institute is an American think tank (tax-exempt!) specializing in Austrian school economics and political philosophy. It was established in 1982 with the approval of Margit von Mises, the widow of the Austrian school economist Ludwig von Mises. They have published many journals on political economy, economics, and philosophy, working from multiple angles to combine racism with wealth worship and empirical science denial.
Yeah. What made the article legit was it's content
Funny, because that's exactly what makes my article legitimate also. Very legitimate content.
In this case, I was not quoting the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, I was quoting Ludwig Von Mises, the economist.
And of course the Ludwig Von Mises Institute has absolutely no connection to Ludwig Von Mises. Ludwig Von Mises was an absolutely neutral and credible individual, and it is only by remarkable coincidence that his Institute is corrupt. Yes? Ahahahahaha.
Wikipedia seems to acknowledge the existence of state capitalism also.
State capitalism is an economic system in which the state undertakes commercial (i.e. for-profit) economic activity and where the means of production are organized and managed as state-owned business enterprises (including the processes of capital accumulation, wage labor and centralized management), or where there is otherwise a dominance of corporatized government agencies (agencies organized along business-management practices) or of publicly listed corporations in which the state has controlling shares.[1]
which is why you attacked the source rather than the content.
You really are a little liar, aren't you? I intervened because you were trying to convince people that you were posting a factual article. You were trying to sell the site as a legitimate news source because it has Wiki in its name and I pointed out that it is a glorified partisan blog.
I intervened because you were trying to convince people that you were posting a factual article
It was a factual article. You didn't attempt to refute any of the factual statements because you couldn't. So you attacked the source. Blog doesn't mean fictional.
No it wasn't. You telling us that something is factual does not make it factual. Does that compute?
You didn't attempt to refute any of the factual statements because you couldn't.
There you go again telling strangers why they do or don't do things. Your article contained no facts and you literally only dropped it into chat to circumvent your own responsibility to forge a coherent argument. You're a thoroughly dishonest idiot.
I'll tell ya what. Next time I am shutting down the prospects of RBE, I will simply state the facts as they are and not tell you that they were also stated in a blog.
Amarel, let's actually examine this quote of yours.
“The socialist movement takes great pains to circulate frequently new labels for its ideally constructed state.
The most recent slogan is "State Capitalism."
Old Ludwig seems to be trying to convince us that socialists -- for reasons he hasn't specified -- decided to begin calling themselves capitalists. I prefer the much simpler explanation that Ludwig, being a classical liberal capitalist, didn't like the fact that state capitalism is a form of capitalism.
Old Ludwig seems to be trying to convince us that socialists -- for reasons he hasn't specified -- decided to begin calling themselves capitalists.
He did specify right there in the quote you are referring to. "Each worn-out label is replaced by another which raises hopes of an ultimate solution of the insoluble basic problem of Socialism -- until it becomes obvious that nothing has been changed but the name".
They call themselves Capitalists in the hopes that all their failures will magically become capitalist failures. The entire quote is literally right there.
He did specify right there in the quote you are referring to.
Lol. Oh no, I'm afraid he didn't buddy.
"Each worn-out label is replaced by another which raises hopes of an ultimate solution of the insoluble basic problem of Socialism
Which is obviously self-contradictory and stupid. How can hopes be raised of an ultimate solution of the insoluble basic problem of socialism if the socialists are calling themselves capitalists? That's absurd. You are going to raise people's hopes about socialism by calling socialism capitalism? Shut the fuck up.
What makes you think that fewer people benefit. In socialism only Government officials and the unproductive benefit.
With capitalism the productive and government officials benefit I would argue that we would be better as a society if the people who benefit are at least productive
There is a distinction between democratic socialism, and socialISM. It IS confusing, I agree..
One PAYS for things like Medicare, and the other OWNS everything.. The ONLY thing democratic socialism owns, is a printing press.. That kind of "socialism" IS good for the USA.
What is good about that? If we use "Medicare" as the example, why should that be a socialist program? We pay into it as an insurance program why not just make it an insurance program? Eliminate the government from it entirely.
An "Insurance program" run by an insurance capitalist exists to make that capitalist(s) RICH. WE have to pay the cost of the insurance expenses AND the often even BIGGER expense of the HUGE buildings around the country that house those capitalists trying to get rich! (Along with the very nice vacations, traveling perks, extravagant dinners with "clients", maybe a much "needed" massage or three??) And then, you have to figure the "bargaining" between the Drug Cartel, the Hospital Investors, the contractors and others looking to get rich off the industry. (During more dinners and junkets). No wonder health "insurance" is so expensive!
Socialize ME! Use ALMOST all of the money I pay for medical PROTECTION, (in taxes FOR the people AND myself), not for some capitalists home or yacht! My taxes "might" be a bit higher, but, deduct the insurance expense we pay and the total will be very much lower, because the cost of operating (and the perks) will be MUCH lower! It might make you smile MORE, Bob!
So you are claiming that politicians aren't getting rich off of they healthcare system? If that is what you think you are very naive. That is why they passed the "Affordable Healthcare Act" If they wanted to help the public in an affordable way they would just open the hundreds of federally owned hospitals to people without insurance. They would pass laws limiting health care prices for any organization which takes federal funds.
As for the question, no, I am not claiming that politicians are not getting rich off of today's health care system. I agree, that would make me naïve. I would say that your proposed solution with the fed hospitals would make YOU naïve. We need a system that would, through competition and regulation, encourage and reduce lower prices. That's what, first, cutting the massive profits and extravagant "business expenses" would do. They should have to bargain and earn their profits, not just write them as to "whatever the market will bear".
Another branch of "God" worshippers didn't either, did it?? They were looking for help from your "god", who didn't show up to save his misguided "creations". Musta' been on vacation?
Sorry, I try not to make fun of someone's religion, but when they USE it to make a ridiculous point …..
I don't remember when socialism was good. USSR, North Korea, Venezuela, and other countries. These countries are poor because of the economic policy of socialism or communism. Capitalism and laissez-faire is the only option if the country and its citizens want to be prosperous. You can read an article on https://edubirdie.com/rewrite-my-essay if you want to know the consequences of socialism in the US. Also read Ayn Rand "Atlas Shrugged." You will see the clear picture of what it will bring.
Capitalism (or really Free Enterprise) is a very good driver economically. But just like we have always had a social education system- we need at least a socialist catastrophic health net.
Also - we really don’t have a true FREE MARKET! We have CORPORATE PROTECTIONism which is so hypocritical!!
Face it : Capitalism committed Suicide!! Cronyism and childish greed killed it. The mule learned the carrot on the stick is bullshit
Had it remained ethical and reasonable- it may have survived. Humans are too juvenile to be that free..
Rather capitalism is destroying the market by not paying its participants. Govt. creating dependencies ? That's a good one. Much more like the capitalist is creating those dependencies.
Reduce the markets buying power everyday means debt and the capitalist has very successfully driven the country into $71 trillion of debt going up $6 million per minute.
Rather, the govt has convinced people that laws of both marketplace and taxes should favor capital and the corp. to inspire growth...that never occurs.
People without capital which is by far most people...are not capitalists at all. Capitalism requires capital.
Rather capitalism is destroying the market by not paying its participants. Govt. creating dependencies ? That's a good one. Much more like the capitalist is creating those dependencies.
Reduce the markets buying power everyday means debt and the capitalist has very successfully driven the country into $71 trillion of debt going up $6 million per minute.
Rather, the govt has convinced people that laws of both marketplace and taxes should favor capital and the corp. to inspire growth...that never occurs.
People without capital which is by far most people...are not capitalists at all. Capitalism requires capital. As for choice, the US govt. has chosen to initiate forces of capital and govt. against the poor.
The capitalist is among the least self sufficient in economy, always with his hand out to govt.
Capitalism is not only not free enterprise, it is not real enterprise at all. Capitalism is money-ism. Capitalism is speculation, debt and turning paper into money. Capitalism involves no labor, that is reserved for whoever the capitalist speculates on or...invests in.
Capitalism is hardly dead, it thrives on a total US debt of $71 trillion, going up $6 million a minute.
Capitalism has its firm grip on govt. with all of that 'capital'...being free speech.[sic]
Truly facing [it], crony, greedy capitalism won the 20st century and has most successfully in partnership with having successfully bought and owned govt. especially as exemplified by the latest of several tax giveaways...thrives in the 21st.
More accurately, [it] has remained un-ethical and unreasonable where greed rules everyday and has survived quite well, while humans do not exist and are...,merely profit centers.
Lol. Right buddy. If you want to know what socialism "looks like", ask the hardcore American capitalist who has swallowed a lifetime of bubblegum propaganda from the far right. Ask the guy who thinks capitalism is what gives us teeth.
Are you looking for a trusted, reliable dentist to take care of all your family's dental needs? Look no further! Caplash Dental is here to provide you with the highest-quality dental services in the area. Our experienced, professional staff is dedicated to making sure that you receive the best care possible. We offer a wide range of services from checkups and cleanings to more complex treatments like root canals and wisdom teeth extractions. Come experience the difference at Caplash Dental https://www.caplashdental.com/family-dentist.page.44.html
I'm all about blogging, and I gotta say, I love your articles! They're insightful and super engaging. This one, in particular, got me curious and excited. I'm gonna save your website and keep coming back for your latest stuff.Learn about plug and play smart load cells
In today's world, it's disheartening to witness people resorting to extreme arguments to emphasize their views or discredit others. I want to express my gratitude for your insightful contribution, which significantly enhances the clarity of this ongoing debate.
Your thoughtful input in this discussion stands out amidst the chaos of extreme viewpoints. Your concise and relevant insight plays a pivotal role in steering this debate towards clarity. Thank you for your impactful contribution.
In certain cases, tree removal is complemented by tree replanting initiatives. This proactive approach ensures that the removal of a mature tree is mitigated by the planting of new ones, contributing to the overall health of the environment and maintaining biodiversity. The choice of replacement trees is often guided by factors such as local climate, soil conditions, and the ecological role of the removed tree. https://longislandlumberjack.com/
Blogging is a regular aspect of my schedule, and I deeply appreciate your articles for their insightful content and engaging style. This specific write-up has not only captured my initial interest but also sparked enthusiasm for further exploration.
During the mid-20th century, there was a shift towards more standardized and formal designs. Elegant script fonts, embossing, and engraved details were popular choices for traditional weddings. However, as the latter half of the century approached, couples began to explore more diverse styles.
The U.S. currently has elements of socialism, such as Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment. Socialism, as seen through its implementations in various ...The government treats the citizens as equals, and the wealth generated by employees is distributed equally to everyone. The government manages the means of production, which ensures that there is fairness in resource utilization and distribution.Critics of socialism cite the Soviet Union and Venezuela as examples of countries where socialism has failed. The exponents of socialism in one country contend that Stalin's theory was firmly in line with the basic tenets of Leninism in that the victory of socialism is possible in one or separate countries while other countries may continue to remain bourgeois for
Unveil the transformative journey of wedding card designs. No longer confined to basic paper, they now epitomize the couple's essence and set the tone for the celebration. Explore a plethora of options - from intricate detailing to contemporary minimalism - each crafted to uniquely capture your story.
Witness the remarkable journey of wedding card designs. What started as a simple piece of paper conveying essential details has blossomed into an array of options. These range from intricate, detailed designs to the chic simplicity of contemporary styles, catering to the diverse tastes of each unique couple.
Thanks for your post. I’ve been thinking about writing a very comparable post over the last couple of weeks. I’ll probably keep it short and sweet and link to this instead if thats cool. Thanks.replacement windows scottsdale az
The formation of tonsil stones is associated with various factors, including poor oral hygiene, chronic inflammation of the tonsils, and the presence of large tonsil crypts. Individuals who have a history of recurrent tonsillitis or chronic inflammation of the tonsils may be more prone to developing tonsil stones. Additionally, certain lifestyle factors, such as smoking and dehydration, can contribute to the formation of these calcified formations.
The U.S. currently has elements of socialism, such as Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment. Socialism, as seen through its implementations in various countries, has proved to be impractical as it did not achieve the mass equality it sought to.Key Takeaways. The U.S. has a mixed economy, exhibiting characteristics of both capitalism and socialism. Such a mixed economy embraces the free market when it comes to capital use, but it also allows for government intervention for the public good.Capitalism is the economic system in the United States. It is a market economy. Capitalism means that people, not the government, own most
