CreateDebate


FactMachine's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of FactMachine's arguments, looking across every debate.

Your hatred will motivate me to keep fighting for life just to keep pissing you off, thank you.

2 points

Nomencunt check it out, Mathfan just rekt you, you can't ban him this time, you will have to face the truth that you are butt sniffing poodle with an enlarged colon.

I've only played the 4th one and the second one, so I'm going to say the 7th one.

Your penis is the size of a quantum string.

Your balls are the size of neutrinos.

You have convinced yourself that due to your lack of "credentials" as a science journalist, that you are an authority on these topics

What kind of degree do you have Nomenclature? How many times does he have to tell you he's studying physics at university? I bet he has more education in physics than your sorry ass, you are educated to baby talk the public about physics, not to actually understand it to the extent of being a real physicist.

I genuinely hope you are going to present a better argument

I genuinely hope you are going to get testicular cancer, he is more educated than you.

A Pompous Clown With A Trumpet Up His Sphincter.

I knew your "brotherhood" with Mathfan wouldn't last long the moment I realized he wasn't an imbecile. If you really think about it, all of your attacks can be applied to you more than him.

you don't even bother reading/understanding the things

Semantical nit pickery will get you no where. He didn't actually say anything incorrect in any tangible way, he just failed at presenting his ideas with a totally idiot proof level of nuance that couldn't be spun into a web of deceit by scum like you.

computers don't program themselves.

DNA didn't program itself either, the "code" in DNA is the result of a gradual process that occurred in a complex chemical environment, you are a creationist. If you believe the annunaki made our genetic code then who made theirs? Is there an infinite chain of creators? Somewhere along the line a code HAS to form naturally to create an intelligent being to create the codes that where created deliberately. This is why your logic is non existent and your obsession with codes is futile.

You don't have the faintest idea what you are talking about so drop the authoritative tone you bloody nincompoop.

Man, I would like to see you impaled on a spike bleeding out of your anus with ice picks in your eyeballs. I would dip my bread in your blood and eat your liver with a side of goat testicles.

2 points

@iliketodebasemyself

You are really beginning to piss me off, I just read that incredulously sanctimonious drivel you tried to pull, whining like a little baby about ad-hominems because you don't know what time dilation means. Damn, you are a total fucking jack ass, since the theory of general relativity states that time runs differently from different points of view and your place in time is RELATIVE that means that any time can be the past or future depending on your place in time, if we travel into the future then back to the present then the future is in our past, if the present is the past then why are we always passing the present and moving into the future? You're literally mentally ill and you make no god damn sense.

The Fermi Paradox is based on the false assumption that intelligent life is abundant, calling it a "paradox" is drastic over kill, because it's actually not that surprising that there is no galactic empire.

It takes a long ass time to even travel between solar systems, it would take roughly four years to reach the nearest star system at light steed. So even if there was another form of intelligent life it would take them quite a while to colonize an entire galaxy, plus intelligent life forming billions of years ago is less likely because the universe used to be much more chaotic.

Another problem is that life is much more rare than the Drake equation predicts, it doesn't take into account the fact that most star systems are binary or part of a cluster and are much more chaotic than ours and full of life-destroying radiation.

3 points

Like2debate stop acting like you know what you're talking about, you don't know what the kardashev scale is and you sound like an ignoramus. A type one civilization doesn't just extract energy from a planet, it controls an entire planet and can use all of it's energy sources, a type 2 controls an entire star system, using tiny amounts of solar energy doesn't qualify you as a type 2.

FactMachine(430) Clarified
1 point

Is that so? I just thought they where two christians teaming up to spam their bull shit.

You're a tremendous piece of shit. Keep projecting you ass-troll projector.

All anyone does (except for me and Mathfan) on this site is regurgitate their politically biased neurosis. When the fuck is anyone going to talk about something that is substantially relevant? The world is rotting around us and all you mindless parrots do is contribute to that with your simple minded "inside the box" political regurgitation and incessant bleating about the same issues over and over again.

I was with you until you mentioned soda.

Soda is the devils drink.

It's not the one percent you need to worry about, it's the 0.00001 percent.

2 points

Saying he's a paid shill is a bit of a stretch, and this is coming from a certified conspiracy theorist. Have you ever considered the possibility that he is just astronomically retarded and remarkably intellectually dishonest to the 33rd degree of luciferian baphomet worshiping levels of hypocrisy?

You only think I'm stupid when I don't agree with you

If that was true I would think almost everyone is stupid...wait, I already do.

I have unfortunately had to school you about a number of issues you have been ignorant in.

Only in your mind, my young padawan.

You are genuinely incapable of critically analysing your own belief structure

You are genuinely incapable of analyzing my belief structure, first of all I don't have "beliefs" and second of all you don't even know me half as well as I know you because I stalk you on this site.

which makes you no better than a donkey

A donkey eh? that's funny coming from a lefty fucktard.

random insult generators.

My brain is a random insult generator. you condom gobbling crop duster.

you are absolutely fucking infantile.

WWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH MOMMY I POOPY MY BOOM BOOM WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH

2 points

while stating explicit lies in the same sentence

I honestly don't think he is a liar, just stupid.

I support Israel to the extent that they are arguably an appropriate ally

Israel is a genocidal terror state and america only has it's nose up their bum because america is a Rothschild cuckfest of globalist trash. I don't blame him for calling you a zionist, it's a bit of an over-statement but supporting Israel is abjectly wrong and disgusting.

has made fun of the size of my huge Jewish nose

I would like to see that for myself.

I never thought you were quantumhead

You said I was "probably quantumhead" remember?

Eventually he settled on his alt-account of Nomenclature.

That's probably just Bronto's far-right conspiracy theory.

mathfan

Where is the debate you speak of? I want to evaluate it for myself. Mathfan happens to be my only ally on this site, and Nomenclature is also his ally (even though I hate him) it's funny how you specifically picked us as the top 3 trolls. I haven't noticed any troll behaviour from Mathfan, he seems like an intelligent bloke and can post lengthy and detailed responses.

definition of a troll

A troll is someone who shitposts or takes on false personas and mannerisms etc. to fuck with people.

You weak minded fool, if you only knew the POWER of the DARK SIDE...What about Darth Maul, he was never a padawan, he was raised to be a dark sider by the night sisters and given to Lord Sidious at a young age. Most jedi cannot use lightning, and to do so requires the use of the DARK SIDE OF THE FORCE, Some jedi have learned it but they are considered dangerous by the other jedi and untrustworthy, and they cannot fully master the ability. So you see my young apprentice, there are no true light side users who can conduct SITH lightning, the jedi do not abstain from it for a "fair fight" because we are the ones using it in the first place, if they wanted a fair fight they would use it too! Not all Sith are the same, many Sith are loyal, but many are not, Sith doctrine is similar to that of laveyan satanism, we do whatever suits us.

I'm so racist...........................................................................................

Wow, no admission that you are blatantly WRONG about K-2, did you even read that shit? You cock sucking anal whore, you are focusing on omega 3 because it's easier for you and avoiding the shit you have no defense against. Yeah fish is a much better source of omega 3 and I know about the fatty acid ratio etc. but I'm not a fucking vegan, I am an omnivore, I believe in a balanced fucking diet you fuck. The fear mongering about antinutrients needs to stop, they are not as big a problem as you make them out to be, they only effect certain nutrients and only are present in trace amounts in only a few vegetables and I actually agree with you mostly about grains and legumes which have the most antinutrients and other such garbage. If you look at the wiki article for anti nutrients you should notice that they only effect specific nutrients and if you eat right with a balanced diet it won't be a problem.

Okay Sv3rige, here you go

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_K

I was incorrect about the fatty acid synthesis I will admit that, I just looked into it, but contrary to your belief there ARE plant based sources, here you go.

http://www.onegreenplanet.org/natural-health/plant-based-foods-with-the-highest-amount-of-omega-3-fatty-acids/

I was hasty and reckless when I said fatty acids where synthesized by the human body but I was right about K-2 and you're still fundamentally incorrect about 90% of what you say.

Good, good! let your hate for jews flow through you! You have done well, but you have not surpassed my last apprentice, who came up with this;

"You indesputably rancid excretion of anal dribblets in a test tube of strange quark matter which is compressing your jumping jumbling jiggling gelatinous jamaican jugs into the density of the core of the center of my black ass hole"

Actually I just made that up now.

Dude, bro, man, how was that off topic? (I'm on crack, bear with me) Just answer the shit or piss off "mate" because you KNOW antifa are BOTH "bad" and doing a bad job fighting fascism, the truth is they don't do shit to fight fascism, just random people on the street and you KNOW IT, SCUM! Antifa are not antifascist at all, they are just fish legged cod-botherers who beat up old ladies and throw smelly butt hole sauce at people.

You're just being anal to avoid a serious response you semen receptacle. Do you not think antifa members are generally a bunch of SJW morons? Do you not think they attack innocent people? Stop being a free radical oxidized donkey bitch and answer me you cretin!

If antifa are so good and are a legitimate antifascist organization then tell me why they attack random people so often? Explain why there victims are NEVER actual neo-nazis? You are mistaken about a great many things my young apprentice.

0 points

In most cases I would agree but the church shouldn't even exist in the first place so no.

FactMachine(430) Clarified
2 points

There are lot of useless people who think they are hard working.

Lazy people are the norm and so are stupid people, in fact most people are both. . It's amazing how much you stand out in this world just by being worth anything at all in the first place.

If you are stupid and hard working you are wasting your hard work.

2 points

Just because they are called "antifa" doesn't automatically make them good you ABSOLUTE FOOL. You are unbelievably fucking stupid, you say that just because Hitler says he is a socialist doesn't mean he is a socialist, well just because antifa says they are antifascist doesn't mean they aren't just a bunch of lunatics attacking random people and chanting incessant slogans.

Sexcon, I hate Trump but at least I don't have to blatantly and deliberately misinterpret everything he says. Not everyone at that protest was either a leftist or a nazi, there where more than just nazis on the other "side" you blathering blubbering bloody blighter. Just because the worst pieces of shit there happened to be neonazis doesn't mean there weren't other forms of pieces of shit there including people on the left like BLM and antifa, in fact if you ask me they where ALL pieces of shit for the most part. Just because neonazis suck doesn't mean other people don't suck and just because there where nazis doesn't mean everyone who wasn't a feminist, antifa or BLM was a nazi, what part don't you understand?

This is why you deserve to fucking die screaming nomenclature, you think antifa actually fights fascism? All they do is scream at people and throw stink bombs and piss at reporters and innocent bystanders. The only reason antifa doesn't have everyone who disagrees with them in concentration camps is because they're too stupid to gain any real power.

You subhuman scum, you deserve to die for being so worthless and simple minded.

2 points

I would rather be lazy and smart instead of hard working and schizophrenically delusional and brainwashed.

2 points

Before I get into this I just want to make it clear that I'm not a lefty fucktard or any other denomination of group think indoctrination so don't even try to turn this into a polarized and narrow minded left vs. right debate, I am not advocating for social democracy at all.

Your statement would be perfectly valid if it where not for the fact that you think being successful in capitalism is the same as "natural selection" because that is not the case at all.

You are blatantly a social elitist, you are conflating wealth with intelligence and social status with "adapting successfully" clearly forgetting the fact that many "successful" people where given everything they have without doing anything to earn it, just got lucky, or weaseled their way to the top and have literally nothing to offer the world but parasitism, as they don't actually produce anything of value and are only taking advantage of capitalism to accumulate wealth.

If you think natural selection and monetary system selection are the same then do you think Justin Bieber is superior to you? He's a lot more "successful" after all. He is only wealthy because stupid teenage girls with brains the size of bieber's micropenis exist on this planet, there is one example of how capitalist selection is in many cases the exact OPPOSITE of natural selection.

The fact of the matter is Nicola Tesla died poor and homeless and he was many orders of magnitude more intelligent than you'll ever be, Albert Einstein was never as wealthy as George Soros or Henry Kissinger, do you think they are more intelligent than him? Or do you think they are disgusting little leech parasites who weaseled and bought their way to the top?

Your elitist worldview is inconsistent with reality, look at the inbred british royal family and other examples of "old money" do you honestly think their wealth makes them superior? Do you think that's natural selection or the exact opposite?

Human society creates the OPPOSITE of natural selection, it allows inbred scum to inherit wealth and power, it allows useless toilet bowl creatures like the people on wall street to accumulate vast quantities of resources just for playing with imaginary fractional reserve money on a computer screen. It allows horrible shitty people to become rich and famous celebrities SPECIFICALLY because the average person is an IDIOT who likes shitty simple minded music and other garbage media.

The wealthiest people are not superior, they are very often total trash, if you honestly think otherwise then imagine these people trying to survive in the wilderness with nothing but their own intelligence and physical fitness, your notions of "natural selection" would be altered swiftly. The wealthiest and most influential people have never been the most intelligent or fit, it's people like Max Planck and Charles Proteus Steinmetz who are truly intelligent, and they where no where near as rich as inferiors like the rockefellers and rothschilds. If you want to conflate natural selection with human society's selection then show me one example of a filthy rich person who is actually physically fit compared to a cave man or mentally fit compared to Tesla? You can't do it because you are WRONG.

FactMachine(430) Clarified
1 point

Most people who have that bias against episode 1-3 don't fully understand their plot and are just focusing on the negative aspects (which there are plenty of) meanwhile the original trilogy has already made a much stronger impression on them especially if they watched it from childhood, so they will always be biased. There are a lot of things about Star Wars, especially in episode 1-3 that are implied but never directly explained, so if you are not very knowledgeable about SW or can't tell that episode 1-3 are much more complex than the original trilogy chances are you are just relying on personal bias.

There is a difference between a fictional energy field and a failed attempt at incorporating real physics in a fictional setting you nerf herding sack of bantha fodder.

The holocaust was fake, the gas chambers where actually for removing lice. Hitler was a vegan hippie who loved animals and was just trying to stop the zionist NWO.

EXCON

should be STEPPED ON

by leprachauns, while I EJECT BOMBS

that blast him with photons and LEPTONS

and free radical ELECTRONS

his skills don't exist like Boba FETT'S MOM

he calls me F ON

account of the fact he can't use the word "fact" as punishment for all the facts that he GETS WRONG

this is the BEST SONG

I'll cut off your head and make myself a NECK BONG

My intellECTS STRONG

while you fall into DEATH'S PALMS

I'm at home with your girl while she strokes on my SEX WAND

1: I'm much more familiar with Star Wars but from what I've seen of Star Trek it seems less impressive to me.

2: Star Trek is fraught with physics fallacies and petty attempts at sounding scientific when it's clear to anyone who has basic knowledge that 99% of their quantum bullshit is a gross misrepresentation of how shit actually works in order to bend and stretch the mechanics of reality to conform with the whims of the show's writers.

3:Both Star Wars and Star Trek are blatantly inaccurate in their portrayal of the technologies and social structures one should expect from advanced civilizations. Take into consideration the simple fact that these are fictional type one and two civilizations being conceptualized by people from type zero civilizations, our values and psychological traits are therefore projected onto beings who should be vastly more advanced than us, it's like expecting an ant to behave like a human. When you consider that, it's pathetic how in Star Wars (wherein larger galactic governments exist but the technological level is technically Kardashev 1 if you discount the warp drive tech, which technically shouldn't be in Star Wars when you consider how advanced that is compared to other Star Wars tech.) there are still type zero governmental and socioeconomic structures and a significant lack in certain tech such as nanotech and renewable or highly efficient energy sources, while at the same time their ability to travel through space is blown out of proportion. Star Trek is even more pathetic in this regard because Star Trek has Type 2 Kardashev civilizations with the same socioeconomic bullshit and even more technological fallacies.

4: Star Wars actually has a point, Star Trek is more about wandering around through space and getting into conflicts with random aliens, Star Wars is about a cosmic force being kept in balance and the battle for freedom and justice in the galaxy.

The correct answer is that Nomenclature doesn't have a mind to begin with so how can the Illuminati control it? You all lose, especially you Nomenclature, fuck you.

You deserve to have chocolate flavoured semen particles ejected into your face from the center of a white hole in the spatial supervoid of Stephen Hawkings butt crack you greasy crusted pubic follicle.

He's not nomenclature you dolt, I'm beginning to think you're nomenclature and you think constantly accusing everyone of being nomenclature will hide your identity.

2 points

I think that due to the way our society is structured, a huge bulk of peoples brains are not becoming properly/fully developed and confine them to a stage of quasi-Homo Sapiens

There are many factors which go into this other than religion and the many other cultural programming and indoctrination systems. The average human is deficient in many nutrients and exposed to toxins as well, everything from the quality of the air and water to the preservatives and sugar overloads in the grocery store are contributing to the arrested development. There is a complex break down of human health at work which stems from many correlating factors. First of all humans have only just recently started to be exposed to so much sugar and many of the food sources we rely on, particularly grains, which contribute to the sugar deluge and damage your teeth and your gut flora, processed foods and glyphosates (pesticides) also damage your gut flora. And when you have damaged gut flora you absorb less nutrients and more toxins can get through, which get into the blood stream and can have a cumulative effect on multiple bodily systems including the brain. Many modern humans are sick because their gut flora is sick, and there is a massive problem with nutrient deficiencies because the soil is depleted and contaminated in many areas and because the animals used for meat and dairy by industrial agriculture are malnourished and sick because they are fed unnatural diets and kept in unsanitary immobilizing conditions, plus people don't know how to eat anymore, and don't understand that different haplogroups are adapted to different diets based on the food sources that where more scarce or abundant in the region they are from. One example of pure disgustingness is that the common milk carton at the grocery store contains trace amounts of pus and feces due to the unsanitary conditions and the sickness of the animals, the milk also lacks a lot of the nutritional value of healthy cow's milk due to the not very cow friendly low grass and high grain diet, plus the pasturization process actually destroys enzymes and fatty acids.

the "higher-ups" are imbeciles just like the overwhelming majority of people caught up in the popular culture and are not at all "on-the-same-page" as the professors, even though they have power over the professors

That's one of the biggest failures of how society is structured, scientific illiterates can make decisions they are not qualified to make and meddle in things they shouldn't be meddling in because they are successful in things like business and politics.

need to marshal an appropriate intellectual and emotional response by calling a spade a spade on this issue or else we are doomed to perpetual ignorance/stupidity/mental and emotional instability/ect. as a species and will ceaselessly remain in the "Dark Ages"

We should summon all the religious people and all the atheists on this site to a giant multi-stage intellectual battle covering these three topics

1: Evolution vs. creationism.

2: The effect that religion has had on humanity historically.

3: The nature of causality and why God's existence would be a causal paradox and a fundamentally impotent explanation of the universe's creation.

FactMachine(430) Clarified
1 point

Why don't you like peyote? If I'm not mistaken the main psychoactive compound in peyote is actually mescaline, so when you say you took mescaline are you talking about pure mescaline or peyote?

Even if Meth coke and heroin can be "inspiring" due to the stimulation of your brain cells and the euphoria they are just too damaging to the body, especially meth, and do have a neurotoxic effect. When I was a teenager I wanted to try them but I'm glad I never got the chance and I don't think it's worth it at all.

2 points

it is one of the last true bastions of where intellectualism is "cool"

Intellectualism is the main thing that makes humans special, our intelligence is what has kept us alive this long, so people who don't see it as important or can't use it are almost literally half-mentally disabled, chimp-human hybrids, they have literally been mind fucked into a subhuman state of cognition.

the students who are sane and really want to know about the true nature of the topics in detail are "missing out" because the teachers intentionally never say enough to "bridge-a-gap"

If those cowardly sniveling butt hole fornicators, both the professors and their "higher ups" would just attack with even more facts and logic instead of bowing to the mighty power of hurt feelings and stupid anachronistic superstitious beliefs, then the world would be a much better place. The right wingers always talk about PC culture but one PC problem in the west is that we're afraid to thoroughly criticize and attack three of the most stupid things in the universe; Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Which all do their part to fuck up the world to a large extent. We need more people in the schools and universities who will just lay out the evidence and say "it's a scientific fact that your religion is wrong, now take some omega 3 or something and get back to work"

9 points

A. You're a retard

B. Sometimes the only way to stop someone from killing you or other people is to kill them.

C. You are grossly oversimplifying your argument and any intellectually honest person can admit that in certain instances offense can be used as defense and defense can be used as offense.

D. Making guns illegal would not stop criminals from getting guns illegally or finding other alternatives, and the biggest murderers out there, the military would still have guns and far worse as I explained, so the only people who wouldn't get to have guns for the most part are normal civilians and responsible good people.

E. It's pathetic to worry about guns in a time like this, like I said before you are swatting at mosquitos while you ignore the sasquatch trying to molest you and the giant brain eating mutant tape worm trying to perforate your eyeball.

F. Stop using the word "egregious" all the fucking time.

G. Why don't you get a life and talk about the real fucking problems instead of whining about guns all day, if you could eradicate every single gun off the face of the earth it wouldn't make a droplet of nasal mucus' worth of a difference. There would still be millions of starving people drinking muddy ebola water in africa, there would still be corporations dumping chemicals and plastic all over the earth, there would still be tyrannical governments with drones and nukes and surveillance tech, and there would still be retards like you contaminating the internet.

2 points

Wow, you could just see the cognitive dissonance activating in that guy's brain from his facial expression, almost like he was going into "zombie mode". One clear way to know that our education system is fucked is that you can obtain a PHD in science and still live in the snow globe. I once knew a man who had a PHD in biology who was a young earth creationist. He could have got a much better job with his degree but instead he became a school gym teacher because he didn't want to teach evolution or have anything to do with it. That's one example of how the fire globe of snow hose bull shit can mentally fuck people up for life and hold them back, even when they had the potential to be highly intelligent.

7 Isn't even an even number you redart!

Chicken breast.

Shakalakaboomboom.

it's you who is stupid

Wow, what's next, is a black person going to call me a nigger?

Evolutionists virtually shut down research on DNA

Wrong, it's mostly evolutionists who are researching DNA.

Evolutionary belief is a hindrance to scientific investigation

You need to stop spending your time in christian echo chambers and expand your horizons, you are the one trying to push your beliefs instead of contributing to scientific investigation.

it's a waste of time and money......and it's money which fuels it.

Yes it is...wait I thought you where talking about the church, never mind.

There is no such thing as "junk DNA"

It's not that it doesn't exist, it's just that some of it actually does have a purpose we don't understand or does code but is dormant.

Maybe you used to be a monkey, I have always been a man.

Whether you like it or not we are both apes who are related to monkeys.

2 points

it is not at all clear to me how you would go about achieving that when initial and continued exposure fails.

Some people are just too stupid and too indoctrinated, but with a lot of them it just takes a shit load of time and profusions of information before they finally get it. You also have to meet them half way a lot of the time and try to work your way into the truth. What I mean by this is that if you really want to change someones mind who has been programmed to be retarded, you have to be understanding of their retardation and even pretend to be open minded towards it when you know it's bullshit. You have to approach them using their language as well and give them new intellectual vocabulary, basically speak to them within the framework of their puny mind's conditioning before you try to introduce a concept which goes against their programming template and first introduce them to the thought process and the reasoning which leads to that conclusion, other wise their brain will react like it's being invaded by aliens and they won't have the intellectual tools to see where you are coming from.

even if intelligence waves do reach people, it in no way grantees that it will be effective

What we need is RBE communities and "resorts" to emerge and gradually convert everyone, these communities would serve as both a beacon of intelligence waves for the outside world and an environment conducive to curiosity creativity and co-operation where both adults and children can be deprogrammed from the mental diseases of modern society.

a Disney channel snow globe of a world

That brings back memories of when I was ten years old and I was over at my highly religious third/second cousins house, they had another family over and my younger cousins all watched Disney, but the other family's mother thought Disney was satanic because Walt is a freemason, so they got into a giant argument about Disney and the illuminati and then my cousin's mother's husband finally admits "I'm actually a mason myself, they are a god-fearing fraternity" and the other family gathered their children and stormed out of the house, the mother called him a "luciferian pig" on the way out and slammed the door.

Evolution is useless for biology.

Creationism is useless for biology.

There is nothing in biological science which requires belief in evolution.

There is nothing in biological science which requires belief in creationism.

The same goes for all of the sciences.

The same goes for all of the sciences.

Evolution is a useless totally unnecessary waste of time which hinders biological research, and in some cases practically causes research to cease

That's just irretrievably stupid, evolution and the study of biology are inseparable.

there is no such thing as "junk DNA" like the goofy evolutionists used as a phony trophy of "evidence of evolution" and wasted uncounted millions of dollars and hours publishing their "discovery" and promoting it while getting funded by suckers who want to believe in evolution.

It's true that "junk DNA" has been used to promote the evolutionary model but it's not like all the research on the subject was just wasted trying to use it to prove evolution and accepting it as more than just "junk DNA" doesn't disprove evolution at all. It's a lot more complicated then your puny christian brain can comprehend, there is such a thing as "non-coding DNA" but a lot of the "junk DNA" or supposed non coding DNA has a function that is unknown or is actually a back up file of sorts for certain genes. And yes there are actually gene remnants that are dormant from back when we where a different species so "junk DNA" actually does disprove creationism.

FactMachine(430) Clarified
2 points

the number of stupid/ignorant/stubborn people vastly outnumber the amount of reasonable people

I know, how are we ever going to make it?

the majority of adults are so attached to their infantile superstitious beliefs that they think learning science is "dry", "scary", "cold", "devoid of any deep meaning/feeling" and don't want their kids to learn it

The reason for this is because they don't even know what science is, what it's for or how to use it, which is almost laughably because they where taught by a majority of parents who are programmed with the same superstitions and are scientifically illiterate. We are in difficult times because we cannot allow people to program their children with this primitive mindset but we cannot force them to teach their children a certain way either without becoming giant sacks of tyrannical intestinal discharge. The only way to deal with this is to blast emissions of intelligence waves in every direction and hope it reaches as many people as possible.

the leaders of the business world and governments (the powerful classes) have a vested interested in keeping the populace misinformed, uneducated, unintelligent, conditioned toward obedience, ect

For these institutions to exist in the first place requires a scientifically illiterate populace.

The kids would be naturally drawn to this information if they were exposed to it

The types of things kids and people in general are drawn to is a double edged sword, there are plenty of footholds for things such as consumerism, superstition, and conformity as well as things such as curiosity, social and environmental awareness, and rational thought.

perpetual firehose of bullshit

This is one of the biggest problems on earth, how do we silence the perpetual firehose of bullshit and replace it with a constant down pouring rain of logic? The firehose of bullshit is a man made implement designed to saturate those who are exposed to it with ignorance, it can spray you much harder than the rain usually can, and there can be many replicas spraying many different people in the face, and someone will always be working behind the hose trying to spray you in just the right places. But unlike the firehose of bullshit the rain of reason and truth is not man made, it can rain on everyone from every direction because it is a tangible reality of nature just like the clouds above us, and it is all around is, so once everyone gets rained on they will not fear the firehose of bullshit, because they will already be soaking wet with something that follows naturally from the universe around them rather than something that weaseled it's way into their brain through constant reinforcement and was designed to hose them down every time they formed a thought that was outside the culturally reinforced paradigm

FactMachine(430) Clarified
1 point

I've got gasoline in my ass hole.......................................................

0 points

The buybull, the holy babble, the book of moron, the face psalms.

I personally believe that you deserve to die.

1.because I didn't choose to feel such strong hatred of you, it is occurring naturally from my brain hole.

2 points

This is once again one of the few times I don't want to inject acid into your eyeballs, that was a solid post. Sometimes I think maybe you aren't so bad, maybe we got off on the wrong foot, but then I look at your next post and I'm like "wtf was I thinking?"

1) If a hairy sasquatch man is trying to rape you and a mosquito is trying to land on you at the same time do you ignore the sasquatch raping you in the butthole and try to swat away the mosquito? crazy citizens with guns is the mosquito, crazy governments with nukes is the sasquatch.

2) The other problem doesn't make the other problem go away and I never said it did, but the problem I am bringing up is far more serious and all you liberals want to talk about is gun control, we can discuss gun control but let's first address the fact that institutions exist all over the planet that call themselves "governments" who have done nothing historically except squat on top of the common people like vultures and crap on them while exploiting their labor and hoarding resources and these institutions want to have the means to cause mass extinction then tell you that you can't have something 278623874698274598713698752634987562987345684757843 times less dangerous.

We've got giant institutions called "governments" lording over us who are usually the most insane and violent people of all historically, and you stupid fucking pea brains want gun control for citizens yet you don't mind men in uniforms having whatever they want? You liberals are brainwashed sheep.

When we start restricting the governments access to bio weapons, nukes and drones or AI surveillance tech then you can start talking about gun legislation, until then we have bigger problems. Only a total piece of crap would call for gun control for citizens while the police get militarized and the governments and large corporations of the world get access to more and more technology to kill, track, enslave. and profit off of people while destroying the environment instead of using it to benefit mankind all because of people like you who are such sheep that you focus on useless and counter productive garbage like gun control and never worry about the institutions that have far more dangerous weapons than guns.

Whether or not a civilisation is advanced is impossible to determine accurately without a record of the civilisation

Unless of course you find physical evidence of a sophisticated culture such as metal tools or megalithic ruins.

Your question was not whether it is possible for advanced civilisations to have been lost to history, but whether advanced civilisations have actually been lost to history

You're an idiot.

and that of course is impossible to answer because your own question precludes the answer.

No it doesn't you anti intellectual troglodyte cretin, it's a very simple question, were there advanced civilizations before the current historical records indicate? Just because something doesn't fit into the current consensus doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Just because we don't have the record for something doesn't mean it didn't exist and just because something wasn't recorded doesn't mean it didn't happen and there are other forms of evidence for civilization other than scrolls and tablets etc. you nincompoop, how can you be so stupid that you don't understand that you can estimate how advanced a culture was and when it existed from evidence such as the type of buildings they produced, tools and other artifacts, the type of weathering or oxidization or carbon dating on these artifacts and buildings etc. and connect the dots to figure out how old the fucking shit is and what kind of technology it would take to build it, there is plenty more to go on than written records you shameless imbecile. There are megaliths under water in the fucking ocean that have just recently been discovered around central america, japan and several other places. There is evidence of water erosion on the fucking Sphynx in Egypt which suggests it's much older than previously thought. They're still discovering pyramids and other structures in central america and africa and pretty much all over the world, there is even some ancient stone work in australia which was inhabited by primitive savages before english colonization according to mainstream history.

You can call me all the nasty names you like, pal.

Semen guzzling horse cock sucker egg mcmuffin butter balls bitch boy with a penis the size of a tardigrade and just as fucking ugly you insufferable foreskin moisturizing lotion-equipped masturbater spankin' it off to Bronto's crap filled diaper because you're a sick pedophile with a scat fetish you skunk breathed feckle wetted hymen lipped degenerate. You monkey fucking ass paddled hash addled fat ass hole, you abject colon stain, you resinous layer of fecal residue on the surface of a dung beetle's arse.

Your question is still stupid

Your thinking on the subject is so lazy and disengaged that you don't even notice how meaningless your objections are, the truth is you just don't care about subjects like this because all you care about is bashing conservatives and promoting your far left ideologies.

You fucking retard, there's evidence other than just things that are deliberately recorded by the people of that time to indicate that they existed, for example buildings, artwork, skeletal remains etc. You are literally fucking retarded, if I jerk off into a bowl of ramen noodles and you ate those noodles but didn't notice, and I never told anyone what I did would that mean it never happened? Just because they aren't "recorded" or there are no records left in any intelligible state doesn't mean we couldn't find evidence, in fact there is a massive quantity of evidence. You are an absolute ignoramus who doesn't even know what archeology is, how do you think we know what dinosaurs where even though they didn't leave any records? Holy fucking organic free range eggs from an Amish farm you are a knuckle dragging dim witted barbarian with a brain the size of Tyrion Lannisters left testicle.

2 points

1)I don't believe that you're not a pedophile, why else would you be obsessed with the issue and in favor of pedophilia?

2) The evidence that pedophilia is wrong is that every pedophile I've ever seen looks like a pathetic repugnant mentally ill toilet bowl creature and no adult would ever consent to have sex with them, let alone a child.

3) Ask yourself the question "if I was a child, or anyone for that matter, would I want to be touched by the adult version of myself or banged in the butthole" The answer is obviously no.

4) you are a disgusting pseudo sentient subhuman biological waste sack, you are not a human being, you are a profane nasty little goblin creature and I want to pour bleach in your eyeballs and make a kangaroo rape you in the anus while I cut your fingers off and make you lick the bottom of a Nigerian septic tank.

"Lol Ikr" why are you typing like a drug addled teenager now? Take your faggy txt tlk the fuck up outta here nicca

The fire at the Reichstag was an INSIDE JOB and a FALSE FLAG I heard it from Alex Jones so I know it's true!

Nomenclature has his own gender now? If I had to guess it would be something between a futanari, a shemanzee and a virus that can only reproduce by attaching itself to a hosts cells.

0 points

My blood is 90% THC so if you love marijuana you need to love me too.

Such a homosexually inclined fudge packer such as yourself probably loves every man it sees.

Do you know who the Rothschilds are?

characters characters characters

0 points

The fact that you find something as inert as marijuana "fucked up" proves that you are a pussy.

2 points

I'm not Quantumhead you pseudo intellectual doltish inebriated space ball, you empty headed hare-brained incoherent cod piece. You anti-cognizant reverse-neuroplastic counter intuitional lobotomy patient.

You're a reTzard..............................................

I don't think there is any clear line between living and non living, I view it more as a spectrum. Since you are part of a certain spectrum as well I'm sure you can relate.Take for example the extraterrestrial "grey" aliens who are said to be incapable of direct reproduction, yet they are clearly "organisms" and there are possibly a profoundly abundant copious quantity of other functionalities present in in extra terrestrial organisms (and no I'm not a UFO ancient alien retard so don't take this the wrong way) which are vital to their existence or equally as important to their place in the life spectrum as things such as reproduction or respiration but do not exist anywhere on earth. Those life forms might consider us to be bizarre extremophiles and question whether we are actually "alive" in the same way that they are if they are the type of aliens that would have the ability to cognitively formulate those thoughts to begin with.

Muhammad was a pedophile and shariah law is homophobic ans misogynistic and islam is a violent ideology and the only half way good muslims are "moderates" who don't even really practice or believe in most of the religion.

Jews have been around a lot longer than muslims and have built economic jew networks across the globe which leech off of everyone and manipulate entire nations.

Judaism also promotes pedophilia, bigotry etc. if you read the talmud or the old testament.

Since jews basically control the global economy and run america (just look at wall street, the history of the federal reserve, the Rothschild family and their fractional reserve banking empire which controlled the entire western european economy and still does) I think it's safe to say they are more dangerous. Muslims can't even figure out how to make nukes, but Jews funded the manhatten project and played both sides in WW2. (keep in mind that jews have controlled the economy of western europe since the time of Napolean)

When are you ass holes going to stop redundantly bickering and find something better to do?

FactMachine(430) Clarified
1 point

Have either of you ever tried neoguri?..........................

Good point.

Now let me fill my character requirement.

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

I figured as much, you have confirmed my suspicion you lobster back dandy. How old are you? (In case you are wondering I'm 22 and I'm a German Italian French Irish Norwegian Swedish Troglodyte Neanderthal Cave Monkey from the USA)

Yes it's making more and more sense, when I first heard of panspermia as an 8 year old I thought it was stupid, and that it would be much easier for life to form on a nice cozy planet than on a ball of ice and rock flying through space, this was my childish and simplistic interpretation at the time. But as I grew I became more open minded to the idea as my stupidity and ignorance gradually decreased, and at this point it seems to be a very solid theory. But there are bound to be planets out there even still which happen to produce life without panspermia, even if it happens less often, and there are bound to be lifeforms which are very different from anything on earth, even to the extent that they might not even be considered "biological" in nature. It may seem obvious but what I'm getting at is that there are probably vast multitudes of ways life can form, but for this solar system panspermia seems very likely.

FactMachine(430) Clarified
1 point

They create a character that happens to be female and suddenly it's "feminazi propaganda"?

Even within the context of the fictional universe of Star Wars there are certain parameters one must take into account. Relative to other characters who are supposed to have the highest affinity to the force such as Anakin Skywalker Rey is blatantly superior to the point of making them look mediocre when you consider her lack of training. It is a fact that there is a political incentive to make more female and minority lead roles, as well as transgender ones, and Rey is deliberately designed to be a symbol of female power to the extent that it undermines the plot of the actual film, even if it was a male character with no training using master level force powers it would be inconsistent with Star Wars canon and ridiculous.

This wouldn't even be an issue if the character was male, it would be taken all in stride

It would be an issue if they where undermining the quality or consistency of the film in order to make a political statement about male power.

Kinda feels like this is why women still have a ways to go

We've all got a ways to go, third wave feminism just makes us go in the wrong direction. Instead of society out growing gender inequality and racial inequality feminists and people like BLM just want to put men at an economic disadvantage and make white people slaves.

Hopefully it'll be a good story all around

I think it will actually turn out to be pretty good in the end, Did you see Rogue One? That one had a female lead role too, I think Disney should be sued for not making her either black, hispanic or muslim.

In the future, all Star Wars films will have transgender lead roles, and it will be re-franchised as "Star- all genders are equal except white males"

That looks to be some strong evidence. Although the nature of these simple organisms or organic structures is still unknown. These are definitely organic structures but it's inconclusive whether or not they are actually life forms in the strictest sense. Nevertheless, this shit is very fascinating, and we are statistically lucky to have complex organic chemistry on two different planets in our solar system. This also gives more credibility to the idea that some of the ingredients for life on earth may have been carried here from meteorites

@Amarel

1) My terminology is more technical and more accurate than yours.

2) you still haven't defined the parameters of human nature or discussed the actual nature of human nature.

3)The fact that the capacities and propensities of mankind will vary by individuals does not refute that man also has common capacities and propensities. and that does not refute the fact that We also have common or similar propensities and capacities with other animals, so once again, what can you possibly do to draw some sort of objective portrayal of this "human nature" business in a tangible format for my neural processors?

4)There IS a way that humans are and a way that humans aren't, but "human nature" is a vague and unscientific way of explaining it that is indicative of a lack of technical understanding in the actual process which shapes this supposed "human nature." Human nature is a conceptual notion that was invented before anyone even knew what a "neuron" was, keep that in mind. Right now we are using a very unscientific and primitive language, it is hard to communicate without occasionally resorting to some form of metaphor or inherently subjective representation when speaking in human languages. It is from this semantic backround, that words like "nature" have arisen from in the first place, it is a technically meaningless word. So go fuck yourself.

2 points

For once Nomenclature you have produced something that doesn't make me want to kill you. I agree with that post 100%

You imbecile, you have no idea how civilization works do you? Things change, and they change a lot quicker once you start getting advanced in the ways of quantum computers and biotech. In 4000 years there probably won't even be any humans left nevermind Jews, we will have either all gone extinct or become an entirely different species through incremental biotechnological augmentation and gene editing.

2 points

You create a new debate HAPPILY

PRACTICALLY

knowin' that everyone's gunna react InthusiASTICALLY

but TRAGICALLY

you begin to ATROPHY

cause' ACTUALLY

all you receive is APATHY

Smashin' you autoMATICALLY

So I've CONCLUSIVELY CONCLUDED

that for YOU TO BE DELUDED

and continue to do what you do just wouldn't be PRUDENT

My rhymes are valuable and VAST, MAN

Tellin' them to excon is like putting a diamond in the TRASH CAN

You deserve to have a rusty ebola infested syringe filled with liquid fluorine injected into your urethra.

Human nature is a meaningless concept, it's a god of the gaps, it is not a technical explanation of the actual fucking processes that cause humans to behave and think in certain ways, it is just a primitive way of saying "the way humans are" as a blanket statement because you don't even know what the fuck humans are or what makes them respond in certain ways on an objective basis. You will never understand that 90% of your entire thought process is formulated within the subjective internalizing matrix of the primitive homo monkey brain of superstitious contrivances because of mental blockages such as this. Try to rise above your primitive monkey brain and comprehend that "human nature" is not objective terminology, there is only the capacities and propensities of mankind which vary greatly from person to person and are mostly a result of adapting to their environment, there is no specific "human nature" because every human has a different nature to at least some degree, and sometimes a completely opposite nature, thus there is no clear line to be drawn between what is human nature and what is not.

You can't politicize science you snaggle toothed yellow bellied dildo-rarefied anus possessing degenerate. Politics is explicitly separate from science and has no scientific basis, political "science" is nothing but some philosophy and social constructs mixed with some manipulation tactics. I bet you jerked off to Bill Nye the science guy when he did his abhorently degenerate propaganda episode on gender. You libtarded porno mag collecting basement troll on oxycontin, you delicate dandy dildo holster, this is what happens when you mix politics with science. 50 genders and no such thing as climate change, you both fucking suck and don't know shit about science. Politicians aren't fucking scientists, they're actors, businessmen, and Illuminati reptillian Freemason KKK Zionists from Andromeda

Okay I read it, I'm not impressed. You didn't define human nature and you didn't refute me you penis horn.

I only did that because this walking pile of bacterial excretions never replied to my ass kicking of his anti marijuana bullshit.

If A is a success in life

Then A must equal X plus Y plus Z no doubt

If work equals X and play equals Y

Then Z must be equal to you shuttin' your mouth

lalalalalalalalalallala I can't hear you.....................................

0 points

If "all types" includes bad people

"Bad" is far too vague, different nations and religions have different standards when it comes to "bad" and certain nations and religions actually encourage people to be bad. Particularly Abrahamic religions and middle eastern nations.

FactMachine(430) Clarified
2 points

Can God put de protein in yu moosels? ye moosels cant get no protons just from prayin' to the lurd. The supreme and ultimate reality is that your belief in God has never supplied you with a single tangible beneficial outcome as a result of your supremely convoluted conclusions about "The Supreme and Ultimate Reality." Which is just a fancy way of saying "The baseless assertion that God exists"

I can tell you don't know anything about marijuana and have never actually consumed it, you are oblivious to the nature of it's effects.

People who are lazy, delusional, stupid, etc. will be that way whether they smoke weed or not, most people who smoke weed are not that way because they smoke weed, they are that way because most people are that way to begin with...If Einstein smoked a fat spleefer it wouldn't make him any less coherent or intelligent, I know this because I smoked marijuana all throughout high school and it didn't effect my performance at all, in fact it increased my motivation and reduced the stress of being around a bunch of people I hated.

Pot smokers do not pose any danger as drivers compared to people who are drunk, marijuana doesn't actually IMPAIR cognitive functions unless your brain has very low THC tolerance or if you are not mentally healthy to begin with

There is no evidence that Marijuana can induce mental illness, just that it can exacerbate symptoms in those who are already mentally ill.

My father smoked Marijuana for 30 years, he was an engineer who constructed medical devices and aircraft parts for the U.S military. Do you think he was a "useless lotus eater in a semi-stupor?"

Your worst offence is that you failed to mention or even consider that there are people who NEED marijuana as a legitimate treatment for disorders such as epilepsy.

I can tell you don't know anything about marijuana and have never actually consumed it, you are oblivious to the nature of it's effects.

People who are lazy, delusional, stupid, etc. will be that way whether they smoke weed or not, most people who smoke weed are not that way because they smoke weed, they are that way because most people are that way to begin with...If Einstein smoked a fat spleefer it wouldn't make him any less coherent or intelligent, I know this because I smoked marijuana all throughout high school and it didn't effect my performance at all, in fact it increased my motivation and reduced the stress of being around a bunch of people I hated.

Pot smokers do not pose any danger as drivers compared to people who are drunk, marijuana doesn't actually IMPAIR cognitive functions unless your brain has very low THC tolerance or if you are not mentally healthy to begin with

There is no evidence that Marijuana can induce mental illness, just that it can exacerbate symptoms in those who are already mentally ill.

My father smoked Marijuana for 30 years, he was an engineer who constructed medical devices and aircraft parts for the U.S military. Do you think he was a "useless lotus eater in a semi-stupor?"

Your worst offence is that you failed to mention or even consider that there are people who NEED marijuana as a legitimate treatment for disorders such as epilepsy.

I can tell you don't know anything about marijuana and have never actually consumed it, you are oblivious to the nature of it's effects.

People who are lazy, delusional, stupid, etc. will be that way whether they smoke weed or not, most people who smoke weed are not that way because they smoke weed, they are that way because most people are that way to begin with...If Einstein smoked a fat spleefer it wouldn't make him any less coherent or intelligent, I know this because I smoked marijuana all throughout high school and it didn't effect my performance at all, in fact it increased my motivation and reduced the stress of being around a bunch of people I hated.

Pot smokers do not pose any danger as drivers compared to people who are drunk, marijuana doesn't actually IMPAIR cognitive functions unless your brain has very low THC tolerance or if you are not mentally healthy to begin with

There is no evidence that Marijuana can induce mental illness, just that it can exacerbate symptoms in those who are already mentally ill.

My father smoked Marijuana for 30 years, he was an engineer who constructed medical devices and aircraft parts for the U.S military. Do you think he was a "useless lotus eater in a semi-stupor?"

Your worst offence is that you failed to mention or even consider that there are people who NEED marijuana as a legitimate treatment for disorders such as epilepsy.

I can tell you don't know anything about marijuana and have never actually consumed it, you are oblivious to the nature of it's effects.

People who are lazy, delusional, stupid, etc. will be that way whether they smoke weed or not, most people who smoke weed are not that way because they smoke weed, they are that way because most people are that way to begin with...If Einstein smoked a fat spleefer it wouldn't make him any less coherent or intelligent, I know this because I smoked marijuana all throughout high school and it didn't effect my performance at all, in fact it increased my motivation and reduced the stress of being around a bunch of people I hated.

Pot smokers do not pose any danger as drivers compared to people who are drunk, marijuana doesn't actually IMPAIR cognitive functions unless your brain has very low THC tolerance or if you are not mentally healthy to begin with

There is no evidence that Marijuana can induce mental illness, just that it can exacerbate symptoms in those who are already mentally ill.

My father smoked Marijuana for 30 years, he was an engineer who constructed medical devices and aircraft parts for the U.S military. Do you think he was a "useless lotus eater in a semi-stupor?"

Your worst offence is that you failed to mention or even consider that there are people who NEED marijuana as a legitimate treatment for disorders such as epilepsy.

I can tell you don't know anything about marijuana and have never actually consumed it, you are oblivious to the nature of it's effects.

People who are lazy, delusional, stupid, etc. will be that way whether they smoke weed or not, most people who smoke weed are not that way because they smoke weed, they are that way because most people are that way to begin with...If Einstein smoked a fat spleefer it wouldn't make him any less coherent or intelligent, I know this because I smoked marijuana all throughout high school and it didn't effect my performance at all, in fact it increased my motivation and reduced the stress of being around a bunch of people I hated.

Pot smokers do not pose any danger as drivers compared to people who are drunk, marijuana doesn't actually IMPAIR cognitive functions unless your brain has very low THC tolerance or if you are not mentally healthy to begin with

There is no evidence that Marijuana can induce mental illness, just that it can exacerbate symptoms in those who are already mentally ill.

My father smoked Marijuana for 30 years, he was an engineer who constructed medical devices and aircraft parts for the U.S military. Do you think he was a "useless lotus eater in a semi-stupor?"

Your worst offence is that you failed to mention or even consider that there are people who NEED marijuana as a legitimate treatment for disorders such as epilepsy.


3 of 6 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]